Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Earl J. RICHMOND
Jr.
Classification: Murderer
Characteristics:
Rape
Number of victims: 4
Date of murder:
April/November
1991
Date
of arrest:
April 3,
1992
Date of birth:
November 6,
1961
Victims profile: Army Spc. Lisa Ann Nadeau,
24 / Helisa Stewart Hayes,
27, and her
two children, Philip, 8, and Darien, 7
Method of murder: Strangulation
Location: New Jersey/North Carolina, USA
Status:
Executed
by lethal injection in North carolina on May 6,
2005
Summary:
In November 1991, the bodies of 27 year old Helisa Stewart Hayes and her
two children aged 8 (Philip) and 7 (Darien), were found in their home at
the Sunshine Mobile Home Park in Fayetteville.
Hayes had been beaten and strangled. Her son had been stabbed 40 times
with a pair of scissors and had an electrical cord wrapped around his
neck five times. Her daughter was strangled with the cord from a curling
iron.
Richmond, a former Army Drill Sergeant, was a family friend and had
dated one Helisa's sisters. He even served as a pallbearer at the
funerals.
Richmond was also a best friend to Wayne Hayes, Helisa Hayes' former
husband and the children's father. Richmond allegedly got angry when
struck during an argument with Hayes, forced her into the bedroom and
raped her.
He then took 8-year-old Phillip to a bathroom, where he strangled him an
electrical cord and stabbed him 40 times with a pair of scissors.
He then strangled 7-year-old Darien, in her room with the cord from a
curling iron. DNA evidence later confirmed that the semen found inside
of Helisa’s body belonged to Richmond.
Richmond initially denied any involvement in the murders, but confessed
upon being informed of the DNA evidence.
Richmond was separately convicted in New Jersey and sentenced to life in
prison for the first-degree murder of Army Spc. Lisa Ann Nadeau, 24, in
April 1991, seven months before the Hayes murders. Nadeau, a payroll
clerk at Fort Dix, N.J., had been beaten with a hammer, stabbed, hog-tied
and strangled.
Richmond did not become a suspect in Nadeau's death until after he was
arrested in the Hayes murder.
Citations:
State v. Richmond, 347 N.C. 412, 495 S.E.2d 677 (N.C. 1998) (Direct
Appeal). Richmond v. Polk, 375 F.3d 309 (4th Cir. 2004). (Habeas)
Final Meal:
Declined.
Final Words:
"At this time, I'd like to extend my deepest apologies to all the
victims' families and their loved ones. I'd like to say that I'm not a
man that shies away from his responsibilities. I'd like to say that I
hope that now, through my death, that y'all can move forward with your
lives. Thank you and God bless you."
ClarkProsecutor.org
North Carolina Department of Correction
RICHMOND, EARL
DOC Number: 0343602
DOB: 11/06/1961
RACE: BLACK
SEX: MALE
DATE OF SENTENCING: 06/01/95
COUNTY OF CONVICTION: CUMBERLAND COUNTY
FILE#: 92014119
CHARGE: MURDER FIRST DEGREE (PRINCIPAL)
DATE OF CRIME: 11/04/1991
Earl Richmond - Chronology of
Events
5/6/2005 - Earl Richmond executed at 2 a.m.
5/5/2005 - Governor Michael Easley denies clemency
5/5/2005 - U.S. Supreme Court denies application for a stay of execution
and petition for a writ of certiorari.
3/17/2005 - Correction Secretary Theodis Beck sets an execution date of
May 6, 2005
2/28/2005 - U.S. Supreme Court denies Powell's petition for a writ of
certiorari.
2/6/1998 - North Carolina Supreme Court affirms Powell's conviction and
sentence of death.
6/1/1995 - Earl Richmond sentenced to death in Cumberland Superior Court
for the murders of Helisa, Phillip and Darien Hayes.
North Carolina Department of Correction
For Release: IMMEDIATE
Contact: Sherri Johnson
Date: 5/5/2005
Phone: (919) 733-5612
GOV. EASLEY DENIES CLEMENCY IN RICHMOND CASE
Raleigh - Gov. Mike Easley today denied the clemency
petition filed by Earl Richmond Jr., a convicted triple murderer
scheduled for execution at 2 a.m. on May 6, 2005.
