Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Miguel
A. RICHARDSON
A.K.A.: "Silky"
Classification: Murderer
Characteristics:
Robbery
Number of victims: 2
Date of murders:
March 31,
1979
Date
of arrest:
June
1980
Date of birth: July
7,
1954
Victims profile: John Ebbert and Howard Powers(security guards)
Method of murder:
Shooting (.38 caliber pistol)
Location: Bexar County, Texas, USA
Status:
Executed
by lethal injection in Texas on June 26,
2001
Summary:
Oklahoma native Miguel Richardson was on the run for more than a
year after the 3/31/79 robbery and slayings of two security guards
at a San Antonio area Holiday Inn.
John Ebbert and the second victim were
investigating a complaint from a motel guest when they found
Richardson attempting to break into a room. As they were escorting
him to the office, a gun that had been concealed in his waistband
fell to the floor. He grabbed the gun and held the guards at
gunpoint.
He handcuffed one of them, took their money and then shot
them both. He was not arrested until 6/80 in Denver, Colorado.
Citations:
Richardson v. State, 744 S.W.2d 65 (Tex.Cr.App. 1987) (Direct
Appeal). Richardson v. Texas, 109 S.Ct. 3235 (1989) (Cert. Granted). Richardson v. Texas, 113 S.Ct. 3026 (1993)(Cert. Granted).
Richardson v. State, 886 S.W.2d 769 (Tex.Cr.App. 1991) (On
Remand). Richardson v. State, 901 S.W.2d 941 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994) (On
Remand). Richardson v. Texas, 115 S.Ct. 2617 (1995) (Cert. Denied). Richardson v. Texas, 119 S.Ct. 550 (1998) (Cert. Denied). Richardson v. Johnson, 248 F.3d 1139 (5th Cir. 2001)
(Habeas). Richardson v. Johnson, 121 S.Ct. 2244 (2001) (Cert. Denied). Richardson v. Johnson, 256 F.3d 257 (5th Cir. 2001) (Habeas/Competency). Richardson v. Johnson, 121 S.Ct. 2580 (2001) (Stay).
ClarkProsecutor.org
Texas Attorney General
Media Advisory
Miguel Richardson Scheduled to be Executed
AUSTIN - Texas Attorney General John Cornyn
offers the following information on Miguel Richardson, who is
scheduled to be executed after 6 p.m. on Tuesday, June 26, 2001.
On September 16, 1981, Miguel Richardson was
convicted of the murder of John Ebbert in San Antonio, Texas, during
the course of a robbery.
A summary of the evidence presented at
trial follows.
FACTS OF THE CRIME
In March 1979, John Ebbert and Howard Powers were
security guards at a Holiday Inn in San Antonio, Texas.
Ebbert and Powers were dispatched early in the
morning of March 31, 1979, to investigate a complaint from a guest
that someone was trying to break into her room. The room was
occupied by women from Mexico City. Shortly after the front desk
clerk had sent the guards to investigate the complaint, the guest
called again and stated she thought she had heard gunshots.
Less than one hour later, the bodies of the two
security guards were found in a first floor stairwell. Both had been
shot at close range with a .38 caliber pistol. The empty wallet of
one of the guards was found nearby.
At the time of the offense, Richardson was
traveling with three young women and the four of them occupied the
room across the hall from the Mexico City guest who had called
security originally. The three young women, aged 17, 17 and 16, were
working as prostitutes in the various cities the group visited. All
three women testified at the trial.
On the evening before the offense, Richardson had
mentioned that one of the women from Mexico City was wearing what he
considered to be expensive jewelry.
According to one prostitute's testimony,
Richardson awakened her on the morning of the offense and told her
he had disguised himself and, armed with a .38 caliber pistol he had
acquired several days earlier, attempted to gain entry to the room
occupied by the women from Mexico City.
He was interrupted while
trying to break in by the two security guards. The guards were
escorting Richardson down the stairs to the front desk to establish
his identity when Richardson's pistol, which was in his waistband,
fell to the floor.
Richardson grabbed the gun, handcuffed one of the
guards, took their money, shot and killed both of them, and returned
to his room.
