Murderpedia

 

 

Juan Ignacio Blanco  

 

  MALE murderers

index by country

index by name   A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

  FEMALE murderers

index by country

index by name   A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

 

 

 
   

Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.

   

 

 

Toronto Markkey PATTERSON

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
Classification: Homicide
Characteristics: Juvenile (17) - Robbery
Number of victims: 3
Date of murder: June 6, 1995
Date of arrest: Same day
Date of birth: October 17, 1977
Victims profile: Kimberly Brewer, 25, and her two daughters, 3 year old Ollie, and 6 year old Jennifer
Method of murder: Shooting (.38-revolver)
Location: Dallas County, Texas, USA
Status: Executed by lethal injection in Texas on August 28, 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
photo gallery
 
 
 
 
 
 
clemency petition
 
 
petition for writ of certiorari
 
 
application for certificate of appealability and brief in support
 
 
dissent of 3 supreme court justices
 
 
 
 
 
 


Summary:


Toronto Patterson began selling crack cocaine and openly displayed his gang membership when he was 15 years old.

By age 17, he developed an affinity for expensive chrome and gold automobile wheels. Knowing that a cousin in the penetentiary stored a BMW with such wheels at the home of Evelyn Stiff, he drove there and visited with his cousin, Kimberly Brewer.

He left, only to return later, entering and shooting Kimberly and her two daughters, 3 year old Ollie, and 6 year old Jennifer. All three were shot in the head and died.

Patterson then took 3 of 4 wheels off the BMW in the garage and fled. That same afternoon, Patterson tried to sell the stolen wheels. The clothing that Patterson wore earlier in the day had tiny spots of blood and was recovered, along with the wheels from Patterson's girlfriend's home.

Upon arrest, Patterson at first claimed that two Jamaicans actually did the shooting. In the second statement, after he was confronted with the fact that police had located the wheels at his girlfriend's house, Patterson admitted that he was the one who committed the triple homicide.

At trial, Patterson recanted and claimed that the statement had been coerced. He was tried only on charges of killing the 3-year-old. Because the girl was under 6, Patterson was found guilty of a capital offense.

In a classic case of returning to the scene of the crime, prosecutors scanning television coverage of the bodies being removed from the house spotted Patterson in the video.

Final Meal:

Six pieces of crispy fried chicken, four jalapeno peppers, four buttered buttermilk biscuits, chef salad (with bacon bits, black olives, ham, and Italian dressing), six Sprites, and white cake with white icing.

Final Words:

"I am sorry for the pain, sorry for what I caused my friends, family, and loved ones. I feel a great deal of responsibility and guilt for what happened. I should be punished for the crime, but I do not think I should die for a crime I did not commit."

ClarkProsecutor.org

 
 

Texas Attorney General

Media Advisory

Friday, Aug. 23, 2002

Toronto Patterson Scheduled to be Executed.

AUSTIN - Texas Attorney General John Cornyn offers the following information on Toronto Patterson, who is scheduled to be executed after 6 p.m. on Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2002.

On Nov. 20, 1995, Toronto Patterson was sentenced to die for the capital murder of Ollie Brown in Dallas, Texas, on June 6, 1995.

A summary of the evidence presented at trial follows:

FACTS OF THE CRIME

Toronto Patterson began selling crack cocaine when he was 15 years old. As a drug dealer, Patterson earned $500 to $700 a day and developed an affinity for expensive chrome and gold or all gold automobile wheels.

Patterson owned a car that was equipped with such wheels, but it was stolen in April 1995. Patterson was aware that Vernon Stiff, a cousin who was serving time in the penitentiary, stored a BMW with expensive wheels at the home of Evelyn Stiff, Patterson's great-aunt.

On June 6, 1995, around 10 or 11a.m., Patterson left his girlfriend's house and informed a friend that he was going to physical therapy for a back injury. On that same day, Patterson drove his grandmother's car to Evelyn Stiff's home and visited with Kimberly Brewer, one of Evelyn's daughters.

After chatting with Kimberly for about 15 minutes, Patterson went to physical therapy.

Thereafter, Patterson returned to Evelyn's house and fatally shot Kimberly and her two children, three-year-old Ollie, and six-year-old Jennifer, with a .38-revolver. Patterson shot Kimberly in the head as she relaxed on a living room recliner.

He shot Jennifer in the head as she watched cartoons and played in her bedroom. Ollie, who was on the bed in the same room, was killed by a gunshot to the head. Ollie also had gunshot wounds to her left hand and neck.

The children's injuries indicated that Patterson was only three feet away when he shot them, and Ollie's injuries were consistent with an adult standing over her and firing downward while she cowered in the corner of the bed and covered her ears.

After committing the murders, Patterson proceeded to the garage, unfastened three of the wheels from the BMW, and placed them in his grandmother's car. He was unable to unfasten the fourth wheel. Patterson did not take any other valuable items from the house.