Richmond is on death row for the November 1991
murders of Cumberland County residents Halisa Hayes and her two children,
Phillip and Darien. Richmond was also convicted of the first degree rape
of Hayes and is serving a life sentence for the death of Lisa Ann Nadeau
in New Jersey. “Given the facts and circumstances of this case, I find
no compelling reason to invalidate the sentence recommended by the jury
and affirmed by the courts,” said Easley.
Execution date set for Earl
Richmond Jr.
RALEIGH - Correction Secretary Theodis Beck has set
May 6, 2005 as the execution date for inmate Earl Richmond Jr. The
execution is scheduled for 2 a.m. at Central Prison in Raleigh.
Richmond, 43, was sentenced to death June 1, 1995 in
Cumberland County Superior Court for the November 1991 murders of Helisa
S. Hayes and her children Philip Hayes and Darien Hayes. He also
received a life sentence for first-degree rape.
Central Prison Warden Marvin Polk will explain the
execution procedures during a media tour scheduled for Monday, May 2 at
10:00 a.m. Interested media representatives should arrive at Central
Prison’s visitor center promptly at 10:00 a.m. on the tour date. The
session will last approximately one hour.
The media tour will be the only opportunity to
photograph the execution chamber and deathwatch area before the
execution. Journalists who plan to attend the tour should contact the
Department of Correction Public Affairs Office at (919) 716-3700 by 5:00
p.m. on Friday, April 29.
Killer executed for 1991 crimes
Raped and strangled
a woman and killed her two children in 1991
By Andrea Weigl - Raleigh News & Observer
May 6, 2005
RALEIGH, N.C. -- A former Army drill sergeant was
executed this morning for killing and raping a Fayetteville woman and
then strangling her two children to death with electrical cords.
Earl Richmond Jr. , 43, of Fayetteville, had been a
family friend to Helisa Stewart Hayes and had dated one of her sisters.
He even served as a pallbearer at the funerals for Hayes, 27, and her
son, Phillip, 8, and her daughter, Darien, 7.
In November 1991, the
family's bodies were found in their home at the Sunshine Mobile Home
Park in Fayetteville. Hayes had been beaten and strangled. Her son had
been stabbed 40 times with a pair of scissors and had an electrical cord
wrapped around his neck five times. Her daughter was strangled with the
cord from a curling iron.
Richmond had been a best friend to Wayne Hayes,
Helisa Hayes' former husband and the children's father. Wayne Hayes was
scheduled to be among the witnesses to Richmond's death by lethal
injection at 2 a.m. today at Central Prison near downtown Raleigh. Other
scheduled witnesses included Hayes' sister, Tara Clark, and Theresa
Nadeau Collins, the sister of another of Richmond's victims. "He's a
beast in human skin," said Collins, of Plainfield, Conn. "He doesn't
have any remorse."
Richmond had been separately convicted of first-degree
murder in the death of Army Spc. Lisa Ann Nadeau, 24, in April 1991 --
seven months before the Hayes murders. Nadeau, a payroll clerk at Fort
Dix, N.J., had been beaten with a hammer, stabbed, hog-tied and
strangled. Richmond did not become a suspect in Nadeau's death until
after he was arrested in the Hayes murder. He was sentenced to life in
prison for Nadeau's killing. Richmond had been removed as a drill
sergeant at Fort Dix for misconduct, officials said at the time
Richmond has been on North Carolina's death row since
June 1995. He was moved at 3:30 p.m. Wednesday to the death watch area,
which has four cells and a day room away from death row and is where
prisoners stay before execution. At 4:05 p.m. Thursday, he learned that
the U.S. Supreme Court rejected his request to stay the execution.
Richmond did not request a last meal, a prison spokeswoman said. By 8
p.m., Gov. Mike Easley denied Richmond's plea for clemency.
Richmond's appellate lawyers say a judge should not
have allowed prosecutors to argue for a death sentence by saying
Richmond was still a danger to society without letting jurors know he
was serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole. The
state's lawyers point out that a federal appeals court ruled it amounted
to "harmless" error and a jury would likely have still sentenced
Richmond to death.