At Richardson's request, the woman went to the
scene of the murders and wiped the area with a towel to remove any
fingerprints.
The victims had not yet been discovered, and she saw
their lifeless bodies in the tairwell. She returned to the room and,
at Richardson's request, disposed of the bullets and spent shells by
flushing them down the toilet.
Richardson later told another of the
prostitutes about the murders. Richardson boasted to two of the
women that he killed the guards after they had given him their money
and begged for their lives.
Within days of the shooting, Richardson and two
of the underage prostitutes fled the State of Texas and reached
Denver, Colorado, where they were apprehended.
While in Colorado and
fighting extradition to Texas (Richardson fought extradition for
more than two years), Richardson also confessed to these murders to
Mark Stanley Seiver, another inmate.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In May 1981, Richardson was charged by an
indictment returned in Bexar County, Texas, with the capital offense
of intentional murder of John Ebbert during a robbery.
A jury found Richardson guilty of the capital
offense on September 16, 1981, rejecting a lesser-offense
instruction on murder.
A separate punishment hearing ensued, and, on
September 18, 1981, the jury answered affirmatively the two special
issues submitted pursuant to former Article 37.071 of the Texas Code
of Criminal Procedure.
In accordance with state law, the trial court
assessed punishment at death. Appeal was automatic to the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals, which affirmed the conviction and
sentence on October 28, 1987.
On July 3, 1989, the United States Supreme Court,
however, granted Richardson's petition for writ of certiorari,
vacated the judgment, and remanded the action for further
consideration.
On remand, the Court of Criminal Appeals again
affirmed the conviction and sentence, then denied Richardson's
motion for rehearing on September 18, 1991.
On June 28, 1993, the Supreme Court again,
however, granted Richardson's petition for writ of certiorari,
vacated the judgment, and remanded the action for further
consideration.
On remand, the Court of Criminal Appeals again
affirmed the conviction and sentence, then denied Richardson's
motion for rehearing on September 21, 1994.
This time, on June 26, 1995, the Supreme Court
denied certiorari review. Richardson filed an application for state
writ of habeas corpus with the state trial court of conviction in
December 1996.
After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court entered
findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending that habeas
relief be denied. The trial court's findings were adopted by the
Court of Criminal Appeals on June 10, 1998.
Richardson again filed a petition for writ of
certiorari, which the Supreme Court denied on November 30, 1998.
Richardson proceeded into federal court by filing a petition for
writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the
Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, on October 8, 1998.
By orders entered on March 28, 2000, the district court denied
habeas relief and permission to appeal.
On April 16, 2000, the district court denied
post-judgment relief sought by Richardson and again denied
permission to appeal.
The United States Court of Appeals for the
Fifth Circuit similarly denied Richardson permission to appeal on
January 23, 2001. Richardson again filed a petition for writ of
certiorari, which the Supreme Court denied on June 11, 2001.
On June 5, 2001, Richardson filed a request for
clemency and a reprieve with the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles.
The Board voted on June 22, 2001, to deny clemency and a reprieve.
On June 7, 2001, Richardson filed a motion with
the state trial court of conviction claiming that he is incompetent
to be executed or was forcibly medicated for the purpose of
rendering him competent to be executed. On June 19, 2001, the trial
court rejected these claims.
On June 14, 2001, Richardson filed a successive
application for state writ of habeas corpus raising the competency
claims and also claiming that newly discovered evidence demonstrates
that he suffers from bipolar disorder and that he might have been
under its effects at the time of the offense.
The trial court denied
his application for state writ of habeas corpus on June 20, 2001.
Richardson appealed that decision to the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals, which dismissed it as an abuse of the writ on June 21,
2001.
The following day, Richardson filed a petition
for writ of certiorari, which is pending before the U.S. Supreme
Court. Also on June 21st, Richardson filed two petitions for writ of
habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Western
District of Texas, San Antonio Division, raising his competency
claims.
The district court dismissed those petitions on June 21st
and June 22nd, respectively.
On June 22nd, Richardson filed an appeal to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which is pending. As of
5 p.m. Monday, June 25, 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit had not yet ruled on the writ
of certiorari and the appeal respectively.
PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY
At the punishment phase of trial, the state
presented the following evidence. In 1973, Richardson was convicted
of possession of stolen mail, a federal offense.
The parole officer
assigned to Richardson's case testified that he was regularly asked
to predict future behavior and that he considered Richardson to be a
high risk and dangerous.
On April, 20, 1980, Richardson attacked the shift
commander at the Denver County Jail where he was being held pending
his extradition to Texas. Richardson became violent and agitated in
the shift commander's office after being informed that he would be
placed in isolation, and he attempted to strike the officer with a
fire extinguisher.
On June 19, 1980, Richardson attempted to escape
from Denver authorities after being taken to the hospital.
This
time, after his handcuffs were removed, Richardson stabbed Deputy
Sheriff Kenneth Hall in the neck with a homemade shank that had been
concealed in his pants. The shank penetrated the right side of
Hall's neck to his spine. Richardson attempted to escape from
custody again.
In the early morning hours of May 6, 1997,
Richardson and several other inmates (including two other death row
inmates) were being returned to state prison in Huntsville from the
Bexar County jail.
The guard driving the transport vehicle stopped
for a restroom break near Houston. As the driver went to ascertain
whether the restroom was secure to permit the inmates to use it, the
other guard opened the van's side door.
Suddenly, Richardson and the
two other death row inmates pushed their way through, knocking the
guard to the ground. As the inmates beat the fallen guard and
attempted to wrest the gun from the guard's holster, the first guard
returned to the van and, using his baton, knocked them away from the
fallen guard.
One guard was able to draw his weapon and convince
Richardson and the other two death row inmates to get back inside
the van.
ProDeathPenalty.com
Oklahoma native Miguel Richardson was on the run
for more than a year after the 3/31/79 robbery and slayings of two
security guards at a San Antonio area Holiday Inn.
John Ebbert and the second victim were
investigating a complaint from a motel guest when they found
Richardson attempting to break into a room. As they were escorting
him to the office, a gun that had been concealed in his waistband
fell to the floor.
He grabbed the gun and held the guards at
gunpoint. He handcuffed one of them, took their money and then shot
them both. He was not arrested until 6/80 in Denver, Colorado.
UPDATE
A former pimp who became a church group
leader while in prison was executed today for fatally shooting one
of 2 hotel security guards slain during a robbery in San Antonio
more than 22 years ago. Miguel "Silky" Richardson, 46, with a
history of violence and attempted escapes, was executed by lethal
injection in Texas. "I feel so much love," he said as witnesses
filed into the chamber.
Richardson spoke for nearly 8 minutes about love,
smiling and winking the entire time. He then began chanting in a
foreign language, his voice rising and falling with a tear running
from his right eye, before shouting "take me! I'm ready! I'm your
friend, I'm not a monster being executed. I am a minister of love,"
he said.
As the drugs began flowing, Richardson remarked it was a "good
day to die. Take me God." He was pronounced dead at 6:28 p.m. CDT.
Richardson adopted the nickname "Silky" after the lead character in
a 1970s book about a Harlem, N.Y., pimp.
At the time of the March 1979 shootings of
security guards John Ebbert and Howard Powers at a San Antonio
Holiday Inn, Richardson was sharing a room with 3 prostitutes, two
17 years old and one 16. The security guards confronted him after
responding to a complaint from a woman across the hall that someone
was trying to break into her room.
Testimony later showed Richardson had coveted the
expensive jewelry worn by the woman staying in that room. When
Richardson -- wearing a woman's wig -- was being escorted down a
stairwell to the hotel lobby, the 2 unarmed guards, John Ebbert and
Howard Powers, were robbed and shot to death. Richardson was
arrested a few days later in Denver during another robbery and
fought extradition to Texas for 2 years.
