Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Details of killer's prison admission revealed after
jury convicts Bridger of murder of five-year-old April Jones.
Mark Bridger probably sexually assaulted April
Jones before brutally murdering and dismembering her body, disposing
of her at various locations, police believe.
It comes as we can now reveal Bridger admitted to a
prison chaplain that he dumped April’s body in the fast flowing river
which runs behind his house.
The admission during a counselling session, which
was not relied on by prosecutors during his trial, was made while
Bridger was being held in HMP Strangeways following his arrest.
Exact details have not been released but reporters
who attended the hearing at Mold Crown Court listened to legal
arguments in which the admission was discussed.
Detective Superintendent Andy John, the officer
responsible for the case, admitted no-one will ever truly know what
Bridger did to the vulnerable cerebral palsy sufferer in his Ceinws
house and how he disposed of her body afterwards unless he tells the
truth.
But the investigator believes his officers gathered
enough evidence to “hypothesise” about what happened on the night of
October 1.
When asked what he thought Bridger had done, the
detective said there was evidence to support the fact April had been
“possibly sexually assaulted before she suffered significant harm”.
He added the forensic evidence also suggested there
may have been “a level of dismemberment in the house” which would have
then resulted in the “deposition of the body or body parts at various
locations”.
Tragically, despite the massive police search
operation which followed April’s abduction, her body has never been
found.
It is this fact, that April’s body has never been
recovered, that made the investigation into her disappearance all the
more difficult.
But following the successful prosecution of
47-year-old Bridger, DS John spoke freely about how his team cracked
the case.
He described how, after April’s mother Coral raised
the alarm, the only information his team had to work with was a
seven-year-old child’s account.
Given the urgency of the situation DS John made the
unprecedented decision to instigate the Child Rescue Alert – something
which to his knowledge had never been done before.
The challenge there was to ensure the description
provided by April’s best friend was accurate and reliable enough to
release to the public.
But soon after having instigated the CRA the
detective knew he had made the right move, with officers handling more
than 1,200 calls and creating 4,700 messages within the first 24
hours.
Within hours after April was abducted hundreds of
locals took to the streets and the surrounding area to help with the
search.
And while their actions have been praised, their
absence from their homes created an unwanted hurdle for police to
overcome.
“The challenge for us on the night in question,
because social media was up and running very quickly, is that the
majority of people in Machynlleth were out wanting to assist the
family and ourselves in searching for April,” DS John said.
“So in many respects it’s the people that we needed
to speak to to see if they had seen something were not there and
available.”
As a result, it was not until around 9am the
following day, that detectives had learnt of Bridger’s presence on the
Bryn-y-Gog estate at the time the abduction had taken place.
DS John also said he felt it was important to point
out that Bridger was well known in the area and “did not look out of
place”.
“That is why we did not get that information from
the public in terms of someone standing out as a potential suspect,”
he added.
With the clock ticking and the knowledge that most
child kidnap victims are killed within hours of their abduction
weighing heavily on his mind, DS John quickly set about establishing
who the suspect they were dealing with was.
“We knew from the outset we had very little time to
play with in terms of trying to find April alive and well and so
finding out who he was, what his background was, where he lived, what
vehicles he had access to was obviously a priority and we did it as
quickly as we could.”
Eventually, six hours after he was identified as a
suspect, Bridger was arrested on foot walking between Machynlleth and
his village of Ceinws.
But despite having him in custody, officers were
still no closer to finding April as even though Bridger admitted to
killing the youngster, he claimed he could not remember what he had
done with her body.
As a result officers acted with haste without fear
of contaminating anything which may potentially be used as evidence
against Bridger.
“The overriding objective from an investigative
prospective was always to find April and it’s important to point out
that as this was a crime in action it’s very different to most crimes
that we deal with,” DS John said.
“The priority was to find April, the secondary
objective was to preserve and secure evidence and it’s important to
point that out because when we were going into the address we were
obviously going in trying to find Bridger and at the same time we were
looking for April and on that basis the officers were not forensically
aware, they were very much going in, kicking doors in, in order to try
and find a child.”
Back at Aberystwyth police station – where Bridger
was being held – detectives conducted an “urgent interview” with
Bridger in which claimed he accidentally knocked April down with his
Land Rover.
