Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Lulonda
Lynn FLETT
Classification: Mass murderer
Characteristics: Arson (torching a rooming house)
Number of victims: 5
Date of murders: July 16, 2011
Date of arrest:
Next day
Date of birth: 1971
Victims profile:
Norman Darius Anderson, 22 /
Maureen Claire Harper, 54 / Kenneth Bradley Monkman, 49 / Dean
James Stranden, 44 / Robert Curtis Laforte, 56
Method of murder: Fire
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Status:
Sentenced to
five life sentences on June 12, 2013 — one for each case of
manslaughter — but they will be served concurrently and she will
be eligible for parole in five years
Winnipeg woman sentenced to life for 5 fire
deaths
Cbc.ca
June 13, 2013
Lulonda Flett has been sentenced to life in prison
in connection to the torching of a Winnipeg rooming house that killed
five people in July 2011.
Flett was handed five life sentences — one for each
case of manslaughter — but they will be served concurrently and she
will be eligible for parole in five years.
Two years were knocked off her eligibility wait for
time already served.
Flett pleaded guilty in October 2012 and a
sentencing hearing took place earlier this year.
On Thursday, the judge said she considered all of
Flett's cognitive challenges and difficulties in life. However, she
also believed Flett intended to cause harm to two women in the fire,
even if she didn't intend the full catastrophic consequences of her
actions.
Flett left the courtroom in tears.
Evelyn Laforte’s 56-year-old son, Robert, died in
the fire. She said she had mixed emotions about the verdict.
“I realize that nothing can bring my son back,”
said Laforte. “So I guess the justice system has done what they can.”
She described Robert as a kind person who never had
much in life.
She added she doesn’t think she’ll ever have
closure.
“Any mother that loses a child knows the
heartache,” said Laforte.
Five people died in the blaze on Austin Street in
the city's Point Douglas neighbourhood.
There were eight people in the home at the time,
including Flett's sister-in-law, Lynette Harper, who escaped unharmed.
The week before the fire, court records show Flett
had been ordered by the courts to stay away from Harper.
Flett had been handed a conditional sentence on
assault charges after pleading guilty to participating with another
woman in a 2009 attack on Harper.
The judge said she accepted Flett was only trying
to scare two women inside, but she said the evidence showed Flett was
capable of seeing the risk she was taking. As a result, the judge
said, a life sentence was fair and just.
Fire officials have said the blaze likely started
near the front entrance, possibly on the veranda, blocking an obvious
escape route. The front of the structure was engulfed when
firefighters arrived.
If Flett does get parole in five years, she will
always be supervised in the community as part of a life sentence.
Winnipeg woman pleads guilty to 5 fire deaths
Rooming house set ablaze in Point Douglas area
Cbc.ca
October 22, 2012
A woman charged with killing five people in a 2011
Winnipeg rooming house fire has pleaded guilty to manslaughter.
Lulonda Lynn Flett, 41, had faced five counts of
second-degree murder and three counts of attempted murder in
connection to the blaze in the Point Douglas neighbourhood.
The plea is part of a deal with the Crown to avoid
a long trial. In addition to five counts of manslaughter, Flett also
pleaded guilty to one count of arson.
Court of Queen's Bench Justice Brenda Keyser asked
Flett, who was sniffling a bit throughout the hearing, if she clearly
understood the charges.
"You hesitated a bit. Are you certain this took
place?" Keyser asked Flett in court.
"Yes," Flett answered.
"You appreciate you will go to jail for long period
of time?" the judge asked.
"Yes," Flett said.
"Anything you want to say?" Keyser asked.
"No," Flett replied.
Her lawyer, Darren Sawchuk, said Flett did not
intend to kill anyone.
"I think once the facts are laid out before the
court, when we return [for sentencing], you'll have a better
understanding of the lack of intent in this case and the other
circumstances that make manslaughter the appropriate charge," Sawchuk
said outside court.
Maximum penalty is life in prison
Flett faces a maximum penalty of life in prison. A
sentencing hearing is set for March 21, 2013.
Sawchuk would not say what sentence he will seek,
nor would he discuss details of what happened until the sentencing
hearing takes place.
The fire at 288 Austin St. broke out in the early
morning of July 16, 2011.
There were eight people in the home at the time,
including Flett's sister-in-law, Lynette Harper, who escaped unharmed.
The week before the fire, court records show Flett
had been ordered by the courts to stay away from Harper. Flett had
been handed a conditional sentence on assault charges after pleading
guilty to participating with another woman in a 2009 attack on Harper.
