Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
16 year old Adria Sauceda was at a block party in San Antonio,
became intoxicated, and was driven away from the scene by Leal,
who claimed to know her mother. About 30 minutes later, Leal’s
brother arrived at the party and excitedly yelled "What the hell
happened?" and explained that Humberto had come home with blood on
him saying he had killed a girl.
Adria's nude body was found nearby on a dirt
road. Her head had been bludgeoned with a 30-40 pound chunk of
asphalt. There was a bloody and broken stick protruding from her
vagina. Bite marks were found on her chest, neck and cheek.
Later that day, police questioned Leal and
searched his house. Police seized a blouse belonging to Sauceda
that contained several blood stains, hair and fibers. Blood and
other bodily fluids were found on Leal’s underwear. Police found
blood stains on the passenger door and seat of Leal’s car. Leal
had scratches and cuts on his body. He stated that he was with
Sauceda in his car when she began hitting him and the steering
wheel, causing him to hit a curb. He tried to calm her down, but
she leaped from the car and ran away. After waiting about ten to
fifteen minutes to see if she would return, he went home.
After the police informed Leal that his brother
had also given a statement, Leal gave another statement. This
time, Leal claimed that he followed Sauceda after she jumped out
of the car. She attacked him, and he pushed her away. She fell on
the ground and did not get up. Leal attempted to wake her, but
could not. When he saw bubbles coming out of her nose, he got
scared and left. He said he went home, prayed, and told family
members what had happened.
Citations:
Ex Parte Leal,Not Reported in S.W.3d, 2011 WL 2581917 (Tex.Crim.App.
2011). (PCR) Leal v. Dretke, 428 F.3d 543 (5th Cir. 2005). (Habeas) Garcia v. Texas, --- S.Ct. ----, 2011 WL 2651245 (2011). (Stay)
Final/Special Meal:
Fried chicken, Tacos, Fried okra, A bowl of pico de gallo, and two
Cokes.
Last Words:
"I truly am sorry. That is all. I've hurt a lot of people. I take
full blame for everything. I am sorry for what I did. May they
forgive me. Let's get this show on the road, Warden. One more
thing: Viva Mexico, Viva Mexico."
Humberto Leal Jr.
Date of Birth: 01-16-73
DR#: 999162
Date Received: 09-01-95
Education: 8 years
Occupation: mechanic
Date of Offense: 05-21-94
County of Offense: Bexar
Native County: Monterrey, Mexico
Race: Hispanic
Gender: Male
Hair Color: Black
Eye Color: Brown
Height: 5' 11"
Weight: 188
Prior Prison Record: None.
Summary of incident: Convicted in the abduction,
rape, and bludgeoning death of 16 year old Adria Saveda of San
Antonio. Saveda was raped with a piece of lumber and her head
crushed by a 35 pound piece of aspalt after being abducted from a
perty by Leal. Her nude body was found near a creek off Reforma
drive with the piece of lumber still protruding from her vagina.
when arrested, police found scratches and cuts on Leal's face and
body.
Co-Defendants: None.
Texas Attorney General
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Media Advisory: Humberto Leal scheduled for
execution
AUSTIN – Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott
offers the following information about Humberto Leal, who is
scheduled to be executed after 6 p.m. on Thursday, July 7, 2011. A
Texas jury sentenced Leal to death in July 1995 for the capital
murder of Adria Sauceda.
FACTS OF THE CRIME
On May 20, 1994, sixteen-year-old Adria Sauceda
and Humberto Leal were at a party. At some point, an intoxicated
but conscious Sauceda was placed in Leal’s car, and Leal got in
the vehicle and drove away. About thirty minutes later, Leal’s
brother arrived at the party and yelled that Leal had come home
with blood on him saying he had killed a girl.
Several of the party members went looking for
Sauceda in the same general area where the party was held. They
called police after they found her nude body on a dirt road. They
noticed Sauceda’s head had been bashed in and it was bleeding.
When the police arrived, they saw the nude Sauceda lying on her
back. There was a 30- to 40 pound chunk of asphalt lying partially
on Sauceda's left arm. Blood was underneath this rock. A smaller
rock with blood on it was located near Sauceda’s right thigh.
Sauceda’s head was splattered with blood. There was a bloody and
broken stick protruding from Sauceda’s vagina.
Later that day, police questioned Leal and
searched his house. Police seized a blouse belonging to Sauceda
that contained several blood stains, hair and fibers. The police
also confiscated Leal’s clothing from the night of the murder.
Blood and other bodily fluid were found on Leal’s underwear.
Police found blood stains on the passenger door and seat of Leal’s
car. Police later arrested Leal at his home. A medical examiner
testified that Sauceda died from blows to the head and that based
on the injuries to her head, she would had to have been struck
with the rock two or three times. The medical examiner said
Sauceda’s neck also contained injuries consistent with manual
strangulation and that she had three bite marks on her body that
matched dental impressions of Leal’s teeth.
Leal admitted at his trial that as he was
taking Sauceda from the party he turned in the opposite direction
from the way she had directed him to drive and when she attempted
to get out of his car he refused to allow her to do so. He
testified that when Sauceda finally did exit his car, he attempted
to pull her back, but said she began hitting, pushing, and
scratching his face. He testified that when Sauceda scratched him,
he pushed her, felt something wet on the back of her head, shook
her in an unsuccessful attempt to wake her, and then fled in fear
when he saw bubbles coming out of her nose.