Richmond's lawyers also say Nadeau's father, Arthur,
should not have been allowed to testify about his daughter's death
during the sentencing phase of the trial about the Hayes' murders.
Arthur Nadeau's testimony was based on what he heard at the trial in New
Jersey, and amounted to hearsay, Richmond's lawyers said. Richmond was
denied his constitutional right to confront a knowledgeable witness
about Nadeau's killing, they say.
But the state's lawyers say Richmond's own confession
about Nadeau's death was far more damaging than anything Arthur Nadeau
said on the witness stand. Arthur Nadeau's testimony was an accurate
account of his daughter's injuries, which the defense doesn't dispute,
the state lawyers added.
ProDeathPenalty.com
A former drill sergeant who brutally murdered a
Cumberland County woman and her two children a few months after killing
an Army clerk in New Jersey will face execution in May, North Carolina's
top prison official said Friday. Earl Richmond Jr., 43, is scheduled for
execution at 2 a.m. May 6 at Central Prison in Raleigh, Correction
Secretary Theodis Beck said in a statement.
Richmond was sentenced to death in 1995 for the
November 1991 murders of Helisa S. Hayes, her son Phillip and her
daughter Darien. He also received a life sentence for first-degree rape.
Testimony at Richmond's trial indicated he raped and strangled Helisa
Hayes, 27, after an argument. He then took 8-year-old Phillip to a
bathroom, where he strangled him with the cord to a hair curler and
stabbed him 20 times with a pair of scissors. He strangled Darien, 7, in
her room with the cord from a curling iron.
Richmond was separately sentenced to life in prison
without parole for a 1992 conviction in New Jersey on a federal murder
charge. Richmond killed Lisa Ann Nadeau, a Fort Dix, N.J., payroll clerk,
months before the triple murder in Cumberland County, which borders Fort
Bragg. In July, a federal appeals court rejected arguments that Richmond
was denied adequate legal representation.
His appeals lawyers argued
that his trial attorneys failed to present expert evidence that he
couldn't form intent to kill his victims because he had consumed 20
beers, a fifth of liquor and smoked crack cocaine on the night of the
slayings. Richmond's defense attorney said at the trial that besides
being under the influence of alcohol and cocaine, he flew into a rage
when Hayes hit him during an argument.
Richmond's appellate record states the following
facts of the case: During the early morning of November 2, 1991,
Richmond went to the home of Helisa Hayes, the ex-wife of his best
friend, Wayne, and allegedly engaged in consensual intercourse with her.
Thereafter, Richmond and Helisa allegedly got into an argument about
Helisa flaunting her relationships with other men in front of her ex-husband.
During this argument, Richmond, after supposedly being struck with an
object by Helisa, grabbed and carried her into her bedroom. Once inside
of the bedroom, Richmond struck Helisa in the face with his fist and
proceeded to engage in "forceful" intercourse with her. After having "forceful"
intercourse with Helisa, Richmond strangled her to death with his hands
and poured rubbing alcohol over her vaginal area. Richmond then grabbed
Helisa's eight-year-old son, Phillip, who was laying down in the hallway
outside of his mother’s bedroom, carried him into the bathroom, stabbed
him approximately forty times with scissors and wrapped an electrical
cord five times around his neck. After killing Phillip, Richmond went
into the bedroom of Helisa's seven-year-old daughter, Darien, who was
sleeping in her bed, and strangled her to death with the cord from a
curling iron.
Helisa's father discovered the bodies of his daughter
and two grandchildren on November 4th when, after having not heard from
Helisa for two days, he became concerned about her safety and broke into
her home. Because Richmond was Helisa’s ex-husband's best friend and
because he was well acquainted with Helisa and her children, even
serving as a pallbearer at their funerals, police interviewed Richmond,
among others, soon after the dead bodies of Helisa and her two children
were discovered.
