Murderpedia

 

 

Juan Ignacio Blanco  

 

  MALE murderers

index by country

index by name   A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

  FEMALE murderers

index by country

index by name   A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

 

 

 
   

Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.

   

 

 

Michael Joseph PASSARO

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
Classification: Murderer
Characteristics: Parricide - Custody dispute
Number of victims: 1
Date of murder: November 23, 1998
Date of arrest: Same day
Date of birth: July 26, 1962
Victim profile: Maggie Passaro, 2 (his daughter)
Method of murder: Fire (set fire to a family minivan)
Location: Horry County, South Carolina, USA
Status: Executed by lethal injection in South Carolina on September 13, 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 

Summary:

In the midst of a custody dispute, Passaro parked the family minivan in front of his estranged wife's Myrtle Beach condominium, doused the inside with gasoline and set it on fire with their 2-year-old daughter, Maggie, strapped in her car seat.

Passaro planned to die in the blaze, too, but jumped from the van when it exploded. Firefighters who rushed to the scene asked Passaro if anyone was inside, but he refused to answer.

Passaro purportedly believed that after he died he would be reunited in heaven with his dead daughter and his first wife, who died in a car accident.

He had written a suicide note in which he said he hoped his estranged wife, Karen, would "live in pain for the rest of her life." Passaro pled guilty and waived appeals.

Final Meal:

None.

Final Words:

Passaro smiled, blew kisses at his family then told them he loved them and that it was over.

ClarkProsecutor.org

 
 

ProDeathPenalty.com

Michael Passaro was so angry with his estranged wife that he set fire to a family minivan, killing their 2-year-old daughter, according to prosecutors at his sentencing hearing.

Against advice from his attorneys, Passaro pled guilty to charges of murder and 1st-degree arson in Maggie's Nov. 23, 1998, death.

Prosecutors presented evidence of the crime to Judge Dean Hall, who imposed the death sentence. A prosecutor read a typewritten suicide note with singed edges that was recovered from the white 1995 Ford minivan.

Passaro set fire to the van outside his wife's condo at South Bay Lakes in Surfside Beach. Passaro left Maggie in the van while he escaped from the fire. "Well, Karen [Passaro] won the war, and it's at the expense of our daughter," the note said. "I guess that I'm getting the last laugh now, Karen.

Whatever anyone does, please make sure Karen doesn't kill herself. I want her to live in pain." "Has he achieved his objective?" the prosecutor asked Karen Passaro. "Yes. I will live like this forever, for the rest of my life. I can't concentrate or even focus some days," Karen Passaro said. "Maggie will never get to grow up. ... And in the process he took away my future."

Jonathan Simons, a clinical psychologist who examined Passaro, testified Passaro knew right from wrong. "My impression is that in Michael's mind his identity became somewhat blurred. He felt his wife was robbing him of his identity, and he had to win that battle," Simons said.

Hembree asked Simons whether "Michael Passaro's hatred for Karen Passaro was greater than the love he had for Maggie Passaro?" Simons said: "I think some people could see that. ... He had this delusion of being with Maggie and going to heaven to see his 1st wife." Susan Lewis, who taught Passaro in a nursing class, testified he needed emotional support and wasn't thinking clearly.

Lewis, who testified for the defense, also said Passaro had poor life skills and judgment, and was under a lot of stress with his classes, work and pending divorce. "He thought he had a solution to his problems, and he hoped she was hurt at the outcome," Lewis said.

Fire investigators testified the fire started near the middle seat of the van. The remains of a plastic, 1-gallon gasoline can also were found melted into the floor near where Maggie was strapped in a child safety seat. Maggie's family members left the courtroom while pictures of the charred van with Maggie's body still inside were shown to the judge.

Passaro, who wore shackles, a light-blue shirt and dark-blue slacks, solemnly stared at his hands while the photographs were shown. "She was alive when the fire was raging. She burned to death as a result of the flame and fire in the car," said Clay Nichols, a forensic pathologist who examined Maggie. "I can't think of a more painful way to die."

Witnesses testified Passaro jumped out of the van soon after it exploded. "We pulled him away to the grassy area," said John Watts, a witness. "We asked him if anyone else was in the van, and he would not answer us." Maggie's body was found after the fire was extinguished and investigators were searching for a cause of the fire.

Paramedics testified Passaro was conscious when they arrived, and the clothing on his right arm and the back of his legs was singed. "There's no joy in sending someone to death row," said Prosecutor Greg Hembree after Passaro, 38, was sentenced. "There's satisfaction that it was the appropriate sentence. Michael Joseph Passaro deserves the death penalty. The burning death of a 2-year-old is inexcusable."

UPDATE:

Michael Passaro has refused to appeal his sentence and urged the courts to ignore the efforts of well-meaning attorneys to spare him from a lethal injection. "You do not have to live this life. I do," he wrote in a letter to South Carolina's Supreme Court. "The state says I should die for what I did, and I am not going to stand in their way." The SC Supreme Court unanimously agreed.

Defense lawyers say shortly after Passaro married his first wife, she was killed in an accident. When she ran out of their house to help the victim of a nearby car accident, another car struck and killed her. "I want to be buried with my 1st and only love, Donna," he wrote in his suicide note.

Passaro was devastated, turning to drugs and alcohol to ease his pain. Eventually, he regained control of his life and moved to South Carolina, becoming a paramedic near Myrtle Beach and studying to be a nurse. He met his second wife, Karen, at a hospital where she worked.

The 2 were married and by 1996 had a baby girl, Maggie. "All he had ever wanted was a family and a home and someone to love him," Passaro's mother, Betty, said in court.

But the marriage soured. Passaro's wife asked for a divorce and got a restraining order. Passaro got to see his daughter one weekend a month. It was after one of those visits he parked his van outside his wife's condominium and set it on fire.

One of the 1st officers on the scene would later testify Karen Passaro heard the commotion and came outside. She recognized the van and demanded over and over to know whether her daughter was inside. Horry County Fire Capt. James Cyganiewicz stalled as long as he could but eventually broke the news. He said she collapsed in sobs.

"It's pretty funny how the system works," Passaro wrote in his suicide note. "I get visitation with my daughter, and I'm allowed to end our lives from existence with the help of the courts and my wife. I guess that I'm getting the last laugh now, Karen." Passaro has hardly made himself a sympathetic character.

His temper in prison has been well documented. One guard testified Passaro got angry when he was told he couldn't have orange juice. "I have burned my child to death, and I'll burn you," Passaro told the guard. "I'll burn your house down with your family in it." A psychiatrist has ruled Passaro is competent to waive all his appeals.

He told his lawyer he was willing to ask the courts to look at his case only if he would spend 15 years or fewer in prison because he didn't want to spend the rest of his life behind bars.

 
 

Passaro Submits to Execution Without Appeal

By Jeffrey Collins, Associated Press.

TheState.com

09-14-02

The 40-year-old inmate could have stopped his execution any time because he has never appealed his sentence, but with his mom, sister and 11 other witnesses watching, he died by lethal injection at 6:15 p.m.