EVIDENCE OF FUTURE DANGEROUSNESS
During the punishment phase of his trial, the
jury learned that two weeks before Sauceda’s murder, Leal sexually
assaulted another teenage girl and bit her on the neck. The jury
also learned that, following that assault, Leal had repeatedly
telephoned the girl’s older sister and threatened to have someone
kill her if she testified against him. Finally, the jury learned
that Leal had a reputation of not being a peaceful and law abiding
citizen and that he had a history of intimidating and bullying his
fellow students and teachers.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
08/17/94 - A Bexar County grand jury indicted
Leal for capital murder.
07/11/95 - A Bexar County jury convicted Leal
of capital murder.
09/17/97 - Leal filed an original application
for a state writ of habeas corpus.
02/04/98 - Leal’s conviction and sentence
were affirmed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
02/22/99 - The Supreme Court denied Leal’s
petition for certiorari.
10/20/99 - The Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals denied state habeas relief.
03/14/00 - Leal filed a petition for a
federal writ of habeas corpus.
03/20/00 - Leal’s petition for certiorari for
his first state habeas application was denied.
10/20/04 - A San Antonio federal district
court denied habeas relief.
03/24/05 -Leal filed his second state habeas
application.
10/13/05 -The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed
the denial of Leal’s first federal habeas petition.
04/17/06 - The Supreme Court denied Leal’s
petition for certiorari.
03/07/07 - The Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals dismissed Leal’s second state habeas application.
03/14/07 - Leal filed his second federal
habeas petition.
12/17/07 - A San Antonio federal district
court dismissed Leal’s second federal habeas petition.
03/31/08 - The Supreme Court denied Leal’s
petition for certiorari.
06/02/08 - Leal filed a motion for DNA
testing in the trial court.
10/10/08 - The trial court denied Leal’s
motion for DNA testing.
12/03/08 - The Texas Court of Appeals
dismissed appeal of trial court’s denial of DNA testing.
11/18/09 - The Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals denied appeal of the trial court’s denial of DNA testing.
12/01/09 - Leal filed a Section 1983 lawsuit
in federal district court.
04/21/10 - The federal district court
dismissed Leal’s 1983 lawsuit without prejudice.
11/08/10 - The Bexar County trial court
scheduled Leal’s execution for July 7, 2011.
03/28/11 - Leal filed lawsuit challenging the
Texas lethal-injection protocol.
04/28/11 - The Travis County court dismissed
Leal’s lawsuit for want of jurisdiction.
05/18/11 - Leal filed a motion to amend his
1983 suit in a San Antonio federal district court.
06/07/11 - Leal filed a clemency petition
with the Board of Pardons and Paroles.
06/10/11 - The Texas Court of Appeals
affirmed the Travis County district court’s decision.
06/10/11 - Leal filed a motion for an
evidentiary hearing in a San Antonio federal district court
06/14/11 - Leal filed a request for a
temporary restraining order in federal district court.
06/16/11 - Leal filed his third federal
habeas petition in U.S. District Court.
06/20/11 – Leal’s 1983 suit was dismissed by
the federal district court.
06/22/11 – U.S. District Court dismissed
Leal’s third federal habeas application without prejudice.
06/23/11 – Leal filed a second subsequent
application for post-conviction writ of habeas corpus.
06/27/11 - Leal filed a motion for emergency
relief in the Texas Supreme Court.
06/27/11 – The Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals denied Leal’s application for a post-conviction writ.
06/28/11 - Leal filed motions for a stay, a
cert petition and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
06/30/11 - Leal filed appeal of dismissal of
his third federal habeas petition.
06/30/11 - The Texas Supreme Court denied
Leal's petition for review.
06/30/11 -- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Fifth Circuit denied Leal's motion for stay.
07/01/11 -- Leal filed a supplemental brief
in the U.S. Supreme Court.
07/01/11 -- Leal filed a petition for
certiorari in the U.S. the Supreme Court.
07/01/11 -- The U.S. Court of Appeals denied
appeal of dismissal of his Section 1983 lawsuit.
07/05/11 -- The Board of Pardons and Paroles
decided not to recommend 180-day reprieve of execution.
Texas ignores U.S. protests; Killer of San
Antonio teen executed
By Brandon Scott - ItemOnline.com
Jul 08, 2011
HUNTSVILLE — Despite warnings from the U.S.
government, Texas put to death Mexican national Humberto Leal on
Thursday for the 1994 abduction, rape and murder of 16-year-old
Adria Saveda of San Antonio.
Leal, an illegal alien who moved to the U.S. as
a young child, was denied legal assistance through the Mexican
consulate, an issue that incited challenges to his execution and a
flurry of requests for a delay. The Obama administration had asked
the Supreme Court for a stay, expressing concern for Americans
accused of crimes while traveling outside the country, according
to the Associated Press.
Preston Parsley, who traveled to Huntsville
from San Antonio to protest Thursday's execution, said he wanted
to express his opposition to what he believes is an unjust
practice by the state. ”Proper procedures weren't followed,” he
said. “This put citizens abroad at risk.”
Antonia Mendoza of Houston, who identified
herself as Leal's “second aunt,” spent time Thursday evening
outside the Huntsville “Walls” Unit — where the death house is
located — comforting Leal's mother, Francisca Leal. ”I’m sad at
what she must be going through," Mendoza said. “(Humberto) and I
haven't been close. We keep in touch since all this through the
news and TV."
