Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Lyndon MOSLEY
Georgia v.
Lyndon Mosley
"The Teen
Stabbing Trial"
In a case that illustrated the
escalation of teen violence in high schools,
Lyndon Mosley, 15, faced murder charges for
the stabbing death of 16-year-old Ronald
Gaines.
The two teenagers, who both attended Southwest
Dekalb High School in Georgia, reportedly did not know each other
before their argument in September 1997. But this did not prevent
them from getting into a heated argument that culminated when they
began fist-fighting, and Mosley stabbed Gaines in the chest.
Mosley claimed that the stabbing was accidental
and occurred in self-defense. Because of the crime, he was charged
as an adult and faced life in prison with the possibility of parole
after 14 years if convicted. In addition to murder, Mosley was
charged with carrying a weapon on school property.
The Senseless Confrontation
The incident between Gaines and Mosley on Sept.
18, 1997 began on the steps leading to the football field at
Southwest Dekalb High School. Both the prosecution and the defense
agree that Gaines started the argument with Mosley when he noticed
Mosley and his friend, Jay Cannon, running past them. Gaines
allegedly shouted at them, "Look at them p___y-ass n_ggers running
like bitches!"
In response, Mosley said either, "F____ you!" or
"Who you calling a bitch?" The exchange between Mosley and Gaines
became more heated and the two progressed towards the football field.
They were joined by a group of student onlookers
who may have been urging them to fight. Mosley's friend, Randy Parks,
tried to intervene and break up the confrontation between Gaines and
Mosley, but he retreated when he was accidentally cut on the hand by
a knife Mosley was holding. Noticing Mosley's knife, Gaines
allegedly considered picking up a large rock and using it as a
weapon against Mosley. But then he reconsidered and began to walk
away from Mosley. But Mosley apparently began to taunt Gaines, and
Gaines returned to the scene.
That decision proved fatal for Gaines. According
to the prosecution, Gaines and Mosley began shoving each other.
Gaines allegedly swung at Mosley, who simultaneously stabbed him
once in the chest.
Unaware that an artery had been punctured and
that he was mortally wounded, Gaines, perhaps in an attempt to show
machismo, lifted his shirt and showed the student onlookers his
wound.
Mosley, meanwhile, left the scene with Cannon and
went to a neighbor's yard to wash off the knife with a garden hose.
Gaines attempted to leave the scene but collapsed and died after
walking about 30 yards away from the football field. Two hours after
the stabbing, Mosley turned himself in to police. The knife that
killed Gaines was never recovered.
Prosecutors believed that at the time of the
altercation, Mosley was trouble-making time bomb ready to explode.
The day before the stabbing, Mosley was placed on
in-school suspension for skipping classes.
On the day of the incident, the assistant
principal and school detective caught Mosley wandering the school
hallways and skipping his classes again. According to them, he was
belligerent and uncooperative when he was escorted to the
principal's office. Mosley even left the building before the
principal (who was busy handling another student matter at that
time) could confront him about his latest actions. An already
annoyed Mosley encountered Gaines on the field steps almost
immediately after he had left the principal's office.
Self-Defense?
But, the defense claimed, Mosley stabbed Gaines
out of self-defense.
According to the defense, Mosley produced the
knife only when he saw several of the victim's friends in the crowd
of onlookers take off their shirts as if to join the fight. Because
he feared being mauled by Gaines' friends, Mosley felt he needed a
weapon to defend himself.
In addition, another defense argument was that
the actual stabbing was a reflex action by Mosley: when Gaines swung
at him, Mosley, who was holding the knife, was only reacting to
Gaines' attempted punch. Mosley's defense also believed that the
victim never really attempted to walk away from the confrontation.
During the incident, when Gaines turned away from
Mosley and appeared to be walking away, he was really asking the
crowd if anyone had a knife he could use.
Mosley's attorneys argued that Gaines, who was
heavier and taller than Mosley, was the aggressor in this fight, not
Mosley. Gaines was the real "ticking time bomb." He instigated the
altercation and was frustrated with a meeting he had had earlier
that day concerning his own suspension.
A few days before the fatal incident, Gaines was
given an "off-campus" suspension for skipping classes. On the day of
the altercation, Gaines and his mother attended a meeting with
school officials regarding his suspension, and it was decided he
would return to class the next day.