Friday. Passaro smiled, blew kisses at his family then told them he loved them and that it was over. He let his final few breaths out as his eyes slowly closed.

It was a much less violent killing than the one four years ago that brought him to the death chamber. In the midst of a custody dispute, Passaro parked the family minivan in front of his estranged wife's Myrtle Beach condominium, doused the inside with gasoline and set it on fire with their 2-year-old daughter, Maggie, strapped in her car seat.

Passaro planned to die in the blaze, too, but jumped from the van when it exploded. Firefighters who rushed to the scene asked Passaro if anyone was inside, but he refused to answer.

Passaro was a Navy veteran and former nurse technician with no other violent crimes on his record.

Passaro's court-appointed lawyer, Joe Savitz, sat outside the Broad River Correctional Institution with a cell phone, ready to file an appeal if Passaro changed his mind. Savitz said before the execution that he doubted the phone would ring because Passaro believed he would be reunited in heaven with his dead daughter and his first wife, who died nearly a decade ago as she tried to help a victim in a car accident.

Prosecutor Greg Hembree, who sent Passaro to death and watched the sentence carried out Friday, called him a cold-blooded killer who wanted to hurt his estranged wife, Karen, as much as he could.

He pointed to a typewritten suicide note salvaged from the van. "Whatever anyone does, please make sure that Karen doesn't kill herself over this," Passaro wrote. "I want her to live in pain for the rest of her life."

Two sisters and the grandfather of the young victim also watched the execution through the glass and bars. The girl's family issued a statement that said they would rather focus on Maggie's life instead of the death of her father. There are no words that could describe the horror that a mother must feel to see an ambulance take her child away," the family said. They recalled fond memories of Maggie - reading her bedtime stories and seeing her standing by the refrigerator asking for strawberry milk.

Just 25 months ago, Passaro pleaded guilty to murder and a judge sentenced him to death. He has never appealed, telling his lawyers and judges a trip to the death chamber is better than spending the rest of his life in a cell. "You do not have to live this life. I do. The state says I should die for what I did, and I am not going to stand in their way," Passaro wrote in a note to the state Supreme Court, opposing Savitz's attempts to force him to appeal his case.

Passaro was so determined to die he even personally appeared before the justices in May, asking them to let him go to his death without a judge ever reviewing his case. That hasn't happened since the state renewed the death penalty nearly 25 years ago. The justices granted Passaro's request, noting that 12 percent of the 302 inmates executed in the United States between 1973 and 1995 waived at least some of their appeals. But Passaro's determination didn't stop the state Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and Christian Action Council from filing an appeal for clemency to Gov. Jim Hodges.

The groups called Passaro's execution court-assisted suicide and said he should be spared because he suffered from a deep depression after his first wife died and was so suicidal that he slept with a knife. The petition says that judges who have reviewed the case never knew about Passaro's background, and that his own trial lawyers didn't fight to save him. Hodges rejected the appeal Thursday. A South Carolina governor has not commuted a death sentence since capital punishment was brought back in 1977.

 
 

Volunteering for Death

Death Row Inmate Set to Die and He Doesn’t Want to be Saved

By Bryan Robinson - ABCNews.com

September 13, 2002

A South Carolina death row prisoner is scheduled to be executed tonight — and he can't wait. Michael Passaro wants to be with the 2-year-old daughter he killed four years ago, the crime that landed him on death row. At around 6 p.m., to the dismay of his attorney and death penalty opponents, he will receive his wish through lethal injection for burning his daughter to death in his own aborted suicide attempt in 1998.

In November of that year, Passaro doused his van with gasoline, strapped his daughter Maggie inside and then sat down in his car before setting it ablaze. However, before the fire could consume him, Passaro jumped out of the car, leaving Maggie to die. Passaro pleaded guilty to murder in 2000 and requested — and received — the death penalty.

Passaro has not, and never wanted to, appeal his guilty plea, and has rejected his attorneys' attempts to help him. In July, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled unanimously that he was competent to waive all his appeals options, clearing the way for his execution tonight.

An ‘Escape’ From Punishment

This has left Joe Savitz, Passaro's appellate lawyer, frustrated. He wants to help Passaro, and is ready to file appeal papers at any time to stop his execution. However, Passaro won't let him. "I could stop it [the scheduled execution] right now if he let me," Savitz said. "I'm ready to file the appeals right now and stop it, but I have to have his consent to do that. But I don't think he will [give his consent] and am confident the execution will go forward. "It's extremely frustrating as an attorney," Savitz continued. "I think he should fight it, personally. His family thinks he should fight. This is not what I was trained to do."

Passaro's desire to die, Savitz said, is rooted in his longtime depression over the death of his first wife, who was killed 10 years ago when a car struck her while she was trying to help an accident victim. Passaro remarried and had his daughter Maggie with his second wife, Karen.

However, the second marriage failed, and Karen Passaro asked for a divorce and filed a restraining order against him. Passaro reportedly only got to see his daughter one weekend a month, and Savitz says, Passaro feared his estranged wife would move, trying to take the girl away from him.

When Passaro lit his van and daughter on fire, he made sure he was parked in front of his wife's condominium. He admitted that he wanted to kill himself and their daughter to get back at his second wife. In a suicide note recovered by investigators, Passaro wrote, "Whatever anyone does, please make sure that Karen doesn't kill herself over this. I want her to live in pain for the rest of her life."

The state of South Carolina is not really punishing Passaro with the execution, Savitz says; it's giving him exactly what he wants. "He does not see the death sentence as punishment. He sees it as an escape from punishment," Savitz said. "He believes that he will be reunited with his first wife and the child that he killed, Maggie. He wants to die and has gotten the state to help him carry it out in what is essentially a state-assisted suicide. He is not doing this because he feels a sense of remorse."

Vengeance for Vengeance

A lack of remorse is one reason why prosecutors have no doubts about their decision to send Passaro to his death. His vindictiveness towards his second wife and willingness to kill his own daughter in revenge make him deserving of the death penalty.

"This is a man filled with spite, hatred and evil," said prosecutor Greg Hembree, after the state Supreme Court ruling in July. "It's always hard to decide to send someone to death, but this was one of the easier decisions I've ever made." Despite the slaying and Passaro's determination to die, a psychiatrist ruled that he was mentally competent to waive his appeals.

Still, death penalty opponents cannot understand how officials can execute someone who showed clear signs of suicidal tendencies and mental illness. "This is a unique case. Passaro was attempting suicide at the time of his crime," said Bruce Pearson, spokesman for the South Carolina Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty. "He appeared to suffer from severe mental depression with his desire to end his life and the life of his child. He's not exactly the paradigm of rational thinking."

Passaro, Pearson said, seems to be a living example of why the death penalty does not work and another reason why he and death penalty opponents are fighting for a moratorium in South Carolina. "Cases where prisoners seem to be using the state indirectly to commit suicide seem to me to nullify any value of the death penalty and [shows] it is not good social policy," Pearson said.