Leal's uncle Jaime Sanchez, also from Houston,
spoke to The Item through a translator. Sanchez said he felt sad
and hoped the U.S. Supreme Court would grant his nephew a last-minute
stay of execution. I hope they cancel it,” he said while gathered
with family on the grounds of the Walls Unit before the execution
was carried out. “I hope they give more of a chance to look at the
evidence and revise the investigation. They're going to make an
error if they execute.”
But Leal was remorseful leading up to his death.
Lying strapped to a gurney in the death house, he apologized for
his actions and said he wanted Christ in his life. “I’ve hurt a
lot of people,” Leal said. “I know Christ has forgiven me, and I
accept his forgiveness. I am sorry for the victim’s family for
what I did. May they forgive me. Let’s get this show on the road,
Warden.” Leal still had one last statement to make before he died,
much to the delight of his sister Mary Angel Tello, who wept
during the entire process, eventually vomiting while inside the
Walls Unit. “Viva Mexico,” Leal said before taking his last breath,
and then he shouted, “Viva Mexico.”
Last week, the Obama administration asked the
Supreme Court to delay Leal’s execution for up to six months to
give Congress time to consider the newly proposed Consular
Notification Compliance Act, which would allow federal courts to
review cases of foreign offenders to help determine if the lack of
consular help makes a difference in the outcome of their cases,
the AP reported. This legislation would bring the U.S. into
compliance with the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
regarding the arrest of foreign nationals. Congress has twice
failed to pass similar legislation.
In a 2004 ruling, the International Court of
Justice suggested reviewing these cases as a remedy to its finding
that the U.S. had violated the Vienna Convention by not allowing
51 Mexican nationals, including Leal, to request help from their
consulate when they were arrested.
Leal’s defense attorneys told the Texas Board
of Pardons and Paroles earlier this week that Mexico’s assistance
came after it was too late to affect the outcome of Leal’s trial.
Two inmates in other states have been moved off death row as a
result of the ruling, one in Oklahoma and one in Arkansas,
according to public records.
The state, however, argued that the evidence,
particularly his own statements and those of his brother,
convincingly showed Leal's guilt, Leal’s victim, Saveda, was
abducted after attending a party by Leal. Authorities found her
nude body near a creek. She had been sodomized with a piece of
lumber and her head had been crushed by a 35-pound piece of
asphalt. When police arrested Leal, he bore cuts and scratches on
his face and body. Evidence also included Saveda’s bloody blouse,
found at Leal’s residence.
Seven more executions are scheduled in Texas
this year, including four in September within an eight-day time
span.
U.N. official says the U.S. was in breach of
international law
DailyMail.co.uk
8th July 2011
Executed: Humberto Leal Garcia lost his appeal
against execution amid claims he was denied his rights under the
Vienna Convention A United Nations official said that the U.S. was
in breach of international law when they put Humberto Leal Garcia
to death in a prison in Texas last night. The 38-year-old Mexican
citizen was executed by lethal injection for raping and
bludgeoning Adria Sauceda, 16, to death with a 40-pound chunk of
asphalt.
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi
Pillay said Leal's execution 'raises particular legal concerns',
including whether he had access to consular services and a fair
trial. Pillay also cited a 2004 International Court of Justice
ruling saying the U.S. must review and reconsider the cases of 51
Mexican nationals sentenced to death, including Leal's. He claims
this never happened. In his last statement before he died, Leal
apologized to the victim's family and asked for their forgiveness,
according to MSNBC.
He said: 'I truly am sorry. That is all. Let's
get this show on the road. 'One more thing: Viva Mexico, Viva
Mexico'
Texas executed Leal despite objections from
President Obama's administration that the action would violate
international treaty obligations and put U.S. citizens abroad at
risk. The high court's 5-4 decision was a setback for the
administration.
While there were few who doubted his guilt,
Garcia's lawyers said he was not given the chance to contact the
Mexican consul which was his right under The Vienna Convention.
The White House also fear that his execution could affect U.S.
diplomatic interests.
Governor of Texas, Rick Perry, had already
rejected appeals to stop the execution from former president
George W Bush as well as diplomats, judges, senior military
officers and the United Nations. Before the Supreme Court ruling
came through a spokesman said the governor had no plans to halt
the execution and the Texas Attorney General's office has urged
the Supreme Court not to intervene. Leal made the 45-mile trip to
the Huntsville Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
from death row at the Polunsky Unit, just outside Livingston.
Appeal: The Obama administration was keen to
stop the execution believing it could be detrimental to
international relations and affect the treatment of Americans
arrested abroad
Prison officials described him as calm. Leal's
final meal request included fried chicken, tacos, fried okra and a
bowl of pico de gallo. He selected a sister, one of his attorneys
and three friends to witness his lethal injection. Also scheduled
to witness are two friends of the father of his victim, 16-year-old
Adria Sauceda of San Antonio.
Leal was convicted in 1994 of raping the girl
before bludgeoning her to death with a '30 to 40-pound' piece of
asphalt rock 'roughly twice the size of the victim's skull' in San
Antonio Texas. 'There was a gaping hole from the corner of the
victim's right eye extending to the centre of her head from which
blood was oozing,' court documents read. 'The victim's head was
splattered with blood.'