Around 2 or 3 p.m., Patterson returned to his girlfriend's house looking scared and out-of-breath. He immediately changed his clothes and explained to his friend that he had just robbed and shot someone in an attempt to rob the person of his wheels, and that he needed help carting three of the wheels into the house.

That same afternoon, Patterson tried to sell the stolen wheels to Aycock Tire and Wheel but because he was unable to make a deal with the store manager, he kept the wheels in his girlfriend's garage.

Police officers arrested Patterson on murder charges the same day, and searched both Patterson's vehicle and the residence of Patterson's girlfriend. The clothing that Patterson wore earlier in the day had tiny spots of blood that were consistent with a blood pattern that would result from shooting someone in the head.

On June 7, 1995, Patterson submitted two written statements to a police detective, admitting to, and apologizing for, his involvement in the murders. In the first statement, Patterson claimed that he gave the stolen wheels to "two Jamaicans" who actually did the shooting.

In the second statement, after he was confronted with the fact that police had located the wheels at his girlfriend's house, Patterson admitted that he was the one who committed the triple homicide.

Patterson testified in his defense at trial, and presented a twist on the "Jamaicans-made-me-do-it" story, claiming that he had nothing to do with the murders and that his previous statements to the contrary were coerced.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June 23, 1995, Patterson was indicted for capital murder in the 5th Criminal District Court of Dallas County, Texas. He pleaded "not guilty." Trial on the merits began on Nov. 10, 1995, and on Nov. 17, 1995, the jury returned a verdict of "guilty."

Following a separate punishment hearing, the same jury answered "yes" to the future dangerousness special issue and found that no mitigating circumstance warranted that Patterson be sentenced to life imprisonment. Consequently, on Nov. 20, 1995, the trial court assessed punishment at death.

Patterson's conviction and sentence were automatically appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, but in 1999, that court affirmed in an unpublished opinion. The Supreme Court denied certiorari review later that same year.

On Sept. 4, 1997, while his direct appeal was pending, Patterson petitioned for state habeas relief. The trial court recommended that relief be denied, and on Feb. 3, 1999, the Court of Criminal Appeals adopted that recommendation after reviewing the record. On Dec. 16, 1999, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas stayed Patterson's execution to allow him to seek federal habeas corpus relief.

Before filing his federal petition, Patterson submitted a second state habeas petition to the Court of Criminal Appeals on April 3, 2000.

On May 3, 2000, the Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed that successive petition as an abuse of the writ.

On Oct. 4, 2000, Patterson applied for federal habeas relief in the district court. On Aug. 17, 2001, that court issued a final order denying relief, and also denied Patterson's request for a certificate of appealability. On Feb. 26, 2002, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Patterson's request for a certificate of appealability.

On June 28, 2002, the Supreme Court denied Patterson's petition for certiorari to the Fifth Circuit. On or about July 29, 2002, Patterson filed a third state writ in the Court of Criminal Appeals, which was dismissed as an abuse of the writ on Aug. 20, 2002.

Patterson has informed the Supreme Court that he intends to file both an original writ and another certiorari petition by Friday, Aug. 23, 2002.

CRIMINAL BACKGROUND

Patterson belonged to a gang when he was a high school sophomore, he wore his gang colors to school, carried a beeper, defied authority, and failed to attend his classes. Patterson threatened to kill school authorities when they confiscated his beeper, and dropped out of high school during his sophomore year.

The year before the murders, Patterson possessed a .38 handgun and a 9 mm handgun. That same year, he fired a "Mac 12" gun at one of his friends. On Sept. 6, 1994, after police officers found a loaded 9 mm handgun in Patterson's vehicle during a routine traffic stop, Patterson was charged as a juvenile for unlawful weapon possession. The case was ultimately dismissed.

Patterson was also a drug dealer and stole money from a drug customer on at least two occasions. On March 10 and March 12, 1994, Patterson sold cocaine to an undercover FBI informant in an area of Dallas that was heavily occupied by gang members.

 
 

Three justices question execution of minors

Rare dissent urges high court to revisit death penalty issue

CNN Law Center

August 30, 2002

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In a rare public dissent on a request for a stay of execution, three U.S. Supreme Court justices -- unable to halt the Wednesday night execution of a convicted Texas killer who was a juvenile when the murder occurred -- are challenging the use of the death penalty in such cases.

Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer issued statements before Toronto Patterson, 24, was put to death in Huntsville, Texas, by lethal injection. A Supreme Court majority late Wednesday allowed Texas prison officials to proceed.

Patterson was 17 when he was arrested in connection with the slayings of a 25-year-old woman and her children, ages 6 and 3. Patterson insisted he was innocent.

Death penalty foes are campaigning to end the execution of individuals convicted of committing heinous crimes as juveniles. They argue that the youths may have been too immature to understand the gravity of their actions.