Volunteer Executions: The Way of the Future?

Still, Passaro's case is not the first volunteer execution Savitz says he has encountered. Since the electric chair has been phased out in most executions as cruel and unusual punishment and lethal injection has become more common, he believes more prisoners will opt to die in the most humane way possible rather than spend the rest of their lives in prison appealing the sentences.

Cases like Passaro's are rare, he said, but could become more common. "You never see anyone volunteering for the electric chair," said Savitz. "But with lethal injection, it's a painless way to go … you go to sleep. Prisoners see it as a way out rather than spending the rest of their lives in prison. It could be the way of the future."

 
 

Lawyer Says Inmate Ready to Die Friday

By Rick Brundrett - TheState.com

September 12, 2002

For Michael Passaro -- the man South Carolina will likely execute Friday -- life changed forever one night long ago. His wife, Donna, who was watching TV while he was sleeping, heard a crash outside their New York suburban home. Donna, a nurse, ran to the crashed car. As she tried to help the driver out of the car, an electrical line struck her, burning her to death.

Passaro fell into a deep depression and never recovered, said a petition asking Gov. Jim Hodges to grant him clemency. He was depressed in 1998 when he burned his 2-year-old daughter, Maggie, to death in a van in Myrtle Beach, the petition said. He had planned to kill himself in the fire with Maggie, but he survived.

Passaro, 40, thinks his execution will reunite him with Maggie and Donna, the petition says. The S.C. Carolina Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and S.C. Christian Action Council said the state shouldn't help him commit suicide.

They filed a 19-page petition on Passaro's behalf, against his wishes. "He does not deserve to die for his crime," the petition said, because the judge who sentenced Passaro to death and the S.C. Supreme Court -- which in July said he could waive all appeals -- never knew the "untold story" of his battle with mental illness. The groups want Hodges to commute the death sentence to life in prison without parole. Hodges, as of Wednesday, hadn't decided. No South Carolina governor has granted clemency since lawmakers restored the death penalty in 1977.

Passaro is scheduled for a lethal injection at 6 p.m. Friday at the state Department of Corrections' Capital Punishment Facility off Broad River Road. He would be the 28th person executed since 1977 and the third this year. Passaro is the first South Carolina Death Row inmate to waive his appeals without a trial, the petition said.

Other inmates have dropped cases after jury verdicts and initial appeals. Capital murder defendants nationwide rarely waive appeals, said Brenda Bowser of the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington, D.C.

Passaro is resolved to die despite others' efforts to spare his life, said Joseph Savitz, his appellate lawyer. "He is convinced that he will be reunited with his first wife, Donna, and his daughter, Maggie. When someone believes that, it's very difficult to change their minds." Savitz said Passaro declined to talk with a reporter. His relatives couldn't be reached for comment and have declined previous requests for interviews.

The average stay on South Carolina's Death Row is about six years, 2000 corrections department figures show. Passaro has been waiting for two years. Death Row has 71 inmates. Passaro could stop his execution by saying he wants to appeal on the grounds his trial lawyers were ineffective, Savitz said. "Even if he should walk into the death chamber Friday and look at his mother and sister and say, 'I don't want to do it,' we would stop it," he said.

Passaro's trial lawyers helped him "complete his suicide, and then convinced the court to help him too," the clemency petition said. The lawyers couldn't be reached for comment. The Attorney General's Office won't stop the execution. "It's his right to waive his appeals. The state Supreme Court found him competent," said Robb McBurney, spokesman for Attorney General Charlie Condon.

Passaro was sentenced to death in August 2000. A month later, he told the state Supreme Court he wouldn't appeal, and he hasn't changed his mind. In a rare move, Passaro went in person in May to tell the five justices his wishes. The court ruled in July that his case met their criteria.

In 1994, the high court ruled that capital murder defendants can waive appeals if they are competent, and their decision is "knowing and voluntary." Clemency petitioners painted Passaro as a young man who had a tough time until he met his first love and first wife, Donna. As he grew up in Long Island, he was a loner with emotional problems. After a stint in the Navy, he worked as a cabby, electrician, ambulance driver and emergency medical technician, and struggled with alcohol and drug abuse, the petition continued.

Passaro and Donna married a short time after they met at a hospital where they worked. She helped him with his emotional, drug and alcohol problems, and encouraged him to pursue a medical career. They had no children, although she had a miscarriage, the petition said. After Donna was electrocuted helping the motorist, Passaro became a zombie, quickly succumbing to drugs and alcohol, the petition said. He drifted, living in New York and Florida and eventually with his parents in Myrtle Beach.

There he met his second wife, Karen, who ran kidney dialysis centers in Horry and Georgetown counties. They began dating shortly after Karen hired him. They married and had a daughter, Maggie. They separated in June 1998. (She couldn't be reached for comment.) Passaro, who was being treated for depression, slept with a knife and often thought about stabbing himself, the petition said. He was very close to Maggie, and desperately tried to protect her from the divorce, the petition said.

Then, on Nov. 23, 1998, he snapped. Passaro was so angry with Karen about holiday visitation he set fire to the family's minivan outside her condominium. Passaro doused the van with gasoline and set it on fire with Maggie strapped to her car seat in the van, police said. He jumped from the van after it exploded, officials said. Investigators found a singed typewritten suicide note in the van in which Passaro confessed to killing Maggie to get back at his estranged wife.

The clemency petition says the note, typed three months before the girl's death, shows Passaro was troubled. It said: "I never wanted my first wife to die or for me to fall apart afterwards, but I did. "I never wanted my second marriage to end in divorce ... but it all happened. I'm tired of fighting. "I just realized that I was never supposed to be happy."

 
 

Man Who Killes 2-Year Old Daughter Executed

TheDeathHouse.com

COLUMBIA, S.C. - A man who burned his two- year- old daughter to death to get even with his estranged wife was executed by lethal injection Friday night.

Michael Passaro did not appeal his death sentence and chose to be executed. He was the third condemned prisoner executed in South Carolina in 2002. The execution took place at the Broad River Correctional Institute. Passaro, 40, believed that after he died he would be reunited in heaven with his dead daughter and his first wife, who died in a car accident.

At his trial in 2000, Passaro had pleaded guilty to arson and the murder of his daughter, Maggie. Passaro strapped the child inside a van and started the fire by pouring gasoline in the vehicle. He later said he planned to kill himself, but jumped out of the van. He was burned, but survived. Passaro had written a suicide note in which he said he hoped his estranged wife, Karen, would "live in pain for the rest of her life." The murder occurred in Myrtle Beach.

In July, the South Carolina Supreme Court unanimously voted to allow Passaro to waive all his remaining appeals. The condemned killer appeared before the justices in May to personally plea for death. "Death or life (in prison) are both death sentences," Passaro said The state’s highest court found Passaro competent to waive his appeals.