Texas authorities failed to tell Leal, who was
born in Mexico and has lived in the U.S. since the age of two,
that under the Vienna convention he was entitled to contact the
Mexican consulate when he was arrested.
Texas Governor Rick Perry brushed aside appeals
from the United Nations and top diplomats to stay Leah's execution
Leal's lawyers argued that the lack of consular access played a
role in the death penalty being applied because the Mexican
national incriminated himself in statements made during 'non-custodial
interviews' with the police on the day of the murder. Had Leal
been given access to the Mexican consulate it would have been
likely to have arranged a lawyer who would have advised the
accused man to limit his statements to the police. As it was, the
Mexican authorities were never informed of his arrest.
However Texas officials argue that Leal Garcia
made statements to authorities before he was in custody and thus
outside the purview of the Vienna Convention. State Department
spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said the federal government had filed
a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on July 1 supporting Humberto
Leal Garcia's bid for a stay of execution until the end of this
year.
The UN high commissioner for human rights, Navi
Pillay, appealed to Perry to commute Leal's sentence to life
imprisonment She said: 'This is to allow some consideration of the
fact that Mr. Leal was not afforded a visit by Mexican consular
officials at an appropriate moment in the trial proceeding - so to
allow that to be taken into account.'
The Obama administration warned that allowing
the execution to go forward could have serious repercussions on
U.S. foreign relations and implications for Americans arrested
abroad. In a letter dated June 28, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder wrote: 'The United States
is best positioned to demand that foreign governments respect
consular rights with respect to U.S. citizens abroad when we
comply with these same obligations for foreign nationals in the
United States.'
A 2004 ruling by the International Court of
Justice held that the United States must review Leal Garcia's
conviction and sentence to remedy earlier instances in which the
Vienna Convention had not been honored in U.S. criminal cases. The
top U.N. human rights official last week urged Texas call off Leal
Garcia's execution, as have dozens of former U.S. law enforcement
officials and ex-diplomats who argue that it would put Americans
at risk in prosecutions abroad.
Sandra Babcock, a Northwestern University Law
School professor, has been hired by the Mexican government to
represent Leal. She points to the fact that, three years ago, the
U.S. Supreme Court rejected a similar appeal by a Mexican national
convicted in Texas who objected to the lack of consular
consultation. She said: 'We have presented substantial evidence
that in this case, the Vienna Convention really mattered. 'The
fact is that, if Mr. Leal had received the consular assistance
that he was entitled to, he never would have been convicted, let
alone sentenced to death.' The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals,
the state's highest criminal court, rejected Leal's request for a
stay of execution. They claimed that Leal 'doesn't have a due
process right to remain alive until the proposed legislation
becomes law.'
Texas executes more criminals than any other
state and that has long caused friction with Mexico, which has no
death penalty. Although the U.S. government has signed the Vienna
Convention, Congress has not passed a law to implement it.
U.S. seeks to limit damage of Texas
execution case
Reuters.com
Jul 8, 2011
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government is
working to limit the diplomatic fallout after Texas executed a
Mexican national over Washington's objections that it violated U.S.
treaty obligations and put U.S. citizens abroad at risk.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was "quite
disappointed" on Thursday after Texas went ahead with the
execution by injection of Humberto Leal Garcia, convicted of
murdering a 16-year-old girl, despite pleas from the federal
government for a last-minute stay, State Department spokeswoman
Victoria Nuland said. "It's important that our partners overseas
know that the U.S. government, the executive branch, was not
comfortable with what happened in this case," Nuland said.
"The secretary is making clear to her
counterparts, whether they're in Mexico or anywhere else, that we
seek to remedy this situation and we seek to remedy it as quickly
as we possibly can," Nuland said at a news briefing. Nuland said
the Obama administration would work with Congress to speed passage
of legislation that would spell out the rights of foreigners to
consular access.
The top U.N. official for human rights, Navi
Pillay, issued a statement on Friday saying Leal Garcia's
execution "places the U.S. in breach of international law." The
U.S. Supreme Court rejected a stay of execution despite warnings
from the Obama administration that the case violated the Vienna
Convention on Consular Relations because Leal Garcia had not been
given appropriate consular access.
In legal briefs, the U.S. government had warned
the execution would create an irreparable breach of international
law and Mexico's government said it would seriously jeopardize
cross-border cooperation on joint ventures and extraditions. Leal
Garcia, 38, who had lived in the United States since he was an
infant, was convicted of raping the girl and bludgeoning her to
death with a piece of asphalt in 1994.
While the United States has joined the Vienna
Convention, critics have argued that individual U.S. states are
not bound by it until Congress passes enabling legislation. Nuland
said the State Department was concerned that the case might impact
the welfare of U.S. citizens who run into legal problems overseas.
The State Department says some 5 million U.S.
citizens live overseas and many millions more travel regularly
outside of the country. About 3,500 Americans were arrested
overseas in 2010 and U.S. consular officials conducted more than
9,500 prison visits. "Frankly, if we don't protect the rights of
non-Americans in the United States we seriously risk reciprocal
lack of access to our own citizens overseas," Nuland said. "Texas
justice is Texas justice. This is simply about ensuring a non-American
facing judicial proceedings in the United States has the same
rights that we expect an American facing judicial proceedings
overseas would have."
