Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
On
04/18/84, Lambrix filed a Direct Appeal to the Florida Supreme Court.
He contended that errors occurred during the guilt phase of his trial.
The errors that occurred were the lack of a representative jury due to
the exclusion of members opposed to the death penalty and restricted
cross-examination of an investigator. The Court affirmed Lambrix’s
convictions and sentence on 09/25/86.
A Petition for Writ of
Certiorari was filed on 10/02/87 to the United States Supreme Court. It
was denied on 08/18/88.
Lambrix filed a 3.850 Motion to the Circuit Court on 10/27/88, which was
denied on 11/18/88.
On
11/21/88, a 3.850 Appeal was filed to the Florida Supreme Court. On
11/30/88, the Court affirmed the denial of Lambrix’s motion.
On
12/01/88, a Petition for Writ of Habeas was filed to the Circuit Court.
It was denied on 06/26/89.
On
07/04/89, Lambrix filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to the
Florida Supreme Court. The petition was denied on 04/26/90. A mandate
was issued on 05/29/90.
A
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was filed to the United States
District Court, Middle District on 12/01/88. It was denied on 05/12/92.
A
Habeas Appeal was filed to the United States Court of Appeals, 11th
Circuit on 06/17/92. On 01/03/96, the United States Court of Appeals
affirmed the denial of Lambrix’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
A
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was filed to the Florida Supreme
Court on 06/16/93. The petition was denied on 06/16/94. Lambrix raised
the issue of Espinosa, which was procedurally barred since it was
not presented in his direct appeal. Lambrix argued ineffective counsel,
which was also barred due to the fact that it had previously been
considered and rejected in another Habeas petition.
Lambrix filed a 3.850 Motion to the Circuit Court on 10/07/94, which was
denied on 03/23/95
On
07/21/95, a 3.850 appeal was filed to the Florida Supreme Court. The
petition was denied on 09/12/96. Lambrix contended that he should have
been allowed to represent himself in trial. This argument was dismissed
on the basis that he waited six years to present the issue, which is
past the two-year limit stated in the 3.850 rule. Lambrix also argued
ineffective counsel, which was also barred.
A
Petition for Writ of Certiorari was filed to the United States Supreme
Court on 08/16/96. The petition was granted on 11/01/96.
A
Petition for Writ of Certiorari was filed to the United States Supreme
Court on 12/06/96. The petition was affirmed on 05/12/97. A mandate was
issued on 06/11/97.
On
11/17/97, a Petition for Writ of Certiorari was filed to the United
States Supreme Court. It was denied on 02/23/98.
On
01/20/98, Lambrix filed a 3.850 Motion to the Circuit Court, which was
amended on
01/20/01. The motion
Imagine being
convicted and condemned to death for the alleged crime of
premeditated murder that simply never happened- a crime
deliberately fabricated by an over zealous, politically ambitious
State Prosecutor concerned more with manipulating a rural
community's emotions into a vindictive passion to gain political
popularity than objectively pursuing justice. Even then, when the
first jury could not agree on any verdict, a subsequent retrial
was held in the same small community, and to ensure a conviction
would be rendered at any cost, the State substituted the original
local judge with a judge from another county known for his exteme
bias against capital murder defendants.
No, this isn't the outline of an imaginative Hollywood plot. It is
the basis of the case against Cary Michael Lambrix in the state of
Florida. This case begins in February 1983. At the time Mike Lambrix
was 22 years old, living with a 31 year old woman by the name of Frances.
They shared a rented mobile home located on a large ranch in rural
Glades County, Florida. On the night of Saturday February 5, 1983, both
Mike and Frances decided to go into the nearby town of LaBelle to have a
few drinks at the Town Tavern. Shortly after arriving, a man
introducing himself as ‘Chip' joined Mike and Frances. Had Mike and
Frances known that ‘Chip' was a 35 year old ex-convict and known drug
smuggler with a criminal history of physically assaulting women,
undoubtedly they would have avoided him.
As the three conversed, a young
local waitress by the name of Aleisha Bryant joined Chip as his date and
the four decided to go to another lounge that featured dancing. For the
rest of the evening and into the early morning hours the four continued
drinking and dancing until ‘Squeaky's Lounge' closed. Chip had
previously made plans to return to Miami and Aleisha had to work the
early shift at LaBelle's Whites Restaurant, and so it was agreed the
four would return to Mike and Frances's trailer to pass the few hours
until Aleisha had to be at work and Chip would drop her off on his way
out of town.