Over the 20 years since his capital murder
conviction, Richardson's case went to the U.S. Supreme Court at
least 6 times, including an 11th-hour review that was rejected by
the justices late Tuesday afternoon. "I think it should be
frustrating to all the citizens of the state," Steve Hilbig, who
prosecuted the murder case in 1981, said of the time it's taken to
carry out the death sentence. "It loses its meaning when it takes 20
years to carry forward. You don't want any shortcuts. You want to
make sure all legal and procedural requirements have been complied
with. But I'm not real sure it takes 20 years to do that."
His appeals primarily focused on his mental
competency and whether Richardson, with a history of illegal drug
use, should be given anti-psychotic drugs by prison officials
without his consent to keep him competent.
Among those who testified
against him at his trial were the prostitutes who accompanied him,
telling a Bexar County jury how one of them wiped the shooting scene
with a towel to remove his fingerprints and how she flushed down a
toilet the spent shells from the .38-caliber pistol used in the
slayings.
They also provided details of the shootings as he
described them. "One of the girls testified how he made (the guards)
beg for their lives," recalled Hilbig, now in private practice in
San Antonio.
Since his arrest, Richardson, who had a federal
conviction for mail theft in his native Oklahoma, had several
violent outbursts. In Denver, court records showed he attacked the
shift commander at the county jail in April 1980 and tried to beat
him with a fire extinguisher.
Two months later, he tried to escape by stabbing
a deputy in the neck with a shank, a homemade knife he fashioned
from a spike, then grabbed the officer's gun and repeatedly tried to
shoot.
The guard, testifying later in a voice left hoarse by the
injury, told how he was able to keep the gun from discharging by
jamming the skin between his thumb and index finger between the
firing pin of the pistol and the shell in the chamber. The officer
showed jurors how he was left with a disfigured hand.
Four years ago, Richardson and 2 other death row
inmates tried to overpower guards as they were being moved in a
prison van from San Antonio to Huntsville. Friends and relatives who
believed he should be allowed to live said Richardson had a
religious transformation while in prison, where he founded a church
group.
Miguel Richardson executed
Amarillo Globe-News
Miguel A. "Silky" Richardson, 46, was executed by
lethal injection on 26 June in Huntsville, Texas for the murder of a
motel security guard.
In March 1979, a motel desk clerk in San Antonio
received a complaint from a guest that someone was trying to break
into her room. The clerk sent two security guards, John Ebbert and
Howard Powers, to investigate.
A few minutes later, the guest called the clerk
again to say that she thought she heard gunshots. Less than an hour
later, the bodies of Ebbert and Powers were found in a stairwell.
They had been shot, and one of their empty wallets was found nearby.
A few days after the murders, Miguel Richardson,
then 24, was apprehended in Denver, Colorado with two underage
prostitutes. Richardson fought extradition to Texas for more than
two years.
At Richardson's trial, the two prostitutes, and a
third underage prostitute that was with Richardson on the night of
the killings, testified. They said that the four of them were
staying at the Holiday Inn across the hall from the woman who
reported the break-in attempt. They said that Richardson had
commented on the expensive jewelry she appeared to be wearing.
One of them testified that Richardson told her
that he had disguised himself in a woman's wig and clothing and was
trying to break into the woman's room when he was interrupted by the
two security guards.
The guards were escorting him from the front
desk when his .38-caliber pistol fell from his waistband to the
floor. Richardson grabbed the gun, handcuffed one of the guards,
took their money, shot and killed both of them, and returned to his
room.
At Richardson's request, one of his prostitutes
went back to the scene and wiped fingerprints away with a towel,
then returned to the room and disposed of the spent cartridges by
flushing them down the toi et. Another of the prostitutes testified
that Richardson had boasted to her about killing the guards after he
took their money.
Richardson had previously served three years of a
six-year sentence in a federal reformatory for possession of stolen
mail. He was paroled in March 1976.
Richardson also attacked a jailer in April 1980
in Denver, while he was pending extradition to Texas. In June 1980,
he stabbed a deputy sheriff in the neck with a homemade shank, tried
to shoot him, and attempted to escape. A jury convicted Richardson
of the capital murder of John G. Ebbert in September 1981, and
sentenced him to death.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the
conviction and sentence in October 1987. The U.S. Supreme Court
vacated his conviction twice, first in July 1989 and again in
September 1994. Each time, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
affirmed the conviction upon review.