It was at that point that DS John took the decision
to inform the family of all the evidence as it developed during the
course of the investigation.
“It is a balance because you have to maintain the
integrity of the investigation but equally the last thing I ever
wanted was for the family to find out from a third person some
significant information about their daughter,” the detective said.
“As soon as we had that initial version of events I
took the decision to explain to the family that night that everything
was pointing to the fact that April was dead and that they needed to
know that at that point so I could try and manage and support them
going forward.
“They were understandably extremely traumatised,
deeply upset and shocked because obviously their hope is that we would
have found April alive and well and that the matters could have been
resolved fairly quickly.
“Obviously that wasn’t the case and as a result
they needed a significant amount of support from that moment on.”
Two police family liaison officers were
subsequently assigned to support them and to help them come to terms
with any developments.
Extremely doubtful of Bridger’s account and without
April’s body, DS John and his team had to find other ways of building
their case against him.
And so it was that the focus of the investigation
shifted to the forensic examinations.
“The biggest examination from a forensic
perspective was obviously at the house,” DS John said.
“We had to work through the house in a methodical
way which took a significant amount of time but in the end we
recovered some significant evidence.”
Jurors heard throughout the trial how April’s blood
was found splattered throughout the picturesque cottage with a large
concentration on the living room floor. The were also repeatedly told
of the library of indecent images of children Bridger had saved on his
computer.
It was these forensic findings, DS John said, which
led to Bridger’s re-arrest.
“When we recovered blood that we were able to match
with April’s DNA, it was at that point that the investigation moved
from one of abduction to one of a murder investigation and it was from
that and some of the other developments [such as the material on his
computer] that we took the decision to arrest Bridger for murder.”
It was sometime later that fragments of bone
believed to be from a child’s skull were found in the ashes of
Bridger’s fireplace.
And while no blood was found on any of the arsenal
of blades Bridger kept at his rented three-bedroom home, it is because
of these findings that DS John believes April may have been cut up
before being dumped in the surrounding countryside.
He added it is because April’s body has been
dismembered that her body has never been found.
“I think the body has been dismembered and various
parts of the remains have been placed in different areas,” he said.
“That’s possibly why, because they are so small and
damaged, that we’ve had so much difficulty in actually locating them.”
When asked where he thinks Bridger would have
disposed of April’s body, DS John added: “Clearly he’s got windows of
opportunity between the time of the abduction and the time of his
arrest so we haven’t been able to rule out 100% that he’s travelled a
significant distance to dispose of parts of the body.
“We can’t rule out parts would’ve gone into the
river, we can’t rule out certain parts haven’t been burnt based on the
remains in the fire albeit it’s important to note that scientist have
said that had significant parts of April’s remains been burnt on the
fire there would have been an expectation to have found more
evidence.”
Attempting to explain the bone fragment findings,
DS John suggested they may have found their way into the fire during
the clean-up.
“What we’ve recovered from the fire, the fragments
seem to point towards parts of the clean up operation which has taken
place with Bridger and any remains recovered from the floor might have
been put on the fire with various other things.”
April Jones murder: How Mark Bridger modelled
himself on world's most notorious killers
May 30, 2013
Detectives behind conviction of April Jones' killer
detail his fascination with figures including Ian Huntley and Ted
Bundy.
Mark Bridger is an “evil and manipulative”
paedophile who may have modelled himself on other murderers such as
Soham child killer Ian Huntley and American serial killer Ted Bundy,
the detective who led the investigation into April Jones’ murder has
said.
Detective Superintendent Andy John told how the
evidence found on the 47-year-old’s computer leads him to conclude
Bridger may have “borrowed the style” of other notorious murders when
abducting and murdering the five-year-old.
And such were the similarities between April’s case
and that of Soham victims Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, that the
senior investigating officer met with the officers who put Ian Huntley
behind bars.
“You can never be certain on these things but on
the basis of what we know about our case and other cases such as that
of Ian Huntley, there are elements which you could argue are similar,”
DS John said.
“We know he has had an interest in other murders
not only in the UK but further afield and it’s possible he may have
borrowed their style.”
