Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Chad
Jason ANDERSON
The shooter's wife, identified by co-workers
as Sarah Miller, was working as a checker at the Eastgate City Market,
2830 North Ave. Police said her husband walked into the store about 6:15
p.m., brandishing a handgun.
San Jose Mercury News
When Hobert Franklin, a customer
buying a money order, attempted to stop Anderson, he pulled out a .22-caliber
Ruger handgun and shot him dead. In the parking lot Anderson shot Sarah
in the torso and the head. Another customer tried to take the gun away.
Anderson killed him too. He then sat down cross-legged on the asphalt,
near his wife's body, and shot himself.
Anderson had secretly taken the gun
from a relative's house earlier that day. Police Sgt. Bob Russell
believes stronger gun-control laws could not have stopped Anderson's
rampage. "It wouldn't have made a difference in this case," Russell said
of proposed legislation. "He didn't buy a gun."
Victims
Sarah Miller Anderson, 25, murder victim - wife
Hubert Aley Franklin Jr., 50, murder victim - bystander
David Wayne Gilcrease, 32, murder victim - bystander
Chad Jason Anderson, 27, murder-suicide
Concealed Carry Now
By Ari Armstrong - Davekopel.com
September 15, 1999
On Friday evening, September 3,
Chad Anderson drove to a Grand Junction City Market grocery store and
asked for his estranged wife Sarah, whom he had assaulted a month
earlier. After leaving briefly and returning, Anderson dragged Sarah
from the store by her hair while cursing her. Hobert Franklin, Jr.
attempted to stop Anderson inside the store. Anderson pulled a .22 Ruger
revolver from his pocket and shot Franklin in the chest, killing him.
Once in the parking lot, Anderson shot Sarah twice, once in the body and
once in the head, killing her.
Meanwhile, David Gilcrease had
herd about the emergency while inside the store and had exited to the
parking lot to confront Anderson. Anderson shot and killed Gilcrease and
then killed himself. Five shots, three innocent deaths and a suicide. A
horrible tragedy. Would a "shall-issue" concealed carry law in Colorado
have stopped it?
While it's impossible to predict
what the effects of a law might have been in a particular case, what's
clear is that the rate of murder, rape, aggravated assault, and robbery
declines in states that permit citizens to carry concealed handguns.
Colorado is one of a minority of states that either prohibits concealed
carry by law-abiding citizens or limits the practice. In Colorado,
county sheriffs may issue concealed carry permits at their discretion.
Professor John Lott, Jr. of Yale
Law School conducted a comprehensive statistical study of crime and
compiled the results in his book, More Guns, Less Crime. Lott
writes that if counties now without "shall-issue" concealed carry
requirements "had been subject to state concealed-handgun laws and had
thus been forced to issue handgun permits, murders in the United States
would have declined by about 1,400... the number of rapes in states
without nondiscretionary laws would have declined by 4,200, aggravated
assaults by 60,000, and robberies by 12,000."
Notably Lott found that mass
public shootings drastically decline because of concealed carry laws. "For
those states from which data are available before and after the passage
of such [nondiscretionary concealed handgun] laws, the mean per-capita
death rate from mass shootings in those states plummets by 69 percent."
So, while it's impossible to
predict whether a nondiscretionary concealed handgun law in Colorado
would have prevented Anderson from murdering three innocent people on
September 3, it's clear that such a law would have saved lives over-all
by preventing many of those types of murders state-wide.
Of course, the anti-gun lobby
uses every tragedy involving guns to push their political agenda to
eventually ban guns altogether. "If Anderson hadn't been able to steal
that .22, he couldn't have used it to murder three innocent people." But
this line of argument ignores some important facts. Even if guns had
been banned altogether, Anderson still could have purchased one on the
black market or resorted to some other weapon like a knife or a crow-bar.
And if guns had been banned,
thousands of lives would have been lost because victims would have been
defenseless in their homes against violent rapists and thugs.
The deterrent effect of
concealed carry laws does not even depend on citizens using their guns
for defense. Instead, many would-be criminals avoid getting into
situations where they might be confronted by citizens bearing arms. Thus,
potential crimes are avoided altogether. It's possible that if Chad
Anderson had known he would have faced several concealed handgun
carriers at City Market, he would never have gone there in the first
place. If that had been the case, those who took the responsibility to
carry handguns and train to use them safely and effectively would have
prevented the terrible tragedy, and they would never even have known it.
That's why the sentiments of
some are biased against guns. Murders make for dramatic television. But
the crimes prevented by handgun ownership can only be studied through
academic statistical research. The lives saved by gun ownership, however,
are no less important simply because they go largely unnoticed by the
media.