Caryl Chessman was once a household name and the
standard bearer for anti-capital punishment campaigning. As a criminal condemned
to die in the gas chamber he attracted the support of public figures and
celebrities from all areas of American soicety.
Chessman was just 27 years old when he was arrested in Los
Angeles on suspicion of being the notorious thief and sexual predator known as
the ‘Red-Light Bandit’.
The Bandit was known to approach victims in ‘Lovers Lane’
spots and flash a red light resembling that used by police in order to stop
motorists. He would then rob the vehicle’s occupants and sometimes abduct women
and force them to perform sexual acts.
Although Chessman signed a confession, he later recanted,
saying that it had resulted from police brutality.
The Crimes
It is still unclear as to whether the ‘Red-Light Bandit’ was
a single person – many claim it was simply a useful moniker used to describe the
acts of a number of criminals. Despite such speculation, Chessman was charged
with the entire crime spree attributed to the Bandit.
In some cases the evidence strongly pointed to Chessman. Two
women testified that he had robbed and sexually assaulted them by making them
perform fellatio after they had persuaded him not to rape them.
In all, evidence pointed to his involvement in 17 cases,
ranging from robbery to kidnapping. Unfortunately for Chessman the ‘Little
Lindbergh’ law, which was passed in California in 1933 after the public outcry
over the Lindbergh case, enforced severe penalties on kidnappers.
Chessman found himself facing a far more serious sentence
when the prosecution successfully argued that he had ‘kidnapped’ his victims by
moving them some distance from their cars. Any crime relating to the Lindberg
law meant either life in prison or the death sentence.
The Trial
Chessman didn’t do himself any favours by representing
himself in court. His demeanour was interpreted as arrogant and matters weren’t
helped by the fact that the court stenographer died early on in the trial.
The transcription was now undertaken by a relative of the
prosecutor, without Chessman's approval. That relative, a chronic alcoholic,
made indiscriminate changes and couldn't even interpret his own handiwork in a
court of law. But despite such judicial bungling even Chessman’s own defence
lawyer George T. Davis thought the defendant difficult. However, Davis became
fond of Chessman over the years and even though he believed him to be arrogant
he also thought of him as a ‘decent and sensitive guy’.
"California was determined never to give him a retrial," said
Davis years later. "Our only hope was to get the case into a federal court."
During the trial Chessman repeatedly refuted claims that he
was the Red Light Bandit, but could not provide evidence corroborating his
innocence.
Eventually the jury determined that one of the kidnapping
counts included bodily harm of the victim. The jury did not recommend mercy, so
the death sentence was automatically applied. Chessman was convicted as the ‘Red
Light Bandit’ for the kidnap and rape of one Mary Alice Meza.
The Aftermath
During his twelve years on Death Row, Chessman became a cause
celebre. His case won media exposure as he presented himself not only as an
innocent man but also as one rehabilitated from his prior life of crime. His
case attracted interest and support among leading criminologists, liberal
intellectuals, and ordinary citizens, many of whom engaged in protests to halt
Chessman's execution.
Among the many notables who supported Chessman’s fight
against execution were former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, writers Aldous
Huxley, Ray Bradbury, William Inge, Norman Mailer, Dwight MacDonald, Christopher
Isherwood, Carey McWilliams and Evangelist preacher Billy Graham.
Wenzell Brown, Chairman of the American Writers Committee
wrote:
“Chessman is guilty of other crimes, to wit, robbing
bordellos and gambling dens operating in California. However, justice cannot be
served by convicting a man of one crime because he committed another.”
Chessman’s own talent for writing convinced many that a
prisoner, even one guilty of murder, could make a great contribution to society
and its understanding of the criminal mind.
Cell 2455 Death Row (1954) Chessman’s first book was an
autobiographical account of his own life in prison. By producing this work
Chessman demonstrated to his supporters and critics that he was a talented
intellectual and the kind of prisoner who exemplified the notion of the
rehabilitative ideal.
