Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Edward Dean
KENNEDY
Robbery
967 F.2d 1482
Docket number: 92-2706
July 20, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Middle District of Florida.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY and ANDERSON,
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The district court denied this successive petition
for writ of habeas corpus, denied a stay of execution, and denied the
motion for a certificate of probable cause. Kennedy has appealed to
this court and now seeks a stay of execution and a certificate of
probable cause.
The claim now asserted by Kennedy is that his
sentencing jury was tainted by a constitutionally deficient
instruction concerning the allegedly heinous aspect of the murders and
that the Florida Supreme Court failed to cure that constitutional
error by conducting a proper harmless error review.1
Kennedy has failed to persuade us that the Florida Supreme Court
improperly interposed a procedural bar. In any event, we conclude that
the presentation of this claim constitutes an abuse of the writ.
Kennedy did not raise this claim in his appeal to this court from the
district court's denial of his first federal habeas petition.2
As to both the procedural bar and the abuse of the writ, we cannot
conclude that Kennedy has demonstrated "cause" or "prejudice" or a
fundamental miscarriage of justice. Sawyer v. Whitley, --- U.S. ----,
112 S.Ct. 2514, 120 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992); McCleskey v. Zant, --- U.S.
----, 111 S.Ct. 1454, 113 L.Ed.2d 517 (1991). We do not believe that
this resolution is debatable among jurists of reason. Barefoot v.
Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 103 S.Ct. 3383, 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1983).
Accordingly, Kennedy's motion for a certificate of
probable cause and for a stay of execution is