To: Saul Green, Esquire Miller, Canfield, Paddock
& Stone, P.L.C., Detroit, Michigan
Attorney for Walter Moss
From: Samuel R. Gross, Thomas & Mabel Long
Professor of Law University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor,
Michigan Cooperating Attorney, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational
Fund
and
Josiah Thompson
Thompson Investigations, Bolinas, California
Re: The Murder of Quintin Moss on June 26, 1980,
in the City of St. Louis, Missouri
Date: June 10, 2005
Introduction
Larry Griffin was convicted on June 26, 1981, for
the murder of Quintin Moss one year earlier, on June 26, 1980. He
was executed on June 21, 1995. From the outset, there have been
serious doubts about whether Griffin was really the killer.
In 1983, in a dissenting opinion in Griffin’s
appeal from his conviction, Justice Blackmar of the Missouri Supreme
Court pointed out that “The only eyewitness to the murder had a
seriously flawed background, and his ability to observe and identify
the gunman was also subject to question.” State v. Griffin, 662 S.W.2d
854, 860 (1983). That description was accurate, with a qualification:
the only person who testified at trial that he saw the murder was an
extremely flawed witness.
We now know much more about the murder of Quintin
Moss. The most important new direct evidence comes from two sources:
1. The first police officer at the scene has now
said – repeatedly on tape and to a news reporter – that the story
told by the supposed eyewitness was false.
2. There was a second victim to the shooting in
which Moss was killed, a man who was shot in his buttock. Although
easy to find, he was contacted by neither defense nor prosecution
and did not testify at trial. This victim states that the supposed
eyewitness was not there at the time of the shooting. More important,
he positively states that Larry Griffin – whom he knew personally –
did not do the shooting.
In other words, we now know that the witness who
provoked Justice Blackmar’s concern in fact lied, while another
eyewitness – a victim of the shooting who still carries a bullet
from it in his body – knew all along that Larry Griffin was innocent,
but was ignored.
What this means, of course, is not only that the
wrong person was arrested and convicted but also that the real
criminals have never been brought to justice. We have substantial
new information on the identities of the actual killers of Quintin
Moss. However, a more thorough investigation by appropriate
authorities will be necessary to prove their guilt beyond a
reasonable doubt.
I. The Evidence at Trial
Quintin Moss was killed in a drive-by shooting at
about 4:25 p.m. on June 26, 1980. Moss, a 19-year old African
American drug dealer and alleged hit-man for a drug ring, was shot
on Olive Street near the corner of Sarah, a notorious block known as
"the Stroll." It was a center of prostitution and drug sales. The
residents of the neighborhood were entirely African American. Even
in 1980, many of the buildings in the immediate area had been
boarded up or demolished.
In 2005, nothing from the 1980s is left on that
block or on several nearby. New townhouses have been built on the
Stroll. Several witnesses testified at trial, or told us recently,
that shootings at the corner of Sarah and Olive were "common." In
particular, the murder victim Quintin Moss himself had been shot at
on that corner six weeks earlier.
About six months before the Moss killing, Larry
Griffin's brother, Dennis Griffin, had been murdered. Dennis, by all
accounts a substantial drug dealer, was several years older than
Larry. It was widely believed that Quintin Moss killed Dennis
Griffin. He was arrested for that murder but released for lack of
evidence. It was also common knowledge that there was a contract out
to kill Moss in retaliation for killing Dennis.
After the first incident in which shots were
fired at Moss (but missed), police officers chased down a car with
Larry Griffin in it, driven by his nephew Reggie Griffin, age 19. No
weapons were found, so they released both Larry and Reggie Griffin.
Evidence of that earlier shooting and Larry Griffin's possible
connection to it was introduced at Griffin's capital trial. It was
the introduction of this “other-crime” evidence with its weak
connection to the defendant Larry Griffin that was the basis for
Justice Blackmar’s dissent on appeal.
Quintin Moss was shot from a slow moving car, a
1968 two-door Chevy Impala, black over blue, that drove south on
Sarah and then turned east on Olive. Moss was on the south side of
Olive about ninety feet east of the corner. By all accounts, there
were two shooters: a black man who leaned out of the front passenger
side window and fired a .38 revolver pistol, and a second black man
who shot a carbine from the rear passenger window.
