Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
05/17/88 The jury found
the defendant guilty on both counts.
05/17/88 Upon advisory sentencing, the jury,
by a 10 to 2 majority, voted for the death penalty.
06/03/88 The defendant
was sentenced as followed:
Count I: First-Degree
Murder – Death
Count II: Cocaine
Trafficking – 30 years
12/24/92 The Florida Supreme Court affirmed
Burns’ convictions, but remanded for new sentencing before a
jury.
04/19/94 The new sentencing jury, by a 12 to
0 majority, voted for the death penalty.
07/06/94 The defendant was resentenced as
followed:
Count I:
First-Degree Murder – Death
Count II:
Cocaine Trafficking – 30 years
Additional Information:
On 12/17/04, the Florida Supreme
Court relinquished jurisdiction to the Circuit Court to determine if
Burns is mentally retarded. On 06/27/05, the Circuit Court determined
that
Burns filed his Direct Appeal in
the Florida Supreme Court on 06/27/89. Burns raised many issues in this
appeal to which the court gave little or no response. Burns, however,
urged that the trial court erred when it allowed character and
background evidence of the victim to be presented to the jury, and erred
in its application of the heinous, atrocious, and cruel (HAC)
aggravating factor.
While Burns argued that unfairly prejudiced both
the guilt and penalty phases of the trial, the Florida Supreme Court
ruled that the introduction of such evidence only deprived Burns of a
fair sentencing. The Florida Supreme Court noted the preponderance of
evidence of Burns’ guilt, and therefore ruled that, even without the
prejudicial testimony, the jury would have enough evidence to convict
Burns of murder.
The court also examined Burns’ HAC claim and found that
the aggravator was inappropriately applied. As such, the Florida
Supreme Court affirmed the convictions but remanded the case for new
sentencing proceedings on 05/16/91. On 12/24/92, the Florida Supreme
Court vacated its earlier decision and issued a clarified opinion on
Burns’ Direct Appeal.
The court explained in more depth their finding
of error regarding the HAC factor. In the absence of the HAC
aggravator, the jury would have only one aggravating factor to weigh
against one mitigating factor, and the court asserted that there was no
way to hypothesize a jury’s recommendation in such a circumstance. In
addition, the court noted the prejudicial victim evidence entitled Burns
to a new penalty phase before a jury. On 12/24/92, the Florida Supreme
Court again affirmed the convictions and remanded for resentencing.
After being resentenced to death
on 07/06/94, Burns filed a Direct Appeal in the Florida Supreme Court on
09/02/94. Burns contended that the court erred in denying his request
to instruct the jury regarding his right to remain silent and again
disputed the admission of victim character and background evidence.
Burns also argued that his case was one of the most mitigated and least
aggravated. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the sentence of death on
07/10/97.
On 11/24/97, Burns filed a
Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court,
which was denied on 02/23/98.
On 06/08/98, Burns filed a 3.850
Motion to Vacate Judgment and Sentence in the State Circuit Court, which
was denied on 12/18/00.
Burns filed an appeal of that
decision in the Florida Supreme Court on 01/22/01. On 12/17/04, the FSC
relinquished jurisdiction to the Circuit Court for a mental retardation
claim. On 06/27/05, the CC denied the mental retardation claim.