Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Michael Joseph
PASSARO
Classification: Murderer
Characteristics:
Parricide - Custody dispute
Number of victims: 1
Date of murder:
November 23,
1998
Date of arrest:
Same day
Date of birth: July
26,
1962
Victim profile: Maggie
Passaro, 2 (his daughter)
Method of murder:
Fire (set fire to a family minivan)
Location: Horry County, South Carolina, USA
Status:
Executed
by lethal injection in South Carolina on September 13,
2002
Summary:
In the midst of a custody dispute, Passaro parked the family minivan
in front of his estranged wife's Myrtle Beach condominium, doused
the inside with gasoline and set it on fire with their 2-year-old
daughter, Maggie, strapped in her car seat.
Passaro planned to die in the blaze, too, but jumped from the van
when it exploded. Firefighters who rushed to the scene asked Passaro
if anyone was inside, but he refused to answer.
Passaro purportedly believed that after he died he would be reunited
in heaven with his dead daughter and his first wife, who died in a
car accident.
He had written a suicide note in which he said he
hoped his estranged wife, Karen, would "live in pain for the rest of
her life." Passaro pled guilty and waived appeals.
Final Meal:
None.
Final Words:
Passaro smiled, blew kisses at his family then told them he loved
them and that it was over.
ClarkProsecutor.org
ProDeathPenalty.com
Michael Passaro was so angry with his estranged
wife that he set fire to a family minivan, killing their 2-year-old
daughter, according to prosecutors at his sentencing hearing.
Against advice from his attorneys, Passaro pled
guilty to charges of murder and 1st-degree arson in Maggie's Nov.
23, 1998, death.
Prosecutors presented evidence of the crime to
Judge Dean Hall, who imposed the death sentence. A prosecutor read a
typewritten suicide note with singed edges that was recovered from
the white 1995 Ford minivan.
Passaro set fire to the van outside his wife's
condo at South Bay Lakes in Surfside Beach. Passaro left Maggie in
the van while he escaped from the fire. "Well, Karen [Passaro] won
the war, and it's at the expense of our daughter," the note said. "I
guess that I'm getting the last laugh now, Karen.
Whatever anyone
does, please make sure Karen doesn't kill herself. I want her to
live in pain." "Has he achieved his objective?" the prosecutor asked
Karen Passaro. "Yes. I will live like this forever, for the rest of
my life. I can't concentrate or even focus some days," Karen Passaro
said. "Maggie will never get to grow up. ... And in the process he
took away my future."
Jonathan Simons, a clinical psychologist who
examined Passaro, testified Passaro knew right from wrong. "My
impression is that in Michael's mind his identity became somewhat
blurred. He felt his wife was robbing him of his identity, and he
had to win that battle," Simons said.
Hembree asked Simons whether "Michael Passaro's
hatred for Karen Passaro was greater than the love he had for Maggie
Passaro?" Simons said: "I think some people could see that. ... He
had this delusion of being with Maggie and going to heaven to see
his 1st wife." Susan Lewis, who taught Passaro in a nursing class,
testified he needed emotional support and wasn't thinking clearly.
Lewis, who testified for the defense, also said
Passaro had poor life skills and judgment, and was under a lot of
stress with his classes, work and pending divorce. "He thought he
had a solution to his problems, and he hoped she was hurt at the
outcome," Lewis said.
Fire investigators testified the fire started
near the middle seat of the van. The remains of a plastic, 1-gallon
gasoline can also were found melted into the floor near where Maggie
was strapped in a child safety seat. Maggie's family members left
the courtroom while pictures of the charred van with Maggie's body
still inside were shown to the judge.
Passaro, who wore shackles, a light-blue shirt
and dark-blue slacks, solemnly stared at his hands while the
photographs were shown. "She was alive when the fire was raging. She
burned to death as a result of the flame and fire in the car," said
Clay Nichols, a forensic pathologist who examined Maggie. "I can't
think of a more painful way to die."
Witnesses testified Passaro jumped out of the van
soon after it exploded. "We pulled him away to the grassy area,"
said John Watts, a witness. "We asked him if anyone else was in the
van, and he would not answer us." Maggie's body was found after the
fire was extinguished and investigators were searching for a cause
of the fire.
Paramedics testified Passaro was conscious when they
arrived, and the clothing on his right arm and the back of his legs
was singed. "There's no joy in sending someone to death row," said
Prosecutor Greg Hembree after Passaro, 38, was sentenced. "There's
satisfaction that it was the appropriate sentence. Michael Joseph
Passaro deserves the death penalty. The burning death of a 2-year-old
is inexcusable."
UPDATE:
Michael Passaro has refused to appeal his
sentence and urged the courts to ignore the efforts of well-meaning
attorneys to spare him from a lethal injection. "You do not have to
live this life. I do," he wrote in a letter to South Carolina's
Supreme Court. "The state says I should die for what I did, and I am
not going to stand in their way." The SC Supreme Court unanimously
agreed.
Defense lawyers say shortly after Passaro married
his first wife, she was killed in an accident. When she ran out of
their house to help the victim of a nearby car accident, another car
struck and killed her. "I want to be buried with my 1st and only
love, Donna," he wrote in his suicide note.
Passaro was devastated, turning to drugs and
alcohol to ease his pain. Eventually, he regained control of his
life and moved to South Carolina, becoming a paramedic near Myrtle
Beach and studying to be a nurse. He met his second wife, Karen, at
a hospital where she worked.
The 2 were married and by 1996 had a baby girl,
Maggie. "All he had ever wanted was a family and a home and someone
to love him," Passaro's mother, Betty, said in court.
But the
marriage soured. Passaro's wife asked for a divorce and got a
restraining order. Passaro got to see his daughter one weekend a
month. It was after one of those visits he parked his van outside
his wife's condominium and set it on fire.
One of the 1st officers
on the scene would later testify Karen Passaro heard the commotion
and came outside. She recognized the van and demanded over and over
to know whether her daughter was inside. Horry County Fire Capt.
James Cyganiewicz stalled as long as he could but eventually broke
the news. He said she collapsed in sobs.
"It's pretty funny how the system works," Passaro
wrote in his suicide note. "I get visitation with my daughter, and
I'm allowed to end our lives from existence with the help of the
courts and my wife. I guess that I'm getting the last laugh now,
Karen." Passaro has hardly made himself a sympathetic character.
His temper in prison has been well documented.
One guard testified Passaro got angry when he was told he couldn't
have orange juice. "I have burned my child to death, and I'll burn
you," Passaro told the guard. "I'll burn your house down with your
family in it." A psychiatrist has ruled Passaro is competent to
waive all his appeals.
He told his lawyer he was willing to ask the
courts to look at his case only if he would spend 15 years or fewer
in prison because he didn't want to spend the rest of his life
behind bars.
Passaro Submits to Execution Without Appeal
By
Jeffrey Collins, Associated Press.
TheState.com
09-14-02
The 40-year-old inmate could have stopped his
execution any time because he has never appealed his sentence, but
with his mom, sister and 11 other witnesses watching, he died by
lethal injection at 6:15 p.m.
Friday. Passaro smiled, blew kisses at
his family then told them he loved them and that it was over. He let
his final few breaths out as his eyes slowly closed.