In his statement, Stevens made clear he agrees with that position. Stevens was among four dissenters in a 1989 Supreme Court ruling that states may execute juvenile offenders.

"I joined that [dissenting] opinion and remain convinced that it correctly interpreted the law," Stevens said of the Stanford v. Kentucky decision.

"Given the apparent consensus that exists among the states and in the international community against the execution of a capital sentence imposed on a juvenile offender, I think it would be appropriate for the court to revisit the issue at the earliest opportunity."

Joined by Breyer, Ginsburg issued a separate brief statement saying it is time to reconsider juvenile executions in light of the high court's ruling last term that declared the execution of mentally retarded killers unconstitutional.

"I think it appropriate to revisit the issue at this time," Ginsburg said.

Many death penalty supporters deny a national consensus exists against executing juvenile offenders.

Of the 38 states with the death penalty, 22 allow the execution of offenders who committed capital crimes at 17. Of those states, 17 also allow the execution of offenders who committed capital crimes at 16.

 
 

ProDeathPenalty.com

Toronto Patterson was 17 when he killed his cousin's 3-year-old daughter for three chrome and gold wheels on June 6, 1995.

According to court records, Kimberly Brewer was found dead from gunshot wounds in her den, and her daughters - 6-year-old Jennifer and Ollie - had been slain in the room which they shared.

The only things missing from the house were 3 chrome and gold car wheels from Kimberly's brother's BMW, which was parked in the garage.

Patterson had visited his cousin, Kimberly, and had returned to his girlfriend's house in a panic saying he just stole 3 wheels, documents showed.

Patterson, in a written confession, stated that he killed all 3, adding that he walked into the children's room and fired twice with his eyes closed.

The courts ruled that the evidence - including the facts that the victims were killed in relaxed positions as though by someone they trusted and that Patterson was known to like fancy wheels - was sufficient. He was tried only on charges of killing the 3-year-old. Because the girl was under 6, Patterson was found guilty of a capital offense.

 
 

Toronto Markkey Patterson

Txexecutions.org

Toronto Markkey Patterson, 24, was executed by lethal injection on 28 August in Huntsville, Texas for killing his cousin and her two children in their home.

In June 1995, someone entered the home of Evelyn Stiff and shot three people to death. Kimberly Brewer, Stiff's 25-year-old daughter, was shot in the living room as she was lying on a recliner. Brewer's six-year-old daughter, Jennifer, was shot on the floor of her bedroom. Brewer's other daughter, Ollie, 3, was shot in her bed in the same room as Jennifer. All three victims were shot in the head with a .38-caliber weapon. Ollie, who died with her hands covering her ears, was also shot in the hand and neck. Three chrome and gold wheel rims were also stolen from a BMW stored in Stiff's garage.

Toronto Patterson, 17, had been dealing drugs since he was 15. He was known for wearing expensive jewelry and clothing and driving expensive cars. He once owned a car with expensive gold and chrome wheel rims, but in April, it was stolen. He knew that his cousin, Vernon Stiff, owned a BMW with expensive wheels. He also knew that Stiff was serving time in the penitentiary, and he was storing his car in his mother's garage.

On the morning of the murders, Patterson left his live-in girlfriend's house and told her that he was going to receive physical therapy for a back injury. About four hours later, Patterson returned home. He changed his clothes and told his girlfriend that he had shot someone and stolen their wheel rims. That afternoon, he took the wheels from Vernon Stiff's car, which were worth around $2,000, to a dealer, but did not sell them. Later that day, when police and news crews were at the murder scene, Patterson and his girlfriend went there to observe what was going on.

Patterson was arrested that evening. The next day, he gave two written confessions to police. In the fist confession, he admitted stealing the wheels, but claimed that he gave them to Jamaican drug dealers, who committed the murders. When Patterson was informed that the stolen rims were found at his girlfriend's house, he gave another confession, in which he also admitted to the murders.

At his trial, Patterson pleaded not guilty. He testified that he had nothing to do with the murders, which he said were committed by Jamaican drug dealers. He testified that his confessions were coerced by police.

As evidence, prosecutors presented the wheel rims, which had Patterson's fingerprints on them, and the clothing found at his girlfriend's house, which had spots of blood from the victims on it. Prosecutors also showed a video of the television news coverage when the bodies were being removed from the house. Patterson and his girlfriend are seen in the background, watching.

Prosecutors also presented evidence that Patterson belonged to a gang in high school, and that he once threatened to kill school authorities when they confiscated his beeper. He dropped out of high school during his sophomore year. In 1994, at age 16, he was charged with unlawful possession of a weapon, a loaded 9mm handgun that was found in his car during a routine traffic stop. He also once sold cocaine to an undercover FBI informant.

A jury convicted Patterson of the capital murder of Ollie Smith in November 1995 and sentenced him to death. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence on direct appeal in January 1999. Patterson's lawyers initiated some of his habeas corpus appeals while his direct appeal was still pending. All of his appeals in state and federal court were denied.

