Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Dante
Wyndham ARTHURS
Next day
On the 17th of November 2007, Arthurs pleaded
guilty to the charges of murder and unlawful detention and
convicted in the Supreme Court of Western Australia, sentenced to
life imprisonment with a non parole period of 13 years. He is
currently in detention at the maximum security Casuarina Prison in
Western Australia and will not be eligible for release until 2019.
Many areas of the Western Australian and
Australian community debated the re-introduction of the death
penalty due to the great emotion evoked by Sofia's murder. The
last person hanged in Western Australia was Eric Edgar Cooke in
1964 and the death penalty was repealed in that state in 1984.
History
At 4:00pm on the 26th of June 2006, Sofia
Rodriguez Urrutia-Shu was at the Livingston Shopping Centre in
Canning Vale, Western Australia with her uncle, sister and
brother. Whilst her family waited in the main area of the shopping
centre, Sofia went down a central corridor to go to the toilet.
Unknown to Sofia, or her family, Arthurs, an employee at the
shopping centre, observed Sofia walking down the corridor and
followed her. After Sofia exited the female toilets, Arthurs
grabbed her from behind and dragged her into the near by disabled
toilet cubicle and locked the door.
Sofia's family, having waited only a few
moments, became concerned and Sofia's 14 year old brother was sent
to look for her. He called for her at the door of the female
toilet but not getting a response walked back along the corridor.
He heard movement coming from the disabled cubicle and knocked on
the locked door calling Sofia's name. There was no response.
Sofia's brother, uncle and younger sister then began a search of
the centre.
A few minutes later, her brother again returned
to the disabled toilet cubicle and opened the now unlocked door.
It was at this time, only 10 minutes after Sofia left her family
that her brother found Sofia's naked and lifeless body lying on
the cubicle floor. Sofia was dead. An search of the shopping
centre failed to locate an offender, to which the entire centre
was closed and declared a crime scene.
It was alleged by prosecutors that the assault
on Sofia only lasted a few minutes, but the ferocity of the attack
on the 8 year old was described as "the worst of its type". At a
young age, Arthurs was diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome and as
such, he offered little explanation for his actions in the toilet
cubicle and failed to understand and accept responsibility for
what had occurred.
Arguments were made against the severity of his
Asperger Syndrome by prosecutors, due to the evidence gathered by
pathologists as to the cause of death and severity of Sofia's
injuries, compared to the explanation given by Arthurs as to how
those injuries and her death had occurred.
In his attempts to restrain Sofia after she had
been dragged into the toilet cubicle, her limbs were contorted so
severely that both her legs were broken and her left arm was
dislocated as Arthurs removed her clothing. Sofia was a small,
petite girl for her age and was no match for the 180 cm and 90 kg
Arthurs. Sofia's throat was also severely compressed and her
larynx was crushed as Arthurs attempted to muffle her cries. The
cause of death was given to be a direct result of strangulation.
In his interview with police, Arthurs admitted
to digitally penetrating Sofia, however it could not be determined
whether this had occurred prior to or after Sofia's death. During
the attack, which was estimated to have lasted between only 3 to
5 minutes, Sofia's brother knocked on the door of the cubicle
having heard movement coming from inside whilst searching for his
sister. Though Arthurs made admissions to hearing the knock on the
door and a name being called, he (nor Police) could identify
whether Sofia was still alive at that time. Sofia was left naked
and dead or dying on the floor as Arthurs made his escape.
Initial investigations at the shopping centre
identified a few possible suspects. One in particular was 21 year
old Dante Wyndham Arthurs, who was employed as a fruit and
vegetable packer at the shopping centre. Arthurs was known to
local detectives as a result of a sexual assault on a 8 year old
girl in the same area 3 years earlier.
Police remained at the crime scene well into
the early morning and at 5:00am the day after Sofia's body was
discovered, they attended the home of Arthurs who lived with his
parents only a few hundred metres from the shopping centre. After
a search of his home, Arthurs was arrested and later charged with
Wilful Murder, 2 counts of Sexual Penetration of a Child and
Deprevation of Liberty.