Once back at the trailer,
Frances began to cook a late dinner of spaghetti while Mike, Chip and
Aleisha congregated in the adjacent living room. Frances later insisted
all three were laughing, teasing and playing around. The stereo was
turned up loud, so she couldn't hear what was being said. As Frances
continued cooking, Mike and Chip decided to go out to his car to
retrieve some music tapes for the stereo as Aleisha stayed inside with
Frances. It was now early Sunday morning, Feb 6th. There were no
lights and so Frances insisted she could neither see or hear anything
outside.
Once outside, their judgement
obviously impaired by a night of heavy drinking, Mike and Chip
concocted a plan to play a practical joke on Frances and Aleisha by
going around the trailer and scratching at the kitchen window in an
attempt to spook them. But, neither Frances or Aleisha heard the
persistent scratching. Now determined to succeed, Mike and Chip came
up with an alternative plan. Chip would hide at the nearby cattle
feed trough while Mike went back inside and got the two women to come
out and as they approached the trough, Chip would jump out. Once back
inside, only Aleisha would venture out as Frances stayed inside to
finish cooking. Almost an hour passed during which Frances claimed she
neither saw or heard anything outside. Then Mike suddenly came back
inside, ‘covered' with blood saying only ‘they're dead'. Frances said
she repeatedly asked Mike what happened, but he wouldn't talk about it.
Mike went into the bathroom and washed up and changed clothes, then he
and Frances briefly discussed what to do, as Frances knew Mike had an
arrest warrant outstanding from when he walked away from a state
‘Halfway House', where Mike was serving a sentence for a ‘bounced'
check charge. It was mutually decided that they cold not call the
Sheriff's Department as they would take Mike into custody. So, they
decided to superficially conceal the two bodies, then abandon Chip's
car far away and leave the area for good.
Several days later Frances was
herself arrested on unrelated charges and gave numerous statements
denying knowing Mike or her recent whereabouts. The police had no
reason to suspect Mike of any "murder" and Frances made a point of not
telling them anything about Chip or Aleisha. Then days later Frances
bonded out of jail and with the assistance of her family, retained a
private lawyer and after receiving legal advice, she went into the State
Attorney's office in Tampa, Florida and told them that Mike had "forced"
her to help conceal the two bodies and that she could show them where.
When asked if she knew why Mike had allegedly killed Chip and Aleisha,
she insisted repeatedly that she did not see or hear anything that
transpired outside, and all she knew was that Mike and Chip went outside
only to have Mike return alone 20 minutes later asking her and Aleisha
to go outside. But, she stayed in while Aleisha went out with Mike and
almost an hour later Mike came back alone, "covered" with blood and in
apparent shock said only that "they're dead", then washed up and changed
clothes and then "forced" her to assist in superficially concealing the
two bodies at the back of a large pasture behind the trailer.
Based upon the information
Frances provided, the local Sheriff's department and State Attorney's
office recovered the bodies and issued an arrest warrant charging Mike
with murder. Without knowing what might have actually happened outside
between Mike, Chip and Aleisha, the local State Attorney (Randall
McGruther) came up with a theory that Mike had deliberately ‘lured'
this local couple to the remote trailer with the pre-meditated
intention of robbing and killing each, even though there was virtually
NO evidence to support this fabricated theory. In fact, when the
bodies were recovered, both had jewelry, money and other personal
effects on them. Neither was ‘robbed' of anything and Mike was never
charged with robbery.
The fact that no evidence
existed to support the theory of robbery is an important point. In
Florida, as in many other states, if a person is killed during the
commission of a robbery, then the perpetrator is charged with ‘Felony"
murder and the State does not have to prove that the perpetrator
actually intended to kill anyone. Rather, the State need only prove
that a robbery occurred and the person charged committed the robbery
and because of or during that robbery a person died- even if by a
heart attack- and it's Capital Murder. But, since there was virtually
no actual evidence that any robbery ever occurred, the state was
prohibited from actually charging Mike with robbery and was obligated
to prove the higher standard of actual premeditated intent to kill
Chip and Aleisha.
By the time Mike was arrested
several weeks later, the State Attorney's office had manipulated the
local newspaper into working up the small community passions with this
fabricated theory of cold blooded robbery and murder by an alleged "escaped
convict", not bothering to point out Mike was not in prison, rather, he
simply walked away from a State Halfway house. But it wasn't about
truth....it was about gaining public support for a politically ambitious
prosecutor.
Mike adamently refused to talk
to the police or media, but Mike's version of what happened that night
never changed, with Frances insisting that she neither saw or heard
anything outside. Mike could provide an account of what had happened
that resulted in their deaths.