Over the years more books followed such as Trial by Ordeal
and The Kid Was A Killer. But it was in his last book The Face of Justice,
completed in secret and just hours before his death, that he commented on why he
was likely to go to the gas chamber. He wrote that to the authorities he
represented:
"a justice-mocking, lawless legal Houdini and agent
provocateur assigned by the Devil (or was it the Communists?) to foment mistrust
of lawfully constituted Authority."
In Justice Chessman wrote about the conditions of the penal
system of the time. The book was well received and revealed that he was a great
thinker and writer. Actually writing the book in prison was an achievement in
itself due to the fact that Chessman’s cell was constantly checked. In order to
hide his daily prose he would transcribe his long drafts into shorthand and
dispose of the original draft down the toilet. The shorthand pieces were then
camouflaged with legal notions so that the wardens dismissed them.
All four of Chessman's books are now out of print, and the
unpublished writings that were known to exist at the time of his death have
never seen the light of day.
But at the time Chessman’s lawyer, George T. Davis, believed
that the media exposure of the case had brought the issue of capital punishment
to the forefront of American politics.
Despite Chessman’s protestations of his innocence, his own
memoirs, somewhat ironically testified to his criminal personality. It was clear
from a young age he seemed to be on a collision course with prison.
Davis himself, although declaring a fondness for Chessman,
also admitted that his client was hard-headed and unyielding. Unfortunately for
Chessman this attitude was often interpreted as arrogance and he was depicted by
the media as a ‘monster’ or ‘psychopathic wild beast’.
If anything, Chessman was more likely to be an intelligent
sociopath who had difficulty feeling empathy for others. Whatever the view of
him, he had become an embarrassment to the authorities and for some, in an
ultraconservative era, had undermined the judicial system.
Davis himself is not entirely sure why the authorities
decided to carry out the death sentence after eight stays of execution over
twelve years. He concedes that Chessman’s languishing on Death Row, gaining
celebrity status and media exposure, was a source of embarrassment to the
government.
"The state of California's attitude then is like President
Bush's now," said the 94-year-old Davis forty-one years later. "That is, 'well,
he got his trial, so let's carry out the sentence'. No-matter what. Expediency
is all they were interested in."
Chessman had to deal with the psychological impact of
preparing himself for death on eight separate occasions. He would take the ‘dead
man’s walk’ to the gas chamber that was housed just below his cellblock. Then at
the eleventh-hour a stay of execution would be approved and Chessman would take
the elevator back up to his cell. It is difficult to think of many people being
able to survive such a continuous ordeal without breaking down.
However, on May 2nd, 1960, time finally ran out for Chessman.
At 10am, Chessman’s execution was given the go ahead. Davis had anticipated that
the petition for leniency would be rejected and had arranged for a cab to take
him to the US District Court by 9am. This was the cliff-hanger of all cliff-hangers
for at precisely 10am the cyanide pellets were to be dropped into the gas
chamber.
What followed was the kind of nail biting scene expected in a
Hitchcock thriller as Davis had to rush over to the district court several
blocks away and re-present his petition after the State Supreme Court had
rejected it by 4 to 3.
With astute foresight, Davis had sent the 15 page document to
the Judge the day before. Unfortunately the Judge had still not read it.
Standing in the courtroom, with one eye on the clock and the
other watching him carefully leaf through the thick manuscript, the opportunity
to save Chessman’s life was hanging on a thread. With only one minute before the
cyanide pellets were to be dropped, the Judge finally agreed to a stay of
execution.
All it needed was a direct call to the chamber phone to stop
the execution. Whether it was a planned operation by the State or a genuine case
of bad luck and bad timing, the secretary who was to make the call, misdialled.
By the time she got through to the warden, the pellets had
been dropped and any attempt to open the chamber or stop the process may have
endangered other people.
After twelve years maintaining his innocence on Death Row,
Caryl Chessman was finally executed at San Quentin prison.
Richard Bevan
CrimeandInvestigation.co.uk