During this initial interview, Richmond told police
that he had not been to the family's home during the weekend of the
murders. Moreover, Richmond sought to shift attention from himself by
telling police that he believed his friend Wayne had visited his ex-wife's
home at some point during the weekend in question. Consequently, police,
rather than considering Richmond a suspect, focused their attention on
Helisa’s ex-husband, Wayne Hayes, another man who was known as her
boyfriend at the time of the murders, and Helisa's father.
Approximately three months after the murders however,
Richmond became a suspect when his sister informed police that she had
dropped Richmond off near Helisa's home on the early morning of November
2nd after they and others attended an all night house party. In light of
this information, police requested a suspect rape kit from Richmond,
which revealed, through DNA evidence, that the semen found inside of
Helisa’s body belonged to Richmond. Based on this DNA evidence, police
brought Richmond in for an interview on April 3, 1992. During this
interview, Richmond, after initially denying any involvement in the
murders of Helisa and her two children, confessed to having committed
the murders upon being informed that DNA evidence revealed that his
semen was found inside of Helisa's body.
When asked to describe the murders, Richmond told
police, in sum, the following: At approximately 3:45 a.m. on the morning
of November 2nd, he went to Helisa’s home after leaving an all night
house party. Upon arriving at Helisa’s home, he and Helisa got into an
argument about her "messing" around on Wayne Hayes. After arguing, he
and Helisa engaged in "forceful" sex and then got into another argument.
During this argument, Helisa struck him with an object and called her
son, Phillip, into the room. In response, he knocked Helisa to the
ground by striking her in the face with his fist, grabbed her son, who
at this point had entered the room, and took him into the bathroom where
he stabbed him to death with scissors. After killing Phillip, he went
into the bedroom of Helisa’s daughter, Darien, and strangled her to
death with the cord from a curling iron. He then went back into Helisa’
bedroom where he strangled her to death with his hands and poured
rubbing alcohol on her vaginal area.
During a subsequent interview on April 5th, Richmond,
although altering his recollection of the events, confirmed his
confession. During this interview, Richmond told police, in sum, the
following: Upon arriving at Helisa’s home at approximately 3:45 a.m., he
engaged in consensual intercourse with Helisa. After having consensual
intercourse, he and Helisa got into an argument about Helisa flaunting
her relationships with other men in front of Wayne Hayes.
During this
argument, Helisa struck him with an object and called her son, Phillip,
into the room. In response, he carried Helisa into her bedroom, struck
her in the face with his fist, engaged in "forceful" sex with her,
strangled her to death with his hands, and poured rubbing alcohol on her
vaginal area. After killing Helisa, he grabbed her son, who had entered
and left the room during the aforementioned events and subsequently laid
down in the hallway outside Helisa's bedroom, and took him into the
bathroom where he stabbed him to death with scissors. After killing
Helisa’s son, he went into her daughter’s bedroom, Darien, and strangled
her to death with the cord from a curling iron.
Based on his April 3rd and 5th confessions, Richmond
was indicted on July 6, 1992 for these crimes. While awaiting trial on
these charges, Richmond was charged in the April 4, 1991 murder of Lisa
Ann Nadeau, an army dispersing clerk at the Fort Dix military base. On
May 28, 1993, Richmond was convicted of Lisa Nadeau’s murder and
subsequently sentenced to life without parole. Richmond was tried and
convicted in May 1995 for the Hayes murders.
National Coalition to Abolish the
Death Penalty
Earl Richmond - North Carolina - May 6, 2005 2:00
a.m. EST
On May 6, 2005 at 2:00 a.m., the state of North
Carolina is scheduled to execute Earl Richmond Jr., a black man, for the
July 1992 murders of Helisa Hayes and her two children, Phillip and
Darien, in Cumberland County.
Richmond, heavily intoxicated on crack cocaine and
alcohol, went to the Hayes residence on Nov. 2, 1991. There, he and Ms.
Hayes engaged in an act of consensual sex. Shortly thereafter, the two
became embroiled in a heated argument. The argument became violent, with
Ms. Hayes hitting Richmond and Richmond, in return, punching her in the
face. Richmond then raped and killed Ms. Hayes. Afterwards, Richmond
killed her son and daughter.