As Mike stated, after he and
Chip unsuccesssfully tried to playfully spook Frances and Aleisha by
scratching at the trailer window, Mike went back inside to ask
Frances and Aleisha out while Chip concealed himself at a nearby
cattle trough. But, only Aleisha came out and Frances stayed inside
to finish cooking as Mike and Aleisha walked around the back of the
trailer towards the feed trough. Chip suddenly jumped out at her,
successfully scaring Aleisha- which both Mike and Chip thought was
very funny. But, Aleisha became very angry at both the stupidity of
this intoxicated joke and the subsequent laughing at her expense and
immediately began verbally assaulting Chip with a barrage of profanity,
and the two began arguing amongst themselves. Mike, still assuming
these two had an actual relationship, decided to let them work it out
between them and slowly made his way back to the trailer, playing with
his dog along the way.
It took a good ten minutes or
better for Mike to make his way around the trailer perimeter fence and
as he approached the trailer, Mike heard a quick scream coming from
the pasture area where he left Chip and Aleisha. Unsure of this
strange sound, Mike waited a moment and heard another more pronounced
scream, clearly someone in trouble. Immediately Mike began back
around the trailer towards the pasture. The property bordered the 200
square mile "Fishery Creek Wildlife Management Area" and a swampy "Bee
Branch Creek", so snakes, wild animals and even an occasional
alligator ventured into the pasture adjacent to the trailer. As Mike
passed a car he had been working on earlier that day, he spontaneously
grabbed the rod-type jack handle as protection.
As Mike went into the pasture
area, he quickly discovered that Chip ane Aleisha were not at the feed
trough where he had left them. It was early morning and no light so
Mike was unable to see beyond a few feet. Mike's dog sensed the
presence of something further back in the pasture and Mike cautiously
began in that direction. As Mike approached the near pasture fence
about 800 to 1000 feet behind the trailer, he began hearing a faint
pounding sound and suddenly walked upon Chip straddling over Aleisha
pinning her motionless on the ground beneath him as he continued
physically assaulting her.
Without stopping, Mike ordered
Chip to let Aleisha go, but Chip refused and Mike forcibly pushed Chip
off Aleisha, even though Chip was substantially larger than Mike. As
Chip fell to the ground on the far side of Aleisha, he immediately
sprung up at Mike who spontaneously swung the solid metal rod, hitting
Chip in the head numerous times before realizing Chip was down. Then
Mike dropped the jack handle and attempted to help Aleisha. She
remained motionless, her clothes disarrayed. Mike assumed she was
unconscious, picked her up and began going back to the trailer before
having to lay her down.
Still assuming she was
unconscious from the assault inflicted by Chip, Mike attempted to mouth
to mouth revive her to no avail. Realizing that she was dead, Mike
returned to where he left Chip to check on him, but the blows had
crushed his skull and he was obviously beyond help. Now in a state of
surreal shock, Mike returned to the trailer and told Frances "they're
dead". After he washed up and changed clothes, Mike and Frances
mutually decided to superficially conceal the bodies and then abandon
Chip's car away from the area.
The State attorney was not
provided Mike's versions of events as a criminal defendant simply does
not talk to the prosecuting attorney, nor did Mike provide the police
with any statement, as by law any statement could be used against you.
Towards the end of 1983, the State attempted to have Mike plea guilty
to a lesser charge, but Mike insisted on his innocence to any act of
murder and a trial date was scheduled to begin December 2, 1983.
On the first day of the
scheduled trial, for reasons that to this date are still not clear, Mike
was brought into the Judge's chambers, and, on record effectively
ordered by the trial Judge that he would NOT be allowed to testify at
the trial. Mike's appointed Public Defender felt that the State's
wholly circumstantial case was so weak that the State could not prove
any case beyond a reasonable doubt and so they approached the Judge and
advised the Judge that they (Kentry Enguaison and Robert Jacobs) did not
want Mike to testify and asked the Judge to instruct Mike that he could
not testify. Judge Adams did as they requested, even though there is a
clearly established legal right to testify on your own behalf.
As the trial progressed,
Mike's Public Defender methodically broke down the State's fabricated
theory of premeditated murder through cross examination of the State's
own witnesses. The State claimed that Mike "lured" this couple back
to his trailer to kill them, the motive being robbery, yet in truth
Mike had no way of knowing that he would have by chance met them, and
there clearly was no robbery. The State's key witness, Mike's ex-girlfriend
Frances, testified that Mike went out first with Chip and then came
back alone "looking normal" and took Aleisha out. Frances admitted she
saw or heard nothing and the last time she saw them, they were "laughing,
teasing and playing around" with each other with no indication of
animosity between any of them.
More importantly, Frances was
absolutely certain that Mike did NOT have any blood on him when he
came back in a alone to get Aleisha to come out, but the State's own
Medical Examiner concluded that substantial amounts of blood on Mike
upon returning AFTER Aleisha went outside could only have come from
Chip as Aleisha did not experience any physical trauma that would have
caused significant bleeding. Thus, Chip HAD to have been alive
outside when Aleisha went out, how could Mike have killed both at the
same time, especially when both Chip and Aleisha were larger than Mike?
