Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Manuel Pina
BABBIT
Rape - Robbery
Execution:
Manuel Pina Babbitt, 50,
99-05-04, California
At San Quentin, Manuel Pina Babbitt, a decorated Vietnam veteran
who murdered a Sacramento grandmother, was put to death by
lethal injection early this morning, one day after turning 50 on
death row.
Prison officials said the injection was delayed until they
received word that the U.S. Supreme Court had rejected without
comment the condemned man's eleventh-hour request for a stay of
execution.
The execution took place at 12:29 a.m., 28 minutes later than
scheduled. He was pronounced dead at 12:37 a.m. His last words,
told to Warden Jeanne Woodford at around mindnight, were "I
forgive you all."
The condemned man was strapped and handcuffed to a gurney with
his arms out; intravenous lines injected him with a cocktail of
chemicals. At one point during the somber proceeding, his body
bucked several times, his chest straining against the straps.
Laura Thompson, Schendel's granddaughter, looked away at that
point. In a statement after the execution, she said, "It is our
hope that this conclusion will bring a sense of closure to our
family. We know that nothing will bring Leah Schendel back to
us, but we feel that we have done everything in our power to see
that justice was done in her name."
Babbitt was sentenced to death for the 1980 murder and attempted
rape of 78-year-old Leah Schendel--an attack he said he did not
remember because it came during a post-traumatic stress
flashback.
Babbitt spent his final hours in seclusion, reading poetry and
meditating instead of speaking with a spiritual advisor,
according to his attorney, Charles E. Patterson.
Patterson described Babbitt as "completely peaceful."
16 family members and friends had filed into the massive prison
throughout the day to visit the condemned man for the last time.
As night fell and the execution neared, various members of the
Babbitt entourage gathered near the prison gates, including
childhood friend Patricia Tavares, who had traveled from
Massachusetts, where "we don't have the death penalty and I'm
proud of it," she said.
Gesturing from her wheelchair at the gathered family, Tavares
said that "when you see these people, you're seeing Manny.
Manny's not leaving us. . . . Manny just wants to go out in
dignity, and that's all we want--privacy and dignity."
As the time ticked away, Babbitt's legal options narrowed. Late
Monday, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied his
request to take his case to federal court, said state Public
Defender Jessie Morris. With less than 2 hours to go before the
execution, Babbitt's attorneys appealed to the U.S. Supreme
Court. Earlier in the day, the state Supreme Court had denied a
request that Babbitt's execution be stayed while a hearing is
held to decide whether the condemned man should have a new trial
based on evidence his lawyers say has recently surfaced.
In a tersely worded ruling, Chief Justice Ronald M. George
called defense arguments about racism in jury selection and
excessive drinking by Babbitt's 1st attorney "untimely" and
"repetitious." Only two of the seven justices voted for a stay
of execution; one did not participate in the ruling.
Babbitt spent his day visiting with friends and family, waiting
for word on court rulings, taking telephone calls and fasting.
Instead of eating the traditional last meal, his attorneys said,
he has asked that the money instead be donated to feed homeless
veterans.
Beverly Lopes, Babbitt's 5th-grade teacher, who traveled from
Massachusetts to support Babbitt's family, said she spent 5
hours with him and "he's doing very well.
"I told him I was honored to be his teacher," she recounted. "I
blessed him on his birthday. . . . I told him to 'hold your head
up high and face the world, so when I go back to my classroom, I
will go and hold my head up high.' "
Scores of protesters, mostly demonstrating against the death
penalty, had gathered at the gates of San Quentin as the
execution neared, including a small group of men who walk 25
miles from San Francisco each time an execution is scheduled.
Babbitt "served our country well," said 65-year-old Lyle
Grosjean of Santa Cruz, a Korean War-era veteran and one of the
so-called "walkers."
"The least we can do is not kill him," Grosjean said.
Wearing a Purple Heart he earned during the Vietnam War, Larry
Yepez brought his Marine dress uniform to the prison, hoping to
leave it behind on the barricades "for Manny," he said.
Yepez said he, too, suffers from post traumatic stress disorder
and believes that the country "turned its back" on soldiers like
himself and Babbitt. The execution, he figures, is just another
cold shoulder to Vietnam veterans.