Richmond fully confessed to the triple homicide. He
was charged with the rape and murder of Ms. Hayes and the murders of her
two children. At trial, he pled not guilty to all charges. The jury
found him guilty of three counts of first-degree murder and one count of
first-degree rape. It imposed three death sentences and one term of life
imprisonment on Richmond for his crimes. Richmond’s trial lasted only
two days.
Richmond’s mitigating circumstances are substantial.
He was forced to endure a harsh, abusive childhood. As a child, he
suffered from physical and verbal abuse at the hands of an alcoholic
father. Additionally, one of his sisters claims that there is a
possibility that he was sexually abused by their father.
A psychologist and psychiatrist that examined
Richmond testified that he was severely depressed, possessed a
personality disorder, and suffered from substance abuse. They concluded
that these conditions, coupled with his troubled upbringing,
significantly lessened his ability to act in accordance with the law.
In addition to these unfortunate circumstances and
impairments, Richmond’s alcohol consumption and drug use on the night
prior to the murders puts into question the extent to which he was able
to act with premeditation. One of Richmond’s sisters testified that she
witnessed Richmond consume an excessive amount of alcohol at a party
that evening. Additionally, she admits that she and Richmond both smoked
crack cocaine later on in the night. The large quantity of alcohol
consumed by Richmond and his use of crack cocaine suggest that
Richmond’s ability to plan the Hayes’ murders was significantly impaired.
Richmond’s behavior during the early morning hours of
Nov. 2, 1991 was most likely a product of an unhealthy upbringing and
substance abuse problems. He deserves treatment—not death. Write to Gov.
Mike Easley of North Carolina and inform him of your opposition to the
execution of Earl Richmond Jr.
Earl Richmond Jr. - A monster is about to die in
North Carolina
NewCriminologist.com
May 1, 2005
A former drill sergeant who brutally murdered a
Cumberland County woman and her two children a few months after killing
an Army clerk in New Jersey, pond scum Richmond will face execution in
May, North Carolina's top prison official said Friday. Earl Richmond Jr.,
43, is scheduled for execution at 2 a.m. May 6 at Central Prison in
Raleigh, Correction Secretary Theodis Beck said in a statement.
Richmond was sentenced to death in 1995 for the
November 1991 murders of Helisa S. Hayes, her son Phillip and her
daughter Darien. He also received a life sentence for first-degree rape.
Testimony at Richmond's trial indicated he raped and strangled Helisa
Hayes, 27, after an argument. He then took 8-year-old Phillip to a
bathroom, where he strangled him with the cord to a hair curler and
stabbed him 20 times with a pair of scissors. He strangled Darien, 7, in
her room with the cord from a curling iron. Richmond was separately
sentenced to life in prison without parole for a 1992 conviction in New
Jersey on a federal murder charge.
Richmond killed Lisa Ann Nadeau, a Fort Dix, N.J.,
payroll clerk, months before the triple murder in Cumberland County,
which borders Fort Bragg.
In July, a federal appeals court rejected arguments
that Richmond was denied adequate legal representation. His appeals
lawyers argued that his trial attorneys failed to present expert
evidence that he couldn't form intent to kill his victims because he had
consumed 20 beers, a fifth of liquor and smoked crack cocaine on the
night of the slayings. Richmond's defense attorney said at the trial
that besides being under the influence of alcohol and cocaine, he flew
into a rage when Hayes hit him during an argument. Richmond's appellate
record states the following shocking facts of the case:
During the early morning of November 2, 1991,
Richmond went to the home of Helisa Hayes, the ex-wife of his best
friend, Wayne, and allegedly engaged in consensual intercourse with her.
Thereafter, Richmond and Helisa allegedly got into an argument about
Helisa flaunting her relationships with other men in front of her
ex-husband. During this argument, Richmond, after supposedly being
struck with an object by Helisa, grabbed and carried her into her
bedroom.
Once inside of the bedroom, Richmond struck Helisa in
the face with his fist and proceeded to engage in "forceful" intercourse
with her. After having "forceful" intercourse with Helisa, Richmond
strangled her to death with his hands and poured rubbing alcohol over
her vaginal area. Richmond then grabbed Helisa's eight-year-old son,
Phillip, who was laying down in the hallway outside of his mother’s
bedroom, carried him into the bathroom, stabbed him approximately forty
times with scissors and wrapped an electrical cord five times around his
neck. After killing Phillip, Richmond went into the bedroom of Helisa's
seven-year-old daughter, Darien, who was sleeping in her bed, and
strangled her to death with the cord from a curling iron.