Those who died in the blaze were:
Norman Darius Anderson, 22.
Maureen Claire Harper, 54.
Kenneth Bradley Monkman, 49.
Dean James Stranden, 44.
Robert Curtis Laforte, 56.
Fire officials have said the blaze likely started
near the front entrance, possibly on the veranda, blocking an obvious
escape route. The front of the structure was engulfed when
firefighters arrived.
Court was told a Gladue report — a pre-sentence
assessment for aboriginal offenders — will be prepared before the
March date.
Gladue reports are based on a Supreme Court of
Canada ruling that said judges should take an aboriginal offender's
background into account for sentencing.
'Tragic case'
Flett is originally from a remote First Nation,
Sawchuk said.
"She's from a remote northern community and she
doesn't have much of a history with the courts, so this whole event
today is in some ways probably a relief to her that we're moving the
matter forward," he said.
"It's a tragic case. It's a terrible case and my
client has accepted responsibility for the role she played in it."
Lyle Duhaime, who lived in the rooming house before
and after the blaze, said he knew three of the five people who died.
"It always hurts, especially when people aren't
ready to die yet," Duhaime told CBC News.
"They're still alive … it wasn't their time, eh? It
didn't happen naturally."
Duhaime said if he had been living in the house at
the time of the fire, he likely would have died as well.
Winnipeg rooming house fire claims 5th victim
Accused ordered to stay away from home resident
Cbc.ca
July 18, 2011
A fifth person has died after a rooming house was
torched on the weekend in Winnipeg's Point Douglas neighbourhood.
Robert Curtis Laforte, 56, had been in critical
condition since the Saturday blaze at the 2˝-storey home at 288 Austin
St. N. but succumbed to his injuries, police said on Monday.
Six adults were taken to hospital in critical
condition and four were pronounced dead soon after.
Lulonda Lynn Flett, 40, now faces five counts of
second-degree murder and three counts of attempted murder. Flett had
been ordered by the courts to stay away from her sister-in-law,
Lynette Harper, who escaped the fire.
Court records show Flett was handed a conditional
sentence last week on assault charges after pleading guilty to
participating with another woman in a 2009 attack on Harper.
Flett, with no prior criminal record, was to take
an anger management course.
Harper was among eight people in the house at the
time of the fire. She escaped unscathed along with another resident
Marie Flett. The remaining fatalities, all from Winnipeg, are
identified as:
Norman Darius Anderson, 22
Maureen Claire Harper, 54
Kenneth Bradley Monkman, 49
Dean James Stranden, 44
One man, Bradley Anderson, remains in hospital. He
was listed in critical condition but has since been upgrade to stable.
Fire officials have said the blaze likely started
near the front entrance, possibly on the veranda, blocking an obvious
escape route. The front of the structure was engulfed when
firefighters arrived.
Neighbours told CBC News that the rooming house is
often home to people struggling with addictions.
Officials said the house had 13 rooms and that they
believed people were also sleeping in the basement.
Woman charged in Winnipeg fire deaths
Cbc.ca
July 17, 2011
Winnipeg police have made an arrest in connection
with a weekend rooming house fire that killed four and left two others
critically injured.
Lulonda Lynn Flett, 40, has been charged with four
counts of second-degree murder and four counts of attempted murder,
police said Sunday. Flett was arrested in a Main Street bar on
Saturday, police said.
Officials examining the charred facade said the
fire likely started near the front entrance, possibly on the veranda,
blocking an obvious escape route. The front of the structure was
ablaze when firefighters arrived.
Police said Sunday a witness saw someone using
something flammable to light the blaze early Saturday morning.
The accused knew someone who lived in the rooming
house, police said. Three men and a woman died as a result of the fire
at 288 Austin St. N., which was called in just before 2 a.m. CT
Saturday. Four others — two women and two men — fled the home and both
men remain in hospital in critical condition.
Neighbours told CBC News that the rooming house is
often home to people struggling with addictions.
Reid Douglas, Winnipeg's deputy fire chief, said
the house had been the subject of a fire safety investigation in the
past month, but the problem had been corrected.
Officials said the house had 13 rooms and that they
believed people were also using basement space for sleeping.
The names of the victims have not been released.
The city's arson strike force and police homicide
unit continue to investigate.
Winnipeg house fire kills 4
Police say blaze is 'suspicious'
Cbc.ca
July 16, 2011
Four people died early Saturday and two others were
in critical condition following a house fire in Winnipeg.