Before murdering his child, Passaro and his wife, Karen Passaro, separated because of marital difficulties. She then filed for divorce. A family court issued a temporary order affecting custody of the Passaro's child, Maggie. Passaro’s first wife was killed in an automobile accident in 1988 while trying to help another motorist involved in a separate accident. A custody order had granted Passaro weekend custody of Maggie from Friday, when he would pick the child up from daycare, to Monday, when he would return her to daycare.

The high court said in its decision that on the Monday before Thanksgiving, Passaro did not take Maggie to daycare. Instead, he drove his van to his estranged wife’s condominium complex; poured gasoline on the floor of the vehicle; ignited the gasoline and jumped out leaving Maggie to die strapped in a child's safety seat. "Investigators found a suicide note in the van, written by Passaro, explaining his wish to kill himself and Maggie so they could spend time in heaven away from Karen," The South Carolina high court wrote in its opinion.

 
 

South Carolina Attorney General

Execution Date Set for Horry County Killer

August 16, 2002

Columbia, S.C. -- Attorney General Charlie Condon announced today that today the S.C. Supreme Court set an execution date of September 13, 2002 for Michael J. Passaro, an Horry County death row inmate, who pled guilty to murdering his two-year-old daughter, Maggie, on November 23, 1998.

Passaro admitted that he drove his van to his estranged wife's condominium compex, poured gasoline on the floor of the vehicle, ignited the gasoline, and jumped out, leaving Maggie strapped in a child's safety seat, where she burned to death. After pleading guilty, he was sentenced to death. Passaro waived his right to appeal, and the S.C. Supreme Court found him competent to make such a decision.

 
 

High court grants man's wish for death sentence

By Rick Brundrett - TheState.com

July 30, 2002

The state's top court on Monday granted Michael Passaro's wish to die for burning his 2-year-old daughter to death in 1998.

In a rare move, the S.C. Supreme Court unanimously said Passaro, 40, can waive all his appeals. He was sentenced to death in Myrtle Beach in 2000 after pleading guilty to murder and arson.

Passaro appeared in person before the five justices in May, asking them to waive his appeals and move up his execution. Rarely has the high court approved such a request, and rarely does a defendant appear before the court during an appeals hearing.

Passaro's appellate lawyer, Joseph Savitz, differed with his client in May. He said then that allowing Passaro to waive his appeals would be "little more than government-assisted suicide." But on Monday, Savitz said the justices "did what I asked them to do" when they let Passaro speak directly to them and work through the merits of the request.

He said he doesn't believe Passaro will ask the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision or seek clemency from Gov. Jim Hodges. "I anticipate he'll be executed in a matter of weeks," said Savitz, deputy chief attorney at the S.C. Office of Appellate Defense.

Robb McBurney, spokesman for state Attorney General Charlie Condon, said his office will ask the Supreme Court for an execution date after Aug. 13, the deadline for Passaro to file his reconsideration request.

Passaro admitted to setting his van on firewith his 2-year-old daughter, Maggie, strapped inside -- at his estranged wife's Myrtle Beach condominium in November 1998. Passaro planned to kill himself in the blaze, but jumped out after setting the fire, investigators said. The girl died.

Passaro was severely burned. Prosecutors said Passaro killed the girl to get back at his wife. Passaro left behind a suicide note in which he said he hoped his estranged wife, Karen, wouldn't later commit suicide so she would "live in pain for the rest of her life."

He told the justices he wanted to waive all his appeals because he had pleaded guilty, so even if he won on appeal, he couldn't win a new trial. The most he could hope for would be a new sentence, he argued, and even then, he couldn't receive anything less than life imprisonment because it was a death penalty case. "Death or life (in prison) are both death sentences," Passaro said, standing before the justices under heavy guard. Passaro first told the Supreme Court in September 2000 he wanted to drop all appeals. He hasn't changed his mind since.

In 1994, the high court ruled in another death penalty case that capital murder defendants can waive their appeals if the court determines they are competent and their decision was "knowing and voluntary." In their ruling Monday, the justices said Passaro's case met their criteria. They also rejected the argument that his request was "tantamount to state-assisted suicide."

Donald Zelenka, an assistant deputy S.C. attorney general, told the justices in May that waiving Passaro's appeals wouldn't be circumventing justice. He said Passaro's request was thoroughly reviewed in a circuit court hearing. Circuit Court Judge H. Dean Hall last year found Passaro to be competent, based on the opinions of two psychiatrists.

Passaro, who is at Lieber Correctional Institution in Dorchester County, could be executed as early as this year. The average stay for the state's Death Row inmates is about 6½ years, according to the state Department of Corrections. There were 72 people on Death Row as of last month.

 
 

Killer allowed to waive appeal

By Tonya Root - MyrtleBeachOnline.com

July 30, 2002

Michael Passaro is competent to waive his automatic appeal and be executed for burning his 2-year-old daughter to death, according to an S.C. Supreme Court opinion issued Monday. Passaro argued May 29 before the justices that he was competent to waive his right to an appeal, which is automatically filed in every death-penalty case. "We questioned Passaro at length during oral arguments. Our own questioning of him leaves no doubt of his competency," Justice E.C. Burnett III wrote, with the other justices concurring.

Passaro's court-appointed attorney, Joseph Savitz, told the justices during May oral arguments if they waived Passaro's appeal, their decision was "little more than government-assisted suicide." Savitz could not be reached Monday for comment.

Solicitor Greg Hembree, who prosecuted Passaro, said Passaro showed during his hearings that he understood the process and his actions. "He was clearly competent and understood them. He knew exactly what he did and the consequences of the crime," Hembree said. "There was never any question of his competency. ... Now it's just a matter of waiting." Hembree said if Passaro does not file for a delay in his execution, a date could be set for later this year.

Passaro, now 39 years old, pleaded guilty in August 2000 to murder and first-degree arson in the burning death of his daughter, Maggie. On Nov. 23, 1988, he drove the family minivan with Maggie strapped in a child safety seat and parked in front of the condominium complex where his estranged wife, Karen, lived. Passaro doused the inside of the van with gasoline and jumped out soon after it exploded. He refused to tell fire officials who responded to the scene if anyone was in the van.

A singed typewritten suicide note written by Passaro was found inside the van. It said he killed Maggie to get back at his estranged wife. Karen Passaro could not be reached Monday for comment. During the May hearing, Passaro told the justices he believed God has forgiven him and that he regretted the things he said about his ex-wife living in pain for the rest of her life.

 
 

Groups Fight to Halt Passaro's Death

By Kenneth A. Gailliard - MyrtleBeachOnline.com

September 12, 2002

Michael Passaro is one day away from the execution he has said he is prepared for, but groups opposed to the death penalty are fighting to save him. The 40-year-old Surfside Beach man is scheduled to be executed at 6 p.m. Friday for the burning death of his 2-year-old daughter, Maggie.