Helisa's father discovered the bodies of his daughter
and two grandchildren on November 4th when, after having not heard from
Helisa for two days, he became concerned about her safety and broke into
her home. Because Richmond was Helisa’s ex-husband's best friend and
because he was well acquainted with Helisa and her children, even
serving as a pallbearer at their funerals, police interviewed Richmond,
among others, soon after the dead bodies of Helisa and her two children
were discovered.
During this initial interview, Richmond told police
that he had not been to the family's home during the weekend of the
murders. Moreover, Richmond sought to shift attention from himself by
telling police that he believed his friend Wayne had visited his
ex-wife's home at some point during the weekend in question.
Consequently, police, rather than considering Richmond a suspect,
focused their attention on Helisa’s ex-husband, Wayne Hayes, another man
who was known as her boyfriend at the time of the murders, and Helisa's
father.
Approximately three months after the murders however,
Richmond became a suspect when his sister informed police that she had
dropped Richmond off near Helisa's home on the early morning of November
2nd after they and others attended an all night house party. In light of
this information, police requested a suspect rape kit from Richmond,
which revealed, through DNA evidence that the semen found inside of
Helisa’s body belonged to Richmond. Based on this DNA evidence, police
brought Richmond in for an interview on April 3, 1992.
During this interview, Richmond, after initially
denying any involvement in the murders of Helisa and her two children,
confessed to having committed the murders upon being informed that DNA
evidence revealed that his semen was found inside of Helisa's body. When
asked to describe the murders, Richmond told police, in summary, the
following: At approximately 3:45 a.m. on the morning of November 2nd, he
went to Helisa’s home after leaving an all night house party. Upon
arriving at Helisa’s home, he and Helisa got into an argument about her
"messing" around on Wayne Hayes. After arguing, he and Helisa engaged in
"forceful" sex and then got into another argument.
During this argument, Helisa struck him with an
object and called her son, Phillip, into the room. In response, he
knocked Helisa to the ground by striking her in the face with his fist,
grabbed her son, who at this point had entered the room, and took him
into the bathroom where he stabbed him to death with scissors. After
killing Phillip, he went into the bedroom of Helisa’s daughter, Darien,
and strangled her to death with the cord from a curling iron. He then
went back into Helisa’ bedroom where he strangled her to death with his
hands and poured rubbing alcohol on her vaginal area.
During a subsequent interview on April 5th, Richmond,
although altering his recollection of the events, confirmed his
confession. During this interview, Richmond told police, in sum, the
following: Upon arriving at Helisa’s home at approximately 3:45 a.m., he
engaged in consensual intercourse with Helisa. After having consensual
intercourse, he and Helisa got into an argument about Helisa flaunting
her relationships with other men in front of Wayne Hayes.
During this
argument, Helisa struck him with an object and called her son, Phillip,
into the room. In response, he carried Helisa into her bedroom, struck
her in the face with his fist, engaged in "forceful" sex with her,
strangled her to death with his hands, and poured rubbing alcohol on her
vaginal area. After killing Helisa, he grabbed her son, who had entered
and left the room during the aforementioned events and subsequently laid
down in the hallway outside Helisa's bedroom, and took him into the
bathroom where he stabbed him to death with scissors. After killing
Helisa’s son, he went into her daughter’s bedroom, Darien, and strangled
her to death with the cord from a curling iron.
Based on his April 3rd and 5th confessions, Richmond
was indicted on July 6, 1992 for these crimes. While awaiting trial on
these charges, Richmond was charged in the April 4, 1991 murder of Lisa
Ann Nadeau, an army dispersing clerk at the Fort Dix military base. On
May 28, 1993, Richmond was convicted of Lisa Nadeau’s murder and
subsequently sentenced to life without parole. Richmond was tried and
convicted in May 1995.
