Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
It was --
at least for residents of Long Island, New York -- the "crime of the
century" when one-month-old Peter Weinberger was kidnapped from his
suburban home on July 4, 1956. Certainly the fallout from the incident
reached national proportions. This child was not from a well-to-do
family, like the Lindberghs. This child came from a middle class family
in suburbia -- where people weren't afraid of being targeted by
extortionists. The Weinberger kidnapping struck fear in the hearts of
average Americans. People started locking their doors. Almost overnight,
an entire country lost its sense of security.
The Weinberger case also
resulted in new legislation -- signed by President Eisenhower -- that
reduced the FBI's waiting period in kidnapping cases from 7 days to 24
hours.*
It all started...
On that particular July 4th in
1956, Betty Weinberger wrapped her month-old son Peter in a receiving
blanket and placed him in his carriage on the patio of their home in
Westbury, NY. She then went inside for a few minutes while he slept.
When Mrs. Weinberger came back
to check on her son, all she found was an empty carriage and a ransom
note. In the note, the kidnapper apologized for his actions but said he
needed money and asked for $2,000. He promised the baby would be
returned "safe and happy" the following day if his demand was met.
Despite the kidnapper's threat to kill the baby at the "first wrong move,"
she called the Nassau County Police Department.
Parents ask for media
blackout
After the kidnapping, Morris
Weinberger requested that the newspapers hold off printing the story of
his son's kidnapping. All but one newspaper granted Mr. Weinberger's
request -- the kidnapping made the front page of the New York Daily
News. By the following day, news reporters swarmed the drop-off area
where the kidnapper requested the money be left. Police left the phony
ransom package at the spot, but the kidnapper never showed up.
The second attempt to collect
On July 10th, six days after the
kidnapping, the kidnapper called the Weinberger home -- two separate
times -- with additional instructions on where to take the money. He
didn't show up at either location. At the second drop site, police
searched a blue cloth bag found alongside a curb. Inside the bag was a
handwritten note -- apparently from the kidnapper -- telling the parents
where to find the baby "if everything goes smooth."
The note was examined by experts
who agreed that the original ransom note and the second note were
written by the same person.
The FBI gets down to work
On July 11th, after the required
seven-day waiting period, the FBI entered the case. Its first step was
to establish a temporary headquarters for its employees from the NY
Office -- agent and support -- in Mineola, Long Island. The temporary
headquarters -- which operated 24 hours a day -- was under the personal
direction of the Special Agent in Charge of the NY Office.
The only evidence officials had
-- up until then -- were the ransom notes. Handwriting experts from the
FBI Laboratory in Washington, DC, traveled to New York and gave Special
Agents a crash course in handwriting analysis. These newly trained
investigators began the task of examining the huge volume of handwriting
specimens maintained by the New York State Motor Vehicle Bureau, federal
and state probation offices, schools, aircraft plants, and various
municipalities.
After examining and
eliminating almost two million samples, the search ended on August 22,
1956. An agent at the U.S. Probation Office in Brooklyn noted a
similarity between the ransom notes and writing in the probation file
of one Angelo LaMarca. LaMarca had been arrested by the Treasury
Department for bootlegging.
As investigators soon
learned, LaMarca was a taxi dispatcher and truck driver who lived with
his wife and two children in Plainview, NY. He lived in a house he
couldn't afford, had many unpaid bills, and was being threatened by a
loan shark. On July 4, 1956, he had found himself driving around
Westbury, seven miles away, trying to figure out how to get the money he
needed.
When he happened on the
Weinberger house, Mrs. Weinberger was leaving her son in the baby
carriage to go into her house. On impulse, LaMarca scribbled a ransom
note in his truck, snatched Peter, and drove off.
The arrest, and a
tragic discovery
On August 23, 1956,
LaMarca was arrested at his home by FBI Agents and Nassau County police.
Although he first denied any involvement in the kidnapping of Peter
Weinberger, he confessed when confronted with the handwriting
comparisons.
LaMarca told
investigators he went to the first drop site the day after the
kidnapping - with the baby in the car -- but he was scared away by all
of the press and police in the area. He drove away, abandoned the baby
alive in some heavy brush just off a highway exit, and went home.
A search of the area by
FBI Agents and Nassau County Police ensued. An FBI Agent spotted a
diaper pin -- then the decomposed remains of Peter Weinberger. The heart-rending
search was over.
In the end
Since LaMarca had
crossed no state lines, he had not violated the federal kidnapping
statute -- and so he was turned over to Nassau County authorities for
state prosecution. In late 1956, he was tried and convicted by a jury on
kidnapping and murder charges. The jury returned its verdict without a
recommendation of leniency. On December 14, 1956, he was sentenced to
death.
After a number of legal
appeals -- including one to the Supreme Court -- Angelo LaMarca was
executed at Sing Sing Prison on August 7, 1958.
The Weinberger Kidnapping
FBI.gov
The Weinberger kidnapping in 1956 also changed the
kidnapping laws. On July 4, 1956, one-month-old Peter Weinberger was
kidnapped from the patio of his home in Westbury, New York. Examiners
from the Laboratory gave FBI and other federal agents a quick course in
handwriting analysis (Federal Bureau of Investigation n.d. [Weinberger
Kidnapping]). After examining nearly two million handwriting specimens—1,974,544
to be exact—the agents identified Angelo La Marca as the writer of the
ransom notes (Federal Bureau of Investigation November 1992).
La Marca, a taxi dispatcher and truck driver with a
wife and two children, was in financial trouble. He could not pay his
bills and was being threatened by a loan shark. The Weinberger baby was
a target of opportunity for him. He snatched the baby as a way to get
the money he needed to pay his bills. On August 22, 1956, after being
confronted with the evidence against him, La Marca confessed.
