DC# Y02046
DOB: 05/11/54
Twentieth Judicial
Circuit, Charlotte County, Case #97-166
Sentencing Judge: The
Honorable William L. Blackwell
Attorney, Criminal
Trial: Paul Sullivan, Esq.
Attorney, Direct Appeal:
Paul Helm – Assistant Public Defender
Attorneys, Collateral
Appeals: William Hennis & Celeste Bacchi – CCRC-S
Date of
Offense: 04/16/96
Date of Sentence:
12/10/99
Circumstances
of Offense:
Daniel Conahan was
convicted and sentenced to death for the kidnapping and
premeditated murder of Richard Montgomery.
Richard Montgomery was
last seen by his friends on 04/16/96. Montgomery said that he
was going out to make a few hundred dollars and would return
shortly. When asked if whether this money-making activity was
legal, Montgomery smirked and said nothing.
In a previous
conversation with his mother, Montgomery told her that someone
offered him $200 to pose for nude pictures, but declined to tell
her who made the offer. In the same conversation, Montgomery
told her he met a new friend, Daniel Conahan, who was a nurse
living in Punta Gorda.
The next day, two
Charlotte County Utility Engineers discovered a human skull in a
wooded area off Highway 41. Police officers called to the scene
discovered the nude body of Montgomery. His body displayed
neck, wrist and waist trauma consistent with ligature or bondage
marks. Also, Montgomery’s penis had been amputated postmortem.
Crime scene investigators collected a rope, a carpet pad used to
cover Montgomery’s body, a skull and torso (belonging to another
individual), a gray coat and numerous combings. A K-9 dog,
trained to detect human scent, was called to the scene and
showed particular interest in a palm tree, which was flattened
or otherwise damaged on one side. Autopsy reports concluded
that Montgomery died as a result of strangulation and the
ligature marks covering his body were consistent with being tied
to a tree.
Due to the unique modus
operandi of this case, police reviewed a similar assault
reported two years earlier. Stanley Burden reported that Daniel
Conahan offered to pay him $100 to $150 to pose for nude bondage
photographs. Burden agreed and Conahan drove the two of them to
a wooded location.
After taking several pictures, Conahan
pulled out a rope and tied Burden to a tree. While restrained,
Conahan performed oral sex on Burden and attempted to have anal
sex with him. Burden resisted by positioning his back side up
against the tree. Conahan placed the rope around Burden’s neck
and unsuccessfully tried to strangle him for half an hour.
Conahan asked Burden why he would not die and Conahan finally
gave up. Burden freed himself and reported the incident to the
police. The police located the crime scene and found a tree
with markings that corroborated Burden’s injuries and story. At
that time, police began an undercover investigation of Daniel
Conahan.
Following his arrest,
Conahan was indicted for the kidnapping, sexual battery and
murder of Montgomery. Conahan waived his right to a trial by
jury. During the guilt phase, the State presented evidence
that, on the day of Montgomery’s disappearance, Conahan’s credit
card was used to buy rope, Polaroid Film, pliers and a knife.
02/25/97
Defendant indicted on the following:
Count I:
First-Degree Premeditated Murder
Count II:
First-Degree Felony Murder
Count III: Kidnapping
Count IV: Sexual
Battery
08/09/99
Defendant adjudicated as follows:
Count I: First-Degree Premeditated Murder
- Guilty
Count II:
First-Degree Felony Murder – Nolle Prosse by State
Count III: Kidnapping
- Guilty
Count IV: Sexual
Battery – Acquitted
11/01/99 Upon
advisory sentencing, the jury, by a 12 to 0 majority, voted for
the imposition of
the death penalty.
12/10/99 The
defendant was sentenced as follows:
Conahan filed a Direct
Appeal in the Florida Supreme Court on 01/24/00. In that
appeal, he argued that the trial court erred in denying his
motion for acquittal because the State’s circumstantial evidence
was legally insufficient. Conahan also claimed that the trial
court erred in its consideration and application of aggravating
circumstances. Lastly, Conahan contended that the prosecutor
violated his right to a fair trial by making improper comments
in his opening and closing remarks of the penalty phase. The
Florida Supreme Court agreed that the prosecutor did improperly
comment upon evidence at the penalty phase, but concluded that
the error was harmless. As such, the Florida Supreme Court
affirmed Conahan’s convictions and sentence on 01/16/03.
The
court issued a revised opinion on 04/24/03, again affirming the
convictions and sentence of death.
Conahan filed a Petition
for Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court on
07/03/03, which was denied on 10/06/03.