Moss was hit thirteen times and died at the scene.
Another black man in the vicinity, Wallace Conners, was hit in the
buttock by one bullet. He was found about seventy-five feet east of
the corner. The car then continued east on Olive. It was found that
night with the murder weapons in it. Various fingerprints were found
in the car but none belonged to Larry Griffin. A recent traffic
ticket of Reggie Griffin's was under a front seat floor mat.
Larry Griffin, who was 25 in June 1980, was tied
to the shooting of Quintin Moss by two witnesses, only one of whom
claimed to have seen him at the scene.
(I) Officer Andre Jones testified that about
thirty minutes before the shooting he saw three black males leave a
notorious drug house several blocks away from the corner of Sarah
and Olive. One of the three was carrying a gun that could have been
a carbine and another was wearing a distinctive baseball cap similar
to a cap later found in the murder car. From a photo, Jones
identified the third man (with no cap and no gun) as Larry Griffin.
Jones did not know Larry Griffin. He said that he knew when he saw
him that this person “was a Griffin but not Reggie.” Jones made
mistakes in his description of the person he photo-ID’ed as Larry
Griffin; for example, the real Larry Griffin had no facial hair on
June 26, 1980. Andre Jones referred our investigator to the General
Counsel of the Police Department, which declined to permit an
interview. Jones did say, “Personally I have no apprehension in
speaking to you about this.”
(II) Robert Fitzgerald was the key witness.
Fitzgerald, a white man from Boston with an extensive criminal
record, was in St. Louis under the Federal Witness Protection
Program. He later testified at an organized crime murder trial back
in Boston and was a state’s witness in other prosecutions. Judging
from news coverage, he developed a reputation as a snitch who
couldn't produce convictions because Boston juries wouldn't believe
him. At Larry Griffin's trial, Fitzgerald testified as follows: Some
of the details that follow are taken from Fitzgerald’s testimony at
a pre-trial deposition on April 10, 1981.
In March 1980, Fitzgerald had been relocated to
St. Louis as a federally protected witness. On June 26 he was living
in a motel. Around noon he and an African American friend, "Carl,"
drove off in Fitzgerald’s car (a ‘73 Oldsmobile Delta 88) to take
Carl's four-year- old “baby” daughter to Carl's mother to babysit.
It was a hot day and the car’s air conditioner exhausted the battery.
The car coasted to a stop on Olive east of Sarah around 12:30 p.m.
He was stuck near that corner for over four hours. Carl and a friend
(another black man) took the battery to be recharged, leaving
Fitzgerald alone on the street with the four-year-old African
American girl for several hours. While they were gone, Fitzgerald
took the girl across the street a couple of times to get soda and/or
popsicles at a liquor store. At the store, he said a few words to
the guy who later got shot in the butt (Conners). He noticed Quintin
Moss and noticed that Moss was selling drugs.
Carl and friend returned with the battery just
before the shooting. They had the hood up installing the battery
when the bullets started flying. The two of them jumped under the
car and Carl yelled, "Get my baby!" Fitzgerald threw himself over
the little girl who was playing near the rear of the car. Then he
looked up at the windshield and front passenger-side window of the
car moving toward him. He got a good view of a black man with a
pistol leaning out the front passenger seat and firing a handgun. He
could not identify the person shooting from the back passenger seat
or the driver except to say that they were black males. As the car
left, he memorized its license plate. Fitzgerald went to Moss and
was trying to take his pulse or administer first aid when the first
police officer arrived. He told this officer that he could identify
the shooter and gave the officer the license plate number of the
murder car. Then, at Carl's urging, they left immediately in his now-operable
car. But the cops sent a cruiser after him, stopped the car, and
took him back to the scene. Fitzgerald gave Carl his car, went back
to the scene in the cruiser. Homicide detectives drove him downtown
to headquarters where he identified Larry Griffin from a photo
array. Later, while being driven back to his motel by another
officer, he identified the murder car where it had been spotted. He
left town for Florida a week later, but let the authorities knew how
to reach him.