A minority of voices in the crowd showed up to express support
for the death penalty in general and Babbitt's execution in
particular, calling capital punishment "American justice."
"Half those people in there should die," said Kristine
McClymonds, 20, of Petaluma, as she stood in front of the prison
gates. Said her companion Aaron, who refused to give a last
name, "It's not about vengeance. It's about what's right."
Earlier, Patterson described the condemned man as resigned to
his fate and wanting "to die with dignity." He said Babbitt
viewed the execution as God's way of calling him home.
While on death row, Babbitt was able to get to sleep "by
listening to his heart beat," Patterson said. "He tries to catch
that last heartbeat before falling asleep. He believes that if
he is executed, he will again listen to that last heartbeat."
Babbitt's execution made 1999 only the 2nd year since then that
California has killed 2 men. Jaturun Siripongs, 43, of Garden
Grove, was executed in February for a double murder he committed
in 1981.
California has the most crowded death row in the nation, with
536 inmates waiting to die, and the pace of executions is
increasing. Opponents of the death penalty expect at least 1 or
2 more executions in California before the millennium.
Late Friday, after Gov. Gray Davis denied Babbitt's clemency
petition, the condemned man's attorneys asked the state Supreme
Court for a stay of execution and a hearing on a new trial.
Patterson argued in the legal filing that his client did not get
a fair trial in 1982 because of the "racial animus and
alcohol-induced ineptitude" of his attorney at the time.
Recently uncovered evidence shows that Babbitt's trial attorney
routinely drank 3 or 4 double vodkas at lunch during the trial,
Patterson alleged in court documents. He described blacks in
derogatory terms and did not object when prosecutors excused the
only African Americans from the jury pool, the documents show.
Don Schendel, the dead woman's son, decried what he called the
defense's "raising the race card" at this late date, more than
18 years after Schendel was killed in her Sacramento home.
"I don't remember anyone speaking about the color of a person
throughout this whole ordeal," Schendel said. "It's all
subterfuge. It's a shame."
In the days and hours before Babbitt's execution, Lance Lindsey,
executive director of Death Penalty Focus, a nonprofit
organization opposed to capital punishment, received an unusual
number of calls from veterans and law enforcement officials
supporting Babbitt, who claimed he suffered from post-traumatic
stress disorder as a result of his Vietnam War experience.
Babbitt served at the siege of Khe Sanh, one of the bloodiest
battles of the Vietnam War.
"They're not the usual suspects that are always against the
death penalty," said Lindsey, who planned to lead a vigil
outside San Quentin Monday night in protest of the execution.
On a foggy night just before Christmas in 1980, Manuel Babbitt
was walking home along a Sacramento street after a day spent
drinking and smoking marijuana. When he paused at an
intersection, he said he saw the headlights of cars coming down
a hill. They looked to him like the lights on enemy aircraft in
Khe Sanh.
"I don't know how I made it across," he said in a clemency tape
presented to Davis. "The next thing I remember was waking up on
a lawn somewhere in Sacramento on one of those streets. That's
all I remember of that night."
Babbitt sliced through the screen door of Leah Schendel's small
apartment with a knife and beat her so brutally that he
shattered her dentures. She died of a heart attack as a result
of the assault.
Babbitt becomes the 7th condemned prisoner - and the 1st African
American - to be executed in the death chamber at San Quentin
State Prison since California resumed executions in 1992.
(sources: Los Angeles & Rick Halperin)
California executes mentally ill Vietnam
veteran
By Jerry White - World Socialist Web Site
May 5, 1999
The state of California put to death Manuel "Manny"
Babbitt, a mentally disturbed Vietnam veteran, early Tuesday
morning. On death row for 18 years, Babbitt, a 50-year-old
grandfather, was executed by lethal injection at San Quentin
prison after last ditch appeals to state and federal courts
failed to win a stay of execution.
More than 700 protesters gathered outside the
prison just north of San Francisco to voice their opposition to
the death penalty and support for Babbitt. The veteran was
convicted of the 1980 killing of Leah Schendel, a 78-year-old
Sacramento woman, during a break-in.