UN official: US execution of Leal broke
int'l law
By John Halperin - MySanAntonio.com
Friday, July 8, 2011
GENEVA (AP) — The United States broke
international law when it executed a Mexican citizen, the United
Nations' top human rights official said Friday. The Texas
execution of Humberto Leal "raises particular legal concerns,"
including whether he had access to consular services and a fair
trial, said U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay.
Leal was executed Thursday evening for the 1994
rape and murder of a San Antonio teenager after his attorneys,
supported also by the Mexican government and other diplomats,
unsuccessfully sought a stay.
Mexico's government, President Barack Obama's
administration and others wanted the U.S. Supreme Court to stay
the execution to allow Congress time to consider legislation that
would require court reviews for condemned foreign nationals who
aren't offered the help of their consulates. The high court
rejected the request 5-4.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry also declined to block
the execution. Texas, the nation's most active death penalty state,
has executed other condemned foreign nationals who raised similar
challenges, most recently in 2008. "Texas is not bound by a
foreign court's ruling. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that
the treaty was not binding on the states and that the president
does not have the authority to order states to review cases of the
then 51 foreign nationals on death row in the U.S," said Katherine
Cesinger, a spokeswoman for Perry.
But what Texas did also "places the U.S. in
breach of international law," said Pillay, who visited Mexico this
week. "What the state of Texas has done in this case is imputable
in law to the U.S. and engages the United States' international
responsibility." Pillay said Perry and the Texas Board of Pardons
and Paroles each failed to exercise consular and fair-trial
obligations — spelled out under the Vienna Convention on Consular
Relations and an International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights — that could have prevented the U.S. from breaching its
obligations under international law.
Pillay also cited a 2004 International Court of
Justice ruling saying the U.S. must review and reconsider the
cases of 51 Mexican nationals — including Leal — who were
sentenced to death. She said those reviews never happened. She
said the execution undermined "the role of the International Court
of Justice, and its ramifications are likely to spread far beyond
Texas."
Mexico's foreign ministry has said in a
statement it condemns the execution of Leal and has sent a note of
protest to the U.S. State Department. It said Mexico's ambassador
to the U.S., Arturo Sarukhan, also attempted to contact Perry, who
refused to speak on the phone.
Leal, a 38-year-old mechanic, repeatedly
apologized and then shouted "Viva Mexico!" as the lethal drugs
began taking effect Thursday. He was sentenced to death for
killing 16-year-old Adria Sauceda, whose brutalized nude body was
found hours after the two left a street party.
Texas governor defends Mexican's execution
By Michael Graczyk - MySanAntonio.com
Associated Press - Friday, July 8, 2011
HOUSTON (AP) — Gov. Rick Perry rebuffed
criticism Friday from the United Nations and Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton for Texas' execution of a Mexican man whose
lawyers said he was not informed he could have sought legal help
from the Mexican government after he was arrested for the murder
of a San Antonio teenager. "If you commit the most heinous of
crimes in Texas, you can expect to face the ultimate penalty under
our laws," Perry's spokeswoman Katherine Cesinger said a day after
convicted killer Humberto Leal was put to death in Huntsville.
In Geneva, the U.N.'s top human rights official
said Leal's execution amounted to a breach of international law by
the U.S.
The Texas governor has the authority in
execution cases to issue a one-time 30-day reprieve, an authority
Perry and other governors in the nation's most active capital
punishment state rarely have invoked. "After reviewing the
totality of the issues that led to Leal's conviction, as well as
the numerous court rulings surrounding the case, including the
most recent Supreme Court ruling on Thursday, Gov. Perry agreed
that Leal was guilty of raping and bludgeoning a 16-year-old girl
to death," Cesinger said.
Adria Sauceda was killed in 1994 in a gruesome
attack in which her head was bashed with a 30- to 40-pound piece
of asphalt and she was raped, strangled, bit and then left nude on
a dirt road with a piece of wood stuck in her.
From the Texas death chamber Thursday evening,
Leal, 38, took responsibility for the slaying, asked for
forgiveness and wrapped up his comments by twice shouting: "Viva
Mexico!" He was born in Monterrey, Mexico, and moved with his
family to the U.S. when he was about 1½ years old.
Mexico's government, President Barack Obama's
administration and the State Department were among those asking
the Supreme Court to stop the execution of the former mechanic to
allow Congress time to consider legislation that would require
court reviews for condemned foreign nationals who weren't offered
the help of their consulates. The high court rejected the request
5-4.
"The secretary herself is quite disappointed in
the outcome in this case," Clinton's spokeswoman, Victoria Nuland,
said Friday. "You know that the U.S. government sought a stay of
Leal's execution in order to give the Congress time to act on the
Consular Notification Compliance Act, which would have provided
Leal the judicial review required by international law. "Frankly
if we don't protect the rights of non-Americans in the United
States, we seriously risk reciprocal lack of access to our own
citizens overseas," Nuland said. "So this is why the secretary is
concerned. ... We've got to treat non-Americans properly here if
we expect to be able to help our citizens overseas."
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi
Pillay said the punishment "raises particular legal concerns,"
including whether Leal had access to consular services and a fair
trial. Pillay also cited a 2004 International Court of Justice
ruling saying the U.S. must review and reconsider the cases of 51
Mexican nationals sentenced to death, including Leal's. In 2005,
President George W. Bush agreed with the ruling but the U.S.
Supreme Court later overruled Bush.