It was a much less violent killing than the one
four years ago that brought him to the death chamber. In the midst
of a custody dispute, Passaro parked the family minivan in front of
his estranged wife's Myrtle Beach condominium, doused the inside
with gasoline and set it on fire with their 2-year-old daughter,
Maggie, strapped in her car seat.
Passaro planned to die in the
blaze, too, but jumped from the van when it exploded. Firefighters
who rushed to the scene asked Passaro if anyone was inside, but he
refused to answer.
Passaro was a Navy veteran and former nurse
technician with no other violent crimes on his record.
Passaro's court-appointed lawyer, Joe Savitz, sat
outside the Broad River Correctional Institution with a cell phone,
ready to file an appeal if Passaro changed his mind. Savitz said
before the execution that he doubted the phone would ring because
Passaro believed he would be reunited in heaven with his dead
daughter and his first wife, who died nearly a decade ago as she
tried to help a victim in a car accident.
Prosecutor Greg Hembree, who sent Passaro to
death and watched the sentence carried out Friday, called him a
cold-blooded killer who wanted to hurt his estranged wife, Karen, as
much as he could.
He pointed to a typewritten suicide note salvaged
from the van. "Whatever anyone does, please make sure that Karen
doesn't kill herself over this," Passaro wrote. "I want her to live
in pain for the rest of her life."
Two sisters and the grandfather of the young
victim also watched the execution through the glass and bars. The
girl's family issued a statement that said they would rather focus
on Maggie's life instead of the death of her father. There are no
words that could describe the horror that a mother must feel to see
an ambulance take her child away," the family said. They recalled
fond memories of Maggie - reading her bedtime stories and seeing her
standing by the refrigerator asking for strawberry milk.
Just 25 months ago, Passaro pleaded guilty to
murder and a judge sentenced him to death. He has never appealed,
telling his lawyers and judges a trip to the death chamber is better
than spending the rest of his life in a cell. "You do not have to
live this life. I do. The state says I should die for what I did,
and I am not going to stand in their way," Passaro wrote in a note
to the state Supreme Court, opposing Savitz's attempts to force him
to appeal his case.
Passaro was so determined to die he even
personally appeared before the justices in May, asking them to let
him go to his death without a judge ever reviewing his case. That
hasn't happened since the state renewed the death penalty nearly 25
years ago. The justices granted Passaro's request, noting that 12
percent of the 302 inmates executed in the United States between
1973 and 1995 waived at least some of their appeals. But Passaro's
determination didn't stop the state Association of Criminal Defense
Lawyers and Christian Action Council from filing an appeal for
clemency to Gov. Jim Hodges.
The groups called Passaro's execution court-assisted
suicide and said he should be spared because he suffered from a deep
depression after his first wife died and was so suicidal that he
slept with a knife. The petition says that judges who have reviewed
the case never knew about Passaro's background, and that his own
trial lawyers didn't fight to save him. Hodges rejected the appeal
Thursday. A South Carolina governor has not commuted a death
sentence since capital punishment was brought back in 1977.
Volunteering for Death
Death Row Inmate Set to
Die and He Doesn’t Want to be Saved
By Bryan Robinson - ABCNews.com
September 13, 2002
A South Carolina death row
prisoner is scheduled to be executed tonight — and he can't wait.
Michael Passaro wants to be with the 2-year-old daughter he killed
four years ago, the crime that landed him on death row. At around 6
p.m., to the dismay of his attorney and death penalty opponents, he
will receive his wish through lethal injection for burning his
daughter to death in his own aborted suicide attempt in 1998.
In November of that year, Passaro doused his van
with gasoline, strapped his daughter Maggie inside and then sat down
in his car before setting it ablaze. However, before the fire could
consume him, Passaro jumped out of the car, leaving Maggie to die.
Passaro pleaded guilty to murder in 2000 and requested — and
received — the death penalty.
Passaro has not, and never wanted to, appeal his
guilty plea, and has rejected his attorneys' attempts to help him.
In July, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled unanimously that he
was competent to waive all his appeals options, clearing the way for
his execution tonight.
An ‘Escape’ From Punishment
This has left Joe Savitz, Passaro's appellate
lawyer, frustrated. He wants to help Passaro, and is ready to file
appeal papers at any time to stop his execution. However, Passaro
won't let him. "I could stop it [the scheduled execution] right now
if he let me," Savitz said. "I'm ready to file the appeals right now
and stop it, but I have to have his consent to do that. But I don't
think he will [give his consent] and am confident the execution will
go forward. "It's extremely frustrating as an attorney," Savitz
continued. "I think he should fight it, personally. His family
thinks he should fight. This is not what I was trained to do."
Passaro's desire to die, Savitz said, is rooted
in his longtime depression over the death of his first wife, who was
killed 10 years ago when a car struck her while she was trying to
help an accident victim. Passaro remarried and had his daughter
Maggie with his second wife, Karen.
However, the second marriage failed, and Karen
Passaro asked for a divorce and filed a restraining order against
him. Passaro reportedly only got to see his daughter one weekend a
month, and Savitz says, Passaro feared his estranged wife would move,
trying to take the girl away from him.
When Passaro lit his van and daughter on fire, he
made sure he was parked in front of his wife's condominium. He
admitted that he wanted to kill himself and their daughter to get
back at his second wife. In a suicide note recovered by
investigators, Passaro wrote, "Whatever anyone does, please make
sure that Karen doesn't kill herself over this. I want her to live
in pain for the rest of her life."
The state of South Carolina is not really
punishing Passaro with the execution, Savitz says; it's giving him
exactly what he wants. "He does not see the death sentence as
punishment. He sees it as an escape from punishment," Savitz said.
"He believes that he will be reunited with his first wife and the
child that he killed, Maggie. He wants to die and has gotten the
state to help him carry it out in what is essentially a state-assisted
suicide. He is not doing this because he feels a sense of remorse."
Vengeance for Vengeance
A lack of remorse is one reason why prosecutors
have no doubts about their decision to send Passaro to his death.
His vindictiveness towards his second wife and willingness to kill
his own daughter in revenge make him deserving of the death penalty.
"This is a man filled with spite, hatred and evil,"
said prosecutor Greg Hembree, after the state Supreme Court ruling
in July. "It's always hard to decide to send someone to death, but
this was one of the easier decisions I've ever made." Despite the
slaying and Passaro's determination to die, a psychiatrist ruled
that he was mentally competent to waive his appeals.
Still, death penalty opponents cannot understand
how officials can execute someone who showed clear signs of suicidal
tendencies and mental illness. "This is a unique case. Passaro was
attempting suicide at the time of his crime," said Bruce Pearson,
spokesman for the South Carolina Coalition to Abolish the Death
Penalty. "He appeared to suffer from severe mental depression with
his desire to end his life and the life of his child. He's not
exactly the paradigm of rational thinking."
Passaro, Pearson said, seems to be a living
example of why the death penalty does not work and another reason
why he and death penalty opponents are fighting for a moratorium in
South Carolina. "Cases where prisoners seem to be using the state
indirectly to commit suicide seem to me to nullify any value of the
death penalty and [shows] it is not good social policy," Pearson
said.
Volunteer Executions: The Way of the Future?