In a federal habeas corpus hearing in 1993
(Griffin v. Delo, No. 88-1074 C(2), United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri) Fitzgerald changed his story in
two critical respects: First, he testified that instead of picking
Griffin’s picture from a photo array,
“.... a detective came over to me and mentioned
to me that ‘We happen to know who did it,’ and threw me a photograph
and -
Q. Just one photograph?
A. Yes, I believe that’s what happened.”
That single photograph had Larry Griffin’s name
on the back and Fitzgerald picked it. Second, Fitzgerald testified
that when he later saw Larry Griffin in court he was not sure it was
the man he had seen shooting but testifies that he identified him
anyway because he knew that he was the same Larry Griffin whose name
was on the photograph. Fitzgerald’s 1993 testimony could explain why,
despite his innocence, Larry Griffin was charged with the murder of
Quintin Moss: It made sense that a Griffin (some Griffin) was
involved in the shooting; Officer Jones thought he recognized Larry
Griffin’s photograph; the police (in some manner, intentionally or
inadvertently) directed Fitzgerald’s attention to Larry Griffin’s
picture; and Fitzgerald, for reasons of his own, identified that
picture.
In addition to his extensive record of
convictions and prison terms, by June 1980 Fitzgerald had several
felony fraud charges pending against him in St. Louis. He admitted
that he had used illegal drugs, including heroin and speed. He
testified at trial that he was arrested soon after he returned to St.
Louis from Florida in October 1980, "to meet his fiancé" and that he
was in custody from then through Larry Griffin’s trial. In fact, as
he admitted in the federal habeas corpus, he received weekend
furloughs while he was being held at the St. Louis County Workhouse
at Gumbo, which he spent at motels with his girlfriend. Indeed, it
appears from witnesses that we have since talked to that Fitzgerald
was not in physical custody when he testified and may have been at
liberty for additional periods of time before trial. He was
sentenced and formally released the day Larry Griffin was convicted.
Other than Fitzgerald’s testimony, no evidence at
trial – no other witness and no physical evidence – placed Larry
Griffin at the scene of this crime or in the car from which the
shots were fired.
II. Our Investigation
A. Larry Griffin’s innocence
We have interviewed three eyewitnesses to the
shooting on June 26, 1980, and its aftermath:
(I) Patricia Moss Mason, Quintin’s sister,
testified for the prosecution at trial that she saw her brother dead
at the scene of the shooting. Although never asked at trial about it,
she also witnessed the shooting itself — a point corroborated both
by her sister Sherry Moss and her mother Missouria Moss with whom
she spoke immediately after the shooting. We interviewed Patricia
Mason in Birmingham, Alabama. She had been back and forth to the
corner of Olive and Sarah a couple of times that afternoon. At the
time of the shooting, she was walking toward her brother at the
corner. She remembers seeing Wallace Conners at the scene and
remembers visiting Conners in the hospital later that day. She was
too far from the shooting to get a clear view of the shooters, but
she is very clear on one critical point: There was no white man
nearby before the killing or attending to Quintin Moss when the
police arrived. In fact she insists that other than the emergency
personnel, nobody bent over Quintin Moss after he was shot.
(II) Michael Ruggeri. Patrolman Michael Ruggeri,
now retired, was the first officer on the scene. He wrote the first
police incident report, a three-page hand-written document that
makes no mention of any white man attending to Quintin Moss when he
arrived. At trial, he testified consistently with Fitzgerald: (1)
that Fitzgerald was at the scene taking Moss's pulse when Ruggeri
arrived; (2) that there was a car nearby (3) that he later saw
Fitzgerald in a car (he said it was a Buick) in the company of a
black man and a child; (4) that Fitzgerald drove off and was then
stopped and brought back to the scene.
We have interviewed Ruggeri several times, each
time on audiotape or videotape. The most recent and detailed
interview was conducted in the company of a highly respected news
reporter. Ruggeri consistently says that there was no white man near
Quintin Moss when he arrived, no car parked near the curb, and no
young black girl nearby. Ruggeri denies that Fitzgerald gave him the
license plate number of the car from which the shots were fired, or
told him that he could identify any of the shooters; at trial
Ruggeri was not asked whether Fitzgerald told him those things.