Babbitt's defense attorneys argued that he
had a Vietnam War flashback and was in a drug- and alcohol-induced
haze when he killed Schendel.
Governor Gray Davis, a Democrat who ran for
office as a law-and-order candidate and death penalty proponent,
rejected Babbitt's appeal for clemency last Friday. Davis said,
"Countless people have suffered the ravages of war, persecution,
starvation, natural disasters, personal calamities and the like,
but such experiences cannot justify or mitigate the savage
beating and killing of defenseless, law-abiding citizens."
Babbitt's fate personifies the treatment of
many working class youth who were first used, and in many cases
destroyed, during America's war in Indochina and then discarded.
He grew up in poverty in a small community of immigrants from
the Cape Verde Islands in Wareham, Massachusetts. He and his
seven brothers and sisters were raised by an abusive father and
mentally ill mother in a house that was heated by wood and
insulated with newspaper, without a toilet or hot water.
Babbitt suffered from learning disabilities
in school and dropped out after seventh grade at the age of 17.
Barely 18, he joined the Marines in 1967. The recruiter gave him
a general intelligence test, but Manny could barely read it, so
the recruiter filled it in for him.
Babbitt recalled one of his first
assignments: loading shells filled with thousands of darts. "A
bunch of little tiny nails hit little tiny humans and all the
humans fell. There'd be nothing but blood and guts on the
landscape and that was the kind of things I had to look at.''
Within six months he was in Khe Sanh, in the
middle of a 77-day siege of the US fire base by the North
Vietnamese Army, one of the longest and bloodiest battles in the
war. Babbitt was one of the 2,000 Marines wounded at Khe Sanh
when on the fifty-sixth day of the battle he was struck in the
head and hand by rocket fragments. He was evacuated in a
helicopter filled with dead Marines in body bags. One week later
he was flown back to Khe Sanh.
When the siege was finally lifted in July
1968, after US bombers had laid waste to the area, nearly 1,000
US Marines, 15,000 North Vietnamese soldiers and thousands of
civilians were dead.
After Khe Sanh, Babbitt fought another bloody
battle, and then went home where he married and signed up for
another tour. He was assigned to guard duty at a military base
in Quonset Point, Rhode Island, where he lived with his new
family. But the impact of Vietnam left deep mental scars.
At home he would scream to his wife to grab
the babies and run for cover from the bombs. He took LSD, a
habit he began in Vietnam, and soon went AWOL (absent without
leave). After the third incident, Babbitt was discharged from
the Marines and his family evicted from the military base. At
the time a close friend said, "He had always had troubles, and
he wasn't particularly bright, but the Manny that came back from
overseas was nuts."
Soon Manny turned to crime, including robbing
gas stations and vacant summer homes.
On October 24, 1973 he was sentenced to eight
years in state prison for armed robbery. Later he was admitted
to the infamous Bridgewater State Hospital for the Criminally
Insane, a prison hospital that gained national notoriety in
1967, when the documentary "Titicutt Follies" chronicled
shocking abuses of patients by hospital workers.
After returning to prison, Babbitt was sent
back to the hospital two months later when he attempted suicide
because his wife was leaving him. In 1975, Babbitt was diagnosed
with paranoid schizophrenia and granted parole from the
hospital. He soon returned to the streets, like thousands of the
more than 500,000 Vietnam veterans with post-traumatic stress
disorder who were left without treatment.
Soon after moving to Sacramento, California
to live with his brother Bill, Manny was involved in the assault
on Leah Schendel. On the afternoon before the attack he drank
and took drugs with another Vietnam veteran. Babbitt says he
does not remember attacking Schendel or another woman the next
night who was beaten. All he remembers is seeing car headlights
in the foggy night that he believed were incoming aircraft or
exploding mortars.
The lawyers who argued for Babbitt's
appeal--Jessica McGuire, a public defender, and Charles
Patterson, a private lawyer who was also a Marine in Khe
Sanh--said Babbitt saw the lights and "disassociated." The sight
of aircraft would always be followed by enemy fire in Vietnam
and soldiers would duck for cover. Babbitt, his lawyers say, ran
for cover into Schendel's house and then beat her when she
panicked.