Still, Passaro's case is not the first volunteer
execution Savitz says he has encountered. Since the electric chair
has been phased out in most executions as cruel and unusual
punishment and lethal injection has become more common, he believes
more prisoners will opt to die in the most humane way possible
rather than spend the rest of their lives in prison appealing the
sentences.
Cases like Passaro's are rare, he said, but could
become more common. "You never see anyone volunteering for the
electric chair," said Savitz. "But with lethal injection, it's a
painless way to go … you go to sleep. Prisoners see it as a way out
rather than spending the rest of their lives in prison. It could be
the way of the future."
Lawyer Says Inmate Ready to Die Friday
By Rick
Brundrett - TheState.com
September 12, 2002
For Michael Passaro -- the man South Carolina
will likely execute Friday -- life changed forever one night long
ago. His wife, Donna, who was watching TV while he was sleeping,
heard a crash outside their New York suburban home. Donna, a nurse,
ran to the crashed car. As she tried to help the driver out of the
car, an electrical line struck her, burning her to death.
Passaro fell into a deep depression and never
recovered, said a petition asking Gov. Jim Hodges to grant him
clemency. He was depressed in 1998 when he burned his 2-year-old
daughter, Maggie, to death in a van in Myrtle Beach, the petition
said. He had planned to kill himself in the fire with Maggie, but he
survived.
Passaro, 40, thinks his execution will reunite
him with Maggie and Donna, the petition says. The S.C. Carolina
Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and S.C. Christian Action
Council said the state shouldn't help him commit suicide.
They filed
a 19-page petition on Passaro's behalf, against his wishes. "He does
not deserve to die for his crime," the petition said, because the
judge who sentenced Passaro to death and the S.C. Supreme Court --
which in July said he could waive all appeals -- never knew the "untold
story" of his battle with mental illness. The groups want Hodges to
commute the death sentence to life in prison without parole. Hodges,
as of Wednesday, hadn't decided. No South Carolina governor has
granted clemency since lawmakers restored the death penalty in 1977.
Passaro is scheduled for a lethal injection at 6
p.m. Friday at the state Department of Corrections' Capital
Punishment Facility off Broad River Road. He would be the 28th
person executed since 1977 and the third this year. Passaro is the
first South Carolina Death Row inmate to waive his appeals without a
trial, the petition said.
Other inmates have dropped cases after
jury verdicts and initial appeals. Capital murder defendants
nationwide rarely waive appeals, said Brenda Bowser of the Death
Penalty Information Center in Washington, D.C.
Passaro is resolved to die despite others'
efforts to spare his life, said Joseph Savitz, his appellate lawyer.
"He is convinced that he will be reunited with his first wife, Donna,
and his daughter, Maggie. When someone believes that, it's very
difficult to change their minds." Savitz said Passaro declined to
talk with a reporter. His relatives couldn't be reached for comment
and have declined previous requests for interviews.
The average stay on South Carolina's Death Row is
about six years, 2000 corrections department figures show. Passaro
has been waiting for two years. Death Row has 71 inmates. Passaro
could stop his execution by saying he wants to appeal on the grounds
his trial lawyers were ineffective, Savitz said. "Even if he should
walk into the death chamber Friday and look at his mother and sister
and say, 'I don't want to do it,' we would stop it," he said.
Passaro's trial lawyers helped him "complete his
suicide, and then convinced the court to help him too," the clemency
petition said. The lawyers couldn't be reached for comment. The
Attorney General's Office won't stop the execution. "It's his right
to waive his appeals. The state Supreme Court found him competent,"
said Robb McBurney, spokesman for Attorney General Charlie Condon.
Passaro was sentenced to death in August 2000. A
month later, he told the state Supreme Court he wouldn't appeal, and
he hasn't changed his mind. In a rare move, Passaro went in person
in May to tell the five justices his wishes. The court ruled in July
that his case met their criteria.
In 1994, the high court ruled that capital murder
defendants can waive appeals if they are competent, and their
decision is "knowing and voluntary." Clemency petitioners painted
Passaro as a young man who had a tough time until he met his first
love and first wife, Donna. As he grew up in Long Island, he was a
loner with emotional problems. After a stint in the Navy, he worked
as a cabby, electrician, ambulance driver and emergency medical
technician, and struggled with alcohol and drug abuse, the petition
continued.
Passaro and Donna married a short time after they
met at a hospital where they worked. She helped him with his
emotional, drug and alcohol problems, and encouraged him to pursue a
medical career. They had no children, although she had a miscarriage,
the petition said. After Donna was electrocuted helping the motorist,
Passaro became a zombie, quickly succumbing to drugs and alcohol,
the petition said. He drifted, living in New York and Florida and
eventually with his parents in Myrtle Beach.
There he met his second wife, Karen, who ran
kidney dialysis centers in Horry and Georgetown counties. They began
dating shortly after Karen hired him. They married and had a
daughter, Maggie. They separated in June 1998. (She couldn't be
reached for comment.) Passaro, who was being treated for depression,
slept with a knife and often thought about stabbing himself, the
petition said. He was very close to Maggie, and desperately tried to
protect her from the divorce, the petition said.
Then, on Nov. 23, 1998, he snapped. Passaro was
so angry with Karen about holiday visitation he set fire to the
family's minivan outside her condominium. Passaro doused the van
with gasoline and set it on fire with Maggie strapped to her car
seat in the van, police said. He jumped from the van after it
exploded, officials said. Investigators found a singed typewritten
suicide note in the van in which Passaro confessed to killing Maggie
to get back at his estranged wife.
The clemency petition says the note, typed three
months before the girl's death, shows Passaro was troubled. It said:
"I never wanted my first wife to die or for me to fall apart
afterwards, but I did. "I never wanted my second marriage to end in
divorce ... but it all happened. I'm tired of fighting. "I just
realized that I was never supposed to be happy."
Man Who Killes 2-Year Old Daughter Executed
TheDeathHouse.com
COLUMBIA, S.C. - A man who burned his two- year-
old daughter to death to get even with his estranged wife was
executed by lethal injection Friday night.
Michael Passaro did not appeal his death sentence
and chose to be executed. He was the third condemned prisoner
executed in South Carolina in 2002. The execution took place at the
Broad River Correctional Institute. Passaro, 40, believed that after
he died he would be reunited in heaven with his dead daughter and
his first wife, who died in a car accident.
At his trial in 2000, Passaro had pleaded guilty
to arson and the murder of his daughter, Maggie. Passaro strapped
the child inside a van and started the fire by pouring gasoline in
the vehicle. He later said he planned to kill himself, but jumped
out of the van. He was burned, but survived. Passaro had written a
suicide note in which he said he hoped his estranged wife, Karen,
would "live in pain for the rest of her life." The murder occurred
in Myrtle Beach.
In July, the South Carolina Supreme Court
unanimously voted to allow Passaro to waive all his remaining
appeals. The condemned killer appeared before the justices in May to
personally plea for death. "Death or life (in prison) are both death
sentences," Passaro said The state’s highest court found Passaro
competent to waive his appeals.
Before murdering his child, Passaro and his wife,
Karen Passaro, separated because of marital difficulties. She then
filed for divorce. A family court issued a temporary order affecting
custody of the Passaro's child, Maggie. Passaro’s first wife was
killed in an automobile accident in 1988 while trying to help
another motorist involved in a separate accident. A custody order
had granted Passaro weekend custody of Maggie from Friday, when he
would pick the child up from daycare, to Monday, when he would
return her to daycare.