Patterson, known in prison as "Tonto," maintained his innocence in a death-row interview. He said that his confession was coerced and his request to see an attorney was denied. "I was in that room so long and didn't know which way was up. [The detective] was telling me what I did. The way he said I was going to be able to talk to someone ... was once I told him what he wanted to hear ... So, I told him, so I would be able to go to the judge and let him know how he did me in that room and stuff. But I found out later, it wasn't like that."

Patterson said that he started selling drugs because "I wanted to kind of keep up, be accepted. By just keeping up with the everyday fad, I would be accepted -- clothes, hairstyles, jewelry, whatever. I started selling drugs to keep up." Patterson's girlfriend was pregnant at the time of his arrest. She gave birth to a daughter, who Patterson saw only once, across the glass at a visitation session.

Two days prior to Patterson's execution, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles voted 16-1 against commuting his sentence to life in prison. The parole board also voted 17-0 against granting a stay of execution. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected his appeal by a 6-3 vote.

"I am sorry for the pain, sorry for what I caused my friends, family, and loved ones," Patterson said in his last statement. "I feel a great deal of responsibility and guilt for what happened. I should be punished for the crime, but I do not think I should die for a crime I did not commit," he said. He continued with his last statement, asking for forgiveness and expressing love to his family. Afterward, the lethal injection was started. Patterson was pronounced dead at 6:20 p.m.

 
 

Death Row Inmate Toronto Patterson Executed

Houston Chronicle

August 28, 2002

HUNTSVILLE -- Apologetic but maintaining his innocence, a former teenage drug dealer was executed this evening for killing a 3-year-old cousin at her Dallas home -- one of three relatives gunned down -- so he could steal some fancy car wheels.

"I am sorry for the pain, sorry for what I caused my friends, family and loved ones," Toronto Patterson, now 24, said while strapped to the death chamber gurney. "I feel a great deal of responsibility and guilt for what happened. "I should be punished for the crime, but I do not think I should die for a crime I did not commit." Patterson said that while he was sorry, nothing could bring back the victims. He prayed his death would bring peace and unite his family. "I ask for your forgiveness and that you will all forgive me," he said. "I invite you all to my funeral. We are still family." As the drugs began taking effect, Patterson exhaled and then gasped. Nine minutes later at 6:20 p.m. CDT, he was pronounced dead.

Patterson was 17 when he was arrested for the fatal shootings of Ollie Brown, 3; her sister, Jennifer, 6; and their mother, Kimberly Brewer, 25.

His age at the time of the slayings renewed criticism of capital punishment for teenagers from death penalty opponents. Two other condemned killers were executed in Texas -- one three weeks ago and another in May -- for crimes committed when they were 17.

While execution critics referred to them as juveniles, under the law in Texas and at least 21 other states they were adults. "If the age was 18, then the 18-year-olds would be someone complained about; if it was 19, it would be the 19-year-olds," said Jason January, who was among Patterson's prosecutors and witnessed the execution at the request of relatives of the slaying victims. "If someone wants to be worried about the execution of juveniles, they should have worried about it when Toronto was filling Ollie, 3 years old, full of holes, and Jennifer, full of holes. Not just one shot, but multiple shots."

Patterson was the 23rd Texas inmate executed this year and the fifth this month. Five more are scheduled to die in September. "I'm scared, but being here, seeing so many other people with dates dying, and how everything gets in motion, I pretty much seen how things are going to go. I guess you'd say -- something like a routine," Patterson said in an interview last week on death row, where he is known as "Tonto."

Patterson was the 13th Texas inmate and the 21st in the United States put to death since 1976 for a murder committed when the killer was younger than 18.

The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles earlier this week refused requests for a reprieve or for clemency. Patterson's attorneys appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, contending his punishment, because of his age at the time of the crime, would be unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment.

About two hours before his scheduled execution time, the high court, in a 6-3 vote, rejected his appeal. "Such executions not only violate international norms, they also offend human decency," said Steven Hawkins, executive director of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty. "The mind of a juvenile offender is by definition less developed than the mind of an adult." Not so, said George West, one of the Dallas County district attorneys who prosecuted Patterson. "The stated age of an individual is one thing, their maturity and experience is another," West said. "And this guy wasn't a dummy."

Evidence showed Patterson went to the home of his great-aunt on June 6, 1995, so he could steal the chrome wheels from a BMW stored there. Similar wheels on his own car had been stolen. Armed with a .38-caliber pistol, prosecutors said he shot Brewer, his cousin and his great-aunt's daughter, as she was seated in a recliner.

