Damren filed a Direct Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on 05/17/96,
citing the following trial court errors: admission of similar-fact
evidence; failure to give adequate jury instruction; overruling Damren’s
objection to prosecutor comments; admission of victim impact evidence;
admission of Chittam’s hearsay statements; finding that the murder was
heinous, atrocious, or cruel and cold, calculated, and premeditated;
failure to find certain mitigation; and imposing a sentence that is
disproportionate compared to other crimes. The FSC affirmed Damren’s
convictions and sentences on 05/08/97.
Damren filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme
Court on 10/06/97 that was denied on 01/12/98.
Damren filed a 3.851 Motion with the Circuit Court on 11/18/98 that was
denied on 06/20/01.
Damren filed a 3.851 Motion Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on
07/05/01, citing ineffective assistance of counsel. The FSC affirmed
the denial of the 3.851 Motion on 01/23/03.
Damren filed a Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus with the Florida Supreme
Court on 12/19/01, citing issues of ineffective assistance of counsel;
improper admission of hearsay statements; and vagueness of the heinous,
atrocious, or cruel aggravating circumstance. The FSC denied the Habeas
Petition on 01/23/03.
|