Dr. Haslam, for Parker, called Dr. Francis Bennett,
who, he said, had been consulted about the girls' friendship before
the tragedy occurred. Dr. Bennett, referring to the moral
responsibility of the paranoic, said it was the murder that was the
actual proof of the diagnosis. "There came the threat of separation.
Anything that threatens the paranoic makes him dangerous. They thought
that by removing Pauline's mother the way would be clear. This idea
was stupid but they have steadily maintained it was justified. Neither
will admit contrition or regret. Pauline told me she would still feel
justified to-day in killing her mother if she was a threat to their
being together. Juliet Hulme was more outspoken. She not only
considers the murder justified but also that other murders might be
justified if there was a threat to the association of the two
accused."
- Asked, "Did these girls know when they were killing Mrs.
Parker what they were doing?"
-
he replied, "They knew they were killing Mrs.
Parker."
By the Judge, Dr. Bennett's views were summarised
thus "In your opinion they knew the act was contrary to the law and
contrary to the ordinary standards of the community, but nevertheless
it was not contrary to their own moral standards?" "That is so, Your
Honour. You have exactly summarized it," Dr, Bennett replied.
Called by the prosecution, Dr. Kenneth Stallworthy,
who had seen the girls, was asked: "Do you consider them sane or
insane?" He replied, "I consider them sane medically because I did not
consider either certifiable, and I consider them sane in a legal
sense. They knew the nature and quality of their act. I am of the
opinion that they both knew at the time that their action was wrong in
law, and that they were breaking the law. In the diaries there was
evidence of motive, planning and premeditation." In his interview with
Parker she said, "We knew we were doing wrong. We knew we would be
punished if we were caught and we did our best not to be caught."
Hulme told him, "I knew it was wrong to murder and I knew at the time
I was murdering somebody. You'd have to be an absolute moron not to
know murder was against the law."
"The accused," said Dr. Stallworthy, "had some
justification for conceit. Hulme displayed a shrewdness in
appreciating difficult questions and a shrewdness in answering them
more like that of an older, sophisticated person. Parker was well
above average in intelligence and is able to write. These two girls
were very very fond of each other. The most important thing in the
world to them was to be together. There have been other great loves in
the world where one person would stick at nothing to be with the
other."
Two other doctors, called by the prosecution, Dr.
Saville and Dr. Hunter, agreed that the girls were sane. All five
doctors gave detailed reasons for their opinions. Those called by
different sides came to different conclusions. As is noticeable in
other murder trials, when the issue of insanity arises, the question
of the meaning of the mental illness known as paranoia appears to be
undecided. It is, apparently, a compelling force under which people do
things they know to be wrong in the eyes of the law but to them are
not wrong.
On the sixth day of the trial counsel for both
girls and for the Crown addressed the court, the judge summed-up and
the jury arrived at their verdict. The question for the jury was
whether the girls knew what they were doing was wrong. According to
the defence, they were "problem children," who at the time they
committed the act were ill and not criminally responsible for their
actions. According to the prosecution, they were two highly
intelligent and perfectly sane but dirty-minded girls. "In my
submission," said the Crown Prosecutor, "They are not incurably
insane. They are incurably bad."
Mr. Justice Adams told the jury that the burden of
proof of insanity rested on the defence. "The gravamen of this ease,"
he said, "is the defence of insanity. If the jury found it established
their duty was to return a verdict of not guilty. Your proper choice
lies between ' guilty ' and ' not guilty ' on the grounds of
insanity." He went on:
"Grave crimes are almost invariably committed by
persons knowing that they were doing wrong but nevertheless by some
perversity of the mental process are led to commit the act. In such
cases the only question is, did the accused know that the act was
wrong?
"There is no doctor who has said or even suggested
that either of the accused did not know that what they were doing was
wrong. Is there anywhere else in the evidence any material on which
you can properly conclude that either of the accused did not know that
the act was wrong? If not, your duty is plain; the proper verdict is a
simple verdict of guilty."
The judge asked the jury to consider two important
words: "knowing" and "wrong." "As to the word ' wrong ' I tell you, as
a matter of law, that a person knows a thing can be wrong if he Or she
knows it to be contrary to the law of the land, and contrary to the
moral standards accepted by ordinary, reasonable members of the
community. It is not permissible to say, 'I knew this was a breach of
the law and a breach of the moral code, but I thought I was above or
beyond the law and that although it was illegal or immoral I might
commit it without infringing my own code of morality.' That is no
defence in law.
"The other important word is the word 'knowing.' It
has to be considered at the very moment of the commission of the
crime.
Were their minds so confused that they did not know
the act was wrong? " asked the judge.
After a retirement of two hours and fifteen
minutes, the jury returned a verdict of guilty against each of the
accused. They also found that both were under eighteen years of age.
In consequence the judge sentenced Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme to
be detained during Her Majesty's pleasure.
So ended the most sensational and the most tragic
murder of 1954. In time, no doubt, the murder of the mother of one by
two young girls will be quoted as the most dreadful crime of the
century. It was a premeditated, carefully planned crime by two girls
who lived in a world of their own. To prevent being parted, they
committed murder. To them the removal of Mrs. Parker was the obvious
way out of the difficulty. The compulsion was more powerful than was
the fear of discovery and retribution. It blinded them to their
responsibilities as human beings. To Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme
the rights of others were of no importance. Complete egotists, they
were insane only in the sense that their ideas were those of animals
rather than of human beings. Their law was the law of the jungle and
like wild animals they must be caged until they have shown themselves
capable of living together with other human beings. One day, perhaps,
they may have a second try at life.
Christchurchcitylibraries.com |