Man who killed 4 is executed
Richmond convicted in
1991 slayings of 2 women, 2 children
By William L. Holmes - Charlotte Observer
Associated
Press - Sat, May. 07, 2005
RALEIGH - Wayne Hayes nervously bounced his leg while
waiting in Central Prison early Friday for the arrival of the man who
killed his two young children and a pair of women nearly 14 years ago.
Earl Richmond Jr. came as expected at 1:50 a.m., shirtless, strapped to
a gurney and with bags of poison hanging at his side. Richmond flashed a
quick smile at his lawyers. He winked at his two sisters, who gazed at
him through thick glass, and told them he loved them.
It's unclear whether he acknowledged Hayes, his
former longtime good friend. Richmond was sentenced to death in 1995 for
the slayings of Hayes' ex-wife, 27-year-old Helisa Stewart Hayes, and
his two children, 8-year-old Phillip and 7-year-old daughter Darien.
Hayes clasped the hands of one of the children's aunts and the sister of
another woman Richmond killed in New Jersey as he waited for the
execution to start at 2 a.m. Richmond was pronounced dead at 2:19 a.m.
After his arrest in North Carolina, Richmond was
charged in the April 5, 1991, slaying of Army Spec. Lisa Ann Nadeau at
Fort Dix, N.J. Nadeau, 24, of Plainfield, Conn., was found bound,
beaten, stabbed and strangled in her Army base residence. Richmond was
sentenced to life in prison in New Jersey before being returned to North
Carolina.
In November 1991, Richmond raped Helisa Hayes and
then strangled her after the two argued, according to investigators.
Phillip witnessed the attack and Richmond dragged him to a bathroom,
where he strangled him with the cord to a hair curler and stabbed him
more than 20 times with a pair of scissors. He then went into Darien's
room and strangled her as she slept.
Days later, he was a volunteer pallbearer at the
funerals and rode in a limousine with Wayne Hayes to the services.
Killer Richmond goes quietly, with apology
By Paul
Woolverton - The Fayetteville Observer
North Carolina Coalition for a
Moratorium
May 7, 2005
RALEIGH - In his final statements, Earl Richmond Jr.
of Cumberland County apologized to the relatives of the people he killed
in 1991. "My actions have crushed the dreams and hearts of many families,"
he wrote in a letter to the Hayes, Stewart and Nadeau families.
Richmond, a former Army drill sergeant, was put to
death by injection Friday morning for the murders of Helisa Stewart
Hayes and her two children in their home outside Fayetteville. He was
43. He had been given a life sentence for killing Army Spc. Lisa Ann
Nadeau at Fort Dix, N.J.
At 1:40 a.m. Friday, 15 people were in the execution
viewing room to watch Richmond die. On the front row, inches from the
double-pane window into the death chamber, sat his sisters Erica Woods
and Lavonne Melvin and his lawyers, Jonathan Broun and Ann Groninger.
Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis sat on the front row,
though slightly separate from Richmond's family. The other witnesses
included Cumberland County District Court Judge John Dickson, who was
Richmond's prosecutor in 1995; Assistant District Attorney Cal Colyer;
Tara Clark and Trenda Boston, sisters of Helisa Hayes; Wayne Hayes, who
was her ex-husband; and Theresa Collins, Nadeau's sister. Two reporters
stood in the back of the room, and two Department of Correction staff
members stood on the sides.
Silence prevails
For most of the next 40 minutes, the room was silent
but for the whooshing of the building's air conditioning, the breathing
of the witnesses and the rustling as they shifted in their chairs. The
room was dim, lit by one bulb above the death-chamber window and the
light spilling in through the chamber window. At 1:49, the heavy steel
door in the death chamber opened. Richmond was wheeled in on a gurney,
covered from feet to shoulders by a pale blue sheet. His upper body was
elevated. His head rested on a pillow. Prison employees pushed the
gurney close to the window. Richmond winked at his sisters and flashed
two quick smiles.