"Texas is not bound by a foreign court's ruling,"
Cesinger said. "The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that the
treaty was not binding on the states and that the president does
not have the authority to order states to review cases of the then
51 foreign nationals on death row in the U.S."
In its ruling Thursday about an hour before
Leal's execution, the Supreme Court's majority opinion pointed to
the IJC decision, saying it's been seven years since then and
three years since the previous Texas death penalty case that
raised similar consular legal access issues. If a statute
implementing the provisions of the international court ruling "had
genuinely been a priority for the political branches, it would
have been enacted by now," the majority ruling said.
Had the White House and dissenting justices
been worried about "the grave international consequences that will
follow from Leal's execution ... Congress evidently did not find
these consequences sufficiently grave to prompt its enactment of
implementing legislation, and we will follow the law as written by
Congress," the ruling continued.
Leal's appeals lawyers had pinned their hopes
on legislation introduced in the Senate last month that applied to
the Vienna Convention provisions and said Leal should have a
reprieve so the measure could make its way through the legislative
process. Similar bills have failed twice in recent congressional
sessions. "Our task is to rule on what the law is, not what it
might eventually be," the court said.
Humberto Leal
ProDeathPenalty.com
The tragic final hours of sixteen-year-old
Adrea Sauceda's life started at an outdoor party in San Antonio,
Texas. A witness observed Adria, apparently intoxicated and
partially undressed, in the middle of a circle of men who were
taking turns "on top of her." Another witness testified that an
unidentified male invited him to have intercourse with Adria. The
same witness testified that he later observed another man carrying
a disoriented Adria to a truck, where he "had his way with her."
Twenty-three-year-old Humberto Leal was also at
the party. At some point the intoxicated but conscious victim was
placed in Leal's car. Leal and Adria left together in Leal's car.
About thirty minutes later, Leal's brother arrived at the party in
a car which came to a screeching halt. Leal's brother was very
excited or hysterical. Leal's brother started yelling to the
people left at the party, "What the hell happened!" Leal's brother
was yelling that Leal came home with blood on him saying he had
killed a girl. Two of the trial witnesses were present when Leal's
brother made these statements. Shortly thereafter Leal's brother
left in a rush.
Several of the party members went looking for
Adria in the same area where the party was. They found her nude
body lying face-up on a dirt road. They noticed Adria's head had
been bashed in and it was bleeding. Her head was flinching or
jerking. These party members called the police. When the police
arrived, they saw the nude victim lying on her back. There was a
30 to 40 pound asphalt rock roughly twice the size of Adria's
skull lying partially on Adria's left arm. Blood was underneath
this rock. A smaller rock with blood on it was located near
Adria's right thigh. There was a gaping hole from the corner of
Adria's right eye extending to the center of her head from which
blood was oozing. Adria's head was splattered with blood. There
was a bloody and broken stick approximately 14 to 16 inches long
with a screw at the end of it protruding from Adria's vagina.
Another 4 to 5 inch piece of the stick was lying to the left side
of Adria's skull. The police made a videotape of the crime scene
portions of which were admitted into evidence.
Later that day, the police questioned Leal.
Leal gave two voluntary statements. In Leal's first statement he
said he was with Adria in his car when she began hitting him and
the steering wheel causing him to hit a curb. Leal attempted to
calm her down but Adria leaped from Leal's car and ran away. Leal
claimed he sat in his car and waited about ten or fifteen minutes
to see if Adria would return and when she did not he went home.
After giving this statement, Leal was informed
that his brother had also given a statement. Leal then gave
another statement. In this statement, Leal claimed he followed
Adria when she got out of his car and ran away. Leal claimed Adria
attacked him. Leal pushed her and she fell to the ground. When she
did not get up Leal attempted to wake her but could not. He then
looked at her nose and saw bubbles. Leal stated he got scared,
went home, prayed on the side of his mom's bed and told family
members what had happened, claiming it was just an accident. After
giving this statement an officer gave Leal a ride home.
The police searched Leal's house. The police
seized a blouse which contained several blood stains, hair and
fibers. This blouse was later identified as belonging to Adria.
The police also seized Leal's clothing from the night before. Leal
was arrested later that afternoon at his home. Leal's car was also
impounded. The police conducted Luminol tests of the passenger
door to determine whether any blood was evident. Blood stains were
discovered on the passenger door and seat. Detectives testified
that the blood stains were streaked in a downward motion,
indicating that the blood had been wiped off. There was
insufficient residue to conduct a blood typing of the stains on
the vehicle. Other DNA evidence was found on the underwear Leal
was wearing that night. That evidence consisted of blood as well
as bodily fluid. The DNA test did not preclude Adria's blood type
from the evidence tested.
Dr. DiMaio, the medical examiner who performed
the autopsy, testified about Adria's injuries and cause of death.
DiMaio testified that even though Adria was intoxicated when she
received her injuries, she would have been aware of what was
happening to her. In addition to Adria's massive head injuries,
DiMaio testified about injuries Adria received to her chest and
shoulder which were consistent with having been inflicted by the
stick found in Adria's vagina. DiMaio also testified about the
defensive wounds Adria received to her hands trying to protect
herself from some object. DiMaio also testified Adria was alive
when the stick was placed in her vagina. Adria's neck also
contained injuries consistent with manual strangulation. DiMaio
testified Adria received some of her injuries while standing up.