The senior detective told how, because of the
apparent comparisons between Bridger’s crimes and those committed by
Huntley in 2002, he met with retired Detective Chief Superintendent
Chris Stevenson.
“It was some weeks after we charged Mark Bridger
but it was clearly to look at an investigative perspective how they
managed their investigation and secondly to look at any similarities
in the circumstances presented,” DS John said.
“I met him face to face, it was very much for me to
share with him what we were dealing with, what the key issues were for
us, what the challenges were, and to hear from him how they approached
their investigation, how they approached the challenges and what they
learnt from it in order for us to try and follow a model and stop us
from doing things that perhaps hadn’t worked out so well for them.”
The detective also said now that Bridger has
“committed the most horrific crimes” he should be regarded as
“extremely dangerous”.
“Based on what we have established from the
investigation – particularly around the computer material – that for
me presents real evidence that we have got an individual who is a
paedophile and now that he has committed the most horrific crimes he
clearly he is extremely, extremely dangerous.”
During the course of Bridger’s trial it emerged he
kept photographs of Soham victims Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman in a
file on his computer.
Also stored were pictures of Caroline Dickinson, a
British 13-year-old who was murdered in France in July 1996; Jessica
Lunsford, a nine-year-old murdered in Florida, the United States, in
2005; and Esra Akyuz, a six-year-old Turkish girl who was murdered in
2001.
While jurors heard how Bridger performed searches
on American serial killer Ted Bundy – who kidnapped, raped and
murdered dozens of women during the 1970s – and the murder of Jamie
Bulger.
It is only now that the trial has concluded that we
can also report how jurors were so revolted at the thought of Bridger
getting gratification at seeing these images in court, that they asked
the judge to stop him viewing them.
And so it was that the judge banned the paedophile
from looking at the computer evidence, ordering the court's computer
screens to be turned off or moved out of his line of vision.
What can also be reported for the first time, and
what the jury were not told during the course of the trial, is that
inside Bridger's VCR machine at the time of his arrest was a recording
of a violent rape scene from a film.
Not only was the video positioned in the middle of
the scene from cult-film The Last House on the Left, but Bridger had
recorded the clip twice over.
While admitting to the fact he could never be
certain as to Bridger’s motives, DS John said he believed Bridger’s
may have used his research to plan his attack.
“It’s very difficult to work out what this man is
thinking,” DS John said.
“He may be of the mindset that he’s used some of
the material that’s come out of those investigations.”
With this in mind, the detective said he believed
Bridger was trying to build himself a reputation and that he even
enjoyed being known for his actions.
“You can’t help thinking that the fact that during
the trial he’s been prepared to take to the witness stand and spend
some time in the witness box trying to justify exactly what’s gone on
in this case, that he sees himself as notorious,” he added.
Throughout his trial Bridger repeatedly broke down
in tears and while giving evidence his voice regularly faltered.
But this was all part of the plan to convince the
jury of his innocence – a cold and calculated plan which according to
DS John came easy to Bridger.
“It was evident from the investigation and
throughout the course of the trial that this is an individual who
fantasies and who has lied to people for many years and that came
through.
“What was evident is that Bridger is somebody who
can go through various emotions very quickly and move from what
appears to be a very emotional individual into somebody who is in
control.
“I would question somebody who does that that
frequently because the fact is, it is likely to be all an act.”
The performance of this act was one example of
Bridger’s need to have control over everything in his life.
And it is when he lost this control that DS John
feels Bridger was prompted to carry out the horrific acts he did on
October 1.
When asked how a middle-aged man with no previous
sexual offences against his name can be moved to kidnap and murder a
vulnerable child, the detective said he thought it was due Bridger’s
feelings of helplessness.
Jurors were told during the trial how Bridger had
recently broken up with his girlfriend and how he had money worries.
And it is these factors, combined with his
“unhealthy interest” in child pornography and historic murder cases
that led him to act, DS John said.
“I think that Mark Bridger at that point in his
life was losing control.
“He’s somebody who likes to operate with a lot of
control and clearly he was losing it all at that point, he’s clearly
got the unhealthy interest in children and I think with other issues
he had at the time he was at a point when he was going to commit the
serious offences that he did and it is just unfortunate that April
Jones happened to be in that location at that time on that evening.”