The old woman was found with a mattress over
her head and a leather cord tied around her ankle. Babbitt's
attorneys say this was significant because when a Marine was
killed in combat his friends tried to protect the body from
further damage by covering the corpse with whatever was handy.
They would also try to tie something around the ankle or foot to
identify the body before it was evacuated.
The police captured Manny with the aid of
Bill Babbitt who was desperately seeking help for his troubled
brother. Bill said the police "urged me to try to solicit a
confession from him so it would expedite his 'care.' They told
me, 'You don't have to worry about your brother going to the gas
chamber. We're going to find a hospital for him, perhaps a place
like Vacaville,'" he added, referring to the state prison that
has a medical and psychiatric facility. Bill has since said he
feels like Judas for delivering his brother into the hands of
the executioners.
Babbitt's appeal lawyers argued that Manny
deserved a new trial because of racial bias and judicial
misconduct in his original trial. James Schenk, Babbitt's court-appointed
lawyer for the 1982 trial, resigned last year from the state bar
after pleading no contest to embezzling $50,000 from clients'
trust funds. During the trial he never called witnesses who had
served with Babbitt in Vietnam, never documented his family
history of mental illness, and never sought Babbitt's Vietnam
medical records. Schenk, who was reportedly drunk during much of
the trial, admitted in court papers that he "failed completely
in the death penalty phase" of the trial.
Babbitt's case received widespread support
from veterans groups, prominent writers, death penalty opponents,
mental illness associations, and even former jurors in the trial
who said they would never have sentenced him to death if they
had been aware of his mental disorders. The brother of Unabomber
Ted Kaczynski, who had also turned in his brother after false
assurances from authorities that they would not seek the death
penalty, added his support.
Last year, after lobbying from veterans,
Babbitt received the Purple Heart medal while on death row. He
was shuffled into a prison room shackled in a chain that wrapped
around his waist, between his legs, to his handcuffed wrists. As
a sergeant major read the citation documenting Manny's wounds at
Khe Sanh, Manny tried to salute. He could not raise his manacled
hands to his forehead so he scrunched forward at the waist,
bringing his forehead to his hand, held stiff in salute. Shortly
after the ceremony, Democratic Senator Diane Feinstein
introduced legislation to ban military personnel from presenting
medals to criminals.
Babbitt's supporters had hoped to win
clemency from Governor Gray Davis, a Vietnam veteran who
promised to give veterans respect during his election bid.
Instead Davis denounced Babbitt's "lifelong and violent criminal
activities," adding that he had had several run-ins with
military police and officers during his time as a US Marine.
This was the second time since taking office in January that
Davis has refused to commute the sentence of a death row inmate.
Babbitt spent Monday, his fiftieth birthday,
counting down the hours to his 12:01 a.m. execution. He asked
that the $50 allotted for his last meal go to homeless veterans.
Manuel Babbitt
Sacramento Bee
After Laura Thompson watched her grandmother's killer die early
Tuesday inside San Quentin's converted gas chamber, she sounded
steadfast and sure that her years-long fight for the execution
had been just.
"Crime is not pleasant," Thompson said. "We cannot expect that
justice will always be pleasant."
But her words, contained in a statement she dictated to the
Associated Press shortly after she watched Leah Schendel's
killer put to death by lethal injection, did not appear to match
her reactions to what she saw inside the chamber viewing room
where 50-year-old Manuel Pina Babbitt died.
At times, she could not bring herself to look at the man she had
fought so hard to see executed, especially when his body
involuntarily convulsed as the lethal drugs hit his system.
Sometimes, Thompson looked down at the floor, other times she
gazed off into space with a hard, blank look on her face.
A few feet away, through the thick glass of the chamber, Babbitt
was dying for the 1980 murder of Thompson's 78-year-old
grandmother in her south Sacramento home.
But the closure that Thompson and other relatives said they
sought through witnessing the execution appeared elusive, at
least early Tuesday.
Perhaps it would come later, with time, Thompson said afterward,
but it was clear that it was not there early Tuesday.