More importantly, the State's
own Medical Examiner concluded that all the blows administered upon
Chip were inflicted in a continuous swinging motion to the front
temporal area of his head and there were no defensive wounds. The
position of the wounds and absence of defensive wounds strongly
implies that Chip had to be the aggressor, and entirely supports
Mike's claim of self defense.
As for Aleisha Bryant, the
Medical Examiner concluded death as "probable strangulation", even
though the physical signs of trauma normally associated with
strangulation were not found, such as haemorraging in the neck area and
fracture of the larynx. But, more importantly, it was established that
to inflict death by strangulation, substantial pressure had to be
continuously applied for 3 to 5 minutes to render the victim unconscious.
A 19 year old 185 pound woman simply is not going to passively stand by
and be strangled to death without fighting for her life. For this reason
it is a standard procedure to collect "fingernail scrapings" from such a
victim and fingernail scrapings were undoubtedly collected in this
case. But when Frances insisted that Mike had no bruises or scratches
consistent with what Aleisha would have inflicted upon her assailant,
and that Chip DID have such scratches, these fingernail scrapings
conveniently disappeared from the State's evidence room.
No defense beyond establishing
reasonable doubt was presented and without Mike being able to
personally testify, his version of what actually transpired outside
resulting in Chip's and Aleisha's death NEVER came out. The jury
deliberated 11 continuous hours without being able to agree upon any
verdict when the trial judge declared it a ‘Hung jury' and dismissed
that jury, ordering a retrial.
The failure to convict Mike of
the allegedly brutal murder became the feature story of the local
newspaper. The retrial was ordered for February 1984 which was an
election year and convicting Mike became a political priority.
Knowing that its case was weak, the State again attempted to convince
Mike to plea guilty to a reduced charge and lenient sentence, but Mike
refused. Then just before the retrial began, the original Judge was
removed and an extremely pro-prosecution Judge was brought in. Judge
Stanley was previously a career prosecutor and known for his policy of
always sentencing convicted murderers to death, even when a jury
recommended life that particular year.
Judge Stanley's extreme bias
quickly manifested itself at the retrial. Motion to move the trial
out of Glades County because of the saturation of prejudicial pretrial
media coverage was denied. As Judge Stanley presided over impaneling a
jury, attempts to strike biased jurors were circumvented and the jury
that tried the case included 4 jurists related to members of the small
local sheriff's department, including the stepfather of a local deputy
(Ralph Alan Green)who was actually under an FBI investigation at the
time for allegedly attempting to physically beat a confession out of
Mike at the County Jail a month earlier, requiring Mike to be
hospitalized.
Judge Stanley then prohibited
Mike's Public Defender from questioning Frances, the State's key witness
on the numerous conflicting stories she gave to the police that directly
contradicted her trial testimony, and refused to allow evidence of
alcohol intoxication in, as such evidence could preclude capital murder
by legally negating actual premeditation. Again Mike was not allowed to
testify and no defense whatsoever was allowed. NOT surprisingly, it
took the jury less than 2 hours to convict Mike of two counts of
premeditated capital murder, and one juror was later heard to complain
that the only reason it took that long was because they couldn't get the
coffee pot to work right away.
On March 22, 1984, Mike was
sentenced to death and sent to Florida's death row. The Judge then
appointed a local ex-prosecutor to represent Mike on appeal, and ex
former Chief Justice Alan Sundberg later testified on Mike's behalf:
this pretense of an appeal was unquestionably the most incompetent
appeal he had ever seen in a capital case. Having succeeded in
preventing Mike from proving his actual innocence of murder at trial,
the politically motivated Judge subsequently obstructed Mike's ability
to prove his innocence on appeal, knowing that Mike's claim and
evidence of self defense was not fully presented on appeal, it would
be procedurally barred from review forever.
It's been 17 years now and
Mike continues to languish on Florida's death row, convicted and
condemned to death for a crime of murder FABRICATED by an over zealous
prosecutor. There never was any eyewitnesses, any physical evidence
or any confessions, nothing but a wholly circumstantial case. Justice
remains to be served and you can help by writing to the Judges and
State Governor and encouraging them to simply allow Mike a fair
opportunity to be heard and the evidence fully considered. Without
support, especially international support, Mike could very well be
executed for a crime of premeditated murder that simply never took
place. The objective evidence accumulated by the State's own Medical
Examiner conclusively supports Mike's claim of what actually took
place that night. But Mike's side of what happened has never been
heard and there's something SERIOUSLY WRONG with any judicial system
that prohibits the accused from telling the jury his side. Justice can
NEVER be served when a criminal defendant is prohibited from defending
against the government's accusations.