Firefighters were called to a 2˝-storey home at 288
Austin St. N. just before 2 a.m. CT after neighbours and passing
drivers noticed the blaze.
Six adults were rushed to hospital in critical
condition, including one who had received CPR at the scene. Four of
the victims were later pronounced dead.
"Three males and one female have succumbed to
injuries sustained and two males remain in critical condition," police
announced Saturday afternoon.
"The cause of the fire is considered suspicious in
nature," they added, but no arrests had been made.
Damage is estimated at $100,000.
A woman named Nicole, who declined to provide her
last name, told CBC News that she spotted the fire as she drove by and
called 911.
"I felt the heat from the house," she said. While
she waited for firefighters to arrive, she said, she saw people
running around in front of the building and screaming.
"It was … it was really hard to watch," she said.
"I'm just really sad that people were hurt last night, and that's it."
Worry for friend
Todd Calback, a friend of one of the people in the
house, said he was shocked by what he saw when he went to the home
later Saturday morning.
"He lived in the top suite up there," Calback said
of his friend. "That was his place, that was his house."
He said his friend lived in a room with his cat.
Calback did not know that four people in the home
didn't survive, and when he found out he broke down. He tried calling
the hospital to see if his friend was OK, but was told that only
family could get that information.
"He was definitely home," Calback said, hoping for
the best. "And he was definitely sleeping."
Later on Saturday, Calback contacted CBC News and
said he had learned his friend had died.
13 rooms in the house
Neighbours told CBC News that the rooming house is
often home to people struggling with addictions.
"This house has always been a house that's
associated with activity of late-night partying, drugs and so on,"
Chris D'Souza said.
Reid Douglas, Winnipeg's deputy fire chief, said
the house had been the subject of a fire safety investigation in the
past month, but the problem had been corrected.
"I was actually quite surprised to hear multiple
casualties [there]," Douglas said, "because our fire prevention branch
has been doing such a fantastic job in rooming houses."
Officials examining the charred façade said the
fire likely started near the front entrance, possibly on the veranda,
blocking an obvious escape route. The front of the structure was
ablaze when firefighters arrived.
Officials said the house had 13 rooms and that they
believed people were also using basement space for sleeping.
The names of the victims have not been released.
The city's arson strike force and police homicide
unit are investigating the fire, as well as a fire in the 500 block of
Selkirk Street that broke out just before 3 a.m. No one was hurt in
that fire.
Police said there's no indication either fire is
related to the current biker gang turf war in Winnipeg.
Lulonda Flett, the map of human frailties, and
where they can lead
By James Turner - Blogs.canoe.ca
May 4, 2013
All it took was drunken anger and a match for a
disadvantaged and unsophisticated mother of six to become Manitoba’s
most recent mass killer.
To look at Lulonda Flett’s case and how she wound
up where she is today — in jail for killing five people trapped in a
rickety rooming house she torched at 288 Austin St. North in 2011 — is
to consider truly human frailties which plague so many in our society.
The word ‘killer’ conjures up images for me, and
many others. Hooded thugs who take lives without a thought.
Remorseless predators so desperate to feel a sense of power and
control they’d commit the ultimate sin to get there.
But that’s not Lulonda Lynn Flett, all things
considered. And that’s the queasy irony of it all.
Ironic in that someone who’s as far from the
stereotype of the common killer as she is, in the end, ends up taking
more life away in one go than anyone else in my memory, including:
teen gangsters armed with automatic guns or bona-fide family-loathing
psychos.
People with histories like Ms. Flett’s don’t
typically wind up in jail for mass slayings, at least not that I’ve
seen. They usually wind up there because they shoplifted diapers,
booze, or to feed a crack habit out of sheer desperation.
And it’s this dissonance, to me, that makes how she
killed five people with one senseless act that much more of a mystery
that’s been weighing on my mind for nearly two years now.
To her, the reason why she is where she is is
simple. But I just don’t think that’s true. Maybe I’m over-thinking
it.
“It was all about the drinking. That’s how I ended
up here.” Lulonda Lynn Flett, to psychologist Dr. Kent Somers, early
2013.
Could it be that simple? Or is it an excuse to try
and dodge a potential life sentence in prison?
Lulonda Flett: The early years
The second-youngest of six siblings (a seventh died
as an infant), Flett (then Harper) was born at the hospital in Norway
House 41 years ago and soon brought back to her home community of St.
Theresa Point.
Her mother’s doctor told her mom to give birth
there because there was no appropriate medical facility in the small
STP reserve, one of four which makes up the overall community of
Island Lake.