Then he moved on to the children, shooting the 6-year-old as she watched cartoons on television, and the 3-year-old as she cowered in a corner of the room, her hands over her ears. "It was extremely sad," West said this week. "The only person who could stop him physically was Kimberly, the woman... But what does he do? He decides: 'I've got to eliminate eyewitnesses because that means I could try to increase my odds of not getting caught. So I eliminate the two kids who know me.' "No question about thought processes there," West added. "There was no need to kill the kids otherwise."

Authorities said he then took three rims from the car but was unable to remove the fourth. His fingerprints were found on the rims, left at his girlfriend's house. His bloody clothing was traced to the victims. He told his girlfriend he had robbed and shot someone. He was arrested the following day. Police saw him in news footage in the crowd outside his cousins' house as the bodies were being removed. He was not grieving, prosecutors recalled.

In testimony at his trial and in interviews, he blamed the deaths on unnamed "Jamaicans." "I wasn't there when the shootings occurred," he said last week. "It was a hokey story," said January. "We were very very confident we got the right man."

 
 

Dallas Man Convicted of Murder at 17 Set to Die

By Michael Graczyk - Dallas Morning News

AP - August 27, 2002

HUNTSVILLE, Texas — For the second time this month — and third this year — a Texas inmate who was 17 when he was arrested for capital murder is set to be put to death, prompting criticism again from death penalty opponents about executing teenage offenders.

Toronto Patterson, now 24, faced lethal injection Wednesday evening for the fatal shooting of a 3-year-old cousin — one of three relatives gunned down in 1995 in Dallas.

Prosecutors said Patterson, who quit school after the ninth grade because he was making a lucrative living dealing drugs in Dallas, killed Ollie Brown; her sister, Jennifer, 6; and their mother, Kimberly Brewer, 25, so he could steal the expensive custom chrome wheels from a BMW car parked in the garage of their home. In 1995 in Dallas, at least nine people were killed for the fancy wheels, which could cost as much as $4,500 a set.

In Patterson's case, he was able to get only three of the four wheels off the car. "Not only was he a killer, he was an ineffective burglar," said Jason January, who was an assistant district attorney in Dallas County and among the prosecutors in the case.

Patterson, arrested a day after the June 6, 1995, shootings after the wheels were found at his girlfriend's house, gave numerous versions of the slayings, ranging from no involvement to being at the scene. He always, however, has blamed unnamed "Jamaicans" for the carnage.

In an interview last week on death row, where he is known as "Tonto," Patterson said he was at the east Dallas home the day of the shootings, but "I wasn't there when they were killed." "I think it's not fair because I did not kill anyone," he said of his punishment. "I'm sorry for the pain I've my family but beyond that, no comment." "He told one of his friends that he just 'jacked' somebody," George West, another prosecutor in the case, said this week. "He had taken the rims to his girlfriend's house. They matched the ones on the car."

In a classic case of returning to the scene of the crime, prosecutors scanning television coverage of the bodies being removed from the house spotted Patterson in the video. "Lo and behold, there's Tonto and the girlfriend just hanging back in the crowd checking it out," January said. "We were shocked to see it. There's his own family and he's not going up to comfort anybody. He's just lurking in the background."

Steven Hawkins, executive director of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, said Patterson, who he characterized as a juvenile, could not handle "social pressure, instinctual urges and other stresses the way that adult minds do. "Juvenile offenders therefore cannot be held to the same degree of culpability as adults, just as mentally retarded people cannot be held to the same degree of culpability." But according to Texas law, and the law in at least 21 other states, Patterson at age 17 was an adult and eligible for the death penalty.

Patterson's lawyers had appeals pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, contending his execution would be unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment. As it has in the past, the European Union, through the Danish Embassy, and Amnesty International USA, which oppose capital punishment in all cases, urged Gov. Rick Perry and the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles to commute the sentence to life or grant a reprieve.

The parole board on Monday voted 17-0 against recommending a reprieve and 16-1 against recommending commutation. In May, Texas inmate Napoleon Beazley was executed for a carjacking slaying in Tyler in 1994 when he was 17. "I figured then I'd soon be dead," said Patterson, who was friends with Beazley on death row.

Then earlier this month, T.J. Jones, condemned for a carjacking slaying in Longview in 1994 when he was 17, was put to death after asking no additional appeals be made to spare him. Jones became the 12th Texas inmate and the 20th in the United States put to death since 1976 for a murder committed when the killer was younger than 18. For the year, Patterson would be the 23rd condemned prisoner executed in Texas and fifth this month.

Life on death row for Patterson has been a far cry from hustling drugs on the streets of Dallas, where since the age of 15 he said he was making hundreds or even more than a thousand dollars a day, buying fancy clothes "and a lot of stuff I wasn't able to enjoy when I was younger."

When he was arrested, a girlfriend was pregnant, and their child was born after he was in custody. The first and only time he's seen his daughter, now 6, was in May when the child's mother brought her briefly to the death row visiting area, where inmates behind glass speak with visitors on telephones. "I'd give my life just to hug and kiss her once," the convicted child-killer said.