The S.C. Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, which is pushing for a moratorium on executions in the state, will hold an interfaith prayer service at 7 tonight at St. Thomas More Chapel, 1610 Greene St. in Columbia. The coalition holds similar protests for all S.C. executions, said Bruce Pearson, a spokesman for the group. Two other groups, the S.C. Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the S.C. Christian Action Council, are asking Gov. Jim Hodges to grant Passaro clemency.

Representatives say Passaro was depressed when he killed his daughter and he never recovered. The groups filed a petition on Passaro's behalf, against his will. The groups want Hodges to commute his sentence to life in prison. No S.C. governor has granted clemency since lawmakers restored the death penalty in 1977.

Passaro told state Supreme Court justices in May that he wanted to die. In July, the court ruled he was competent to waive his appeals. Passaro pleaded guilty in August 2000 to murder and first-degree arson and was sentenced to death. He drove the family minivan with his daughter, Maggie, strapped into a child safety seat and parked in front of the condominium complex of his estranged wife, Karen, on Nov. 23, 1998.

He used gasoline to set the van on fire, then jumped from the van soon after it exploded. He refused to tell fire officials who responded the scene whether anyone else was inside. Firefighters later found a melted gasoline can on the floor in front of Maggie's seat.

Authorities also found what remained of a typewritten note in which Passaro wrote that he killed Maggie to get back at her mother, his estranged wife. Passaro's defenders say he was depressed from the death of his first wife, who was accidentally electrocuted. If clemency is denied, Passaro will be the third person put to death in the state this year.

 
 

Abolish Archives

8-17-00 SOUTH CAROLINA:

An Horry County man was so angry with his estranged wife that he set fire to a family minivan, killing their 2-year-old daughter, prosecutors said Wednesday during a sentencing hearing. A circuit court judge heard testimony during the sentencing hearing for Michael Joseph Passaro, 38, who could receive the death penalty for killing his daughter, Maggie.

Passaro pleaded guilty Monday to charges of murder and 1st-degree arson in Maggie's Nov. 23, 1998, death. The plea was against advice from his attorneys. Prosecutors presented evidence of the crime to Judge Dean Hall, who will impose a sentence.

Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Solicitor Greg Hembree read a typewritten suicide note with singed edges that was recovered from the white 1995 Ford minivan. Passaro set fire to the van outside his wife's condo at South Bay Lakes in Surfside Beach. Passaro left Maggie in the van while he escaped from the fire. "Well, Karen [Passaro] won the war, and it's at the expense of our daughter," Hembree read aloud from the note. "I guess that I'm getting the last laugh now, Karen. "Whatever anyone does, please make sure Karen doesn't kill herself. I want her to live in pain."

"Has he achieved his objective?" Hembree asked Karen Passaro. "Yes. I will live like this forever, for the rest of my life. I can't concentrate or even focus some days," Karen Passaro said. "Maggie will never get to grow up. ... And in the process he took away my future."

Jonathan Simons, a clinical psychologist who examined Passaro in April 1999 and on Tuesday, testified Passaro knew right from wrong. "My impression is that in Michael's mind his identity became somewhat blurred. He felt his wife was robbing him of his identity, and he had to win that battle," Simons said.

Hembree asked Simons whether "Michael Passaro's hatred for Karen Passaro was greater than the love he had for Maggie Passaro?" Simons said: "I think some people could see that. ... He had this delusion of being with Maggie and going to heaven to see his 1st wife."

Susan Lewis, who taught Passaro in a nursing class, testified he needed emotional support and wasn't thinking clearly. Lewis, who testified for the defense, also said Passaro had poor life skills and judgment, and was under a lot of stress with his classes, work and pending divorce. "He thought he had a solution to his problems, and he hoped she was hurt at the outcome," Lewis said.

Fire investigators testified the fire started near the middle seat of the van. The remains of a plastic, 1-gallon gasoline can also were found melted into the floor near where Maggie was strapped in a child safety seat.

Maggie's family members left the courtroom while pictures of the charred van with Maggie's body still inside were shown to the judge. Passaro, who wore shackles, a light-blue shirt and dark-blue slacks, solemnly stared at his hands while the photographs were shown. "She was alive when the fire was raging. She burned to death as a result of the flame and fire in the car," said Clay Nichols, a forensic pathologist who examined Maggie. "I can't think of a more painful way to die."

Witnesses testified Passaro jumped out of the van soon after it exploded. "We pulled him away to the grassy area," said John Watts, a witness. "We asked him if anyone else was in the van, and he would not answer us." Maggie's body was found after the fire was extinguished and investigators were searching for a cause of the fire. Paramedics testified Passaro was conscious when they arrived, and the clothing on his right arm and the back of his legs was singed.

(source: The (Myrtle Beach) Sun News)

  


 

WITNESS TO MY BROTHER’S EXECUTION: A troubled life begins

By Gina Farthing - NewsVirginian.com

April 16, 2005

When my brother was born July 26, 1962, on New York’s Long Island, he didn’t even get his own name.

My parents christened him Michael Joseph Passaro—named after a brother who had died two years before of a heart defect after only four hours outside the womb.

The second of five children, Michael was always considered our family’s “problem” child. He was a mediocre student with little self-esteem. He was a follower, not a leader. He hated to fight - even to defend himself from bullies. That duty fell to me, his older sister by 13 months.

One day in sixth grade when we were walking home from school, two bullies followed close behind with plans to beat up my little brother. When one of the boys pushed Michael to provoke a fight, I stepped between them. Michael ran down the street and watched from 100 yards away while I fought the boys. One quickly backed down. The other bully got kicked, scratched, pinched and punched; I jerked out a clump of his hair.

Let’s just say he and his buddy never bothered my brother again.

It’s not that I liked to fight. Far from it. I always used my verbal skills to avoid confrontations as a child. Sometimes you have no choice though.

Later, as an adult, the knowledge that I could defend myself would serve me well when I worked as a corrections officer - in a men’s maximum-security prison.

At 5-foot-2 in high school, I still defended my brother Michael, who stood 6-foot-3. Some of the battles even were in my own family. My brother, John, a year younger than Michael, once came after Michael with a running lawn mower. Again, I put myself between Michael and the threat. I pounded on John’s chest (he was 6-foot-1), and also gave him what-for verbally.

When things went wrong, it was often Michael’s “fault.”

One time, Michael and our “baby” sister, Mary, who was two years younger, scuffled over a children’s powder puff she had given him as a gift but wanted back. The result was a pile of perfumed talcum powder scattered about the floor. From my bedroom, I heard the commotion and my father’s arrival to mediate.

As usual, it was Michael’s fault, so my father’s idea of punishment was to make him lick up the powder.

Years later, I asked Michael if he had actually done it; he said no. But I will never forget my father yelling at him to lick it up and Michael’s crying that he didn’t want to.

Our father was not abusive, but if pushed, rendered unusual and harsh punishments when it came to Michael. One year when I was in college, both of my brothers came home from a party. Michael was drunk, and my father told them to go to bed. Michael ended up getting sick after he laid down, scaring my father into thinking that his son would choke to death on his own vomit. He threw Michael into a cold shower and dragged him outside. “Don’t come back,” Dad told Michael, “until you can recite the Pythagorean theorem” - a geometry law regarding right triangles.