Mark Bridger: The true picture of the
violence-obsessed fantasist who murdered April Jones
May 30, 2013
Father-of-six spun a 'web of lies' about a glorious
military career to hide a secret life characterised by an obsession
with rape and murder.
Child murderer Mark Bridger is an alcoholic
fantasist who had an obsession with child pornography, rape and
murder.
The 47-year-old, who was today found guilty of the
sexually motivated abduction and murder of schoolgirl April Jones, was
to many people in Machynlleth a charming, charasmatic and courteous
man.
But behind closed doors the father-of-six was a
paedophile who built up his own personal library of indecent images of
youngsters which he would pore over for hours at a time.
Using the internet he researched historic child
murder cases such as that of Holly Wells, Jessica Chapman and Caroline
Dickinson - the victims of notorious Soham murderer Ian Huntley and
the British schoolgirl murdered in France - while he also downloaded
cartoon animations of violent child rapes in addition to pictures of
dead children.
Throughout his trial the prosecution accused him of
playing a "cruel game" by lying about the fact he could not remember
what he had done with April.
Yet lying was nothing unusual for Bridger - a man
whose private life was a far cry from the act he had spent decades
carefully honing and presenting to the people of Machynlleth.
A well known face in the town, he was seen as a
harmless odd-jobs man who once served in the armed forces who could
often be found having a drink in one of the local pubs.
He was a man who provoked sympathy for the apparent
suicide of his mother who he said took her own life after his father
died of a heart attack.
But the truth is, not only are his parents alive,
but he had never served in the SAS or any other arm of the forces and
it was ultimately through his trial that his capacity to live a "lie
and a fantasy" was exposed.
Jurors saw through his attempts to cover up what he
did to April as they also did with his attempts at justifying his
hoard of pornographic images of children.
The former slaughterman tried to explain away his
vile library by saying he wanted to learn how his daughter would
develop and that he had written to pornography companies abroad to
complain about the images he kept as evidence against them.
Despite his carefully hidden depravities and
fondness for alcohol, Bridger did not lack social skills and was known
to have had a number of a relationships with local women.
Indeed he was in a relationship right up until the
day before he brutally murdered cerebal palsy sufferer April - only
for his girlfriend Vicky Fenner to break up with him via text.
Some in the local community saw Bridger as a bit of
a womaniser but it emerged during his trial others thought his
intentions more sinister on the basis that he had "a history of
relationships with young mothers".
His base need for sexual gratification was more
than apparent following the end of his relationship with Ms Fenner.
Instead of grieving for the loss of his companion he scoured social
netwrok sites contacting several women pleading for "no strings" fun.
Perhaps the most disturbing secret Bridger kept
hidden though was his attraction to local girls.
In addition to the catalogue of indecent images
found on his computer was a store of Facebook-style folders of
youngsters from the Machynlleth area.
Among them were photos of April's 13-year-old and
16-year-old half-sisters - some of which also featured the vulnerable
five-year-old.
And poignantly, two years before he murdered April,
Bridger had even tried to make friends with the older sister who he
described as very pretty with potential to become a model.
The pervert searched online for “naked
five-year-old girls” and carefully allocated folders on his laptop
under the headings of “Plus 10”, “Minus 10” and “Clothes”.
Such was his interest in prepubescent girls that
just hours before he snatched and killed April he approached a
10-year-old and asked if she wanted to come for a sleepover with his
daughter at his house.
Perhaps surprisingly, those in the community who
had regular contact with Bridger said there was nothing particularly
remarkable about him.
He was well-known for his string of failed
relationships - he fathered six children with four different women -
and for his tendency for changing jobs.
During his time in Machynlleth he worked as a
lifeguard at the local leisure centre, at an abattoir, as a welder, a
kitchen hand, a bouncer and was most recently working as a labourer
helping with the renovation of a hotel in Ceinws.
Yet his former employers and workmates described
him as an affable hard worker whose worse trait was his habit of being
“a little light-fingered”.
Those who got close to Bridger on the other hand,
painted a more sinister picture of him.
The father of one of his former partners, who does
not want to be named, said he had a hidden “dark side”.
“I’ve known Mark Bridger for over 20 years and I do
not have a kind word to say about him,” he said.