One Schendel relative stood at the back of the chamber softly
crying. Another held hands with a fellow witness. The prosecutor
who sent Babbitt to death row -- Sacramento County Deputy
District Attorney Kit Cleland -- sat hunched over in a chair,
staring down at the floor and never appearing to look at
Babbitt.
And Thompson, the most vocal of those working to see that the
death sentence was carried out, appeared pained and
uncomfortable as she watched it happen before her.
As the troubled former Marine died, his guilt-wracked older
brother watched from a corner, smiling wanly several times.
Hours after watching the execution, William Babbitt
gathered his thoughts at a Half Moon Bay hideaway -- and let
them fly.
"I'm at peace," said William Babbitt on Tuesday. "I pray that
the Schendel family is."
But any peace he feels is tinged with bitterness stretching back
years. William Babbitt turned his brother into police for
Schendel's murder after, he says, he was assured that his
younger brother would get help -- not execution.
While police interrogated his brother, who was barefoot, William
Babbitt recalled asking for socks for his younger brother.
"I was so grateful for those socks. That's the only benefit I
got for turning in my beloved brother," Babbitt said.
If Manuel Babbitt, a former Vietnam veteran, tortured by postwar
mental disorders, had been kept safely in a mental hospital, if
he had gotten the help he needed, he and Leah Schendel would not
have died the way they did, William Babbitt said Tuesday
afternoon.
"My brother died as a result of state-sanctioned murder, and
history will come to realize that fact," said Babbitt, who plans
to spend time away from his Sacramento home following the
execution.
Unlike some on death row who spend their last days in near
solitude, Manuel Babbitt was never far from familiar faces.
Family and friends came in swarms, swelling to as many as two
dozen in one day, said Vernell Crittendon, spokesman for San
Quentin State Prison.
"He was completely calm," said Chuck Patterson, an attorney for
Babbitt, who kept company with him in his last hours and
witnessed his execution.
It was family and friends, not Manuel Babbitt, who urged
last-minute legal appeals, Patterson said.
When his time came, Manuel Babbitt himself never appeared to
open his eyes, never looked around at the witnesses gathered to
see him die or to bid him farewell.
Instead, he issued his last words through the warden: "I forgive
all of you."
Babbitt's was the 7th California execution to take place since
1992 and one of the more unusual ones in many ways.
Unlike the 6 men who went before him, Babbitt chose no last
meal, deciding instead to continue the fast he had begun several
days ago as it became evident his execution would go through as
scheduled.
When he was led to the death chamber, Babbitt was restrained
with narrow handcuffs, instead of the wider leather restraints,
to make it easier to find a vein in his wrist, if one was
needed, Crittendon said.
Unlike the four previous lethal-injection executions conducted
inside San Quentin, Babbitt's body appeared to react as the
three powerful drugs entered his bloodstream. He yawned heavily,
apparently as the heavy dose of tranquilizer hit him, then
convulsed as the other 2 drugs -- one to stop his breathing,
another to stop his heart -- were administered. He was
pronounced dead within 8 minutes at 12:37 a.m.
Manuel Babbitt had been scheduled to die at one minute after
midnight, but even the half-hour delay was unusual in the manner
in which it occurred.
In past executions, prison officials have rushed to conduct
their "ritual" as soon as court rulings are handed down. The
very timing of them -- 12:01 a.m. -- gives them as much time as
possible to fight off court appeals during the life of the
24-hour death warrants.
This time was different, however.
Shortly after 11 p.m., the state Department of Corrections said
it had decided to voluntarily push back the procedure until the
U.S. Supreme Court was given one last chance to review the case.
Even after the high court declined to intervene, there was a
slow-paced, almost leisurely progression toward the end.
Now that it is over, William Babbitt said he will take his
brother's body back to Massachusetts and bury him next to their
father, who died when the 2 were teenagers.
(Sam Stanton was one of 14 media witnesses to the execution.
M.S. Enkoji reported from inside San Quentin)
Manuel Babbitt was convicted of
murdering an elderly Sacramento woman.
Babbitt, 49, was sentenced to death for
murdering Leah Schendel, 78, while robbing her retirement complex
apartment in December 1980. The coroner said she died of a heart
attack brought on by a severe beating and possible suffocation.