My mother and I stayed up, too, waiting for my brother’s return at the back door with the proper password. It took Michael more than a couple of tries - his first reaction was to forget our father’s instructions and the second was to ask of the theorem, “What is that?”

Our mother pleaded with our father to let Michael back in. While she petitioned Dad, I whispered the answer to Michael, not knowing if he’d even remember it. He returned in a few minutes and gave the “A squared plus B squared equals C squared” that Dad required.

Michael often was my companion growing up; he even tagged along on outings with my friends. He lacked his own social and life skills. I nicknamed him “Meekie,” and everyone assumed it was a variation of Michael. But it actually was a play on the word “meek.”

Even a stint in the Navy did little to build Michael’s confidence or self-worth. Always naïve, he ended up completing his tour of service in a Philadelphia brig after accepting a gift of old tools from a superior on board his duty ship. Michael’s superior told him the tools were going to be discarded anyway, so he should have them. Michael was arrested while trying to cart the tools off the USS Hunley, a sub-tender. It never crossed his mind that once something was government property, it always was. His ignorance cost him an honorable discharge.

Michael fared no better with women than with men. They rejected him. That was until he met Donna Jean Knapp.

The love of his life

Donna was just out of a troubled marriage and had a daughter, Missy, about 7. Michael met her through his job at Kings Park Psychiatric Center on Long Island. She was a nurse. He was an orderly.

Donna was about five years older than Michael. I met her once, in the fall of 1987. Michael made her meet me before they married. He wanted my approval first, so she visited me in Florida.

She saw my brother as a loving, tenderhearted man - the opposite of her alcoholic and abusive ex-husband.

I liked Donna - she saw through Michael’s eccentricities. She encouraged him to go to school to become a nurse himself because he enjoyed caring for people.

The couple married in February 1988 and settled on Long Island.

Five months later, the unthinkable happened.

After Donna and Michael played a game of darts at home, Michael went to sleep. Donna heard a car slam into a utility pole at the end of their street. While Michael slept, she ran to the scene to nurse the victims. That’s when a wire knocked loose from the pole whipped Donna and launched her 50 feet, over a hedge.

That was June 18, 1988. I got a call the next day from my mother, who wished me a happy birthday and then told me she had some tragic news: Donna had died that morning.

Before heading into surgery, Donna had begged Michael to take care of her daughter, Missy, then 8. My brother promised he would - but he was sure he’d see her when the surgery ended.

Donna died on the operating table. She was buried in the family plot the couple had bought just months before.

Her parents pressed for custody of Missy and were awarded the 8-year-old.

Michael was devastated. Not only did he lose his beloved wife, but he lost the stepdaughter he had promised to care for. His in-laws afforded him meager visitation opportunities, and then engaged him in legal battles for Donna’s life insurance and her wrongful death settlement - roughly $150,000 combined. (Michael’s stepdaughter got about $25,000, and Michael $75,000. Attorneys got the rest.)

A life spirals into hell

For the next eight years, Michael’s life was marked by grief, self-pity and despondency. He tried to continue with school (in Donna’s memory), but dropped out. He changed jobs over and over - electrician, cabbie, ambulance driver, paramedic.

He moved to Florida to live with me and restart his life, but within six months, my own life and marriage were in shambles.

My husband and I split. After years of his drinking, I’d had enough. My children and I moved in with the only family we had in the area, my in-laws. Michael stayed at the mobile home I’d bought with my husband, until he was able to find a place of his own.

Nothing worked.

In the summer of 1990, Michael went back to New York. He turned to cocaine and alcohol and began a gradual descent into darkness.

He hit rock bottom, or so we thought, when he got drunk and stabbed a friend with a 2½-inch pocketknife for refusing to give him his car keys. His friend was trying to prevent Michael from driving drunk.

The knife wounds were superficial, and the friend refused to press charges. But Michael ended up on probation and was ordered to get counseling.

In 1995, after completing his probation and counseling, Michael moved to South Carolina to live with our retired parents in Longs, west of North Myrtle Beach. Michael enrolled at Carolina Coastal Community College and worked at a kidney dialysis center. He continued with counseling on his own and was prescribed Zoloft to treat his depression.

At the dialysis center, Michael began a relationship with the director, a former nurse named Karen Monk Martin. She was older - a single mother of two grown girls.

They married Jan. 18, 1996, and by March, Karen was pregnant with Michael’s child. The family’s joy would be shortlived.

 
 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court

The State, Respondent,
v.
Michael J. Passaro, Appellant

Appeal From Horry County
H. Dean Hall, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 25507
Heard May 29, 2002 - Filed July 29, 2002

AFFIRMED

JUSTICE BURNETT:

Michael J. Passaro ("Passaro") pled guilty to murder and arson and was sentenced to death. Passaro's counsel filed an appeal to which Passaro filed a motion to dismiss. We ordered the circuit court to conduct a competency hearing. The court found Passaro competent to waive his right to appeal his conviction.

FACTS

The facts are not disputed. Passaro and his wife, Karen Passaro ("Karen"), separated because of marital difficulties. Karen, subsequently, filed for divorce. The family court issued a temporary order affecting custody of the Passaro's child, Maggie.

The order granted Passaro weekend custody of Maggie, beginning on Friday, when he would pick her up from daycare, and ending Monday, when he returned her to daycare. Karen would pick up Maggie on Monday afternoon and keep her until Friday. Passaro and Karen had conflicts concerning the custody arrangement, particularly during holidays.

On the Monday before Thanksgiving, Passaro did not take Maggie to daycare. Instead, he drove his van to Karen's condominium complex; poured gasoline on the floor of the vehicle; ignited the gasoline and jumped out leaving Maggie to die strapped in a child's safety seat. Investigators found a suicide note in the van, written by Passaro, explaining his wish to kill himself and Maggie so they could spend time in heaven away from Karen. (1)

After Passaro's indictment, the State served notice of its intent to seek the death penalty. The trial judge conducted a Blair (2) hearing and found him competent, i.e., he understood the charges against him and was able to assist his court-appointed counsel.

Passaro was arraigned on the day of the competency hearing and entered pleas of guilty to both charges. The trial court accepted the pleas after finding they were entered freely, voluntarily and intelligently. (3) The court reconvened two days subsequent to begin the required sentencing phase.

At the conclusion of the sentencing hearing the trial judge found the existence of the following statutory aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt: 1) physical torture; (4) 2) offender by his act of murder knowingly created a great risk of death to more than one person in a public place by means of a weapon or device which would normally be hazardous to the lives of more than one person; (5) 3) the murder of a child 11 years of age or younger. (6) Although the court found mitigating circumstances, (7) Passaro waived his right for the court to consider any mitigation.