 
 

Toronto Markkey Patterson

Action Issued: 31 July 2002 - USA (Texas)

Amnesty International

Toronto Patterson (m), black, aged 24, is scheduled to be executed in Texas on 28 August for a murder committed when he was aged 17. International law, respected in almost every country of the world except the USA, prohibits the death penalty against people who were under 18 at the time of the crime. The following day it was discovered that a car at the house had had its wheels stolen.

The car belonged to Vernon Stiff, an older cousin of Toronto Patterson who had introduced the teenager to drug dealing in 1993 as a way for Patterson to be able to afford school clothes and supplies. Police arrested Toronto Patterson after they learned that he had a penchant for expensive car wheels, that his had been stolen a short while before, and that he had visited the victims’ home on the day of the murders.

Without a lawyer present, Toronto Patterson gave police a statement in which he admitted to being at the scene of the crime with two Jamaican drug dealers (whose existence was later verified by a trial witness), but did not admit to the murders themselves.

An aggressive interrogation followed, during which Toronto Patterson allegedly asked for a lawyer and for the interrogation to be recorded. After being held incommunicado for over four hours, Toronto Patterson confessed to the shootings: “I’m sorry for what I have done to my family and friends. I confess to Detective Wig that I want y’all to know that I love y’all and I didn’t want nothing to happen to me, nor family or friends. I can be rehabilitated. This is the hardest situation I have ever been in dealing with the Jamaicans. I will never do it again”.

In a completely separate case in Dallas a month later, 21-year-old Michael Martinez was arrested and charged with capital murder. He confessed to the same police officer, who apparently used the same techniques he had employed in Toronto Patterson’s case.

Martinez’s confession was false, and he was later exonerated. Patterson’s jury was not allowed to hear Martinez’s testimony to weigh against Patterson’s claim that his confession had been coerced and that he was innocent of the murders. Over the years in the USA, several prisoners who confessed to the crimes which put them on death row have been released after evidence of their innocence emerged.

The US Supreme Court said in 1982 that “the chronological age of a minor is itself a relevant mitigating factor of great weight”. Nevertheless, Toronto Patterson’s trial lawyers did not present the jury with expert or any other evidence about age as a mitigating issue.

The lawyers also failed to present substantial evidence of Toronto Patterson’s abusive and deprived childhood. From an early age he was exposed to drugs, alcohol and violence in his home and the community. His mother used to beat him; sometimes using electric cords and sticks.

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals then appointed a lawyer to represent Toronto Patterson for his appeals. This lawyer had never handled such an appeal. The one he filed for Toronto Patterson was six pages long.

Such appeals filed by adequately funded, experienced lawyers can be expected to run to 150 pages because of the number of issues raised and the complexity of the law. Toronto Patterson’s appeal did not challenge his trial lawyer’s failure to investigate and present the above mitigating issues. Because they were not raised in the state courts, such issues have been lost to review by the federal courts.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Toronto Patterson was born less than two weeks after the USA signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in 1977, and he was sentenced to death three years after the USA ratified the treaty in 1992. Article 6(5) prohibits the use of the death penalty against people who were under 18 at the time of the crime; a prohibition which stems from recognition of a young person’s immaturity, impulsiveness, vulnerability to peer pressure, and capacity for rehabilitation. Since 1990, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which carries the same prohibition, has been ratified by 191 countries; all but the USA and Somalia.

When the USA ratified the ICCPR, it filed a “reservation” purporting to exempt it from the prohibition on the execution on child offenders.

The Human Rights Committee, the expert body established by the ICCPR to oversee implementation of the treaty, has stated that the reservation is invalid and should be withdrawn. It has confirmed that the prohibition cannot be derogated from, even in times of emergency, and has “deplored” the USA’s continuing execution of child offenders.

Since 1998, there have been 15 executions of child offenders documented worldwide, 10 in the USA (six in Texas). Yemen and Pakistan, two of the six other countries reported to have executed child offenders since 1990, have since abolished such use of the death penalty.

It was recently reported that 74 child offenders who had remained on death row in Pakistan have had their death sentences commuted. Another of the six countries, Democratic Republic of Congo, commuted the death sentences of five child offenders in 2001.

 
 

Canadian Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty

Juvenile Offender Texecuted August 28, 2002 Toronto maintained his innocence right until the end.

"I feel a great deal of responsibility and guilt for what happened...
I should be punished for the crime, but I do not think I should die for a crime
I did not commit...I ask for your forgiveness and that you will all forgive me...
I invite you all to my funeral. We are still family..." - From Toronto's Final Statement

PEN PAL REQUEST :

To Whom It May Concern: I am interested in having a pen pal. I am a young I consider myself as being a kind,smart and intelligent young man, Who enjoys learning, reading, and writing. My hobbies are drawing, writing poems, and craftwork. In my spare time I play all sorts of little sports around here, games and watch TV. I was born a Baptist and I believe in God,I can't just say I am a Christian because there are a lot of things I should be doing but don't, but I do have faith, pray, and read my Bible from time to time. I am a believer. With me being on death row I do believe that one day I will be off, but without adequate legal representation, that task will be very rough, risky, and better yet a long shot. So therefore I have begun writing a book hoping to generate some funds of some matter which could be used to help save my life. I will highly appreciate some sincere friendship and someone who is willing to help or assist in this quest.

