"I feel a tremendous sense of relief that
Samantha's fight was not in vain," Runnion said. "He is guilty,
guilty, guilty, guilty... and that feels really good because nobody
should get away with this."
As the first verdict was read, someone in the
audience said, "yes, yes." Avila bowed his head toward the defense
table but showed no emotion.
The evidence presented in a five-week trial
included DNA from Samantha collected from a small amount of a clear
liquid, which the prosecutor said was consistent with tears or
mucous, found on the inside of the door of Avila's car. Authorities
also collected a sample of DNA that matched Avila's genetic profile
from underneath Samantha's fingernails.
There were also cell phone and bank records that
placed the defendant in the area where the girl was abducted,
kicking and screaming, from outside her home in Stanton on July 15,
2002. Her body was found the following day in mountains some 50
miles away, left on the ground as if it had been posed.
Avila had been acquitted of molesting two girls
in 2001 in neighboring Riverside County, and authorities said they
believe he killed Samantha to avoid another such trial.
The slaying occurred amid a series of incidents
involving children, including the murder of 7-year-old Danielle van
Dam of San Diego and the abduction of 15-year-old Elizabeth Smart in
Utah.
Runnion also delivered an impassioned message
Thursday to criminals who victimize children.
"How many children do we have to take away before
we as Americans get organized?" Runnion said. "We outnumber you so
many times over there is no excuse, and we're not going to let you
get away with it any more. We're going to organize our neighborhoods
and we're going to talk to our children. We're not giving you an
opportunity to prey on our children anymore."
More than 4,000 people attended Samantha's
funeral. In the wake of her death, then Gov. Gray Davis ordered a
statewide expansion of child abduction alerts posted on electronic
billboards along freeways.
Additional evidence presented at Avila's trial
included a description of Samantha's abductor provided by an 8-year-old
friend, which led to a police composite sketch that strongly
resembled Avila. Police also found sneaker prints similar to those
worn by Avila and tire prints like those from his car in the area
where the girl's body was found.
Defense attorney Philip Zalewski claimed the DNA
from the fingernails was not reliable because it was not properly
collected or analyzed and he suggested that the sample found in the
car was planted by investigators -- an allegation strongly denied by
prosecutors.
Zalewski noted inconsistencies in the witness
testimony and called the rest of the evidence a "weak,
circumstantial case." Avila, he said, couldn't have committed the
crime within the timeline established by investigators.
Deputy District Attorney Brent, noting that child
pornography was found on Avila's computer, said the defendant is a
pedophile who killed Samantha because he did not want to go through
another trial like the one in which he was acquitted in 2001.
One of the girls he was acquitted of molesting
had lived with her father at the same apartment complex as Samantha
though she had moved several months before the abduction.
Despite the acquittal, Orange County Superior
Court Judge William Froeberg allowed testimony in the murder trial
from the girls in the 2001 case along with a third who claimed Avila
abused her.