No one thought there was something wrong with
thirty-nine-year-old Deanna Laney on Mother's Day weekend in 2003.
That's why they could not have predicted what she was about to do.
A housewife in New Chapel Hill, Texas who saw
herself as a religious sister to Andrea Yates, the housewife who
drowned her five children in 2001, Laney began to see "signs." Her
fourteen-month-old son, Aaron, was playing with a spear. That was the
first signal from God that she was to do something to her children.
She resisted, not certain that she understood. But
the signs continued.
The case was broadcast on Court TV, and covered by
newspapers, television talk shows nationwide and by Internet Web
sites.
When Aaron presented Laney with a rock that day,
she later reported that she believed she was supposed to pay
attention. This was a symbol. Later that same day, he squeezed a
frog. Then she understood. She was to kill her children, either by
stoning them, strangling them or stabbing them. God had shown her
three ways.
Again she told God no, but again she felt pressured
to comply. "Each time it was getting worse and worse," she later
said, "the way it had to be done." In other words, the more she
resisted, the worse the death would be for her children. She decided
that rocks would be preferable to strangulation, so she found some in
preparation.
Laney knew she had to "step out in faith." She had
to trust God, and she believed that God would use her brutal deed to
do something great. He had done such things in the Bible. Then when
Laney woke up before
midnight on May 9, she knew
that the time was at hand. She had already hidden a rock in Aaron's
room, so she went there first.
Lifting the rock, she hit Aaron hard on the skull.
He began to cry, alerting her husband, Keith. He asked what was wrong
and Laney kept her back to him to prevent him from seeing what she was
doing. She assured Keith that everything was okay. But it wasn't
okay. Aaron was still breathing, so she put a pillow over his face
until she heard him gurgle. She silently told God that He would have
to finish the job.
Next Laney went after her other two sons. She
took Luke, 6, outside first in his underwear and smashed his skull by
hitting him repeatedly with a large rock. Then she dragged him by the
feet into the shadows so that Joshua, 8, would not see him. She left
the stone, the size of a dinner plate, lying on top of him.
Joshua was next and Laney repeated to him what she
had done with Luke, placing them together in a dark area of the yard.
Afterward, she called 911 to report, "I killed my
boys."
When the police came, they found Aaron still
alive. He was taken away and it eventually became clear that both his
vision and motor skills were severely impaired.
Outside, the police saw Laney standing still in
blood-stained clothes. She indicated where she had left the boys and
they found the bodies lying beneath large rocks. Both boys had
serious head wounds. Laney was arrested, leaving her bewildered,
horrified husband to wonder what had happened.
Parallels
Laney's case had many parallels with that of Andrea
Yates. Both women lived in
Texas and home-schooled their
children. Both were deeply religious. Both felt they had no choice
but to do what they did to their children. Both called 911. And both
had some of the same psychiatrists assessing their states of mind for
their trials. Five experts came into the case for Laney, including
Dr. Philip Resnick, who had served on Andrea Yates' defense team, and
Dr. Park Dietz, who was hired by the prosecutor.
But Laney's 2004 trial unfolded quite differently.
While the defense psychiatrists had no trouble
testifying that Laney had been delusional and psychotic at the time of
the crime and could not appreciate that what she was doing was wrong,
the surprise came with the prosecution's expert, Dr. Park Dietz. He
had been instrumental in convincing a jury that despite her terrible
history of mental illness Andrea Yates had known that what she was
doing was wrong and thus she was sane when she murdered her children.
In the Laney case, he surprised everyone by saying the opposite.
From his assessment, he decided that Laney did not
know that what she was doing was wrong. She believed she was
following God's orders. She admitted that she might have been aware
that what she had done was illegal, but she was not thinking about
that. She imagined that she and Andrea Yates, who also had started
with the youngest, would together be the two witnesses when the world
came to an end.
"She struggled over whether to obey God or to
selfishly keep her children," Dietz testified. His impression was
that she had felt she had no choice.
Another psychiatrist for the prosecution, Dr.
Edward Gripon, agreed that the presence of mental illness was
obvious. Several of the experts thought that Laney had suffered from
an undiagnosed psychosis over the past three years.
One more expert witness was Dr. William Reed, a
court-appointed psychiatrist who used the word "crazy" to refer to
Laney, and he agreed with the others.
Among the evidence they used was Laney's post-crime
demeanor. Six days after the attacks, she was calm as she described
for psychiatrists what she had done. There were no tears. She was
awaiting her children's resurrections. With a smile, she said that
because she had obeyed God, "I feel like he will reveal his power and
they will be raised up. They will become alive again." Dr. Resnick
said that since she did not believe she had carried out God's orders
perfectly—she wasn't certain about Aaron--she lapped up water from the
floor and from a toilet bowl.
After getting antipsychotic medication, she
eventually saw her acts in a different light and showed remorse. She
realized with horror that she had suffered from a hallucination that
had triggered her acts.
Laney's sister, Pam Sepmoree, testified that Laney
had been acting strangely in the days leading up to the murders. She
was losing weight, eating less, and reading her Bible more. Sepmoree
said that the boys were her sister's life.
Despite this unprecedented agreement among all the
psychiatrists, prosecutors nevertheless presented a case against Laney
that certain behaviors indicated sanity. She had said that she
believed that her husband would think her acts were wrong, so she
tried to keep Aaron's cries from alerting him. She had called 911 to
turn herself in. And she had told a jailer that she might need an
attorney. In addition, Laney had no documented history of mental
illness, only self-reported episodes: delusions about her baby's feces
and a hallucination of smelling sulpher, which she associated with the
devil.
Jurors got the case on the afternoon of April 3,
and it took them seven hours that same day to acquit Laney of all
charges by reason of insanity. She was transferred to a maximum
security hospital where medical evaluations will determine when she
can eventually be released.
CrimeLibrary.com |