Legal Controversy
Once the news of Sofia's murder spread and
information about her alleged killer was revealed, media
organisations locally, nationally and internationally took great
interest. The crime was described in many news reports as the most
horrific murder in Western Australia since the David and Catherine
Birnie murders in the 1980s. Western Australia Police were
required to quash strong rumours that Arthurs was one of the child
murderers convicted for the Murder of James Bulger in the United
Kingdom in 1993.
It was alleged that Arthurs was in fact Robert
Thompson, who at the age of 10 years old was convicted of Bulger's
murder, given a new identity and then transported to Australia.
Information was revealed publicly by Western Australia and
Australian Federal Police that Arthurs was not Thompson and the
rumour gathered no more momentum. On 29 June 2006, the British
High Commission in Canberra issued a media release stating "There
is no connection between the man arrested in Western Australia and
the individuals involved in the James Bulger case."
Further controversy arose when information was
revealed in the local media that Arthurs had been investigated for
a sexual assault 3 years earlier in 2003, against another 8 year
old girl. It was outlined in media reports and later confirmed by
Western Australia Police Commissioner Karl O'Callaghan and the
Department of Public Prosecutions, that Arthurs was in fact
arrested for the assault, however charges were dropped due to
insufficient evidence and incorrect police interviewing
techniques. At the time of Sofia's murder in 2006, the 2003
assault was re-opened to identify any possible links.
It was then identified that the shorts worn by
Arthurs in the 2003 assault had traces of the victim's blood on
them that wasn't noticed during the 2003 investigation. Western
Australia Police received public condemnation for failing to have
the shorts forensically examined, which could have secured the
conviction of Arthurs for the 2003 assault and therefore could
have avoided Sofia's murder. It was also confirmed that after the
2003 assault, the Department of Public Prosecutions refused to
consider charges against Arthurs because they considered that the
police had been too robust in interviewing him and that a
conviction was unlikely to be obtained. Though Sofia's family were
frustrated by this discovery, they publicly supported the police
and understood that a successful conviction against Arthurs (if in
fact it did occur) in 2003, would not have guaranteed their
daughter would still be alive today.
Legal Proceedings
Sofia's family were devastated by their
daughters' horrific murder and could not face the prospect of the
court process. They were unable to attend any of the proceedings
and so were represented by 2 members of their Mater Christi
Catholic Primary School Parish, a small school that Sofia attended
in the Western Australian suburb of Yangebup. Head Priest at the
Parish, Father Bryan Rosling took up the families struggle to deal
with the massive media attention the murder had raised and Paul
Litherland, a Western Australian Police officer and a parent of
one of Sofia's schoolmates represented the family and set up fund
raising events.
On the 7th of March 2007, after extensive
psychological testing and discussions between prosecutors and
Arthurs defence counsel, Arthurs was required to enter a plea to
the charges of Wilful Murder, 2 counts of Sexual Penetration of a
Child and Unlawful Detention. He pleaded not guilty to all 4
charges and was remanded in custody. On 31 August 2007, Justice
Peter Blaxell ruled that the bulk of the admissions made by
Arthurs in a video recorded interview with police on the morning
after the offence, would be inadmissible at his trial on ground of
"persistent importunity, or sustained or undue insistence or
pressure".
On 31 July 2007, Chief Justice Wayne Martin
ruled that Arthurs receive a bench trial. Martin said that the
"extensive, continuous and in some respects extraordinary"
pre-trial media coverage, the circumstances of the offence and the
fact that a judge would provide reasons for his or her decision
supported a trial by judge alone. Hence it was agreed that Arthurs
would be heard by a Judge alone and not a jury. In the mean time,
discussions continued with the Department of Public Prosecutions
and Arthurs lawyers regarding his plea status. In August 2007,
Arthurs and prosecutors entered into an agreement that would see
Arthurs plead guilty to the lesser charge of Murder, instead of
the current charge of Wilful Murder.
On 17 September 2007, Arthurs pleaded guilty in
the Supreme Court to charges of Murder and Unlawful Detention. The
two counts of Sexual Penetration of a Child under the age of 10
were withdrawn because forensic analysis could not conclude if
Sofia had been sexually assaulted before or after she died.