The high court said in its decision that on the
Monday before Thanksgiving, Passaro did not take Maggie to daycare.
Instead, he drove his van to his estranged wife’s condominium
complex; poured gasoline on the floor of the vehicle; ignited the
gasoline and jumped out leaving Maggie to die strapped in a child's
safety seat. "Investigators found a suicide note in the van, written
by Passaro, explaining his wish to kill himself and Maggie so they
could spend time in heaven away from Karen," The South Carolina high
court wrote in its opinion.
South Carolina Attorney General
Execution Date Set for Horry County Killer
August 16, 2002
Columbia, S.C. -- Attorney General Charlie Condon
announced today that today the S.C. Supreme Court set an execution
date of September 13, 2002 for Michael J. Passaro, an Horry County
death row inmate, who pled guilty to murdering his two-year-old
daughter, Maggie, on November 23, 1998.
Passaro admitted that he drove his van to his
estranged wife's condominium compex, poured gasoline on the floor of
the vehicle, ignited the gasoline, and jumped out, leaving Maggie
strapped in a child's safety seat, where she burned to death. After
pleading guilty, he was sentenced to death. Passaro waived his right
to appeal, and the S.C. Supreme Court found him competent to make
such a decision.
High court grants man's wish for death sentence
By Rick Brundrett - TheState.com
July 30, 2002
The state's top court on Monday granted Michael
Passaro's wish to die for burning his 2-year-old daughter to death
in 1998.
In a rare move, the S.C. Supreme Court
unanimously said Passaro, 40, can waive all his appeals. He was
sentenced to death in Myrtle Beach in 2000 after pleading guilty to
murder and arson.
Passaro appeared in person before the five
justices in May, asking them to waive his appeals and move up his
execution. Rarely has the high court approved such a request, and
rarely does a defendant appear before the court during an appeals
hearing.
Passaro's appellate lawyer, Joseph Savitz,
differed with his client in May. He said then that allowing Passaro
to waive his appeals would be "little more than government-assisted
suicide." But on Monday, Savitz said the justices "did what I asked
them to do" when they let Passaro speak directly to them and work
through the merits of the request.
He said he doesn't believe
Passaro will ask the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision or
seek clemency from Gov. Jim Hodges. "I anticipate he'll be executed
in a matter of weeks," said Savitz, deputy chief attorney at the S.C.
Office of Appellate Defense.
Robb McBurney, spokesman for state Attorney
General Charlie Condon, said his office will ask the Supreme Court
for an execution date after Aug. 13, the deadline for Passaro to
file his reconsideration request.
Passaro admitted to setting his van on firewith
his 2-year-old daughter, Maggie, strapped inside -- at his estranged
wife's Myrtle Beach condominium in November 1998. Passaro planned to
kill himself in the blaze, but jumped out after setting the fire,
investigators said. The girl died.
Passaro was severely burned.
Prosecutors said Passaro killed the girl to get back at his wife.
Passaro left behind a suicide note in which he said he hoped his
estranged wife, Karen, wouldn't later commit suicide so she would "live
in pain for the rest of her life."
He told the justices he wanted to waive all his
appeals because he had pleaded guilty, so even if he won on appeal,
he couldn't win a new trial. The most he could hope for would be a
new sentence, he argued, and even then, he couldn't receive anything
less than life imprisonment because it was a death penalty case. "Death
or life (in prison) are both death sentences," Passaro said,
standing before the justices under heavy guard. Passaro first told
the Supreme Court in September 2000 he wanted to drop all appeals.
He hasn't changed his mind since.
In 1994, the high court ruled in another death
penalty case that capital murder defendants can waive their appeals
if the court determines they are competent and their decision was "knowing
and voluntary." In their ruling Monday, the justices said Passaro's
case met their criteria. They also rejected the argument that his
request was "tantamount to state-assisted suicide."
Donald Zelenka, an assistant deputy S.C. attorney
general, told the justices in May that waiving Passaro's appeals
wouldn't be circumventing justice. He said Passaro's request was
thoroughly reviewed in a circuit court hearing. Circuit Court Judge
H. Dean Hall last year found Passaro to be competent, based on the
opinions of two psychiatrists.
Passaro, who is at Lieber Correctional
Institution in Dorchester County, could be executed as early as this
year. The average stay for the state's Death Row inmates is about 6½
years, according to the state Department of Corrections. There were
72 people on Death Row as of last month.
Killer allowed to waive appeal
By Tonya Root - MyrtleBeachOnline.com
July 30, 2002
Michael Passaro is competent to waive his
automatic appeal and be executed for burning his 2-year-old daughter
to death, according to an S.C. Supreme Court opinion issued Monday.
Passaro argued May 29 before the justices that he was competent to
waive his right to an appeal, which is automatically filed in every
death-penalty case. "We questioned Passaro at length during oral
arguments. Our own questioning of him leaves no doubt of his
competency," Justice E.C. Burnett III wrote, with the other justices
concurring.
Passaro's court-appointed attorney, Joseph Savitz,
told the justices during May oral arguments if they waived Passaro's
appeal, their decision was "little more than government-assisted
suicide." Savitz could not be reached Monday for comment.
Solicitor Greg Hembree, who prosecuted Passaro,
said Passaro showed during his hearings that he understood the
process and his actions. "He was clearly competent and understood
them. He knew exactly what he did and the consequences of the crime,"
Hembree said. "There was never any question of his competency. ...
Now it's just a matter of waiting." Hembree said if Passaro does not
file for a delay in his execution, a date could be set for later
this year.
Passaro, now 39 years old, pleaded guilty in
August 2000 to murder and first-degree arson in the burning death of
his daughter, Maggie. On Nov. 23, 1988, he drove the family minivan
with Maggie strapped in a child safety seat and parked in front of
the condominium complex where his estranged wife, Karen, lived.
Passaro doused the inside of the van with gasoline and jumped out
soon after it exploded. He refused to tell fire officials who
responded to the scene if anyone was in the van.
A singed typewritten suicide note written by
Passaro was found inside the van. It said he killed Maggie to get
back at his estranged wife. Karen Passaro could not be reached
Monday for comment. During the May hearing, Passaro told the
justices he believed God has forgiven him and that he regretted the
things he said about his ex-wife living in pain for the rest of her
life.
Groups Fight to Halt Passaro's Death
By
Kenneth A. Gailliard - MyrtleBeachOnline.com
September 12, 2002
Michael Passaro is one day away from the
execution he has said he is prepared for, but groups opposed to the
death penalty are fighting to save him. The 40-year-old Surfside
Beach man is scheduled to be executed at 6 p.m. Friday for the
burning death of his 2-year-old daughter, Maggie.
The S.C. Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty,
which is pushing for a moratorium on executions in the state, will
hold an interfaith prayer service at 7 tonight at St. Thomas More
Chapel, 1610 Greene St. in Columbia. The coalition holds similar
protests for all S.C. executions, said Bruce Pearson, a spokesman
for the group. Two other groups, the S.C. Association of Criminal
Defense Lawyers and the S.C. Christian Action Council, are asking
Gov. Jim Hodges to grant Passaro clemency.