Passaro's counsel, at Passaro's behest, waived closing arguments. Passaro made a brief closing statement:

Donna (8) was a big part of my life. I was devastated by her passing, and when I met Karen I thought I would have another chance at happiness. We started having difficulties in our marriage and happiness turned to tragedy. Thank you, your honor.

The trial judge concluded the evidence warranted the imposition of the death sentence for murder and a concurrent sentence of 30 years for arson.

Passaro's counsel filed a timely notice of appeal. Passaro, pro se, filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. We remanded the matter to the circuit court pursuant to Singleton v. State, 313 S.C. 75, 437 S.E.2d 53 (1993), to determine whether Passaro was competent to waive his right to appeal.

At the Singleton hearing Dr. Pamela Crawford ("Dr. Crawford"), an expert qualified in forensic psychiatry, testified Passaro was competent, under the Singleton standard, to waive his appeal and to be executed. She found he suffered from no major mental illness, though he had suffered from mild depression in his past, including periods after the death of his first wife and after his incarceration for the murder of his daughter. Dr. Crawford's findings were consistent with the report of the findings of the defense psychiatric expert.

The court found Passaro competent under the Singleton standard. Specifically, the court found Passaro able to understand the nature of the proceedings, the crimes for which he was tried, the reason for and the nature of the punishment, and he possessed sufficient mental capacity or ability to rationally communicate with counsel.

We required the parties submit briefs on Passaro's competence to waive his appeal. We also denied Passaro's motion to dismiss his counsel and appear pro se. However, we allowed Passaro to file an additional pro se brief. In a letter received March 5, 2002 waiving his right to file a pro se brief, Passaro wrote to appellate counsel:

In following the court's order of December 17, 2001, I understand that I have 20 days to respond to your [Office of Appellate Defense] brief and the state's brief.

I received a copy of your brief and the state's brief on February 11, 2002 and after reading both briefs, I do not feel that any more [sic] is needed to be said. I agree with the state.

Therefore, I am waiving the 20 days for my response.

ISSUE

I. Can an individual who pleads guilty to murder and waives introduction of mitigating evidence waive his right to general appellate review?

II. Is Passaro's waiver of his right to general appellate review competent, knowing and voluntary?

DISCUSSION

I

Right to Waive Appeal

A capital defendant may waive the right to general appellate review. State v. Torrence, 317 S.C. 45, 451 S.E.2d 883 (1994) (Torrence II). However, this right is limited to competent individuals whose decision is knowing and voluntary. Id.

Appellate counsel argues this Court should not allow Passaro to waive his right to general appellate review. Appellate counsel bases this argument on the theory that Passaro, who pled guilty to capital murder and then waived mitigation at the penalty phase, should not be allowed to prevent review of his conviction and sentence by waiving appellate review. To do so, counsel insists, is "little more than government-assisted suicide." (9)

Our decisions in Torrence II and State v. Torrence, 322 S.C. 475, 473 S.E.2d 703 (1996) (Torrence III), permit an individual to waive general appellate review of a death penalty conviction. Appellate counsel suggests the distinction between the Torrence line of cases and the instant case is our affirming Torrence's underlying conviction in our initial review of the case. See State v. Torrence, 305 S.C. 45, 406 S.E.2d 315 (1991) (Torrence I) (affirming conviction, but reversing the sentence of death and remanding for new sentencing proceeding). Because this Court has never reviewed Passaro's conviction, counsel asserts we should refuse any request to waive appeals in the case. We disagree.

It is true Torrence did not waive his right to appellate review until after this Court upheld his conviction. When Torrence was sentenced to death the second time, he chose to waive appellate review because he could, at best, receive life without parole at a new sentencing hearing. Torrence preferred the execution of his death sentence to the only alternative, life without parole.

Passaro, unlike Torrence, pled guilty. Allowing individuals, even defendants facing capital punishment, to plead guilty is recognized both in this state and throughout the nation. See State v. Shaw, 273 S.C. 194, 255 S.E.2d 799 (1979) (upholding death sentence of two defendants who pled guilty to murder) overruled on other grounds by Torrence I, supra; see generally Barry J. Fisher, Judicial Suicide or Constitutional Autonomy? A Capital Defendant's Right to Plead Guilty, 65 Alb. L. Rev. 181 (2001) (noting all states except Arkansas, Louisiana and New York allow a defendant in a capital case to plead guilty).

By allowing Passaro to plead guilty, we allow him to significantly restrict the scope of review on appeal because a guilty plea generally constitutes a waiver of non-jurisdictional defects and claims of violations of constitutional rights. See Rivers v. Strickland, 264 S.C. 121, 124, 213 S.E.2d 97, 98 (1975) (stating "[t]he general rule is that a plea of guilty, voluntarily and understandingly made, constitutes a waiver of non-jurisdictional defects and defenses, including claims of violation of constitutional rights prior to the plea"). Counsel does not argue or suggest Passaro was not guilty or his guilty plea defective.

We disagree with appellate counsel's argument that allowing an individual to plead guilty to murder, be sentenced to death and waive his right to general appellate review is tantamount to State assisted suicide. While the competency of the guilty verdict may be in doubt in some future case, it is not in doubt here as Passaro pled guilty below and confirmed his guilt before this Court. See State v. Sroka, 267 S.C. 664, 230 S.E.2d 816 (1976) (affirming guilty verdict by jury based on overwhelming evidence presented at trial and later admission of guilt by defendant in open court).

Importantly, this Court is the final body to decide whether to grant Passaro's waiver. Because of the uniqueness of the death penalty, we carefully review, individually, a petition to waive appellate review. We discern no reason Passaro should be denied his right to waive appellate review because he chose to plead guilty.

II

Ability to Waive Appeal

We limit a death row inmate's ability to waive appeals to those who are competent and whose decision to do so is both knowing and voluntary. See Torrence II, supra. Passaro is competent to waive his right to appeal. His decision to do so is knowing and voluntary.

A. Competency

The standard to determine competency, set forth by Singleton v. State, supra, is: 1) whether the defendant can understand the nature of the proceedings, the crimes for which he was tried, and the reason for the punishment; and 2) whether the convicted defendant possesses sufficient capacity or ability to rationally communicate with counsel. See Torrence II, supra.

The State argues the only evidence, particularly Dr. Crawford's report, presented at the competency hearing demonstrates Passaro is competent under Singleton. We agree.

The evidence presented at the hearing establishes Passaro suffers from no major mental illness. The evidence also shows he understands the nature of appellate proceedings, including the relevant issues of appeal, the role of his attorneys and the function of the court system in the process. Passaro was able to state why he was tried and why he received a death sentence.

Dr. Crawford noted Passaro was aware of the finality of the death penalty and was able to discuss in detail his reason for waiving his appeal. The defense expert's report provided a similar evaluation.

We questioned Passaro at length during oral arguments. Our own questioning of him leaves no doubt of his competency. At oral arguments we questioned Passaro extensively about his trial, the appeals process and the consequence of his request to terminate any appeals on his behalf. It is our observation that Passaro possesses the capacity and ability to communicate with counsel.