A doctor visits there just once a month. Currently,
of 521 Homes in STP – 463 have no water service and there’s an 83 per
cent food insecurity rate.
Food prices are 50 per cent higher than average
retail price — and this is today.
Who knows what it was like in 1971.
Mom was a community health worker and dad worked
“odd jobs” to get their large family by.
Her folks drank, struggled with the bottle — excess
Flett would ultimately came to see as “normative” behaviour in her
later years.
Her parents’ parties often led her older sister to
lock the younger kids in a bedroom when the adults were drinking.
They’d watch TV or play music. She says dad would go on drinking
“binges” to Winnipeg, sometimes staying there for months.
Flett’s older sister described violence breaking
out after the drinking parties wound down. This prompted the sister to
assume the role of protector to her sibings. She’d camp out on floor
by the bedroom’s barricaded door to percent people from entering.
Sometimes, when her dad was on one of his city
‘trips,’ mom would go off to join him. Flett would be packed up to go
stay at her aunt’s.
Sometime before she turned 10, Flett says an older
relative began abusing her. She says she tried to tell her mother
about what was happening, but was accused of “making it up so I
wouldn’t have to sleep over there.”
She also says she tried to tell her aunt but,
“nobody believed me [so] I just stopped trying to tell them.”
To this day, Flett remains curiously concerned
about hurting her now 75-year-old mom’s relationship with her alleged
abuser.
She says he tried to apologize to her once, but she
rebuffed him. “I told him not to talk to me.” The relative was never
charged.
Her mom, now 75 and caring for two of Flett’s
children, ultimately quit drinking after Flett’s father got sick with
stomach ulcers and suffered kidney failure.
Phase two: A portrait of Flett as a young woman
At around 14 or 15 years old, Flett was sent away
from STP to start school in Teulon, at a residential school where nuns
ruled the roost. Her sister — her elder protector — was also there.
Raised in a home where Oji-Cree was the main
dialect, Flett had to adjust her tongue to the English language as the
nuns wouldn’t tolerate a word being uttered in any other language.
They “insisted,” she says.
Nonetheless, Flett got good marks and enjoyed
school. She “never missed a day,” she says.
According to Dr. Somers, “school represented a
refuge from the relative chaos at home, [and] she agreed.” She also
enjoyed playing sports.
The sister had a bit of different view, saying she
dropped out at one point but was convinced to return. She and others,
she says, were treated to disparaging comments from some. “Go back to
the bush where you belong,” were among the insults hurled at them.
It was around this time Flett took her first drink.
She met a young man named Brian, and became pregnant. This was
1986-87.
She ventured into Winnipeg and had the baby at
Villa Rosa. Wanting to return to high school, arrangements were made
for her to live with a relative in Brandon to complete Grade 11. It
didn’t work out as planned.
Flett says that relative’s drinking problem paved
her a road back to St. Theresa.
She still hoped to finish Grade 12, and find a job
at the local nursing station. But it seems the challenges of life as a
new mom didn’t allow that to happen as time wore on. “I had no time
for myself — I always had a baby,” Flett says.
By 18, she met her husband to be, B., a man with
whom she’s had five children. He was a “nice guy,” Flett says.
But ‘Mr. Nice’ wasn’t to last.
“They used to call me raccoon eyes”
By 22, Flett and B. married, and they went to live
at his parents home in nearby Garden Hill. “She was an active and
supportive parent to her children,” her sister says.
Around this time things started to get ugly for her.
“She reported that her husband insisted that she drink with him,
‘forced’ her to do so,” Dr. Somers writes of his interviews with
Flett.
B. and she would drink “super juice” — a noxious homebrew seen by many
as a plague in the “dry” Island Lake community, given the mayhem and
sickness it’s spawned there over the years.
B. also insisted Flett smoke weed and later crack cocaine.
They’d smoke up marijuana “almost daily” and come home from work over
lunch to get high, Flett reported.
Their marriage and substance-sharing didn’t appear to make the bond
between them stronger. Instead, she says B. became “very abusive” on a
physical, sexual and emotional level. Flett also says he cheated. He
couldn’t keep a job.
“According to Ms. Flett, her husband would lock her in the house, take
her shoes and remove the phone so that she couldn’t contact anyone or
‘run away.’ Ms. Flett related that her husband often hit her with
objects, and also burnt her with a cigarette.
“She commented, ‘they used to call me raccoon eyes’ because of the
bruising from the reported assaults,” Dr. Somers wrote.