Representatives say Passaro was depressed when he
killed his daughter and he never recovered. The groups filed a
petition on Passaro's behalf, against his will. The groups want
Hodges to commute his sentence to life in prison. No S.C. governor
has granted clemency since lawmakers restored the death penalty in
1977.
Passaro told state Supreme Court justices in May
that he wanted to die. In July, the court ruled he was competent to
waive his appeals. Passaro pleaded guilty in August 2000 to murder
and first-degree arson and was sentenced to death. He drove the
family minivan with his daughter, Maggie, strapped into a child
safety seat and parked in front of the condominium complex of his
estranged wife, Karen, on Nov. 23, 1998.
He used gasoline to set the van on fire, then
jumped from the van soon after it exploded. He refused to tell fire
officials who responded the scene whether anyone else was inside.
Firefighters later found a melted gasoline can on the floor in front
of Maggie's seat.
Authorities also found what remained of a
typewritten note in which Passaro wrote that he killed Maggie to get
back at her mother, his estranged wife. Passaro's defenders say he
was depressed from the death of his first wife, who was accidentally
electrocuted. If clemency is denied, Passaro will be the third
person put to death in the state this year.
Abolish Archives
8-17-00 SOUTH CAROLINA:
An Horry County man was so angry with his
estranged wife that he set fire to a family minivan, killing their
2-year-old daughter, prosecutors said Wednesday during a sentencing
hearing. A circuit court judge heard testimony during the sentencing
hearing for Michael Joseph Passaro, 38, who could receive the death
penalty for killing his daughter, Maggie.
Passaro pleaded guilty Monday to charges of
murder and 1st-degree arson in Maggie's Nov. 23, 1998, death. The
plea was against advice from his attorneys. Prosecutors presented
evidence of the crime to Judge Dean Hall, who will impose a sentence.
Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Solicitor Greg Hembree
read a typewritten suicide note with singed edges that was recovered
from the white 1995 Ford minivan. Passaro set fire to the van
outside his wife's condo at South Bay Lakes in Surfside Beach.
Passaro left Maggie in the van while he escaped from the fire. "Well,
Karen [Passaro] won the war, and it's at the expense of our daughter,"
Hembree read aloud from the note. "I guess that I'm getting the last
laugh now, Karen. "Whatever anyone does, please make sure Karen
doesn't kill herself. I want her to live in pain."
"Has he achieved his objective?" Hembree asked
Karen Passaro. "Yes. I will live like this forever, for the rest of
my life. I can't concentrate or even focus some days," Karen Passaro
said. "Maggie will never get to grow up. ... And in the process he
took away my future."
Jonathan Simons, a clinical psychologist who
examined Passaro in April 1999 and on Tuesday, testified Passaro
knew right from wrong. "My impression is that in Michael's mind his
identity became somewhat blurred. He felt his wife was robbing him
of his identity, and he had to win that battle," Simons said.
Hembree asked Simons whether "Michael Passaro's
hatred for Karen Passaro was greater than the love he had for Maggie
Passaro?" Simons said: "I think some people could see that. ... He
had this delusion of being with Maggie and going to heaven to see
his 1st wife."
Susan Lewis, who taught Passaro in a nursing
class, testified he needed emotional support and wasn't thinking
clearly. Lewis, who testified for the defense, also said Passaro had
poor life skills and judgment, and was under a lot of stress with
his classes, work and pending divorce. "He thought he had a solution
to his problems, and he hoped she was hurt at the outcome," Lewis
said.
Fire investigators testified the fire started
near the middle seat of the van. The remains of a plastic, 1-gallon
gasoline can also were found melted into the floor near where Maggie
was strapped in a child safety seat.
Maggie's family members left the courtroom while
pictures of the charred van with Maggie's body still inside were
shown to the judge. Passaro, who wore shackles, a light-blue shirt
and dark-blue slacks, solemnly stared at his hands while the
photographs were shown. "She was alive when the fire was raging. She
burned to death as a result of the flame and fire in the car," said
Clay Nichols, a forensic pathologist who examined Maggie. "I can't
think of a more painful way to die."
Witnesses testified Passaro jumped out of the van
soon after it exploded. "We pulled him away to the grassy area,"
said John Watts, a witness. "We asked him if anyone else was in the
van, and he would not answer us." Maggie's body was found after the
fire was extinguished and investigators were searching for a cause
of the fire. Paramedics testified Passaro was conscious when they
arrived, and the clothing on his right arm and the back of his legs
was singed.
(source: The (Myrtle Beach) Sun News)
WITNESS TO MY BROTHER’S EXECUTION: A troubled
life begins
By Gina Farthing - NewsVirginian.com
April 16, 2005
When my brother was born
July 26, 1962, on New York’s Long Island, he
didn’t even get his own name.
My parents christened him
Michael Joseph Passaro—named after a brother
who had died two years before of a heart
defect after only four hours outside the
womb.
The second of five
children, Michael was always considered our
family’s “problem” child. He was a mediocre
student with little self-esteem. He was a
follower, not a leader. He hated to fight -
even to defend himself from bullies. That
duty fell to me, his older sister by 13
months.
One day in sixth grade
when we were walking home from school, two
bullies followed close behind with plans to
beat up my little brother. When one of the
boys pushed Michael to provoke a fight, I
stepped between them. Michael ran down the
street and watched from 100 yards away while
I fought the boys. One quickly backed down.
The other bully got kicked, scratched,
pinched and punched; I jerked out a clump of
his hair.
Let’s just say he and his
buddy never bothered my brother again.
It’s not that I liked to
fight. Far from it. I always used my verbal
skills to avoid confrontations as a child.
Sometimes you have no choice though.
Later, as an adult, the
knowledge that I could defend myself would
serve me well when I worked as a corrections
officer - in a men’s maximum-security prison.
At 5-foot-2 in high
school, I still defended my brother Michael,
who stood 6-foot-3. Some of the battles even
were in my own family. My brother, John, a
year younger than Michael, once came after
Michael with a running lawn mower. Again, I
put myself between Michael and the threat. I
pounded on John’s chest (he was 6-foot-1),
and also gave him what-for verbally.
When things went wrong,
it was often Michael’s “fault.”
One time, Michael and our
“baby” sister, Mary, who was two years
younger, scuffled over a children’s powder
puff she had given him as a gift but wanted
back. The result was a pile of perfumed
talcum powder scattered about the floor.
From my bedroom, I heard the commotion and
my father’s arrival to mediate.
As usual, it was
Michael’s fault, so my father’s idea of
punishment was to make him lick up the
powder.
Years later, I asked
Michael if he had actually done it; he said
no. But I will never forget my father
yelling at him to lick it up and Michael’s
crying that he didn’t want to.
Our father was not
abusive, but if pushed, rendered unusual and
harsh punishments when it came to Michael.
One year when I was in college, both of my
brothers came home from a party. Michael was
drunk, and my father told them to go to bed.
Michael ended up getting sick after he laid
down, scaring my father into thinking that
his son would choke to death on his own
vomit. He threw Michael into a cold shower
and dragged him outside. “Don’t come back,”
Dad told Michael, “until you can recite the
Pythagorean theorem” - a geometry law
regarding right triangles.
My mother and I stayed
up, too, waiting for my brother’s return at
the back door with the proper password. It
took Michael more than a couple of tries -
his first reaction was to forget our
father’s instructions and the second was to
ask of the theorem, “What is that?”
