Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Woman pleads no contest in husband's fatal shooting
Will
Bigham - Insidebayarea,com
August 26, 2011
SAN BERNARDINO -- An Ontario woman pleaded no contest to
voluntary manslaughter and assault Friday in connection with the
2007 shooting death of her husband.
Mia Gonzales entered her pleas in San Bernardino Superior Court
as part of a plea agreement with prosecutors that carries an
eight-year prison sentence, her attorney said.
Gonzales, 36, is set to be sentenced Oct. 28.
A jury acquitted Gonzales of murder in April, but deadlocked in
its deliberations over a lesser offense of voluntary manslaughter.
Gonzales testified during her trial that she shot her husband
-- 44-year-old state parole agent Abel Gonzales -- in the midst of
an argument on Oct. 27, 2007.
She said that as she and her husband argued in their bedroom,
Abel Gonzales restrained her and she retrieved a handgun because
she feared for her safety.
She testified that her husband grappled with her for control of
the weapon and it inadvertently fired. The bullet entered Abel
Gonzales' brain and he died instantly, authorities said.
Mia Gonzales' attorney, Mark Fredrick, said Gonzales chose to
plead no contest rather than stand trial a second time because,
"She's tired, and wants to put it behind her."
"What she said to me is it's time for people to start healing,"
Fredrick said.
Because Mia Gonzales has been in custody since the shooting,
her eight-year prison sentence will be significantly shortened.
Fredrick estimated that she will be released from prison in
about 2-1/2 years.
Abel Gonzales' sister, Sandy Silva, called the outcome of the case
"an injustice for my brother," and said she believes Mia Gonzales
should have been convicted of murder.
"It's really sad for us," Silva said. "My mother didn't even go
because she was so sick over the whole thing. Her heart was
hurting her so much, she just couldn't go."
Verdict angers family
By Will Bigham - DailyBulletin.com
May 14, 2011
The sister of Abel Gonzales said last week that
she and Gonzales' other relatives are "devastated" by the
acquittal on murder charges for his wife, Mia Gonzales, who
fatally shot her spouse nearly four years ago at the couple's
Ontario home.
"What an outcome for such a good guy," Sandy
Silva said of her brother. "He was a good man. He was a good
husband, and he was an awesome father."
A jury found Mia Gonzales not guilty Wednesday
of first- and second-degree murder in connection with her
husband's Oct.27, 2007, shooting death, which she said came amid a
violent late-night struggle.
The jury deadlocked on a lesser charge of
voluntary manslaughter, with 11 of the 12 jurors believing she
should be convicted of the charge.
A juror said Thursday that the panel of nine
women and three men spent its last three days of deliberations
trying to coax the lone holdout into convicting Mia Gonzales. The
deliberations lasted nine days.
"We could have deliberated for the next two
weeks and it wouldn't have changed a thing," said Lisa, a
55-year-old teacher's assistant from Rialto who asked that her
last name be withheld.
After the jury announced it was deadlocked, a
judge declared a mistrial in the case. Prosecutors now have the
option of retrying Mia Gonzales for voluntary manslaughter.
Deputy District Attorney Mary Izadi said last
week that a decision hasn't been made on whether to retry the case
or offer Mia Gonzales a plea agreement.
"There's a lot more discussions that need to
happen before we can make that decision," Izadi said.
Izadi said the case is next due in court May 25
for a hearing in which a judge will consider lowering Mia
Gonzales' bail, which is currently set at $2 million.
The "bail schedule," which is a list of
recommended bail amounts, calls for a bail of $350,000 for
voluntary manslaughter with a firearm, Izadi said.
Mia Gonzales testified during her trial in San
Bernardino Superior Court that her husband, a 44-year-old state
parole agent, was easily angered and often physically abused her.
She testified that the night of the shooting,
Abel Gonzales became more violent than ever during an argument
over whether to divorce. He shoved her and physically restrained
her, she said.
She said she retrieved a revolver, which
inadvertently fired as Abel Gonzales restrained her arms. He was
shot in the head and died within moments.
Lisa, the juror, said she and many of the other
jurors believed Mia Gonzales lied about the circumstances of the
shooting.
She said several jurors believed Abel Gonzales'
killing might have been a murder, but the panel felt it lacked
sufficient evidence to convict Mia Gonzales of the charge.
She called the lone holdout on the jury
"unreasonable" in her position.
"I don't feel justice was served in this case,"
she said. "I just don't. And that's a sad thing."
Sandy Silva said she believes Mia Gonzales, 36,
planned for more than a year before killing her husband. She said
she believes the shooting was a cold-blooded murder motivated by
financial gain.
"The evidence was clear," she said. "The D.A.
did a good job. She did an excellent job in presenting the case.
It just breaks our hearts that we had to wait 3 1/2 years and 3
1/2 weeks to hear a verdict like this."
Ontario woman acquitted of murder; jury
deadlocks on lesser charge
By Will Bigham - Insidesocal.com
May 11, 2011
SAN BERNARDINO — A jury found an Ontario woman
not guilty of murdering her husband today and deadlocked on a
lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter, the woman’s attorney
said.
Mia Gonzales shot and killed her husband, state
parole agent Abel Gonzales, during what she described as a violent
argument on Oct. 27, 2007 about the future of the couple’s
troubled marriage.
The acquittals on charges of first- and
second-degree murder leave voluntary manslaughter as the only
active charge against Mia Gonzales. Paired with a “special
allegation” of using a firearm, it carries a maximum prison
sentence of 21 years.
Mia Gonzales will also have her bail reduced as
a result of the verdicts, said her attorney, Mark Fredrick.
Gonzales has been jailed since the shooting in lieu of $2 million
bail.
The jury of nine women and three men was split
11-1 in favor of a guilty verdict for voluntary manslaughter,
Frederick said.
Mia Gonzales, 36, testified during the trial in
San Bernardino Superior Court that her husband beat her severely
during a midnight argument in the couple’s bedroom in the 1900
block of South Almond Street.
Abel Gonzales became enraged when his wife
asked whether the couple should seek a divorce, Mia Gonzales
testified.
She said her suggestion of divorce came after
several months of physical abuse from her husband.
In order to protect herself and her daughters —
who were in the home at the time — Mia Gonzales said she retrieved
a revolver during the argument from a cabinet in the bedroom. She
said she never intended to hurt her husband.
The couple struggled over the weapon and it
inadvertently fired, Mia Gonzales testified. A bullet entered Abel
Gonzales’ brain and killed him within seconds.
A prosecutor argued during the trial that Mia
Gonzales lied about the circumstances of the shooting and
fabricated allegations that she was abused by Abel Gonzales, 44.
Deputy District Attorney Mary Izadi portrayed
the wife as the aggressor in the incident, and said Mia Gonzales
was upset over her husband’s infidelity.
Izadi did not immediately return a call seeking
comment.
Fredrick said Mia Gonzales was relieved that
she was acquitted of murder and cried when the verdicts were
returned this afternoon.
Fredrick said jurors told him after the hearing
that they believed Mia Gonzales’ testimony that her husband’s
shooting was accidental. But they questioned her decision to
retrieve a revolver, he said.
“The felt there were other options available to
her besides getting the gun,” he said.
The jury reached its verdicts after nine days
of deliberations, which followed six days of witness testimony and
arguments from attorneys.