California's longest-serving death row inmate had his sentence
overturned for the third time Thursday after a federal appeals court
ruled a defense lawyer failed to present evidence that could have kept
his client from being condemned.
Reversing a lower court, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals said lawyer Arnold Lieman "rendered constitutionally
defective assistance" by failing to tell jurors that Lavell Frierson had
a history of mental retardation, child abuse, brain damage and drug use.
"There is a reasonable probability that, had the jury
been able to consider this evidence, the outcome of the penalty
proceedings would have been different," Judge Richard A. Paez wrote for
a three-judge panel.
Frierson, 49, has been on death row at San Quentin
State Prison since he was convicted of murdering Edgardo Kramer, 29, a
Peruvian airline employee, in 1978.
Frierson kidnapped, robbed and shot Kramer and a
colleague in the head when the two men went to a motel near Los Angeles
International Airport allegedly looking for a prostitute, according to
court documents.
The 9th Circuit ordered the district court to commute
Frierson's sentence to life in prison without parole unless California
prosecutors decide to retry him on the penalty phase with hopes of
securing another death sentence.
Terry Thornton, a spokeswoman for the state
Department of Corrections, confirmed that the 27 years and one month
Frierson has been on death row was a record among the state's 653
condemned prisoners.
The death sentence reversed Thursday was the third
one Frierson had overturned after arguing he received inadequate counsel.
In 1979, the California Supreme Court reversed his capital punishment
conviction because another defense lawyer did not present a diminished
capacity defense.
After a second jury found Frierson guilty and
recommended the death penalty, the state's high court upheld the
conviction, but threw out the sentence because lawyers only presented
testimony about Frierson's mental capacity during the penalty phase of
the trial.
The Supreme Court upheld Frierson's third death
sentence. But in Thursday's ruling, the 9th Circuit said that while
Lieman presented evidence of Frierson's drug use, he did not give the
jury information about Frierson's low IQ, emotional problems and
childhood brain injuries.
The panel said Lieman was inadequately prepared
because the lawyer did not read the transcripts of Frierson's second
trial.
A telephone call to Lieman was not immediately
returned.
Gwen Freeman, Frierson's current lawyer, reacted
jubilantly to the news of Thursday's ruling, saying capital punishment
was supposed to be reserved for the most horrific crimes.
"If he had the trial that I think any competent
attorney would have been able to provide for him, there is no question
in my mind he never would have gotten the death penalty," Freeman said.
|