Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Garcia filed a Direct Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on
09/06/88. His appeal centered on the Circuit Court’s exclusion of
payroll records that were argued to be exculpatory evidence and the
State’s statement to the jury that the police were unable to find
exculpatory evidence because none existed.
Garcia argued that a State
witness, Rufina Perez, who claimed to overhear a confession by Garcia,
could not have overheard Garcia because Garcia was no longer working
with Perez at the time of the alleged confession. The payroll records,
which Garcia alleged could prove the veracity of his statement and
impeach the testimony of Perez, were excluded from trial evidence as
unreliable and untrustworthy.
The FSC concluded that the payroll
records were relevant admissible evidence and the statements by the
State about the lack of exculpatory evidence were prejudicial to
Garcia’s case and denied him his right to a fair trial. On 06/14/90,
the FSC reversed Garcia’s convictions, vacated his sentences, and
remanded the case for a new trial.
After resentencing, Garcia filed a Direct Appeal with the Florida
Supreme Court on 08/14/91, citing the following errors: denial of
motions for judgment of acquittal; reading some portions of the trial
testimony to the jury and failing to read other portions; allowing the
prosecutor to introduce inadmissible and prejudicial hearsay;
prosecutorial misconduct during the trial (primarily, during closing
arguments); erroneously instructing the jury on the elements of the
crimes; admitting and allowing the use of inflammatory photographs;
allowing the State to prove the falsehood of Garcia’s alibi; erroneously
instructing the jury on circumstantial evidence; excusing a juror based
on inconsistent and inconclusive statements about the death penalty; the
cumulative effect of guilt phase errors mandates reversal; improper
finding of all aggravating circumstances (currently under prison
sentence; prior felony conviction; murder committed during a felony;
heinous, atrocious or cruel murder); failing to find any mitigating
circumstances; and overriding the jury recommendation of life
imprisonment for one of the murders.
The FSC affirmed the convictions
and sentences on 08/11/94.
Garcia filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme
Court on 01/23/95 that was denied on 04/24/95.
Garcia filed a 3.850 Motion with the Circuit Court on 03/26/97 and
amended the motion on 08/01/97. The motion was denied by the Circuit
Court on 04/01/04.
Garcia filed a 3.850 Motion Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on
05/18/04 that is pending before the court.