After the meeting Gaines and his mother went home,
but he would eventually return to school to socialize with friends.
At the time of his fight with Mosley, Gaines was technically still
suspended and not allowed on the school campus.
Officially, Mosley was charged with one count of
malice murder, two counts of felony murder (which include carrying a
weapon on school property and aggravated assault), and one count of
carrying a weapon on school property.
The Verdict
After two hours and forty minutes of
deliberations, Mosley was convicted of voluntary manslaughter, two
counts of felony murder, and carrying a weapon on school property.
He was not sentenced after the verdict because
defense lawyer Bruce Harvey requested a pre-sentencing investigation
and was granted one by the judge. In his argument, Harvey maintain
that the verdict was inconsistent and it was clear the jury was
unclear about how the jury form worked.
272 Ga. 881
MOSLEY v. THE
STATE
536 S.E.2.d 150 (2000)
Supreme Court of Georgia
October 10, 2000
Docket number: S00A1201
A jury found Lyndon Dechard Mosley guilty of
voluntary manslaughter and felony murder in connection with the
stabbing death of Ronald Gaines at Southwest DeKalb High School. [1]
Mosley contends that the offense of possession of a weapon on school
property under OCGA
16-11-127.1 is not inherently
dangerous and therefore should not serve as the basis for his
conviction and sentence for felony murder. Because we conclude that
Mosley's possession of a weapon on school property was dangerous under
the circumstances in this case, we affirm.
1. The evidence presented at trial shows that
Mosley, then a 14-year-old student, and 16-year-old Gaines, a junior,
exchanged words and then argued for several minutes next to the
athletic field behind the school during the last period of school. As
the confrontation continued in front of a crowd of students, Mosley
pulled a knife from his pants pocket and Gaines picked up a rock.
Gaines threw the rock down and started to walk away, but someone
challenged him to stay and fight. Gaines then turned around and went
towards Mosley, swinging at him. Mosley stabbed Gaines once in the
chest; he exchanged high fives with a friend before running from the
scene. Saying he had been stabbed, Gaines was helped up a flight of
steps before he collapsed next to a school building. The pathologist
testified that the knife had penetrated Gaines' heart and lungs and he
bled to death within minutes of the stabbing. After reviewing the
evidence in the light most favorable to the jury's determination of
guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found
Mosley guilty of the crimes charged. [2]
2. The jury convicted Mosley of voluntary
manslaughter on the malice murder charge in count one, felony murder
with the underlying felony of aggravated assault in count two, felony
murder with the underlying felony of possession of a weapon on school
property in count three, and possession of a weapon on school property
in count four. The trial court entered a judgment of conviction only
on count three, and the verdicts on counts one, two, and four were
vacated by operation of law. [3] Therefore, the trial court did not
sentence Mosley for voluntary manslaughter and felony murder based on
the same aggravated assault and there is no sentence to vacate on
count two. [4]
3. Mosley seeks to vacate the felony murder
conviction for which he was sentenced based on our decision in Ford v.
State. [5] In Ford, this denied on February 14, 2000. Mosley filed a
notice of appeal on February 15, 2000. The case was docketed on April
5, 2000, and submitted for decision without oral arguments on May 29,
2000.
Court reversed a felony murder conviction because
the underlying felony, which was the status offense of possession of a
firearm by a convicted felon, was not inherently dangerous under the
circumstances. In that case, Ford was unloading a semi-automatic
pistol when it fired, sending a bullet through the floor and into a
downstairs apartment where it killed a tenant. We held that the
possession of the firearm alone, without an assault or other criminal
conduct, was not a felony that could support a felony murder
conviction. [6]
In Ford, we defined "a felony" under the felony
murder statute as meaning any felony that is "dangerous per se" or by
its circumstances creates a foreseeable risk of death. [7] In
determining whether a felony meets that definition, this Court does
not consider the elements of the felony in the abstract, but instead
considers the circumstances under which the felony was committed. [8]
Since our decision in Ford, we have refused to apply the non-dangerous
felony rule to other cases involving possession of a firearm by a
convicted felon [9] or misuse of a firearm while hunting. [10]
Similarly, we conclude that the possession of the
weapon on school property under the circumstances in this case was
dangerous and created a foreseeable risk of death. Mosley told a
friend before the initial confrontation that he had his knife at
school that day; the possession of the knife may have influenced his
decision to confront the taller and heavier Gaines. During the verbal
sparring and physical pushing between the two students, Gaines wanted
Mosley to put down the knife so he could "fight fair" and picked up
the rock in response to seeing the weapon. When a student intervened
and tried to break up the fight, he grabbed Mosley's hand and the
knife cut him. The crowd cited the presence of the knife as both a
reason that Gaines should walk away from the fight or, alternatively,
stay and fight. This evidence shows that Mosley's possession of the
knife played a critical role in escalating a typical schoolyard fight
into a homicide.