Unfortunately, little Peter Weinberger was already dead. Agents found
the baby’s remains on the side of the road where La Marca had abandoned
him (Federal Bureau of Investigation n.d. [Weinberger Kidnapping]).
La Marca was prosecuted in state court and convicted.
He was sentenced to death and executed at Sing Sing Prison on August 7,
1958 (Federal Bureau of Investigation n.d. [Weinberger Kidnapping]).
Following this case, President Eisenhower changed the
waiting period for the FBI to assist in kidnapping cases from seven days
to 24 hours. The law was changed again in 1990, mandating that all law
enforcement agencies take action in missing-child cases without
observing a waiting period (Federal Bureau of Investigation n.d. [Crimes
Against Children]).
It was a chilly and gray day in
Westbury, New York, when Beatrice Weinberger fed Peter his 5-ounce
bottle and placed her son in a carriage on the back patio of her home.
As Peter dozed she went inside to get a diaper. When she returned a few
minutes later, Peter was gone and in his place was left a brief ransom
note.
“I hate to do this to you, but I am in great trouble. Don’t notify the
police. I am not asking for a lot of money, only for what I need, and I
am very serious about this.”
When Morris Weinberger returned with his 4-year-old son, the family
surreptitiously made contact with police who laid a trap for the
kidnapper.
Unfortunately for police and the
Weinberger family, the New York Daily News got wind of the
story and ran with it. Of course, the rest of the East Coast press
picked it up and stormed Westbury to stake out the kidnap drop zone.
Dozens of reporters combed the
neighborhood looking for clues and watching the Weinberger house for
signs of a break. Eventually the police asked the reporters to leave,
allowing a photographer and print reporter to stay.
At 9:55 a.m. on July 5, two ransom packages were placed beneath trees
outside the Weinberger home. The packages contained envelopes filled
with blank paper wrapped with bank notes.
“Every instruction about leaving
the package was observed,” Detective Chief Stuyvesant Pinnell told the
press.
Ten minutes after the drop, a taxi
with a female passenger drove by the house three times. Later a red
station wagon driven by a woman paused near one of the packages, but
left when a small boy wandered down the road.
No one else appeared and for some
reason, police did not follow either of the cars.
When it was apparent that the drop had failed, authorities arranged for
Beatrice to make an appeal to the kidnapper via television and radio.
“I am the mother of Peter
Weinberger,” she read from a written statement. “I am willing to
cooperate in any way. I am most concerned of all for the welfare of by
baby. He is only four weeks old.”
Sadly, the only responses to her
plea were from cranks and low-lifes who wanted to take advantage of the
family. Several times people called demanding money, but it was clear
that they were not connected with the crime.
By the time Beatrice went on the
air, Peter Weinberger was already dead. He had been abandoned by the
kidnapper, a former cab driver (possibly the driver who appeared at the
drop zone) named Angelo LaMarca.
LaMarca was a family man who had
happened on tough times and had a petty record for operating an illegal
moonshine still.
On the surface nothing appeared to
be happening on the Weinberger kidnapping. Until there was evidence that
the kidnapper had crossed state lines or until a week passed, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation was prohibited from entering the
investigation. On July 11 the week deadline passed and the FBI took over
the investigation. They began by analyzing the handwritten ransom note.
Over the course of a month they
examined 2 million handwriting samples. They looked at 75,000
fingerprint cards without a match.
Eventually, while looking at
records from the Federal District Court for New York City, they came
across Angelo LaMarca’s signature. He had been arrested two years before
and pleaded guilty to running an illegal still. Laboratory technicians
matched it to the ransom note and rushed to Nassau County on Long
Island, where LaMarca lived with his pregnant wife and two children.
LaMarca was arrested on August 24,
and confessed shortly after. He told police that he abandoned the child
when he saw police around the drop zone on July 5. The Weinbergers held
out hope.
“We are still praying that our
child is alive and well and is being cared for by someone somewhere,”
Beatrice said. “We will not believe otherwise untiul we hear contrary
from someone in authority.
“We cannot put into words our
feelings at the present time.”
On August 25, the decomposed body of Peter Weinberger, still in the
clothes that he was wearing when he was taken from his home, was found.
LaMarca, 31, told authorities where to find the boy — beneath a
honeysuckle vine.
It turns out the Peter was simply a target of opportunity. LaMarca told
authorities that he had written the note in advance, but didn’t have a
particular child in mind.
He also told police that he was spurred on by ever-increasing debts, and
his wife said that his concern over his finances had pushed him into a
deep depression.
“He said he wrote the note but didn’t have anything to do with the
murder,” LaMarca’s wife, Donna, told reporters. “Someone else is
involved, but he won’t say who.”
In November, 1956, Angelo LaMarca went on trial for kidnapping and
murder — crimes that carried the death penalty. The pressure of his
debts prompted temporary insanity, his lawyers unsuccessfully claimed.
After the defense asked for mercy
for the father of a 9-year-old boy and 6-year-old girl, the prosecution
reacted strongly to that plea.
“What mercy was shown baby Peter when he was left in that woods?”
District Attorney Frank Gulotta asked the jury. “What mercy did he show
then?”
He was convicted of both crimes in
December 1956. Whe the death sentence was pronounced, LaMarca’s knees
wobbled and he sank back into his chair.
Two years later, LaMarca got something that the Weinbergers never had —
he said farewell to his young children.
“They got along fine,” Donna
LaMarca said. “He told them to do well in school and to take care of me.
(The girl) is too young to understand, but (the boy) knows what’s
happening.
The next morning, after eating a
hearty breakfast, a silent, but whimpering LaMarca was led into the Sing
Sing death chamber and after a last minute plea to Governor Averell
Harriman failed, was electrocuted.