On 7 November 2007, Arthurs was sentenced to
life in prison with a non-parole period of 13 years. He was also
sentenced to two years for depriving Sofia of her liberty.
Describing Arthurs' crimes as 'so evil they shock the public
conscience,' Justice John McKechnie also advised Arthurs of the
possibility that he may never be released as the release of
offenders sentenced to life imprisonment must be signed off by the
Western Australian Attorney-General.
New Western Australian Attorney-General
Christian Porter has since revoked Arthurs' non-parole period,
making him one of three Western Australians to have their papers
marked "never to be released".
Other allegations
After Arthurs pleaded guilty it was publicly
confirmed that he was under investigation by British police for
sexually assaulting another girl in 2001. Arthurs was never
charged with this incident because he left Britain for Australia
before an identity parade could take place.
Sofia's Legacy
Sofia's Memorial - The Chapel of the
Innocents
Sofia's small school community was devastated
by her murder and set about to raise funds for a memorial to her
at the school, which was the Mater Christi Catholic Primary School
in Yangebup, Western Australia. Over a quarter of a million
dollars was raised locally at the school for a memorial to Sofia
and all Western Australian Children who have had their lives
stolen by criminals. The Chapel of the Innocents was constructed
in 2008 and remains the resting place of Sofia's ashes.
Changes to Legislation
After Sofia was murdered, Police were
restricted in their ability to charge Arthurs with Wilful Murder,
because it could not be proved it was his intention to murder
Sofia. Wilful Murder, which carried a term of life imprisonment
with a non porole period of 15 years (minimum) to 19 years
(maximum) at the time, was the highest charge that could be
preferred for the taking of a life. Instead, Arthurs had to be
charged and convicted with the lesser offence of Murder, which
excluded the element of intent. This still carried a penalty of
life imprisonment, however the non parole periods were 7 years
(minimum) to 14 years (maximum). Realistically, for one of the
most horrific crimes in Western Australia for decades, Arthurs
could possibly spend only 7 years in jail. This caused a massive
public outcry and a demand was made to force a change to the laws
for murder in Western Australia.
Through the then Attorney General Jim McGinty,
Sofia's family and their many supporters petitioned the Government
to have the laws changed to reflect more clearly the seriousness
of the crimes committed. As a result, the charges of Wilful Murder
and Murder were repealed and a single charge of Murder was created
to include more severe penalty options. Though distinction between
an intent to murder and non intent were still included, the
sentencing considerations were dramatically altered.
The new legislation calls for an ability to
impose a "Never to be Released" clause as well as a change in the
minimum sentence that can be imposed before release on parole can
be considered. For Murder with intent the minimum sentence is 20
years and for Murder without a proved intent (Manslaughter) it is
15 years. Though Arthurs could not be retrospectively convicted
under the new legislation, the legacy of Sofia's murder would
ensure no-one again in Western Australia would receive such a
potentially lenient sentence as a result of such a horrific crime.
Sex Offender Register
In addition to the changes to murder
legislation, Sofia's family have worked tirelessly over the years
since her murder to have the Western Australian Government
introduce a Public Sex Offender Register. This would see the names
and suburbs (not address) of convicted sex offenders being made
available to the public. Though public support was very strong for
such a register, the government stalled on the legislation due to
the concerns such legislation could cause to the safety of known
sex offenders. Police in particular showed concerns for the fear
of vigilante attacks against sex offenders who have been released
after serving their time in jail. In November 2011 the government
of Western Australia passed legislation in the lower house for a
register. It is envisioned that serious and repeat offenders will
have their names and suburbs published on a public website.
Furthermore, parents will be able to check if people who have
regular contact with their children are on the sex offenders
register. This will be by way of providing the persons details to
police.
Sofia's killer jailed for life over toilet
murder
By Liza Kappelle and Andrea Hayward -
News.com.au
November 8, 2007
Dante Wyndham Arthurs, 23, must serve at least
13 years before being considered for parole, but it is unlikely he
will ever be released.