 
 

An execution date has been set for Toronto Patterson, for August 28, 2002

Deathrow.at

June 7, 1995, at the tender age of (17), I was arrested in Dallas, Texas on the charge of Capital Murder. Before the year was out, I was tried,convicted, and shipped off to this madhouse known to us as; Texas Death Row. While I was trying to adjust to my new environment, politicians were passing laws that would speed up the process in which they execute.

In light of this, I, like many other death row inmates were forced to aggressively seek assistance from friends and family. But being new to death row, it was nearly impossible to organize friends I didn't have. Therefore, today I am still in search of sincere friendship. Perhaps this quest will be never ending.

Outside of my need to establish friendship, I've begun entertainging thoughts of creating a defense fund for t he purpose of obtaining adequete legal representation. Yet, I must also come up with creative ways to generate funds. Therefore, I have begunto write a book as a means to generate some kind of funds.

With these words, however brief and however unorganized, I hope to receive letters of support from any and everyone who may be concerned. In Struggle! - Toronto Patterson.

 
 

Toronto Patterson Homepage

THE KILLING ON TEENS - TORONTO PATTERSON
Juvenile Offender Facing Execution in Texas
Execution Date: August 28, 2002.

The debate in the US regarding the general application of the death penalty continues, but the issues surrounding the execution of juveniles (those persons below the age of 18 at the time of the crime) attract intense debate. As of December 2001, approximately 82 juveniles sit on death rows around the United States (US). Toronto Patterson, who was just 17 years of age at the time of his offense, may soon face execution in Texas. The execution of Toronto would be contrary to not only American standards of justice, fairness, and decency, but also would be in contravention of international law and fundamental standards of human rights.

CASE TALKING POINTS

On June 6, 1995, Valarie Brewer discovered the body of her sister, Kimberly, in a recliner in front of the television set. In a bedroom of the house, the bodies of Kimberly's daughters, six-year-old Jennifer Brewer, and three-year-old Ollie Brown were discovered.

There were no valuables taken from the house. Upon searching the garage, three of the four wheels on the BMW automobile belonging to Valarie's brother were found missing. It was apparent someone had tried, unsuccessfully, to remove the fourth wheel.

Aware her cousin, Toronto Patterson, recently had his own wheels stolen, Valarie immediately thought of him as a suspect and informed the police.

Patterson told police that two Jamaican men had threatened him and his girlfriend, forcing him at gunpoint, to assist one of the men in removing the wheels from the BMW, while the other man distracted Kimberly. Toronto continues to maintain this account of events, asserting that he was not the person responsible for the murders. The identity of the killer was a hotly contested issue at the trial.

With the support of his grandmother, Toronto Patterson was raised by his teenage mother. He proved to be a promising student when he was in grade school. However, his home-life became increasingly erratic. Toronto Patterson took the brunt of his mother's frustration in the form of whippings.

Drug and alcohol abuse were pervasive within Toronto's world--it was an accepted way of life. Even though drugs and gangs surrounded Toronto, he never became a gang member or used drugs.

When Toronto was nine years of age, his baby sister, Kenisha, was born. She suffered from a serious brain defect. Toronto was left to care for her and became increasingly fond of his sister who died just before the age of two. Kenisha's death deeply impacted Toronto.

Despite, his troubled home-life, Toronto still achieved in school, receiving grades that placed him on the honor roll. However, in order to provide even the most basic of necessities Toronto began to sell drugs for his cousin. The selling increased and his school attendance fell, until he dropped out of the school system.

In spite of the profound neglect and abuse, many positive aspects of Toronto Patterson's personality were preserved. An examination of his social history and background would have revealed a more human face, but regrettably, the jury was never given the opportunity to know and maybe to understand the real Toronto Patterson.

Patterson's Confession Was Extracted by Questionable Interrogation Tactics that were Withheld From the Jury

Toronto Patterson was taken into custody, placed in a small interrogation room and left to wait for half an hour. When the detective first entered the room, he was friendly and Toronto testified that he felt he could trust him. He admitted to being scared because he had never before been interrogated by a police officer.

Toronto gave the detective a statement in which he admitted his presence at the crime scene, but not to the murders themselves. Shortly thereafter, the detective re-entered the room after consulting with another officer and began to shout.

Forcing Toronto to sit in the corner of the room, the detective spat in his face and accused him of lying in his first statement. He falsely told Toronto that he had recovered the murder weapon and the Dayton wheels. The detective then described the murder scene to Toronto, which he states was the first time he had heard details of the shootings.