In June 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to
hear the case again. Richardson filed eight more appeals in state
and federal courts over the next five years, all of which were
denied. Richardson's appeals centered around his competency at the
time of the crime and his competency to be executed.
He claimed that he suffered from a bipolar
disorder at the time of the killings. He also claimed that the state
of Texas was medicating him in order to keep him mentally competent
so that he could be executed.
In May 1997, Richardson and several other inmates
attempted to escape while being transported. In June 2001,
Richardson filed seven more appeals in state and federal courts. All
of these appeals were denied. He also filed a clemency request with
the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, which was rejected.
At his execution, Richardson spoke for nearly
eight minutes, speaking repeatedly of love. "I go out loving
everyone and everything ... I shed tears of love - may they nourish
everyone." He also said, "I am a minister of love." As the lethal
drugs began flowing, he said that it was a "good day to die. Take
me, God." He was pronounced dead at 6:28 p.m.
After the execution, John Ebbert's wife noted
that Richardson did not apologize for the murders, nor did he ask
for forgiveness. However, she did say that justice had been served.
"It was a promise I made to my husband 22 years ago when he was
lying in his coffin that I was going to see this through to the end.
This is the end." Of the 455 offenders currently on Texas' death row,
16 are there for crimes committed in the 1970's.
Texas Execution Information
Center by David Carson
Txexecutions.org
HUNTSVILLE (AP) - A former pimp who became a
church group leader while in prison is headed to the Texas death
chamber Tuesday evening for fatally shooting one of two hotel
security guards slain during a robbery in San Antonio more than 22
years ago.
Miguel "Silky" Richardson, 46, with a history of
violence and attempted escapes, would be the ninth condemned inmate
to receive lethal injection this year in Texas, where a record 40
convicted killers were put to death last year.
At the time of the March 1979 shootings of
security guards John Ebbert and Howard Powers at a San Antonio
Holiday Inn, Richardson was sharing a room with three teen-age
prostitutes. Security guards confronted him after responding to a
complaint from a woman across the hall that someone was trying to
break into her room.
Testimony later showed Richardson wanted the
jewelry worn by the woman staying in that room. When Richardson -
wearing a woman's wig - was being escorted down a stairwell to the
hotel lobby, the two unarmed guards, John Ebbert and Howard Powers,
were robbed and shot to death.
Richardson was arrested a few days later in
Denver during another robbery and fought extradition to Texas for
two years. Over the 20 years since his capital murder conviction,
Richardson's case went to the U.S. Supreme Court at least six times,
including an 11th-hour review pending before justices Tuesday. "I
think it should be frustrating to all the citizens of the state,"
Steve Hilbig, who prosecuted the murder case in 1981, said of the
time it's taken to carry out the death sentence. "It loses its
meaning when it takes 20 years to carry forward. "You want to make
sure all legal and procedural requirements have been complied with.
But I'm not ... sure it takes 20 years."
His appeals primarily focused on his mental
competency and whether Richardson, with a history of illegal drug
use, should be given anti-psychotic drugs by prison officials to
keep him competent.
Among those who testified against him at his
trial were the prostitutes who accompanied him, telling a Bexar
County jury how one of them wiped the shooting scene with a towel to
remove his fingerprints and how she flushed down a toilet the spent
shells from the .38-caliber pistol used in the slayings.
They also
provided details of the shootings as he described them. "One of the
girls testified how he made (the guards) beg for their lives," said
Hilbig, now in private practice in San Antonio. In Denver, court
records showed he attacked the shift commander at the county jail in
April 1980 and tried to beat him with a fire extinguisher.
Two months later, he tried to escape by stabbing
a deputy in the neck with a homemade knife, then grabbed the
officer's gun and repeatedly tried to shoot. The guard told how he
was able to keep the gun from discharging by jamming the skin
between his thumb and index finger between the firing pin and the
shell in the chamber of the pistol. He showed jurors how he had been
left with a disfigured hand.
Friends and relatives who believed he
should be allowed to live said Richardson had a religious
transformation while in prison, where he founded a church group.