In his most recent interview with the reporter
present, Ruggeri stressed that he saw no car in proximity to the
downed victims. He pointed out that over the eight years he
patrolled that district he had never seen a car parked at that
location. As first on the scene with no backup, he would have seen
any car parked at that location as a potential threat. He would have
noted it and proceeded cautiously. The same would apply to finding
an individual bending over the victim. Ruggeri pointed out that such
an individual might be a shooter administering a coup de grace. For
these reasons, Ruggeri is certain there was no car parked where
Fitzgerald said his car was parked and that no one was bending over
the body when he pulled up at the scene. Ruggeri recalls going to
Moss and finding him unconscious. Then he turned to Conners who was
writhing on the sidewalk. He got a general description of the car as
a late sixties Chevy with two black shooters. He put this out via
his radio and then turned back towards Moss.
Ruggeri estimated that he turned back towards
Moss three to four minutes after he arrived on the scene. At that
point he saw a thin white male trying to take Moss’s pulse and
yelling for an ambulance. Moss lost bowel and bladder control and
Ruggeri told the white guy that Moss wouldn’t need an ambulance.
Ruggeri recalled that his take at the time was that the white guy
had wandered up from the Methadone Clinic at Olive and Vandeventer.
Ruggeri was familiar with the adrenalin rush which witnesses to a
shooting exhibit. He said the white guy exhibited none of this. As
Ruggeri put it, “The pucker factor wasn’t there.” He thinks the
white guy might have seen the shooting, but only from a distance.
Other emergency units were arriving. Ruggeri’s
sergeant arrived and took command of the scene. Ruggeri told him of
the white guy trying to get a pulse and the sergeant told him to get
the white guy and hold him at the scene for Homicide. The white guy
was now several hundred feet east of the shooting scene walking east
on Olive. Ruggeri went up to him on foot and told him to come back
to the scene. The white guy told Ruggeri, “I didn’t see nothin’.”
Ruggeri took him back to the scene and later drove him downtown to
police headquarters and turned him over to Homicide. Ruggeri didn't
see the white guy with any companions; didn't see him in any car;
doesn't remember any children with him. Ruggeri pointed out that had
any young child been close to the murder and the fusillade of
bullets she would have been screaming her head off when Ruggeri
arrived at the scene.
At his most recent and extensive interview
Ruggeri was shown a transcript of his testimony at trial. He read it
carefully and expressed surprise. He said he did not remember
testifying in that manner and cannot understand why he would have
done so. He states unequivocally that the testimony was incorrect
and that his current description of events is accurate.
Ruggeri’s description is confirmed in part by
Sergeant Anthony Pona (now retired) who arrived at the scene shortly
after Ruggeri, and later that night spotted the murder car parked on
the street. Pona is certain that Officer Ruggeri did not receive any
information on the license plate number of the car at the scene of
the shooting. If Ruggeri had received that information the license
plate number would have been written on the first page of Ruggeri’s
hand-written police report, and put out immediately over the police
radio – which didn’t happen. Pona is sure, based both on his
recollection of the event and on his reading of the police reports,
that the license plate number was obtained later, by the homicide
detectives.
(III) Wallace Conners is the second victim of the
shooting on Olive near Sarah on June 26, 1980. He was shot in the
buttock and still carries the slug in his body. According to a
police report, he left the hospital within a couple of days and
couldn't be found at the address he gave — an aunt's house. He did
not testify at trial nor in any post-conviction proceeding. He now
lives in Los Angeles. He had not talked about the shooting to any
attorney or police officer or investigator on any side of the case
from when he left the hospital in St. Louis in June 1980 until our
investigator first interviewed him in July of 2004.
The police incident reports state that both at
the scene and later at the hospital Conners was unable to identify
any of the shooters. He told us that he doesn’t remember being asked,
but he was injured and probably medicated. In any event, it is true
that he couldn't identify the shooters: He didn't recognize them.
Conners left St. Louis soon after the shooting
because he didn't want to be killed. He was afraid that whoever shot
him and killed Moss might think it was safest to kill Conners as
well. He went to Texas, where, in January of 1981, he was arrested
for grand larceny. He was tried as a habitual criminal because of
his criminal record from Missouri, and sentenced to life
imprisonment in August 1981. In fact, he was innocent of that crime.
His conviction was reversed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
in November 1984, and a distinguished Houston lawyer (later a judge)
was appointed to represent him on re-trial. His new lawyer
investigated the case for the first time and located witnesses who
conclusively proved Conners’ innocence; in September of 1985 he was
acquitted by a judge in a bench trial and released. Conners has
never lived in St. Louis since 1980. He has been back for short
family visits, but by 1985, when he first returned, the conviction
of Larry Griffin was an event in the distant past and never came to
his attention.