Babbitt was convicted of murder, robbery and
attempted rape. He was also convicted of robbing and attempting to
rape another Sacramento woman, whom he grabbed and beat unconscious
the following night.
Babbitt did not deny the attacks. But he
claimed insanity or diminished capacity because of head injuries
suffered at age 12 and aggravated during 2 combat tours as a Marine
in Vietnam.
State and federal courts have upheld his
convictions and sentence, and the Supreme Court denied review of his
appeal.
Leah Schendel had a large and close family and
had spent the evening of her murder with her siblings. Her brother
and sister-in-law drove her home and walked her to the door. As
they left, they saw a man walking nearby.
Later that night, Leah's apartment was
ransacked; the intruder had cut through her screen door and
viciously attacked her. Leah was only 5 feet tall and weighed less
than one hundred pounds. Her brutally beaten body was found
partially undressed, under a mattress in the bedroom.
Babbitt's request for clemency was denied by
the governor of California.
177 F.3d 744
Manuel Pina Babbitt, Petitioner,
v.
Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden, California State Prison
At San Quentin, Respondent
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 3, 1999
Before: BRUNETTI, THOMPSON and
HAWKINS1,
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Manuel
Pina Babbitt, a California state prisoner
sentenced to die tomorrow morning at 12:01
a.m., has filed a motion for a stay of
execution and an application for leave to
file a successive petition for writ of
habeas corpus under the Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"),
28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) (1998). The Supreme
Court of California this afternoon denied
Babbitt's latest habeas petition and request
for a stay of execution. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2244, and we
deny the motions Babbitt now presents to
this court.
* Manuel
Pina Babbitt was found guilty of the first-degree
murder of Leah Schendel after she died of
heart failure during Babbitt's commission of
a burglary, robbery, and attempted rape.
During his trial, Babbitt relied on a
mental-state defense, which included both
expert testimony of Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder ("PTSD") stemming from Babbitt's
Vietnam experiences and testimony of family
members about his deteriorating mental
condition and often strange behavior. On
April 20, 1982, a California jury convicted
Babbitt of all charges. On May 8, 1982,
Babbitt was found sane. On July 6, 1982,
Babbitt was sentenced to death.
In 1988,
the California Supreme Court rejected
Babbitt's consolidated appeal and habeas
corpus petition and unanimously affirmed
Babbitt's conviction and death penalty
judgment. See People v. Babbitt, 45 Cal.3d
660, 248 Cal.Rptr. 69, 755 P.2d 253
(Cal.1988). The United States Supreme Court
denied certiorari. See Babbitt v.
California, 488 U.S. 1034, 109 S.Ct. 849,
102 L.Ed.2d 981 (1989).
On June 1,
1989, the California Supreme Court denied
Babbitt's second petition for writ of habeas
corpus. After further state habeas
proceedings to exhaust unexhausted claims,
Babbitt filed an amended habeas petition in
the federal district court. The district
court denied the petition, and we affirmed
that denial in Babbitt v. Calderon, 151 F.3d
1170 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied., --- U.S.
----, 119 S.Ct. 1068, 143 L.Ed.2d 72 (1999).
Babbitt
then filed a fourth habeas petition in the
California Supreme Court. That court denied
the petition, and Babbitt has now filed in
this court an "Emergency Motion for Leave to
File a Second Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus" in the district court. In that
motion, he requests a stay of execution for
thirty days so that he may brief the issues
he presents and, "if necessary, seek further
review from the United States Supreme Court."
II
The
petition which Babbitt asks this court to
permit him to file is a successive petition,
subject to the "extremely stringent"
requirements of the AEDPA. Greenawalt v.
Stewart, 105 F.3d 1268, 1277 (9th Cir.1997).
Except
under extremely narrow circumstances, not
present here, section 2244(b)(1) of the
AEDPA requires the dismissal of claims that
were previously presented in a federal
habeas petition. See Martinez-Villareal v.
