On
11/14/83, Haliburton filed a Direct Appeal with the Florida Supreme
Court, arguing that the failure of the police to allow an attorney to
consult with Haliburton during questioning violated Haliburton’s right
to counsel. On 08/30/85, the FSC vacated the conviction and death
sentence of Haliburton.
On
12/18/85, the State of Florida filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari
with the U.S. Supreme Court, and on 03/24/86, the USSC vacated the FSC’s
decision and remanded the case for reconsideration by the FSC.
On
10/01/87, the Florida Supreme Court again vacated the conviction and
sentence and remanded the case for a new trial.
On
02/17/88, a jury recommended the death sentence for Haliburton by a vote
of 9-3. On 04/11/88, Haliburton was resentenced to death.
On
04/18/88, Haliburton filed a Direct Appeal with the Florida Supreme
Court, claiming the following nine issues: trial court error in refusing
to require the jury to return a special verdict of premeditated or
felony murder; not allowing defense to comment on a witness during
closing arguments; rereading portions of requested testimony; improper
admission of three photographs into evidence; refusing to declare a
mistrial due to admission of cumulative, irrelevant, and prejudicial
evidence; refusing to declare a mistrial due to alleged attempts by the
prosecutor to shift the burden of proof; Florida’s capital sentencing
statute is unconstitutional; allowing the jury to consider the HAC
aggravating factor; and two of four aggravating factors were improperly
found (under sentence of imprisonment and cold, calculated, and
premeditated murder).
On 04/05/90, the FSC affirmed the conviction and
sentence of death.
On
06/20/90, Haliburton filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the
U.S. Supreme Court that was denied on 06/28/91.
On
02/16/92, Haliburton filed a 3.850 Motion with the Circuit Court that
was denied on 01/25/94.
On
02/18/92, Haliburton filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the
Florida Supreme Court, citing four issues relating to ineffective
assistance of counsel. On 01/09/97, the FSC denied the Petition.
On
05/23/94, Haliburton filed a 3.850 Motion Appeal with the Florida
Supreme Court, citing the following nine issues: improper denial of a
motion for rehearing, state withholding of exculpatory evidence and
ineffective assistance of counsel at the guilt phase, ineffective
assistance of counsel at the penalty phase, overbroad jury instructions
regarding aggravating circumstances, state compliance with public
records requests, ineffective assistance of counsel regarding waiving of
a speedy trial, ineffective assistance of counsel regarding
prosecutorial misconduct, improper jury instructions that shifted the
guilt to Haliburton, and denial of due process due to the Governor
signing a death warrant before the two year time limit for filing a
motion for post-conviction relief expired.
On 01/09/97, the FSC
affirmed the denial of the 3.850 Motion.
On
04/10/98, Haliburton filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the
U.S. District Court, Southern District that was denied on 09/10/01.
On
02/27/01, Haliburton filed an appeal with the Florida Supreme Court,
which the FSC treated as a 3.850 Motion Appeal. On 05/01/01, the court
dismissed the appeal with prejudice.
On
10/15/01, Haliburton filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Appeal
with the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, citing
allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel. On 08/21/03, the USCA
affirmed the denial of the Petition by the USDC.
On
06/20/03, Haliburton filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the
Florida Supreme Court, citing Ring issues. On 10/09/03, the FSC
denied the Petition, without opinion.
On
03/19/04,
Haliburton filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme
Court, appealing the decision of the USCA. On 06/07/04, the USSC denied
the Petition.
On
11/30/04, Haliburton filed a 3.851 Motion with the Circuit Court that
was dismissed on 01/28/05.
|