Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Dr. Robert
W.
BUCHANAN
Defendant: Robert Buchanan Crime Charged: Murder Chief Defense Lawyers: Charles W. Brooks, William J. O'Sullivan Chief Prosecutors: De Lance Nicoll, James Osborne, Francis
Weliman Judge: E. C. Smyth Place: New York, New York Date of Trial: March 20—April 26, 1893 Verdict: Guilty Sentence: Death
SIGNIFICANCE: This was one of the earliest trials to be fought
almost exclusively on forensic science testimony.
In May 1892 a New York reporter, Ike White, heard
rumors surrounding the sudden death of a brothel keeper named Anna
Buchanan. According to the death certificate the madam had succumbed to
a stroke, but friends of the dead woman were convinced that she had been
poisoned by her husband, Dr. Robert Buchanan, so that he might acquire
her $50,000 fortune.
White did some digging and uncovered a journalistic
gem: just three weeks after Anna's death, Buchanan had remarried his
first wife, Helen, in Nova Scotia. Further investigation revealed
Buchanan to be a debauchee, who most nights could be found in New York's
bordellos, drinking and carousing till the early hours, a lifestyle that
made serious inroads into his bank balance, hence the rumors about
Anna's death.
Further fanning the flames of suspicion were remarks
allegedly made by Buchanan two years earlier during the trial of Carlyle
Harris, a New York medical student charged with wife-murder. At first
her death, too, had been attributed to a stroke, but pinpointing of the
pupils had led investigators to detect a morphine overdose. Harris was
convicted and sentenced to death. Buchanan had followed proceedings with
great interest, frequently referring to the accused as a "bungling fool"
and a "stupid amateur," and boasting that he knew how to avoid the
telltale pinpoint pupils.
When the trial, presided over by Recorder Smyth,
opened on March 20, 1893, it was soon clear that this case would be
fought in the test-tube. Courts were just beginning to pay close
attention to scientific testimony and in Professor Rudolph Witthaus, the
prosecution had one of the nation's foremost toxicologists. Witthaus,
who had analyzed the dead woman's organs, told the court how, using the
Pellagri test, he discovered that "the body contained 1/10th of a grain
of morphine in the remains," which he estimated was the residue of a
fatal dose of 5 or 6 grains.
Heartened by this testimony, chief prosecuting
counsel Francis Wellman asked the witness if he knew any means whereby
it was possible to disguise the pinpoint pupils so characteristic of
morphine poisoning. Witthaus referred to his original report: "Treatment
of the eyes with atropine might very well eliminate the narrowing of the
pupils which otherwise follows morphine poisoning."