In addition, the purpose of the felony-murder
statute and OCGA
16-11-127.1 supports our
conclusion that the underlying possession offense is sufficient to
support Mosley's conviction for felony murder. The function of the
felony murder rule is to furnish an added deterrent to the
perpetration of felonies that create a foreseeable risk of death by
their nature or circumstances. [11] The General Assembly enacted OCGA
16-11-127.1 as part of the School
Safety and Juvenile Justice Report Act to reduce school violence and
enhance school safety by banning weapons at school functions or on
school property. [12] Given the grisly incidents of violence at
schools across the country during the past three years, [13] this
Court does not want to undercut the deterrent effect of the felony
murder rule or downplay the danger associated with the possession of
weapons on school property.
4. Regarding the disputed evidentiary issue, the
trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of a
confrontation that Mosley had with school authorities immediately
preceding his fight with Gaines.
J. Tom Morgan, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy,
Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General,
Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, H. Maddox Kilgore,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
*****
Notes:
1. The stabbing occurred on September 18, 1997.
Mosley was indicted on October 16, 1997. A jury found him guilty on
April 17, 1998, and the trial court sentenced him on December 4, 1998.
Mosley filed a motion for a new trial on December 29, 1998, which was
2. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC
2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
3. See OCGA
16-1-7; Goforth v. State,
271 Ga. 700 (523 SE2d 868) (1999); Malcolm
v. State,
263 Ga. 369, 373 (434
SE2d 479) (1993).
4. See Darden v. State,
271 Ga. 449 (519 SE2d 927) (1999) (defendant
cannot be sentenced for felony murder and voluntary manslaughter based
on the same underlying aggravated assault); Edge v. State,
261 Ga. 865 (414 SE2d 463) (1992) (adopting
a modified merger rule).
5.
262 Ga. 602 (423 SE2d 255) (1992).
6. Id. at 603-604. See generally Baker v. State,
236 Ga. 754, 755-758 (225
SE2d 269) (1976) (discussing both the non-dangerous felony
problem and the merger problem of the felony murder rule); Johnson v.
State,
258 Ga. 856, 859-860 (376
SE2d 356) (1989) (Hunt, J., concurring specially) (contending
that legislature intended to include only felonies that are inherently
dangerous or bear a causal relation to the death as the underlying
felony in a felony murder conviction).
7. 262 Ga. at 603; see OCGA
16-5-1 (c) ("A person also commits the
offense of murder when, in the commission of a felony, he causes the
death of another human being irrespective of malice.").
8. See, e.g., Roller v. State,
265 Ga. 213 (453 SE2d 740) (1995). See
generally State v. Stewart, 663 A2d 912 (R.I. 1995) (discussing
adoption of approach used in majority of states that considers the
facts and circumstances of the particular case in determining if the
felony was inherently dangerous in the manner and circumstances in
which it was committed).
9. See, e.g., Metts v. State,
270 Ga. 481 (511 SE2d 508) (1999) (possession
of firearm was dangerous and life-threatening when defendant pointed a
loaded, cocked gun at human being outside window); see also Sims v.
State,
265 Ga. 35, 36 n. 2 (453
SE2d 33) (1995) (defendant created foreseeable risk of death
by searching for victim while armed with an automatic pistol).
13. See Armstrong Williams, Do Feel-Safe Laws Make
Us Any Safer?, Wash. Times, Nov. 13, 1999, at A10 (citing schoolyard
murders in Kentucky, Arkansas, Oregon, Mississippi, and Colorado).