It didn’t seem to ever get better. In fact, the abuse escalated into
the evil cycle of domestic violence.
“Ms. Flett recounted an incident in which he assaulted her and then
dragged her across a patch of rough ground,” Dr. Somers said. He was
charged and served six months in lockup — and was fully compliant.
“[W]hen he returned to live with Ms. Flett, the violence continued and
it was ‘worse.’ It was a cycle, she kept going back to him, he’d
apologize and convince her he’d never do it again.
Berating herself for believing him time and again, she says her
in-laws “told her that the violence was ‘always’ her fault.”
Flett’s kids began begging her to not go back to B. “They said he was
going to kill me one day,” Flett says.
She and B. eventually separated. He left for Thompson. She stayed in
STP — for now.
Somehow in the midst of all this Flett worked at the community
Northern Store and managed to acquire her certificates in Home Care
support work and First Aid along the way.
But now her drinking, it didn’t stop.
It just got worse.
2009-10: a new beginning?
In 2009, Flett came into a bit of a windfall. It may have also been
her downfall.
Having never claimed any federal benefits for the kids, Flett was
handed a $14,000 child-benefits cheque and they moved to Winnipeg.
That year or early the next, Flett started dating C., who was 36 and
from her community. They met while he was on a drinking trip to the
city.
“For Lulonda, this was the best relationship she had ever known,”
Flett recently told the writer of a “Gladue” report looking at her
aboriginal background and circumstances.
“He never hit me, he never abused me, and he was always there for me,”
Flett said. “The two were inseparable, spending all their time
together,” the report states.
For a time — and bolstered by the child-tax money – Flett returned to
STP, paid for her kids’ needs, helping to fix up her mom’s home.
But C. had his own troubles. An alcoholic himself, he’d panhandle or
borrow cash from a relative to get by. Eventually, he started
siphoning money out of Flett and the relationship took a dark turn
towards an apparent cliff.
“Lulonda returned to the city to be with C. She paid for his wants —
alcohol and survived on family and friends as she had no real address.
C. was very controlling over money and Lulonda especially as her money
dried up. C. and Lulonda were both now on welfare and were drinking
constantly.”
It was reflection upon this phase which caused her to realize the
power the booze had over her life. “It was all about the drinking.
That’s how I ended up here,” Flett told Dr. Somers.
Not seeing the drinking as a problem, Flett never sought treatment.
Her kids urged her to take it easy but “even these pleas” didn’t
trigger a desire to seek change, Dr. Somers reports.
“She reported only that she has “tried to quit,” prompting
hospitalizations for alcohol withdrawal. Flett subsequently relapsed
(evidently quite quickly) to stifle emotional pain and because of her
affiliation with others who were drinking.”
She equated the hospitalizations largely as normal, given her
upbringing (see above).
It was around here that someone made a call to Child and Family
Services, while Flett was in the throes of a drinking binge.
Flett’s children were taken away. One was already living with an aunt.
Two others went to live with her mom. The others went to dad.
Flett “voiced bitterness toward B., expressing the belief that he had
made the call to CFS in 2010 that resulted in the apprehension of her
children,” Dr. Somers wrote. “I kind of don’t trust him,” she said.
The alcohol abuse only escalated after the kids were removed from her
care. “I was lonely and depressed; I was angry at myself … I didn’t
care about myself,” Flett said.
She was drinking up to a 26 oz. bottle of liquor daily up until the
day after her arrest. She’d withdraw in hospital, get a valium
prescription to ease the symptoms upon discharge. Resuming her
drinking habit was “virtually immediate.”
It’s like she was living in a black hole: Drinking, blacking out from
it, waking up and starting again.
“I wish it was me who died.”
“I was so out of it: I just remember drinking with C.”
This: Pretty much the only thing Flett remembers about the early
morning she torched the couch on porch of 288 Austin St. N. An act of
anger which would wreak havoc on the lives of so many.
Just days before, she had been cut loose from the Remand Centre after
being snatched on an old warrant for an assault against a relative who
stayed at the rooming house. Someone she was barred from being around
by virtue of court-orders.
“She reported that (C.) had told her they had argued” on the night in
question, but can’t remember what about, Dr. Somers said.
“She recalled attending 288 Austin Street North … but voiced
uncertainty as to her actions, almost 20 months having passed.”
Flett was later arrested in a bar and had to be told about what she
did and the “extent of harm done” by the officers who interviewed her,
the psychologist said, adding:
“When asked about a possible motive for the office,
Ms. Flett stated she had been angry at C’s mother, who apparently
resided in the rooming house … Apparently, (C’s) mother had previously
called the police complaining about Ms. Flett’s behaviour at the
rooming house.