“He was terrible to my daughter and her kids – they
lived in fear of him.
“He had a dark side but he hid it well, although I
saw through it.
“I always knew there was something sinister about
him but no one was ever prepared to listen to me, they knew it too,
they could sense it I think, but preferred to look at him as ‘good old
Mark’, one of the lads.
“Well he wasn’t, and I have always known he wasn’t,
he is a an angry, violent man and I had been warning people round here
about him for years."
He added: “Prison is too good for the likes of him,
he was evil hiding in plain view.
“It was just a matter of time until he did
something terrible.”
Bridger, who had lived in Machynlleth for more than
20 years, was known to police as a petty criminal.
But while he had string of minor convictions and
had served a small amount of time in prison, there was nothing that
would have lead police to him in the initial hunt for April’s
abductor.
One man who did see the violent side of Bridger is
local businessman Mark Hodge.
Mr Hodge, 56, was recovering from cancer when
Bridger attacked him on his own doorstep in the middle of the night.
Bridger turned up at his house at 1am and began
shouting – angry about a dispute over a mechanical digger and at the
entrepreneur’s parents attempts to get him to pay his rent for the
house which they had leased out to him.
“It wasn’t very nice at all,” he said.
“I’d just got over cancer and I was still ill with
rheumatoid arthritis so he knew I couldn’t handle myself.
“He smashed me in the mouth. I’d gone to bed at
midnight and my wife was still up watching a film when it happened.”
Bridger was prosecuted for the assault and received
a four-month suspended sentence at Welshpool Magistrates Court.
One of his former neighbours also told how he kept
an arsenal of weapons above his fireplace in a property he rented in
the nearby village of Llanbrynmair.
Paul Edwards, 22, said Bridger was also known for
his heavy drinking during the day and could often be seen drinking
cans of cider in his garden.
“I went in his house once and he had guns in a
cabinet.
“There was a Samurai sword on the fireplace.”
Mr Edwards added: “Mark was definitely alcohol
dependent. He used to drink Strongbow a lot during the day and I
understand he was very depressed.
“He came across as a nice person but not everyone
knows the other side of him. There was always something mysterious
about Mark.
“He was strange.”
According to another Llanbrynmair neighbour,
Bridger was later evicted from the house after the owner of the
property took exception to the chickens he kept.
But while Bridger showed parts of his “dark side”,
even those who knew him well did expect him to be capable of abducting
and murdering a child.
His former friend Gwyn Pugh, who worked as a
bouncer with Bridger, said: “I’ve known Mark for years and I struggle
to believe he could hurt a child.
“I used to work on the doors with him in and around
Mach and he was very useful to have round too.
“He had a bit of a temper on him yeah and I know he
got into a bit of bother with the law over the years but the idea he
could kill a little girl is too much to imagine.”
He added: “It is not the Mark I have known for so
many years and it is not the Mark that people in Mach have known
either.
“He had a temper yeah, but so do many people, he
was always a nice, quiet guy and everyone who knew him, liked him.
“The idea he could do something like this is a
unimaginable.”
When he couldn't control his women any more,
Mark Bridger set his sights on little girls
Mark Bridger had a history of womanising and
domestic abuse
He targeted young single women and moved into their
homes
Bridger was known as 'Billy Bulls******' for the
amount of lies he told
Claimed he used to be in the Army and was a
survival expert
Fathered six children by four women and then
abandoned them
By Paul Harris for the Daily Mail
May 30, 2013
They had scoured every inch of the town, an entire
community banding together to find April Jones.
But one man among the hundreds out searching that
day knew precisely where she was.
Her blood had not even dried on the floor of his
home when he changed into camouflage clothes and walked calmly towards
the market town of Machynlleth.
He could, of course, have shut himself away in the
rented, woodside cottage where he took April the previous evening. But
so many people had turned out to look for her that his absence would
have aroused suspicion – especially because Bridger had long-standing
links with her family.
Friends and acquaintances had already joined the
search, as would his estranged son and at least one of his many former
girlfriends. What could appear more natural than to be seen with the
search parties?
Like just about every other aspect of his life, it
was a sham. For Mark Leonard Bridger, we now know, was a dangerous and
manipulative paedophile who fantasised about local schoolgirls,
downloaded child porn and created a photo gallery of youngsters on his
computer.