There is no evidence suggesting Passaro is not competent under the Singleton standard. We conclude, based on the hearing below and our questioning, that Passaro is competent to waive his appeal.

B. Knowing and Voluntary

The evidence presented at the competency hearing and Passaro's testimony before this Court establishes the wavier of his right to appellate review is knowing and voluntary. (10) Dr. Crawford noted Passaro understood the consequences of his action. No evidence suggests Passaro is being coerced into waiving his appeal.

While defense counsel notes Passaro, at Dr. Crawford's second visit on March 20, 2001, expressed the possibility he may change his mind, he made no such comments at the competency hearing. In his letter to defense counsel waiving his right to file a pro se brief, Passaro unequivocally agreed with the State's brief. Such a statement reaffirms his prior commitment to waive his right to appeal.

At oral argument, we questioned Passaro extensively about the voluntary nature of his request. We also questioned whether he fully understood the appellate process and what he could hope to gain by appealing his sentence. We conclude Passaro's request is knowingly and voluntarily made.

III

Sentence Review

Having concluded Passaro may waive his right to general appellate review, we proceed to review the sentence as required by S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-25(C) (1976). (11)

A. Arbitrariness Review

We are required to consider whether a death sentence "was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor." S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-25(C)(1) (1976). Appellate counsel has not argued Passaro's sentence was influenced by passion, prejudice or any other arbitrary factor. Having reviewed the record we conclude the sentence was not influenced by such arbitrary factors, but was the product of sound deliberation based on the evidence. See State v. Shaw, supra, overruled on other grounds by Torrence I, supra.

B. Circumstances of Aggravation Review

The trial judge imposed the death penalty after finding the following statutory aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt: 1) physical torture; (12) 2) offender by his act of murder knowingly created a great risk of death to more than one person in a public place by means of a weapon or device which would normally be hazardous to the lives of more than one person; (13) 3) the murder of a child 11 years of age or younger. (14)

It is not disputed Maggie Passaro was under 11 years of age at the time of the murder. The child was 2 years of age at the time of her death. Because the State has proved the existence of at least one aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt it is not necessary to address the other aggravating circumstances. See State v. Chaffee, 285 S.C. 21, 328 S.E.2d 464 (1984), overruled on other grounds by Torrence I, supra (death penalty may be imposed upon finding at least one statutory aggravating factor).

After a review of the record, we conclude the evidence supports the trial judge's findings beyond a reasonable doubt.

C. Proportionality Review

The United States Constitution requires the death penalty to be imposed only if the sentence is "neither excessive nor disproportionate in light of the crime and the defendant." State v. Copeland, 278 S.C. 572, 590, 300 S.E.2d 63, 74 (1982). In conducting a proportionality review, this court searches for "similar cases" where the death sentence has been upheld. Id.

A review of case law reveals no factually similar case, i.e., the murder of a person under eleven years of age by arson.

This Court has, however, upheld the death sentence in cases where a defendant has murdered a person under the age of eleven. See State v. Ard, 332 S.C. 370, 505 S.E.2d 328 (1998) (upholding death sentence for defendant convicted of murder of his unborn, but viable, son); State v. Rosemond, 335 S.C. 593, 518 S.E.2d 588 (1999) (death penalty was proper for a defendant who murdered his girlfriend's ten-year old daughter by shooting her); State v. Wilson, 306 S.C. 498, 413 S.E.2d 19 (1992) (death sentence was proportional to crime where defendant gunned down elementary school students). Passaro's crime is no less gruesome than those, perhaps more so considering the evidence Passaro knowingly and intentionally started the fire, jumped from the van, and failed to inform rescuers that his child was still strapped to a safety seat in the vehicle. The brutality of the murder is underscored by evidence the victim was alive during the fire, succumbing to death only after the intense heat caused her severe pain and suffering.

Evidence of Passaro's individual characteristics show he suffered slight mental or emotional disturbance at the time of the murder and did not have a substantial history of violent criminal conduct. We upheld a death sentence under similar mitigating circumstances in State v. Wilson, supra. The death sentence is proportional to the characteristics of this crime and the individual defendant.

CONCLUSION

Passaro may waive his right to general appellate review. He is competent to do so, and his request is both knowing and voluntary. We further find the death sentence was properly imposed after finding the existence of at least one aggravating circumstance. The sentence was not imposed arbitrarily and was not disproportionate.

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.

*****

1. The letter is caustic in tone, urging at one point for Karen to not kill herself so she may "live in pain [because of Maggie's death] for the rest of her life."

2. State v. Blair, 275 S.C. 529, 273 S.E.2d 536 (1981).

3. The judge noted Passaro took 40 milligrams/daily of the drug Prozac, which did not impair his ability to assist counsel.

4. S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(1)(h) (Supp. 2001).

5. S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(3) (Supp. 2001).

6. S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(10) (Supp. 2001).

7. The trial court found the existence of two statutory mitigating circumstances: 1) Passaro had no significant history of prior criminal conviction involving the use of violence against another person; 2) the murder was committed while the defendant was under the influence of mental or emotional disturbance. See S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(b)(1)-(2) (Supp. 2001).

8. Donna was Passaro's first wife. She was struck and killed by an automobile while attempting to help another motorist involved in a separate accident. She died in 1988.

9. Death row volunteers are neither new or unusual. See Christy Chandler, note, Voluntary Executions, 50 Stan. L. Rev. 1897 (1998); Richard C. Dieter, Ethical Choices for Attorneys Whose Clients Elect Execution, 3 Geo. J. Legal Ethics, 799, 802-03 (1990); Jane L. McClellan, Stopping the Rush to the Death House: Third-Party Standing in Death-Row Volunteer Cases, 26 Ariz. St. L.J. 201, 202, 212 (1994). States executed 302 inmates between 1973 and 1995, with 12% of those being the result of inmates refusing their right to appeal or petition for various post-conviction relief. NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Death Row U.S.A. 3-9 (1995).

10. Passaro has been prescribed medication, primarily Prozac, to calm him and to help him sleep. Passaro stated the medication does not affect his ability to reason, coherently or rationally. The medical evidence presented at the hearing below confirms this assessment.

11. We have never directly addressed whether a defendant may waive sentence review under S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-25 (C) (1976). See, e.g., Patterson v. Commonwealth, 262 Va. 301, 551 S.E.2d 332 (Va. 2001) (allowing death row defendant to waive general appeal for errors but not sentence review) State v. Dodd, 120 Wash.2d 1, 838 P.2d 86 (Wash. 1992). We do not address Passaro's ability to waive sentence review here because the issue has neither been raised nor briefed by either party. Because this case arises from the direct appeal filed by appellate counsel, we have conducted the sentence review. See S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-25(F).

12. S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(1)(h) (Supp. 2001).

13. S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(3) (Supp. 2001).

14. S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(10) (Supp. 2001).

 

 

 
 
 
 
home last updates contact