Adria received her head injuries while lying flat. The injuries to
Adria's head were due to blows from the front. These injuries were
inconsistent with a fall. Adria's head injuries were consistent
with Adria lying on the ground with somebody standing over her
striking her. DiMaio testified the large rock could have delivered
the injuries to Adria's head. Based on the injuries to Adria's
head, DiMaio testified Adria would had to have been struck with
the rock two or three times. DiMaio testified Adria died from
blunt force trauma injuries to the head. DiMaio could not say for
certain that the rock caused the injuries. He testified Adria was
beaten about the face with a blunt object or more than one object
which could have been the rock or something else.
On cross-examination, DiMaio testified that one
blow from the rock could have caused Adria's death. DiMaio also
testified about bite marks he found on Adria's left cheek, the
right side of her neck and the left side of her chest. Another
witness compared the bite marks on Adria's chest and neck with
dental impressions of Leal's teeth. They matched. The State's
indictment charged that Leal killed Sauceda while in the course of
and attempting either to kidnap her or to commit aggravated sexual
assault. Leal was convicted and, after a separate punishment phase,
sentenced to death.
Ex Parte Leal, Not Reported in S.W.3d,
2011 WL 2581917 (Tex.Crim.App. 2011) (PCR)
FN1. To date, all pleadings concerning this
defendant have been filed under the name “Humberto Leal” or
“Humberto Leal, Jr.” In this subsequent application, counsel has
styled the pleading “Humberto Leal Garcia.” For consistency of our
records, the Court will continue to use the designation “Humberto
Leal” to refer to the defendant/applicant.
PER CURIAM.
This is a subsequent application for writ of
habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, § 5.
In July 1995, a jury convicted applicant of the
offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues
submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article
37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set applicant's
punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction
and sentence on direct appeal. Leal v. State, No. AP–72,210 (Tex.Crim.App.
Feb. 4, 1998)(not designated for publication).
In September 1997, applicant filed in the trial
court his initial post-conviction application for writ of habeas
corpus. This Court denied applicant relief. Ex parte Leal, No. WR–41,743–01
(Tex.Crim.App. Oct. 20, 1999)(not designated for publication).
Applicant filed his first subsequent application in the trial
court in March 2005. This Court dismissed that application because
it failed to meet the dictates of Article 11.071, § 5. Ex parte
Leal, No. WR–41,743–02 (Tex.Crim.App. Mar. 7, 2007)(not designated
for publication). This, his second subsequent application, was
filed in the trial court on June 23, 2011.
In this application, applicant asserts that (1)
he is a Mexican national; (2) his right to consular notification
was violated, therefore, the International Court of Justice's
decision in the Case Concerning Avena and other Mexican Nationals
(Mex.v.U.S.), 2004 I.C.J. No. 128 (Judgment of Mar. 31), entitles
him to a new review of his case; and (3) his imminent execution
should be stayed pending passage of legislation regarding
procedures on how to implement this review, which legislation is
currently pending in Congress. We have reviewed the application
and find that applicant has failed to meet the requirements of
Article 11.071, § 5. Accordingly, we dismiss his application.
Applicant alternatively argues that we should
consider his application under our original habeas jurisdiction or
reconsider the claim under one of his previously filed Article
11.071 applications. This we decline to do. Applicant's motion for
stay of execution is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED. PRICE, J., filed a concurring
statement in which JOHNSON and ALCALA, JJ., join. KEASLER, J.,
filed a concurring statement in which MEYERS, J., joins. HERVEY
and COCHRAN, JJ., not participating.
PRICE, J., filed a concurring statement in
which JOHNSON and ALCALA, JJ., joined.
There is no dispute that allowing the
applicant's execution to go forward without first affording him a
hearing in satisfaction of the International Court of Justice's
judgment in the Avena case,FN1 would violate the United States's
treaty obligations under the Vienna Convention on Consular
Relations,FN2 the Optional Protocol,FN3 and Article 94 of the
United Nations Charter FN4—obligations that are binding on Texas
by way of the Supremacy Clause of the United States
Constitution.FN5 The United States Supreme Court has acknowledged
as much, while holding that the various treaty provisions that
bind the United States to comply with an ICJ decision are not self-executing,
and thus require legislation for their implementation. FN6 To
date, no such legislation has passed. Lamentably, the applicant
finds himself in possession of an apparent right under
international law without an actual remedy under domestic law.FN7
FN1. Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican
Nationals (Mex.v.U.S.), 2004 I.C.J. 128 (Mar. 31). FN2. Vienna
Convention on Consular Relations, Apr. 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77, 596
U.N.T.S. 261. FN3. Optional Protocol Concerning the Compulsory
Settlement of Disputes, Apr. 18, 1961, Art.I, 21 U.S.T. 326,
T.I.A.S. No. 6820. FN4. U.N. Charter art. 94, para. 1. FN5. U.S.
Const. art. VI, cl. 2. FN6. 552 U.S. 491 (2008). FN7. See Medellin
v. Texas, 554 U.S. 759, 763–64 (2008) (Breyer, J., dissenting) (observing
that, in earlier Medellin opinion, “this Court, while recognizing
that the United States was bound by treaty to follow the ICJ's
determination as a matter of international law, held that that
determination did not automatically bind the courts of the United
States as a matter of domestic law.”).