Needless to say, Conners remembers the shooting
well. He had been on the block all day and had chatted with Quintin
Moss, an acquaintance but not a friend of his. He confirms that he
saw Patricia Moss at the scene and later at the hospital. Like
Patricia Moss and Michael Ruggeri, Conners says there was no white
man stuck on that corner for hours (certainly not with a four-year-old
black girl) and that no white man came up to Moss before the police
arrived. Conners is certain there was no car parked just east of the
shooting. If there had been, he points out, he would have run to it
for cover instead of running west, toward the corner of Sarah, and
getting shot on the way.
Conners was standing about fifteen feet directly
across from the car from which shots were fired with the windows
open. He looked at all three occupants and got a very clear view of
the pistol shooter in the front passenger seat who was leaning out
of the window. This was the shooter Robert Fitzgerald identified as
Larry Griffin. Conners does not know who that man was; he did not
recognize him. However, Conners is absolutely certain that man was
not Larry Griffin, and that Larry was not in the car at all.
Conners, now fifty-two, was a year or so older
than Larry Griffin and a friend of Larry's older brother, Dennis. He
was 27 in June 1980, and had known Larry for years, not intimately
but well. Conners had only recently been released from nearly seven
years in prison, and most of the guys on “the Stroll” were new to
him. But Larry Griffin was one of his old crowd; he would have
recognized him instantly. He gave us a good description of the
pistol shooter in the front passenger seat. He doesn't know who it
was but he is certain it was not Larry Griffin. In fact, he talked
to Larry Griffin briefly about the shooting a couple of days later.
This was after he left the hospital but before he left St. Louis.
Although Conners was out of state at the time of
Larry Griffin's trial in June of 1981, it would not have been hard
for the prosecution or defense to locate him and bring him back to
testify. At that time, Conners was in county jail in Houston, Texas,
awaiting trial on the larceny charges for which he was ultimately
exonerated in 1985. He could have been located by routine inquiries.
In fact, his presence in custody in Houston must have been known to
at least some members of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Force
because on June 22, 1981 – the very day that Larry Griffin's trial
began – the Harris County District Attorney's Office applied for a
subpoena to bring St. Louis City Police Officer Merle McClain to
Houston to testify in Conners’ trial in Houston. Officer McClain
actually testified in Conners’ trial in July 1981.
(IV) Robert Fitzgerald himself died on August 24,
2004, in Florida, of lung cancer and cirrhosis, before we could
interview him.
B. The identities of the actual killers
(I) Ronnie Thomas-Bey (aka Ronnie Lee Thomas, aka
Ricky Thomas) was the registered owner of the car from which Quintin
Moss was killed. Several days after the shooting Thomas-Bey was
arrested as an accessory before the fact, but released for lack of
evidence. As far as we know, Ronnie Thomas-Bey was not suspected of
being one of the three men in the car at the scene of the murder,
and his picture was not presented to witnesses for possible
identification.
In 1991, Thomas-Bey was indicted as one of
thirteen defendants in a federal RICO prosecution of various people
associated with the St. Louis Moorish Science Temple, United States
vs. Jerry Lewis Bey, et al, No. 91-1CR(6), United States District
Court, Eastern District of Missouri (the “Moorish Science Temple
case”). In December of that year Thomas-Bey became a cooperating
witness for the Government, and in 1993 he testified at the Moorish
Science Temple trial as Government witness.
As a cooperating witness, Thomas-Bey pled guilty
to various RICO violations in federal court in 1993; he also pled
guilty to three counts of murder in Missouri state court in 1993 and
was sentenced to three terms of life imprisonment, which he is now
serving in federal custody under the Federal Witness Protections
Program. Thomas-Bey was given federal immunity for numerous other
murders in which he was involved.
On December 1, 1995, Thomas-Bey was deposed in
State v. Jerry Lewis-Bey and Gerald Hopkins-Bey, Circuit Court of St.