April was there, in a Facebook photo that showed
her smiling beside one of her teenage half-sisters. On the evening of
October 1, their paths would fatally cross.
The story Bridger concocted about running April
over and losing all recollection of what he did with her body was as
ludicrous as it was incredible. When interviewed by police, he even
wove in some colourful fiction about his background.
By his various accounts he was a Royal Marine who
served in Afghanistan, an IRA target in Northern Ireland, an SAS-trained
veteran, survival expert and hunter, a mercenary in Angola, a doctor
of marine biology. He was none of these.
He never had any military service and the stories
he spun about being shot in the back, or being invalided out of the
Army after smashing two vertebrae in a parachute jump, were simply
more lies.
The doctorate? He bought the worthless
qualification online, he once admitted, to enhance his credit rating.
‘Dr Mark Bridger’ was the name on the credit card he proudly showed
off.
The real Mark Bridger was a womaniser who beat his
girlfriends, fathered and abandoned a succession of children and
groomed his way into April’s family to win her trust. The sole,
constant thread that ran through his life was deceit. Not everyone was
taken in.
‘We used to call him Billy Bulls***,’ said Geraint
Vince, who was Bridger’s boss six years ago at a welding company
before sacking him for fiddling his hours. ‘He was a compulsive liar
who tried to get people to like him by creating elaborate stories
about his past. He used to lie so much, I think he actually believed
it himself.’
A key element of Bridger’s role in the April Jones
tragedy is the kaleidoscope of relationships that revolved around him
wherever he settled.
Several girlfriends or partners had links to the
estate where April’s family lived, one in a home just 50 yards away,
another with family connections there.
The Jones and Bridger children played or went to
school together; some of the parents’ former or subsequent partners
knew each other. His connection to the Jones family goes back decades.
Bridger was born in 1965 in Surrey, the son of City
of London police officer Graham Bridger and his wife Pamela.
His CSE school grades would have been enough to
allow him to join the police but he didn’t follow his father’s
footsteps. Instead he dropped out of an engineering course before
training as a fireman in London.
He left the service before qualifying, claiming he
had made the wrong career choice. In fact he was about to get two
years’ probation at the Old Bailey for possessing a firearm, theft,
and obtaining property by deception. He was also in trouble with his
relationships.
Deborah Verona, from Lambeth, south London, was 19
when in 1986 she gave birth to Steven, the first of Bridger’s six
known children by four different partners.
Bridger, then 20, abandoned her and left her to
bring up the baby. He fled to Blaenau Ffestiniog, in Snowdonia, after
falling out with his parents over access to their new grandson.
He told acquaintances there that his father died
from a heart attack and his grief-stricken mother committed suicide.
He created the persona of ‘survival expert’, sleeping in a tent.
Someone who got to know him recalled: ‘He didn’t
really know what he was doing. He tried hunting rabbits but he wasn’t
any good at it. It was all part of the fantasy life he was living.’
It wasn’t long before he found someone to impress.
He got Keeley Reynolds pregnant at 17 and quickly became violent,
causing her almost to lose the baby by punching her in the stomach.
Bridger vanished when he heard Keeley’s father was
coming to get him. He hitch-hiked in 1989 to Machynlleth, boasting
that he had been ‘run out of town’ after getting a girl pregnant. He
was certainly proud of his ability to charm the opposite sex.
His conquests were usually years younger than him,
some in their mid-teens. He became particularly attracted to the
vulnerability of single young mothers whose partners had walked out on
them.
‘They were his meal ticket,’ a former friend said.
‘He’d upset so many landlords by being a bad tenant, he’d been
blacklisted. So these women were ideal for him. They had their own
home and he’d worm his way in within weeks.
‘The pattern was almost always the same though. He
was possessive and controlling and before long he was knocking them
about.’
In 1990 he married Julie Williams, three months
after they met. She was 19 and he was 24. Within a year they had a
baby, Sean, followed by their second son, Scott.
Bridger talked his way into the role of instructor
at a now-defunct outdoor adventure centre. Eventually, after what one
friend called ‘a volatile relationship’, Julie threw him out.