To satisfy the requirements of Article 11.071,
Section 5(a)(1), FN8 justifying a subsequent application for writ
of habeas corpus and a stay of execution, the applicant invokes
proposed legislation that was introduced two weeks ago in Congress
that would obligate the federal courts (but not state courts) to
conduct the kind of hearing that the Avena case mandates before he
may be executed consistent with our treaty obligations. Though
this is apparently the third time implementing legislation has
been introduced in Congress, the applicant's experts assure us
that the current bill enjoys widespread bipartisan support as well
as the support of the Executive Branch. Even so, the legislative
process being what it is, the bill is not likely to pass until the
end of this calendar year at the earliest. I agree with the Court
that pending legislation constitutes neither new law nor new facts—at
least not new facts entitling the applicant to relief—in
contemplation of Article 11.071, Section 5(a)(1). FN8. Tex.Code
Crim. Proc. art. 11.071, § 5(a)(1).
The applicant asks us, alternatively, to treat
his application as an original writ application, unhindered by the
restraints of Article 11.071. But the application seeks relief
from a capital conviction and/or punishment, and it is my
understanding that “Article 11.071 presently provides the
exclusive procedure for the exercise of this Court's original
habeas jurisdiction when the applicant seeks relief from a
judgment imposing a penalty of death.” FN9 Nor does the nascent
legislation create a compelling enough reason to reopen the
applicant's initial writ application, as we did in Ex parte
Moreno.FN10 In my view, the applicant currently lacks a basis for
a remedy in our state courts in Texas.
FN9. Ex parte Alba, 256 S.W.3d 682, 698 (Tex.Crim.App.2008)
(Price, J., dissenting). FN10. 245 S.W.3d 419, 428–29 (Tex.Crim.App.2008).
This does not mean he lacks any state remedy at all. The Executive
Department has the power, unfettered as ours is, to grant the
applicant a reprieve. FN11 And it is precisely when the Judicial
Department proves institutionally unequal to the task that the
exercise of executive clemency is most appropriate. With the
recommendation of the Board of Pardons and Paroles, the Governor
may effectively stay the applicant's execution until such time as
legislation passes that finally implements our indisputable treaty
obligations and provides a remedy for the applicant's right under
international law. FN12 By himself, the Governor can grant one
thirty-day reprieve, affording the trial court an opportunity to
delay re-imposition of sentence until such time as implementing
legislation may pass.FN13 In this way, Texas can still honor its
duty under the Supremacy Clause to honor the treaty obligations of
the United States, just as Justice Stevens has implored us to
do.FN14 FN11. Tex. Const. art. 4, § 11. FN12. Id. FN13. Id. FN14.
See Medellin v. Texas, supra, at 536 (Stevens, J., concurring)
(“One consequence of our form of government is that sometimes
States must shoulder the primary responsibility for protecting the
honor and integrity of the Nation. Texas' duty in this respect is
all the greater since it was Texas that—by failing to provide
consular notice in accordance with the Vienna Convention—ensnared
the United States in the current controversy.”).
With these comments, I regretfully concur in
the Court's order.
KEASLER, J., filed a concurring statement in
which MEYERS, J., joined.
I join in the Court's decision to deny Humberto
Leal's application to stay his execution scheduled for Thursday,
July, 7, 2011, and to dismiss his second subsequent application
under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071 Section 5.
In his application for a stay of execution and
application for habeas relief Leal raises three basic points.
First, he argues that the Consular Compliance Act, which has been
introduced in the United States House by Senator Patrick Leahy,
would require that Leal receive review and reconsideration of his
conviction and sentence under the International Court of Justice's
(ICJ's) Avena decision. And second, Leal contends that he is
entitled to habeas review because the Inter–American Commission on
Human Rights (IACHR) has concluded that Leal's case was prejudiced
by the Vienna Convention Violation. We have previously determined
that analogous arguments did not meet the requirements of Section
when they were raised by Jose Ernesto Medellin in his second
subsequent state application for a writ of habeas corpus.
Pending legislation is not the law, and any
argument that the Consular Compliance Act will be passed by
Congress and signed into law by the President is purely
speculative. We are bound to follow the law as it is and, at this
time, there is nothing that makes the Avena decision binding
law.FN1 Next, Leal cites no authority and fails to explain how the
IACHR's determination is binding on this Court or any other court
in the United States.
FN1. See Medellin v. Texas, 554 U.S. 759,
759–760 (2008) (denying request for stay of execution because the
possibility that the Congress or Texas Legislature would pass
legislation giving effect to Avena was “too remote to justify an
order from this Court staying the sentence imposed by the Texas
courts.”); Foster v. Neilson, 27 U.S. 253, 315 (1829) (“Until such
act shall be passed, the Court is not at liberty to disregard the
existing laws on the subject.”). Leal also complains that his
execution would violate his right to free speech and to petition
Congress to enforce Avena. But Leal has not established that his
execution, pursuant to a valid death sentence, presents an
unreasonable restriction on these rights. Because the “Consular
Compliance Act” is not the law, it cannot legitimately be used as
support for this argument. In this instance, the State's right to
finality trumps the rights Leal asserts.
There is nothing in the United States
Constitution that prohibits the State from proceeding with Leal's
execution. Leal has failed to show that his current claims meet
the requirements of Section 5.FN2 As a result, I agree with denial
of his motion to stay and the dismissal of Leal's second
subsequent habeas application. FN2. See e.g., Ex parte Medellin,
223 S.W.3d 315, 349–52 (Tex.Crim.App.2006).