Our mother pleaded with
our father to let Michael back in. While she
petitioned Dad, I whispered the answer to
Michael, not knowing if he’d even remember
it. He returned in a few minutes and gave
the “A squared plus B squared equals C
squared” that Dad required.
Michael often was my
companion growing up; he even tagged along
on outings with my friends. He lacked his
own social and life skills. I nicknamed him
“Meekie,” and everyone assumed it was a
variation of Michael. But it actually was a
play on the word “meek.”
Even a stint in the Navy
did little to build Michael’s confidence or
self-worth. Always naïve, he ended up
completing his tour of service in a
Philadelphia brig after accepting a gift of
old tools from a superior on board his duty
ship. Michael’s superior told him the tools
were going to be discarded anyway, so he
should have them. Michael was arrested while
trying to cart the tools off the USS Hunley,
a sub-tender. It never crossed his mind that
once something was government property, it
always was. His ignorance cost him an
honorable discharge.
Michael fared no better
with women than with men. They rejected him.
That was until he met Donna Jean Knapp.
The love of his life
Donna was just out of a
troubled marriage and had a daughter, Missy,
about 7. Michael met her through his job at
Kings Park Psychiatric Center on Long
Island. She was a nurse. He was an orderly.
Donna was about five
years older than Michael. I met her once, in
the fall of 1987. Michael made her meet me
before they married. He wanted my approval
first, so she visited me in Florida.
She saw my brother as a
loving, tenderhearted man - the opposite of
her alcoholic and abusive ex-husband.
I liked Donna - she saw
through Michael’s eccentricities. She
encouraged him to go to school to become a
nurse himself because he enjoyed caring for
people.
The couple married in
February 1988 and settled on Long Island.
Five months later, the
unthinkable happened.
After Donna and Michael
played a game of darts at home, Michael went
to sleep. Donna heard a car slam into a
utility pole at the end of their street.
While Michael slept, she ran to the scene to
nurse the victims. That’s when a wire
knocked loose from the pole whipped Donna
and launched her 50 feet, over a hedge.
That was June 18, 1988. I
got a call the next day from my mother, who
wished me a happy birthday and then told me
she had some tragic news: Donna had died
that morning.
Before heading into
surgery, Donna had begged Michael to take
care of her daughter, Missy, then 8. My
brother promised he would - but he was sure
he’d see her when the surgery ended.
Donna died on the
operating table. She was buried in the
family plot the couple had bought just
months before.
Her parents pressed for
custody of Missy and were awarded the 8-year-old.
Michael was devastated.
Not only did he lose his beloved wife, but
he lost the stepdaughter he had promised to
care for. His in-laws afforded him meager
visitation opportunities, and then engaged
him in legal battles for Donna’s life
insurance and her wrongful death settlement
- roughly $150,000 combined. (Michael’s
stepdaughter got about $25,000, and Michael
$75,000. Attorneys got the rest.)
A life spirals into
hell
For the next eight years,
Michael’s life was marked by grief, self-pity
and despondency. He tried to continue with
school (in Donna’s memory), but dropped out.
He changed jobs over and over - electrician,
cabbie, ambulance driver, paramedic.
He moved to Florida to
live with me and restart his life, but
within six months, my own life and marriage
were in shambles.
My husband and I split.
After years of his drinking, I’d had enough.
My children and I moved in with the only
family we had in the area, my in-laws.
Michael stayed at the mobile home I’d bought
with my husband, until he was able to find a
place of his own.
Nothing worked.
In the summer of 1990,
Michael went back to New York. He turned to
cocaine and alcohol and began a gradual
descent into darkness.
He hit rock bottom, or so
we thought, when he got drunk and stabbed a
friend with a 2½-inch pocketknife for
refusing to give him his car keys. His
friend was trying to prevent Michael from
driving drunk.
The knife wounds were
superficial, and the friend refused to press
charges. But Michael ended up on probation
and was ordered to get counseling.
In 1995, after completing
his probation and counseling, Michael moved
to South Carolina to live with our retired
parents in Longs, west of North Myrtle
Beach. Michael enrolled at Carolina Coastal
Community College and worked at a kidney
dialysis center. He continued with
counseling on his own and was prescribed
Zoloft to treat his depression.
At the dialysis center,
Michael began a relationship with the
director, a former nurse named Karen Monk
Martin. She was older - a single mother of
two grown girls.
They married Jan. 18,
1996, and by March, Karen was pregnant with
Michael’s child. The family’s joy would be
shortlived.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
The State, Respondent,
v. Michael J. Passaro, Appellant
Appeal From Horry County
H. Dean Hall, Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 25507
Heard May 29, 2002 - Filed July 29, 2002
AFFIRMED
JUSTICE BURNETT:
Michael J. Passaro ("Passaro")
pled guilty to murder and arson and was sentenced to death.
Passaro's counsel filed an appeal to which Passaro filed a motion to
dismiss. We ordered the circuit court to conduct a competency
hearing. The court found Passaro competent to waive his right to
appeal his conviction.
FACTS
The facts are not disputed.
Passaro and his wife, Karen Passaro ("Karen"), separated because of
marital difficulties. Karen, subsequently, filed for divorce. The
family court issued a temporary order affecting custody of the
Passaro's child, Maggie.
The order granted Passaro
weekend custody of Maggie, beginning on Friday, when he would pick
her up from daycare, and ending Monday, when he returned her to
daycare. Karen would pick up Maggie on Monday afternoon and keep her
until Friday. Passaro and Karen had conflicts concerning the custody
arrangement, particularly during holidays.
On the Monday before Thanksgiving, Passaro did not take Maggie to
daycare. Instead, he drove his van to Karen's condominium complex;
poured gasoline on the floor of the vehicle; ignited the gasoline
and jumped out leaving Maggie to die strapped in a child's safety
seat. Investigators found a suicide note in the van, written by
Passaro, explaining his wish to kill himself and Maggie so they
could spend time in heaven away from Karen.
(1)
After Passaro's indictment, the State served notice of its intent to
seek the death penalty. The trial judge conducted a Blair
(2) hearing and
found him competent, i.e., he understood the charges
against him and was able to assist his court-appointed counsel.
Passaro was arraigned on the day of the competency hearing and
entered pleas of guilty to both charges. The trial court accepted
the pleas after finding they were entered freely, voluntarily and
intelligently.
(3) The court
reconvened two days subsequent to begin the required sentencing
phase.
At the conclusion of the sentencing hearing the trial judge found
the existence of the following statutory aggravating circumstances
beyond a reasonable doubt: 1) physical torture;
(4) 2) offender by
his act of murder knowingly created a great risk of death to more
than one person in a public place by means of a weapon or device
which would normally be hazardous to the lives of more than one
person;
(5) 3) the murder
of a child 11 years of age or younger.
(6) Although the
court found mitigating circumstances,
(7) Passaro waived
his right for the court to consider any mitigation.
Passaro's counsel, at
Passaro's behest, waived closing arguments. Passaro made a brief
closing statement:
Donna
(8) was a big
part of my life. I was devastated by her passing, and when I met
Karen I thought I would have another chance at happiness. We
started having difficulties in our marriage and happiness turned
to tragedy. Thank you, your honor.