The detective accused Patterson of killing his three cousins and then punched and pushed him with his finger in various places to illustrate where the victims had been shot. These accusations persisted for half an hour.

At one point, the detective's beeper went off and after looking at the display, he again misleadingly informed Toronto that his fingerprints had been found on the murder weapon.

Toronto was held incommunicado for over four hours, scared and confused. Toronto Patterson signed a statement in which he admitted to shooting his cousin, Kimberly, and then shooting into her children's room with his eyes closed.

The detective denied punching Toronto in the head and forcing him into a corner of the room during the interrogation. He did admit that he had been trained to make a suspect uncomfortable during an interrogation.

The homicide detective who interrogated Toronto has a history of using questionable tactics to extract confessions in high profile crimes. One month after Patterson's interrogation, but before the trial, the detective was involved in the interrogation of another capital murder investigation, that of Michael Martinez. After taking Martinez's initial statement, the detective obtained two subsequent statements.

Between statements, the detective confronted Martinez with "new facts" and told him, "We know you are lying." He threatened to charge Martinez' girlfriend unless he signed the subsequent statements. Another individual was ultimately charged with the capital murder to which the detective had compelled Martinez to confess. The evidence of the detective's coercive interrogation tactics in the Martinez case was excluded at Toronto's trial.

Executing Juvenile Offenders Runs Counter to Basic American Standards of Decency and Fairness

The execution of a juvenile offender is contrary to fundamental principles of American justice, which punishes according to the degree of culpability and reserves the death penalty only for the most serious offenders.

By their very nature, teenagers are less mature, and therefore less culpable than adults. Adolescence is a transitional period of life when cognitive abilities, emotions, judgment, impulse control, and identity are still developing. Indeed, immaturity is the reason we do not allow those under eighteen to assume the major responsibilities of adulthood such as military combat service, voting, entering into contracts, drinking alcohol or making medical decisions.

A number of organizations including, the American Bar Association, the Child Welfare League of America, the Children's Defense Fund, and the National Mental Heath Association urge that the execution for a crime committed while a juvenile is simply unacceptable in a civilized society.

Executing Juvenile Offenders is Contrary to International Law

The execution of child offenders is not only contrary to principles of American justice, but is also in contravention of international law and fundamental standards of human rights.

The ultimate goal of the international community is to abolish the death penalty under all circumstances, however, until that time there are restrictions on the categories of persons who can be executed, juveniles being one of the restricted categories. The prohibition of the execution of juveniles is referenced in a number of international treaties, declarations, and statements by international bodies, in addition to the laws of the majority of nations.

The execution of juveniles is expressly forbidden in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Article 6(5), the American Convention on Human Rights, Chapter 2, Article 4, Section 5, the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Article 68 and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Article 37.

In continuing to execute juveniles, the United States acts in defiance of substantial international consensus and law. Indeed, the US stands virtually alone in this practice. Since 1990, only seven countries have reportedly executed juveniles: Iran, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Yemen, Pakistan and the United States.

In the last three years the small number of nations known to have executed child offenders has further declined to only three: the DRC, Iran and the United States. In 1994, Yemen changed its law to prohibit the execution of juveniles.

The Nigerian government asserted to the UN Sub-Commission that the execution, which took place in 1997 was not of a juvenile and Saudi Arabia emphatically denies the 1992 execution of a juvenile. In July 2000, Pakistan moved to outlaw such executions under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance signed on 1 July 2000, and in December 1999, the DRC called for a moratorium on all executions.

However, in January 2000, a 14 year-old child soldier was executed in the DRC. Since that time, according to OMCT-World Organization Against Torture, four juvenile offenders sentenced to death in the DRC in a military court were granted stays and the sentences were commuted following an appeal from the international community.

It is unmistakable that beyond the borders of the United States, the application of the death penalty for child offenders is rapidly advancing towards total abolition. Of the six countries, other than the US, that have reportedly executed juvenile offenders, all have either changed their laws or the governments have denied that the executions took place.

Case Timeline

Toronto Patterson was convicted of capital murder in Dallas in November of 1995. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal in January of 1999. The following month, in February of 1999, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals also denied Toronto relief in his state post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus.

In October of 1999, the United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari following Patterson's direct appeal. The convicting court immediately set an execution date for February 24, 2000. However, on December 16, 1999, the federal district court in Dallas stayed Patterson's execution pending litigation of his federal petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Patterson filed his federal petition on October 4, 1999. In August of 2001, however, the federal district court denied relief, and, in September, denied Patterson's application for certificate of appealability. Patterson filed an application for certificate of appealability and brief in support in the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in November of 2001. The Attorney General was recently granted an extension of time to respond to Patterson's appellate brief until January 11, 2002.

 

 

 
 
 
 
home last updates contact