According to Ms. Flett, Mr. Harper’s mother has been concerned about
the number of people in the building and the resultant noise. However
Ms. Flett was clear she did not intend significant harm to others nor
did she anticipate that deaths would ensue from her actions.
She commented bleakly, ‘I wish it was me who died.’
She expressed a mixture of tearful remorse for her actions tempered
only by a measure of incredulity at the extent of what had occurred.”
Instead, dead are: Norman Darius Anderson, age 22;
Maureen Claire Harper, age 54; Kenneth Bradley Monkman, age 49; Dean
James Stranden, age 44; Robert Curtis Laforte, age 56.
Flett knew one of the men personally, and says she was related to
Maureen Harper.
The wreckage of the fire was incredible to behold. I remember
distinctly being there. I will never forget it.
Nearly two years sober, now
Flett today, is a “physically robust” (Dr. Somers’ words) woman living
in the “Delta” wing of the Women’s Correctional Centre just outside of
Winnipeg.
It’s special needs wing of the new prison, a place where she’s been
subjected to intimidation by other inmates who have discovered what
she did.
Dr. Somers, in his lengthy report on Flett, makes several findings
about her psychological makeup and abilities, ultimately conclusing
she’s a “vulnerable individual” who has serious intellectual deficits
and only “modest internal controls” to help herself manage her
behaviour.
“A significant aspect of these findings from
intellectual testing, although notably limited at present, is that
these data suggest a context for understanding Ms. Flett’s responses
to events in her life. That is, her capacity for learning from prior
experiences is likely to differ from that of others [whose abilities
are are typical for their age.]…
“Her responses to stress or to problems in her personal life are
likely to be more limited and less effective than are those of most
others her age. Her actions are most likely to be directed by
immediate considerations [most likely about herself] rather than
anticipation of long-term consequences [those affecting both herself
and others]. Her focus on her own needs and interests over those of
others is not a reflection of callous self-interest, it is an
expression of her limited capacity for anticipating others’ needs or
reactions while being [in comparison] acutely aware of her own hurt,
fear and perceived options.“
She needs help, Somers ultimately finds.
Also, she’s no psychopath.
Somers found no “compelling evidence of psychopathy” in the woman.
That is: no display of traits suggesting exaggerated self-importance,
callous lack of empathy for others, multiple and versatile patterns of
offending, nor frank manipulations of others. (Those are essentially
his words).
He notes, however, several “historical factors” associated with
Flett’s offending risk. This quasi ‘probability of future harm’
assessment includes the findings:
Unabated substance abuse, with no intervention.
Chronic domestic abuse with physical injuries
Emotional neglect
Sexual abuse which persisted despite having tried to report it.
Disrupted schooling
No interventions; no treatment for mental health issues in past.
The Crown wants to send Flett to prison for life for what she did, for
her guilty pleas to five counts of manslaughter.
Her own lawyers want to see her serve time amounting to no more than
10 years.
You can read all about the sentencing process elsewhere. That’s not
the purpose of this (lengthy) post.
See, the thing is, after considering all the factors, I just don’t
know what’s appropriate here in terms of jailhouse punishment.
Let’s face it, even if she does get life, she’ll still be eligible —
eligible — for parole after seven years. So really, the Crown’s bid is
one for lifetime supervision. Considering the horrific double-fatal
arson case of Howard Mason, the request may not be out of line. The
request appears to fall a little flat, however, when considering
Flett’s nearly total lack of criminal involvement.
Also muddying the mix is her comment to Dr. Somers about not
anticipating deaths would result from her actions.
It has me seriously wondering: Can someone with Flett’s background —
with the life she’s been through and her level of intoxication at the
time — actually fire the synapses which would suggest otherwise? That
she actually knew what she was doing?
I’m just not so sure.
Some parting words of forgiveness
Marie Anderson, the mother of Norman Anderson, who died in the
horrible blaze, wrote Flett a simply-worded letter. The level of
forgiveness expressed is unusual, and if taken sincerely – inspiring.
“I often think about you and wonder how you must be
feeling.
I am writing you this letter to let you know I am not mad or angry
with you and that I love you even though I never met you.
It is really hard for me to think about this person that I love so
much, that was taken away from me suddenly.
I pray that things will go well for you in court and I do not want to
lay charges but it’s not up to me, to make that decision.
I want you to know I want to put this behind me and move on with my
life