The trial judge concluded
the evidence warranted the imposition of the death sentence for
murder and a concurrent sentence of 30 years for arson.
Passaro's counsel filed a
timely notice of appeal. Passaro, pro se, filed a motion to
dismiss his appeal. We remanded the matter to the circuit court
pursuant to Singleton v. State, 313 S.C. 75, 437 S.E.2d 53
(1993), to determine whether Passaro was competent to waive his
right to appeal.
At the Singleton
hearing Dr. Pamela Crawford ("Dr. Crawford"), an expert qualified in
forensic psychiatry, testified Passaro was competent, under the
Singleton standard, to waive his appeal and to be executed. She
found he suffered from no major mental illness, though he had
suffered from mild depression in his past, including periods after
the death of his first wife and after his incarceration for the
murder of his daughter. Dr. Crawford's findings were consistent with
the report of the findings of the defense psychiatric expert.
The court found Passaro
competent under the Singleton standard. Specifically, the
court found Passaro able to understand the nature of the proceedings,
the crimes for which he was tried, the reason for and the nature of
the punishment, and he possessed sufficient mental capacity or
ability to rationally communicate with counsel.
We required the parties
submit briefs on Passaro's competence to waive his appeal. We also
denied Passaro's motion to dismiss his counsel and appear pro
se. However, we allowed Passaro to file an additional pro
se brief. In a letter received March 5, 2002 waiving his right
to file a pro se brief, Passaro wrote to appellate counsel:
In following the court's
order of December 17, 2001, I understand that I have 20 days to
respond to your [Office of Appellate Defense] brief and the
state's brief.
I received a copy of
your brief and the state's brief on February 11, 2002 and after
reading both briefs, I do not feel that any more [sic] is needed
to be said. I agree with the state.
Therefore, I am waiving
the 20 days for my response.
ISSUE
I. Can an individual who
pleads guilty to murder and waives
introduction of mitigating evidence waive his right to general
appellate review?
II. Is Passaro's waiver
of his right to general appellate review competent, knowing and
voluntary?
DISCUSSION
I
Right to Waive Appeal
A capital defendant may
waive the right to general appellate review. State v. Torrence,
317 S.C. 45, 451 S.E.2d 883 (1994) (Torrence II). However, this
right is limited to competent individuals whose decision is knowing
and voluntary. Id.
Appellate counsel argues this Court should not allow Passaro to
waive his right to general appellate review. Appellate counsel bases
this argument on the theory that Passaro, who pled guilty to capital
murder and then waived mitigation at the penalty phase, should not
be allowed to prevent review of his conviction and sentence by
waiving appellate review. To do so, counsel insists, is "little more
than government-assisted suicide."
(9)
Our decisions in Torrence II
and State v. Torrence, 322 S.C. 475, 473 S.E.2d 703 (1996) (Torrence
III), permit an individual to waive general appellate review of a
death penalty conviction. Appellate counsel suggests the distinction
between the Torrence line of cases and the instant case is
our affirming Torrence's underlying conviction in our initial review
of the case. SeeState v. Torrence, 305 S.C. 45, 406
S.E.2d 315 (1991) (Torrence I) (affirming conviction, but reversing
the sentence of death and remanding for new sentencing proceeding).
Because this Court has never reviewed Passaro's conviction, counsel
asserts we should refuse any request to waive appeals in the case.
We disagree.
It is true Torrence did not
waive his right to appellate review until after this Court upheld
his conviction. When Torrence was sentenced to death the second
time, he chose to waive appellate review because he could, at best,
receive life without parole at a new sentencing hearing. Torrence
preferred the execution of his death sentence to the only
alternative, life without parole.
Passaro, unlike Torrence,
pled guilty. Allowing individuals, even defendants facing capital
punishment, to plead guilty is recognized both in this state and
throughout the nation. SeeState v. Shaw, 273 S.C.
194, 255 S.E.2d 799 (1979) (upholding death sentence of two
defendants who pled guilty to murder) overruled on other grounds
by Torrence I, supra; seegenerally Barry J.
Fisher, Judicial Suicide or Constitutional Autonomy? A Capital
Defendant's Right to Plead Guilty, 65 Alb. L. Rev. 181 (2001)
(noting all states except Arkansas, Louisiana and New York allow a
defendant in a capital case to plead guilty).
By allowing Passaro to plead
guilty, we allow him to significantly restrict the scope of review
on appeal because a guilty plea generally constitutes a waiver of
non-jurisdictional defects and claims of violations of
constitutional rights. SeeRivers v. Strickland, 264
S.C. 121, 124, 213 S.E.2d 97, 98 (1975) (stating "[t]he general rule
is that a plea of guilty, voluntarily and understandingly made,
constitutes a waiver of non-jurisdictional defects and defenses,
including claims of violation of constitutional rights prior to the
plea"). Counsel does not argue or suggest Passaro was not guilty or
his guilty plea defective.
We disagree with appellate
counsel's argument that allowing an individual to plead guilty to
murder, be sentenced to death and waive his right to general
appellate review is tantamount to State assisted suicide. While the
competency of the guilty verdict may be in doubt in some future
case, it is not in doubt here as Passaro pled guilty below and
confirmed his guilt before this Court. SeeState v. Sroka,
267 S.C. 664, 230 S.E.2d 816 (1976) (affirming guilty verdict by
jury based on overwhelming evidence presented at trial and later
admission of guilt by defendant in open court).
Importantly, this Court is
the final body to decide whether to grant Passaro's waiver. Because
of the uniqueness of the death penalty, we carefully review,
individually, a petition to waive appellate review. We discern no
reason Passaro should be denied his right to waive appellate review
because he chose to plead guilty.
II
Ability to Waive
Appeal
We limit a death row
inmate's ability to waive appeals to those who are competent and
whose decision to do so is both knowing and voluntary. See
Torrence II, supra. Passaro is competent to waive his
right to appeal. His decision to do so is knowing and voluntary.
A. Competency
The standard to determine
competency, set forth by Singleton v. State, supra,
is: 1) whether the defendant can understand the nature of the
proceedings, the crimes for which he was tried, and the reason for
the punishment; and 2) whether the convicted defendant possesses
sufficient capacity or ability to rationally communicate with
counsel. SeeTorrence II, supra.
The State argues the only
evidence, particularly Dr. Crawford's report, presented at the
competency hearing demonstrates Passaro is competent under
Singleton. We agree.
The evidence presented at
the hearing establishes Passaro suffers from no major mental illness.
The evidence also shows he understands the nature of appellate
proceedings, including the relevant issues of appeal, the role of
his attorneys and the function of the court system in the process.
Passaro was able to state why he was tried and why he received a
death sentence.
Dr. Crawford noted Passaro
was aware of the finality of the death penalty and was able to
discuss in detail his reason for waiving his appeal. The defense
expert's report provided a similar evaluation.
We questioned Passaro at
length during oral arguments. Our own questioning of him leaves no
doubt of his competency. At oral arguments we questioned Passaro
extensively about his trial, the appeals process and the consequence
of his request to terminate any appeals on his behalf. It is our
observation that Passaro possesses the capacity and ability to
communicate with counsel.
There is no evidence
suggesting Passaro is not competent under the Singleton
standard. We conclude, based on the hearing below and our
questioning, that Passaro is competent to waive his appeal.