He had pleaded guilty in
the WA Supreme Court to dragging Sofia Rodriguez-Urrutia-Shu into
a disabled toilet cubicle at a Canning Vale shopping centre in
Perth on June 26, 2006.
He strangled her, stripped her and digitally
penetrated her before propping her naked body against the cubicle
wall and fleeing.
Evidence led police to his Canning Vale home
the next day, where they found a bag in a wardrobe containing
latex gloves, handcuffs and rope along with a collection of
pictures of young girls and their addresses.
Justice John McKechnie told a trembling Arthurs
yesterday there were some crimes "so evil" they shocked the public
conscience and the crime against Sofia was one of them.
He sentenced Arthurs to life in prison, with a
non-parole period of 13 years.
He had to set a minimum between seven and 14 years.
He also sentenced Arthurs to two years, to be
served concurrently, for depriving Sofia of her liberty.
"I find you have a dangerous sexual motivation
towards young girls that manifests itself in violent situations
with young girls," the judge said.
Arthurs' lawyer Bob Richardson said his client
had attacked another eight-year-old girl in Perth in 2003, but
police bungling led to the dropping of charges that may have
convicted Arthurs – possibly preventing the slaying of Sofia.
"If he had have been convicted at that time,
these issues, I'm not saying they would have been, but could have
been addressed," Mr Richardson said.
The 2003 charges were dropped because police
were too aggressive in their questioning and also told the
Director of Public Prosecutions there was no forensic evidence to
support a prosecution.
But today, the court heard recent forensic
testing had now linked Arthurs to the crime for which he has since
confessed in return for indemnity from prosecution.
This prompted police today to order an internal
review into why Arthurs' shorts were not forensically tested in
2003.
Mr Richardson told the court Arthurs had no
clear recollection of what happened in the toilet where he killed
Sofia, but could see pictures in his head of himself doing
something to her.
Arthurs told his lawyer and medical experts he
recalled seeing his hands around a throat and panicked when he
noticed she had stopped breathing.
"I tried to shake a response from her, then her
arms broke," Arthurs told a psychologist, Mr Richardson told the
court.
"I heard a large snapping noise."
Arthurs told them: "He watched himself go
across to her to remove her clothing and insert one finger into
the vagina.
"He noticed there was blood".
Under WA law, sexual assault charges can only
be laid if the victim was alive at the time of the attack.
Prosecutor Sam Vandongen said medical reports
suggested Sofia's arms were broken before her death.
Fractures in her legs were caused by severe
torsion or twisting – not consistent with Arthurs' claim the
injuries were caused when he threw her against the toilet.
"Her body was sexually penetrated ... there
were significant other injuries ... which place this particular
offence in the worst of its type," Mr Vandongen said.
As Arthurs fled the toilet, attempts to catch
him and revive Sofia failed.
But forensic evidence led police to Arthurs
house the next day where the pictures of other young girls and
their names, ages and addresses were found.
Mr Vandongen said these items indicated Arthurs
had a sexual interest in young girls.
Forensic psychologist Greg Dear told the court
Arthurs had Asperger's Syndrome, a form of autism that meant he
had little insight into his own thoughts or feelings.
But this did not explain his actions on the day
Sofia died.
Justice McKechnie told Arthurs: "The
circumstances of the commission of this offence are so grave ...
and your future dangers so real I will set a substantial minimum
period".
Arthurs can be considered for parole in 13
years, backdated to his arrest on June 27, 2006.
But it is unlikely he will ever be released.
The release of prisoners from life imprisonment
must be signed off by WA's attorney-general and the current
incumbent, Jim McGinty doubts any attorney-general would consider
releasing him.
Outside the court, Father Bryan Rosling read a
statement from Sofia's parents Gabriel and Josephine, who stayed
away from court today with their remaining three children to avoid
the pain of hearing legal quibbles and details of Arthurs'
previous offences.
"We cannot bring Sofia back but we believe it
is possible to save other Sofias in the future," they said.
"Why wait for another child to be the victim of
a homicidal paedophile before making available a public register
for sex offenders?"