256 F.3d 257 (5th Cir. 2001)
MIGUEL RICHARDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v.
GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,
Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee.
No.
01-50568
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIFTH CIRCUIT
June 25, 2001, Decided
Order Denying a Certificate of Appealability and
Stay of Execution Western District of Texas.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit
Judges.
BY THE COURT:
* Miguel A. Richardson on
October 8, 1998, filed a petition for habeas relief in the
United States District Court, Western District of Texas, San
Antonio Division, pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. 2254. Richardson
asked the federal courts to overturn his 1981 capital murder
conviction and sentence of death. On January 23, 2001, this
court affirmed the United States District Court's denial of
federal habeas corpus relief1
and stay of execution. The United States Supreme Court denied
certiorari on June 11, 2001, Richardson v. Johnson, ___ U.S.
___, 121 S.Ct. 2244 (2001).
In this second federal
petition filed four days ago and now before us, Richardson asked
the United States District Court to conduct a hearing to
determine if he is competent to be executed and to stay his
execution now scheduled for June 26, 2001, pending that decision,
all, Richardson says, as required Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S.
399, 91 L. Ed. 2d 335, 106 S. Ct. 2595 (1986).
II
The District Court, while
denying relief in this second petition, granted a certificate of
appealability, persuaded that whether Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal,
523 U.S. 637, 140 L. Ed. 2d 849, 118 S. Ct. 1618 (1998),
overruled our decision in In Re: Davis, 121 F.3d 952 (5th Cir.
1997), presents a substantial question about which reasonable
jurists may differ.
The district court's grant of
a certificate of appealability has no significance if the
petitioner is prosecuting a successive writ -- and he clearly is.
Of course, this does not answer the question of whether a Ford
claim is subject to the limits of a successive writ. That is a
distinct question.
As for that, we do not read
the decision of the Supreme Court in Stewart v. Martinez
Villareal as overruling or casting doubt on our decision in In
Re: Davis. Rather, the Supreme Court by footnote explicitly
declined to decide the case of a petitioner who did not present
his Ford claim in his first federal habeas, as did Martinez
Villareal.
III
This leaves the argument that
Richardson did not have a Ford claim at the time he filed his
first federal habeas, a contention with two aspects. The first
is that the factual basis for the Ford claim could not have been
discovered at the time of the first federal habeas. That claim
is refuted by the assertion that he has long suffered this
bipolar disorder and by his own expert witness.
The second aspect is that the
Ford claim was not ripe when the first federal habeas petition
was filed for the reason that execution was not then imminent.
To accept this argument would mean as a practical matter that no
Ford claim would need to be presented in a first filed habeas,
given that state courts, in part at our urging, now seldom set
execution dates until after the first round of appeals and
habeas.
We need not wrestle that issue
at this late date given the findings of fact issued by the 175th
Judicial District Court and approved by the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals. Those findings included findings that the
applicant "presents no factual information, however, concerning
his current mental health status." The court also found that "applicant
points to nothing which shows that he is presently incompetent
to be executed." The state habeas court detailed record evidence
to support its conclusion that "based on all of the foregoing,
the Court finds that applicant understands that he is to be
executed, that his execution is imminent, and the reason for his
execution."
IV
There are several difficulties
with petitioner's claim of involuntary medication, including
whether it is cognizable in habeas. The larger and first hurdle
for petitioner is that this claim has no factual legs. The state
habeas court found that no such showing of involuntary
medication was made and that there was no showing that the
medication was given "for the purpose of making him competent to
be executed."
The state habeas court pointed
to affidavits of Dr. Peccora and Gwendolyn Bundy that the
applicant was not involuntarily medicated. Finally, the state
habeas court found "Dr. Sparks affirms that he found nothing, in
all the records that he reviewed, which contradicts Dr.
Peccora's statement that Richardson accepted and received the
medications voluntarily."
V
Ford claims admittedly have an
uneasy fit with the AEDPA's limits upon successive writs. We
examined that fit in In re: Davis and remain convinced that it
is both sound and binding.
The request for certificate of
appealability and request for application for stay of execution
are DENIED.