B. Knowing and
Voluntary
The evidence presented at
the competency hearing and Passaro's testimony before this Court
establishes the wavier of his right to
appellate review is knowing and voluntary.
(10) Dr. Crawford
noted Passaro understood the consequences of his action. No evidence
suggests Passaro is being coerced into waiving his appeal.
While defense counsel notes
Passaro, at Dr. Crawford's second visit on March 20, 2001, expressed
the possibility he may change his mind, he made no such comments at
the competency hearing. In his letter to defense counsel waiving his
right to file a pro se brief, Passaro unequivocally agreed
with the State's brief. Such a statement reaffirms his prior
commitment to waive his right to appeal.
At oral argument, we
questioned Passaro extensively about the voluntary nature of his
request. We also questioned whether he fully understood the
appellate process and what he could hope to gain by appealing his
sentence. We conclude Passaro's request is knowingly and voluntarily
made.
III
Sentence Review
Having concluded Passaro may waive his right to general appellate
review, we proceed to review the sentence as required by S.C. Code
Ann. § 16-3-25(C) (1976).
(11)
A. Arbitrariness
Review
We are required to consider
whether a death sentence "was imposed under the influence of passion,
prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor." S.C. Code Ann. §
16-3-25(C)(1) (1976). Appellate counsel has not argued Passaro's
sentence was influenced by passion, prejudice or any other arbitrary
factor. Having reviewed the record we conclude the sentence was not
influenced by such arbitrary factors, but was the product of sound
deliberation based on the evidence. SeeState v. Shaw,
supra, overruled on other grounds by Torrence
I, supra.
B. Circumstances of
Aggravation Review
The trial judge imposed the death penalty after finding the
following statutory aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable
doubt: 1) physical torture;
(12) 2) offender by
his act of murder knowingly created a great risk of death to more
than one person in a public place by means of a weapon or device
which would normally be hazardous to the lives of more than one
person;
(13) 3) the murder
of a child 11 years of age or younger.
(14)
It is not disputed Maggie
Passaro was under 11 years of age at the time of the murder. The
child was 2 years of age at the time of her death. Because the State
has proved the existence of at least one aggravating circumstance
beyond a reasonable doubt it is not necessary to address the other
aggravating circumstances. SeeState v. Chaffee, 285
S.C. 21, 328 S.E.2d 464 (1984), overruled on other grounds by
Torrence I, supra (death penalty may be imposed upon
finding at least one statutory aggravating factor).
After a review of the
record, we conclude the evidence supports the trial judge's findings
beyond a reasonable doubt.
C. Proportionality
Review
The United States
Constitution requires the death penalty to be imposed only if the
sentence is "neither excessive nor disproportionate in light of the
crime and the defendant." State v. Copeland, 278 S.C. 572,
590, 300 S.E.2d 63, 74 (1982). In conducting a proportionality
review, this court searches for "similar cases" where the death
sentence has been upheld. Id.
A review of case law reveals
no factually similar case, i.e., the murder of a person
under eleven years of age by arson.
This Court has, however,
upheld the death sentence in cases where a defendant has murdered a
person under the age of eleven. SeeState v. Ard, 332
S.C. 370, 505 S.E.2d 328 (1998) (upholding death sentence for
defendant convicted of murder of his unborn, but viable, son);
State v. Rosemond, 335 S.C. 593, 518 S.E.2d 588 (1999) (death
penalty was proper for a defendant who murdered his girlfriend's
ten-year old daughter by shooting her); State v. Wilson, 306
S.C. 498, 413 S.E.2d 19 (1992) (death sentence was proportional to
crime where defendant gunned down elementary school students).
Passaro's crime is no less gruesome than those, perhaps more so
considering the evidence Passaro knowingly and intentionally started
the fire, jumped from the van, and failed to inform rescuers that
his child was still strapped to a safety seat in the vehicle. The
brutality of the murder is underscored by evidence the victim was
alive during the fire, succumbing to death only after the intense
heat caused her severe pain and suffering.
Evidence of Passaro's
individual characteristics show he suffered slight mental or
emotional disturbance at the time of the murder and did not have a
substantial history of violent criminal conduct. We upheld a death
sentence under similar mitigating circumstances in State v.
Wilson, supra. The death sentence is proportional to the
characteristics of this crime and the individual defendant.
CONCLUSION
Passaro may waive his right
to general appellate review. He is competent to do so, and his
request is both knowing and voluntary. We further find the death
sentence was properly imposed after finding the existence of at
least one aggravating circumstance. The sentence was not imposed
arbitrarily and was not disproportionate.
TOAL, C.J., MOORE,
WALLER and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.
*****
1. The
letter is caustic in tone, urging at one point for Karen to not kill
herself so she may "live in pain [because of Maggie's death] for the
rest of her life."
2.
State v. Blair, 275 S.C. 529, 273 S.E.2d 536 (1981).
3. The
judge noted Passaro took 40 milligrams/daily of the drug Prozac,
which did not impair his ability to assist counsel.
4. S.C.
Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(1)(h) (Supp. 2001).
5. S.C.
Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(3) (Supp. 2001).
6. S.C.
Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(10) (Supp. 2001).
7. The
trial court found the existence of two statutory mitigating
circumstances: 1) Passaro had no significant history of prior
criminal conviction involving the use of violence against another
person; 2) the murder was committed while the defendant was under
the influence of mental or emotional disturbance. See S.C.
Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(b)(1)-(2) (Supp. 2001).
8. Donna
was Passaro's first wife. She was struck and killed by an automobile
while attempting to help another motorist involved in a separate
accident. She died in 1988.
9. Death
row volunteers are neither new or unusual. See Christy
Chandler, note, Voluntary Executions, 50 Stan. L. Rev.
1897 (1998); Richard C. Dieter, Ethical Choices for Attorneys
Whose Clients Elect Execution, 3 Geo. J. Legal Ethics, 799,
802-03 (1990); Jane L. McClellan, Stopping the Rush to the Death
House: Third-Party Standing in Death-Row Volunteer Cases, 26
Ariz. St. L.J. 201, 202, 212 (1994). States executed 302 inmates
between 1973 and 1995, with 12% of those being the result of inmates
refusing their right to appeal or petition for various post-conviction
relief. NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Death Row U.S.A.
3-9 (1995).
10.
Passaro has been prescribed medication, primarily Prozac, to calm
him and to help him sleep. Passaro stated the medication does not
affect his ability to reason, coherently or rationally. The medical
evidence presented at the hearing below confirms this assessment.
11. We
have never directly addressed whether a defendant may waive sentence
review under S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-25 (C) (1976). See, e.g.,
Patterson v. Commonwealth, 262 Va. 301, 551 S.E.2d 332 (Va.
2001) (allowing death row defendant to waive general appeal for
errors but not sentence review) State v. Dodd, 120 Wash.2d 1,
838 P.2d 86 (Wash. 1992). We do not address Passaro's ability to
waive sentence review here because the issue has neither been raised
nor briefed by either party. Because this case arises from the
direct appeal filed by appellate counsel, we have conducted the
sentence review. See S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-25(F).
12. S.C.
Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(1)(h) (Supp. 2001).
13. S.C.
Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(3) (Supp. 2001).
14. S.C.
Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C)(a)(10) (Supp. 2001).