Terrified for the welfare of herself and her sons,
she banned him from making contact with the boys.
Despite living nearby in the little market town,
which has a population of only 2,000, he never tried to build a
relationship with them. How ironic that Scott Williams, now 20, took
part in the search to find April.
Until a few months beforehand, he didn’t even
realise Bridger was his father. ‘He’s never really been in my life,’
Scott said. ‘I only met him on a couple of occasions, like down the
pub when he’s been there at the same time as I have.’
It was in the same pub that Bridger met April’s
future mother Coral – they both played darts there. At the time she
was married to Indian restaurant worker Dobir Ali, the father of her
teenage daughter.
It was in 1996 that Bridger met April’s father Paul
Jones, who was dating Karen Griffiths, a relationship that would give
them two daughters who eventually became half-sisters to April.
Bridger was seeing Karen’s younger sister Elaine.
He was 30 at the time; she was 15, Mr Jones
recalled. The couple moved in together on the estate from which April
would disappear some 14 years later.
Elaine gave birth to a son at 18 and a daughter two
years later. Her son by a subsequent partner would become April’s
close friend. Bridger and Elaine had violent arguments during a stormy
relationship which lasted eight years before it broke down.
He fled to Australia for a couple of months before
returning to launch a legal battle for access to his children ‘so I
could still have a part in their lives’.
It led to more rows, one of which involved police
being called after Bridger injured a neighbour who intervened. When
police arrived, he was brandishing a large piece of wood, and
threatened a police officer with a machete. More convictions were
added to the list.
Although the couple eventually came to an
arrangement over the children, Bridger’s separation from Elaine left
the low-paid abattoir worker and odd-job man on the lookout for a new
woman.
He quickly began a relationship with Corinna
Robinson, who at 27 was 13 years his junior.
He changed his name to Mark ‘Buster’ Verona, taking
the surname from Deborah, the former partner he abandoned all those
years ago.
He told friends the identity had been given to him
by the Army to protect him from the IRA after he ran over one of the
terrorist group’s members in Northern Ireland.
A friend of Corinna said: ‘She was really good for
Mark. She got him sorted out. But they had a very difficult break-up.
She wanted him to go and he didn’t want to. In the end he just moved
on and found someone else.’
That ‘someone else’ was Vicky Fenner, a mother of
two aged 24, little more than half his age. Remarkably, Vicky
described Bridger as kind-hearted and funny.
He liked to pose for photographs in fancy dress,
one of which shows him in drag and make-up. By now, Bridger was
jobless, bankrupt, spending most of his benefits on booze and taking
medication for depression. He claimed to be ‘95 per cent impotent’,
and told friends he felt his life was ‘falling apart’.
He was approaching 50 and his conquests were not
getting any easier. He was losing the ability to be in control, at
least where adults were concerned. His sexual ambitions and fantasies
lay elsewhere.
His time with Vicky gave him a perfect excuse to
put himself at the heart of what would become his stalking ground. The
house she used to share with her mother was yards from April’s.
The home of his ex-girlfriend Elaine and the two
children he fathered with her was also nearby.
Hence Bridger’s Land Rover, in which he kept baby
wipes, nylon ties, bin liners and duct tape, was regularly seen on the
estate. Sometimes he invited youngsters who knew his own children to
play in it.
In the period leading up to April’s murder, Bridger
grew closer to Paul Jones, helping to mend the children’s bikes at one
stage. Bridger often had a packet of crisps or some sweets to offer
April whenever she appeared.
He and Vicky moved to the rented Mount Pleasant
Cottage in August last year. In the six weeks they spent there, he was
secretly downloading child porn, researching child abduction, rape and
murder cases, and lusting after local schoolgirls.
When his partnership with Vicky inevitably hit the
rocks, they went through a short separation and she ditched him in a
text he received hours before he snatched April.
He spent that day sending a series of messages to
ex-girlfriends and acquaintances in the vain hope of starting a new
relationship. On his laptop, he watched a sickening porn cartoon that
showed a young girl being raped while restrained and bound with duct
tape.
He took the laptop with him when he went out that
evening. In the fading light, he saw a sweet little girl playing
innocently in the street. At that moment, Mark Bridger turned his
ultimate fantasy to reality.