Louis City, State of Missouri, 94-1366, a state-court prosecution of
some the defendants who had already been convicted in federal court
in the Moorish Science Temple case. He was asked about his role in
the murder of Quintin Moss, and testified under oath that he was
present in the car from which Moss was shot – his own car – but did
not himself shoot Moss. As best he could recall, they weren’t
looking for Moss at the time but for a “guy called Black, something
at the time, because I was trying to help Reggie [Griffin]....”
“Q. Was Larry Griffin present when he [Quintin
Moss] was killed?
A. No.
Q. Are you sure?
A. No, I’m not.”
Thomas-Bey went on to explain that he couldn’t
remember for sure who was there because the drive-by shooting of
Quintin Moss “was just an insignificant incident....you have got to
understand something, you are talking about over 20 years of
incidents, information and I’m doing my best.” He also testified
that “a lot of times I wasn’t in possession of [my] car. Reggie
would have it,” that he and Reggie were close, and that Reggie
Griffin (but not Larry) worked with Thomas-Bey in the same drug ring.
(II) The other two killers – in addition to
Ronnie Thomas-Bey – appear to be Reggie Griffin, Larry Griffin’s
nephew, and Ronnie (“Hump”) Parker, a drug-dealing associate of
Reggie Griffin and Ronnie Thomas-Bey. Both Reggie Griffin and Ronnie
Parker are serving sentences of life imprisonment without the
possibility of parole in Missouri state prisons.
Reggie Griffin was 19 on June 20, 1980 – six
years younger than his uncle Larry, and more than seven years
younger than Wallace Conners, who didn’t know him. Both Reggie
Griffin and Ronnie Parker had worked in the drug trade with Larry
Griffin’s older brother Dennis, and both were closely associated
with Ronnie Thomas-Bey. By contrast, we have heard from several
sources that Larry Griffin was not a member of that drug ring, and
Ronnie Thomas-Bey’s deposition testimony is consistent.
Jerry Lewis-Bey, the lead defendant in the
Moorish Science Temple case, was the Minister of the St. Louis
Moorish Science Temple since 1980. The Moorish Science Temple trial
in 1991 included extensive evidence that Ronnie Thomas-Bey had
worked as a hit man for Jerry Lewis-Bey through most of the 1980s.
We interviewed Lewis-Bey in July 2004 at the Federal Correctional
facility in Edgefield, South Carolina, where he is serving a
sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for
his convictions in the Moorish Science Temple case.
Lewis-Bey told us that he went to Montreal in
June 1980 to attend the Sugar Ray Leonard/Roberto Duran prize fight.
Upon his return, he learned that his cousin, Ronnie Thomas-Bey, had
been arrested and then released for a drive-by shooting. When he ran
into Thomas-Bey, Lewis-Bey asked him about the shooting. Thomas-Bey
replied that he, Reggie Griffin and Ronnie Parker had been riding
around in Thomas-Bey’s car and happened to spot Quintin Moss selling
drugs at the corner of Sarah and Olive Streets. Thomas-Bey turned
over driving duties to Parker because he wanted to do some of the
shooting. The guns were in the car as a matter of course. Reggie
Griffin was in the back seat, Thomas-Bey in the right front
passenger seat and Parker driving when the killing occurred.
Lewis-Bey stated that this version of the killings was “gospel,”
that everyone “back then knew that this was the way it went down.”
Lewis-Bey told us that Thomas-Bey said nothing
about a white man being at the scene of the Moss murder. He offered
his opinion that if Thomas-Bey, Reggie Griffin and Parker had seen a
white man at or near the scene of the Moss murder, they would have
killed him too.
Lamont Griffin, a nephew of Larry Griffin’s and
cousin of Reggie Griffin’s, was interviewed last August at
Crossroads Correctional Center in Cameron, Missouri, where he is
serving a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of
parole for an unrelated murder. Lamont Griffin was shown a portion
of a report of the interview with Lewis-Bey that included Lewis-Bey’s
description of the shooting of Quintin Moss and his statement that
it was “gospel.” Lamont Griffin read that portion of the report, was
silent for a moment, and then said “That’s about the truth for me.”
A few minutes later he confirmed again that Ronnie Parker was the
third occupant of the car in addition to Reggie Griffin and Ronnie
Thomas-Bey. We have heard the same story from several other sources
as well, some of them confidential. The only difference is that some
report that Ronnie Thomas-Bey was driving rather than shooting (as
Thomas-Bey himself said in his deposition in State v. Jerry
Lewis-Bey, et al.) and that Ronnie Parker was the pistol shooter in
the front passenger seat.