Stewart, 118 F.3d 628, 630 (9th Cir.1997),
aff'd, 523 U.S. 637, 118 S.Ct. 1618, 140
L.Ed.2d 849 (1998). Claims that were not
previously presented must also be dismissed
unless either (1) they rely on a new rule of
constitutional law or (2) the petitioner
makes a prima facie showing that "the
factual predicate for the claim could not
have been discovered previously through the
exercise of due diligence" and "the facts
underlying the claim, if proven and viewed
in light of the evidence as a whole, would
be sufficient to establish by clear and
convincing evidence that, but for the
constitutional error, no reasonable
factfinder would have found the applicant
guilty of the underlying offense." 28 U.S.C.
§ 2244(b)(2).
We have
interpreted this last prong as permitting a
petitioner to establish by clear and
convincing evidence that, " 'but for
constitutional error, no reasonable juror
would have found the petitioner eligible for
the death penalty under the applicable state
law.' " Thompson v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 918,
923 (9th Cir.1998) (quoting Sawyer v.
Whitley, 505 U.S. 333, 336, 112 S.Ct. 2514,
120 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992)), cert. denied., ---
U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 3, 141 L.Ed.2d 765
(1998).
We address
each of the claims Babbitt proposes to raise
in the district court, if he were authorized
to do so.
Babbitt
argues that, because of his trial counsel's
alcohol abuse, his counsel was ineffective
during the guilt, sanity, and penalty phases
of Babbitt's trial. Babbitt contends he was
unable to raise this argument in the amended
petition he previously filed in the district
court because he only recently discovered
the evidence while preparing for his
clemency hearing. The recent discoveries
include his trial counsel's recent
resignation from the State Bar as a result
of a legal malpractice action alleging that
he had been drinking during the trial. This
information caused Babbitt's habeas counsel
to re-interview the trial counsel's legal
staff, who revealed that trial counsel had
drunk "three or four drinks" on a "number of
occasions" during the lunch recesses of
Babbitt's trial.
Babbitt
raised an ineffective assistance of trial
counsel claim in his amended habeas petition
he previously filed in the district court. A
"ground is successive if the basic thrust or
gravamen of the legal claim is the same,
regardless of whether the basic claim is
supported by new and different legal
arguments.... Identical grounds may often be
proved by different factual allegations...."
United States v. Allen, 157 F.3d 661, 664
(9th Cir.1998) (internal quotations and
citations omitted).
In his
previously filed federal habeas petition,
Babbitt argued that his counsel failed to
sufficiently present a PTSD defense at the
guilt phase or as mitigating evidence at the
penalty phase. We rejected both of his
arguments under the test in Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80
L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). See Babbitt, 151 F.3d at
1174, 1175-76.
Although
Babbitt asserts new factual explanations for
his counsel's ineffectiveness at trial, the
gravamen of his legal argument is
essentially the same. Because we have
already determined that trial counsel's
performance during the guilt, sanity, and
penalty phases was not constitutionally
deficient, we will not consider new factual
grounds in support of the same legal claim
that was previously presented. See Allen,
157 F.3d at 664. Under the AEDPA, a legal
claim considered previously must be
dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1).
Even if we
were to conclude that Babbitt's ineffective
assistance of counsel claim (now grounded on
allegations of his counsel's alcohol abuse
during trial) was not previously presented,
we would nonetheless deny Babbitt's
application to file a successive petition on
this ground because Babbitt fails to make a
prima facie showing that he could not have
previously discovered the facts underlying
his claim through the exercise of due
diligence. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2);
Siripongs v. Calderon, 167 F.3d 1225, 1226
(9th Cir.1999).
The recent
allegations of alcohol abuse during
Babbitt's trial stem from two of Babbitt's
trial counsel's staff members. These persons
were known to Babbitt as early as 1991.
Given Babbitt's focus on his trial counsel's
ineffectiveness, a claim he has asserted
from the beginning of his state habeas
applications and in his amended habeas
petition previously filed in the district
court, there is no reason, other than lack
of due diligence, to explain Babbitt's
failure to include in his previous federal
habeas petition the allegations he now makes
concerning his trial counsel's alcohol
abuse. Cf. McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467,
497, 111 S.Ct. 1454, 113 L.Ed.2d 517 (1991)
(fact that petitioner did not possess or
could not reasonably have obtained certain
evidence does not excuse failure to raise
claim earlier "if other known or
discoverable evidence could have supported
the claim in any event"). Because Babbitt
would be unable to meet the AEDPA's due
diligence requirement, we would be required
to reject this claim in any event. See 28
U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2).