We have interviewed both Ronnie Parker and Reggie
Griffin. Parker was interviewed first, at the Missouri State
penitentiary in Jefferson City where he is serving a term of life
imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Parker did not admit
participation in the Moss/Conners shooting; but when told that we
had heard that the three men in the car were Ronnie Thomas-Bey,
Reggie Griffin and himself, Parker said that when he spoke to the
lawyer and investigator who handled Larry Griffin’s habeas corpus
petition he told them “that what they had to do was to get Reggie on
the phone and get the feds to put Ronnie [Thomas-Bey] on the phone
and let the three of us talk about it.”
Later, toward the end of the interview, Parker
said more than once: “You go talk to Reggie and then come back to
me. That’s how we’ll do it.” We did talk to Reggie Griffin, at the
Crossroads Correctional Center, where he too is serving a term of
life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Reggie Griffin
denied any personal knowledge of this crime. Toward the end of the
interview he said: “Even if I was there, I wouldn’t walk into a
mother-fuckin’ capital murder case.”
We then returned to see Parker after the
interview with Reggie Griffin and reported Reggie’s position. Parker
seemed disturbed by this and finally said: “Look, what I’m gonna do
is write Reggie a letter and then I’m gonna write to you. You can
then see if you want to come see me again.” We have not heard back
from Parker.
At Larry Griffin’s federal habeas corpus hearing
in 1993 (Griffin v. Delo, supra) a witness named Kerry Caldwell –
like Ronnie Thomas-Bey, a government witness in the Moorish Science
Temple case – presented a different story of the shooting of Moss
and Conners. Caldwell testified that he had been a member of Dennis
Griffin’s drug gang; that on June 26, 1980, he spotted Quintin Moss
on the street and called an associate to come kill him; and that in
response three members of the gang arrived in Ronnie Thomas-Bey’s
car and shot Moss, an event Caldwell said he witnessed. He
identified the driver as Humphrey Scott (who died in 1986), the man
shooting from back seat as Darryl Smith (who died in 1990), and the
man shooting from the front passenger seat as Ronnie Parker.
Judge Filippine of the Eastern District of
Missouri did not believe Caldwell’s testimony for a variety of
reasons, including that Caldwell had immunity for the crime and was
a friend of the Griffins – and that his testimony was inconsistent
with Robert Fitzgerald’s (e.g., Caldwell did not see a white man
near the Moss after the shooting).
We do not believe that Caldwell’s story is
accurate; it contradicts a consistent description of the Moss/Conners
shooting that we have heard from many sources. It may well be that
Caldwell lied, as Judge Filippine found. It is also possible that
Caldwell was mistaken. He testified that he never actually talked to
Darryl Smith, the confederate he called, but only left voice
messages on Smith’s pager. When Ronnie Thomas-Bey’s car showed up
with blazing guns, Caldwell might have assumed it was in response to
his call when in fact (as Thomas-Bey himself testified) the
encounter was accidental. If so, it makes sense that the one person
Caldwell identified correctly was Ronnie Parker – the front-seat
passenger who was leaning out of the window, and therefore the only
one of the three Caldwell could have actually seen if he were
present, as he said, in his own car.
At the habeas corpus proceeding in 1993,
Griffin’s attorneys presented an affidavit from Robert Dwyer, a DEA
agent. In his affidavit Dwyer stated that in December of 1990 or
January of 1991, when Dwyer was a St. Louis City Police homicide
detective on loan to the United States Attorney’s office, Caldwell
discussed the Moss murder with Dwyer as part of Caldwell’s
cooperation agreement with the United States Attorney.
We talked to Agent Dwyer, and he confirmed
Caldwell had told him that Larry Griffin was not present at the Moss
shooting. Dwyer added that if Caldwell had claimed that Larry
Griffin had no role at all in the Moss killing he, Dwyer, would have
remembered it and challenged it as “bullshit.” Apparently Dwyer
believed that Larry Griffin was not present at the scene, but must
have had some role in the murder nonetheless. Of course, Larry
Griffin was convicted solely on the basis of evidence that he was
present and fired shots, and there was no evidence whatever that
anyone who was not present had any role in the shooting. |