Babbitt,
an African-American, also contends his trial
counsel was racially biased and that this
bias created a structural error that impeded
his opportunity for a fair trial and
sentence. Specifically, Babbitt argues that
his counsel failed to interview African-American
witnesses, failed to protest when the
prosecutor dismissed African-American venire
persons via peremptory challenges, and
failed to communicate adequately with
Babbitt.
Because
Babbitt did not raise this argument in his
previously filed federal habeas petition,
and the claim does not rely on a new rule of
constitutional law, we must determine
whether Babbitt makes a prima facie showing
of due diligence under 28 U.S.C. §
2244(b)(2)(B). See Martinez-Villareal, 118
F.3d at 631.
Babbitt
argues that he did not become aware of his
trial counsel's alleged race bias until he
recently learned that his counsel was being
sued for discriminatory practices by a
former secretary. While investigating the
former secretary's allegations, Babbitt's
habeas counsel re-interviewed Babbitt's
brother, William Babbitt, and learned that
Babbitt's trial counsel had used a racial
epithet and spoken negatively of the
capabilities of African-American jurors
while meeting with William Babbitt and his
wife prior to Babbitt's trial in 1982.
Most of
the facts Babbitt alleges about his
counsel's alleged race bias have been known
to him since the conclusion of his trial. He
knew, for example, that he was an African-American
defendant charged with an interracial crime
against a white woman and tried with an all-white
jury, a white judge, and a white defense
attorney. His counsel's failure to question
the members of the jury about their
potential race bias and to protest the
peremptory challenge of African-American
jurors was also plainly ascertainable by
reviewing the record.
These
facts, in themselves, provided sufficient
factual predicates to trigger Babbitt's
obligation to raise a racially biased
counsel claim in his previously filed
federal habeas petition. Due diligence by
Babbitt's habeas counsel would also have
uncovered trial counsel's alleged racially
derogative remarks to Babbitt's brother, who
was called as a witness during the trial.
We
conclude that the factual predicates
underlying Babbitt's racial animus claim
could have been discovered through the
exercise of due diligence. See 28 U.S.C. §
2244(b)(2)(B); cf. McCleskey, 499 U.S. at
497. Accordingly, we must reject this claim
under the AEDPA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2).
III
Although
we need not address the second prong of 28
U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2), given our determination
that Babbitt failed to exercise due
diligence in both of his first two claims,
we also note that Babbitt's ineffective
assistance claim stemming from his counsel's
alleged alcohol abuse and his racial animus
claim would also fail under the AEDPA
because the facts underlying these claims,
if proven, would be insufficient to
establish by clear and convincing evidence
that, but for the constitutional error, no
reasonable factfinder would have found
Babbitt guilty of the underlying offense or
eligible for the death penalty under
California law. See Thompson, 151 F.3d at
923; LaGrand v. Stewart, 170 F.3d 1158, 1999
WL 104754, at * 1 (9th Cir. Feb.26, 1999).
In other
words, Babbitt's claims, even if they were
proven, do not establish actual innocence of
either the murder of Ms. Schendel or the
special circumstance findings that made
Babbitt eligible for the death penalty,
which findings were that the murder was
committed while the defendant was engaged in
the commission of a robbery, attempted rape,
and burglary. See People v. Babbitt, 248
Cal.Rptr. 69, 755 P.2d at 259 (citing Cal.
Pen.Code § 190.2(a)(17)(i), (iii) & (vii)
(1988)).
IV
For the
reasons set forth above, Babbitt's "Emergency
Motion for Leave to File a Second Petition
for Writ of Habeas Corpus" and his motion
for a stay of his execution are DENIED.
Judge Hawkins was drawn
by lot to replace Judge Hall, a previous
member of this panel, when Judge Hall by
reason of her senior status elected not to
continue as a member of the panel