A few minutes later, he raised his head and appeared
to mouth the words "I love you" to each sister. Then he mouthed
something else, perhaps to Wayne Hayes, on the second row. It wasn't
clear what he was trying to say. Richmond lay his head back on the
pillow, closed his eyes and turned his face to the right, away from the
window. But his profile - sharp features, high cheekbones, goatee and
mustache - remained visible. He never opened his eyes again. At 1:57,
Central Prison Warden Marvin Polk entered the viewing room. "Ladies and
gentlemen, I've been in contact with the secretary of correction," he
said. "If there are no further instructions, the execution will proceed
as scheduled."
Polk left the room.
At 1:59, Richmond quickly raised and shifted his
head, then lay back down. At 2, the executioners began injecting the
chemicals through intravenous lines into his body. His eyelids
fluttered. Thirty-five seconds later, his chest rose with a deep breath.
Then Richmond's breathing grew shallow. It appeared to stop about 30 to
40 seconds later. His mouth dropped open. Richmond showed no more
movement.
At 2:20, the curtain in the window to the execution
chamber was drawn shut. Polk returned to the viewing room moments later.
"Ladies and gentlemen, the sentence of the court has been carried out,"
Polk announced. "He was pronounced dead at 2:19 a.m."
Witnesses' reaction
Richmond was the first man since 1940 to be executed
for a crime committed in Cumberland County. He was the 36th person North
Carolina has executed since it reinstated the death penalty in 1977.
Relatives of Hayes, Nadeau and Richmond declined to be interviewed
afterward.
Grannis, the Cumberland County district attorney,
gave a written statement. He said his office is grateful that the state
executed Richmond. "We trust that Earl Richmond Jr.'s execution has
provided some measure of justice for his victims and for the citizens of
the State of North Carolina," he wrote. Broun and Groninger had a brief
news conference after the execution. They released documents that
suggest Richmond was a changed man on Central Prison's death row, one
with a strong Christian faith and one who accepted responsibility for
his actions.
In a paper titled "Testimony of Earl Richmond," which
he delivered to 78 death row inmates Tuesday, Richmond cited his faith
and said he had been ready for his execution for years. "I don't believe
in the death penalty under any circumstances, but I was born to die, and
now I'll die to live," he said. At 5 p.m. Thursday, nine hours before
the execution, Richmond was scheduled to get the traditional final meal,
a dinner of whatever he requested, within reason, prison spokesmen said.
Richmond decided not to take this last privilege. "My victims got no
last meal," he said in his testimony to the other inmates. He said he
had asked Gov. Mike Easley not to consider clemency for him.
No interviews
Richmond refused news interviews. He had told his
lawyers not to talk publicly about his case, Broun said after the
execution. "He did not want us to be talking about his remorse or other
things beforehand because he did not want it to be thought of as just
some ploy or some attempt to get clemency," Broun said. Even though
Richmond did not feel he deserved clemency, Broun and Groninger
requested it on his behalf and on behalf of his family, Broun said.
Easley denied the clemency shortly before 8 p.m. Thursday.
Richmond raped and strangled 27-year-old Helisa Hayes
in her home off Bingham Drive near Fayetteville in November 1991. Then
he stabbed her 8-year-old son, Phillip Desmond Hayes, with scissors 62
times and slashed his throat before wrapping an electric cord around his
neck. He strangled Hayes' daughter, Darien, with an electric cord.
In April 1991, he tied up Army Spc. Lisa Ann Nadeau,
24, in her townhome at Fort Dix, N.J., stabbed her in the leg, hit her
in the head, and raped and strangled her. He let her two children live.
One was 3 years old; the other, 6 months.
The prison released a transcript of Richmond's final
statement, given orally less than an hour before his death. "At this
time, I'd like to extend my deepest apologies to all the victims'
families and their loved ones," he said. "I'd like to say that I'm not a
man that shies away from his responsibilities. I'd like to say that I
hope that now, through my death, that y'all can move forward with your
lives. Thank you and God bless you."
Richmond executed for 1991 triple murder
By Paul Woolverton - Fayettesville Observer
May 6, 2005
RALEIGH - Ten minutes before his execution Friday
morning, Earl Richmond Jr. winked and flashed two quick smiles to his
sisters, Erica Woods and Lavonne Melvin, through the double pane glass
window of the execution chamber.
A few minutes later, he appeared to mouth the words
“I love you” to them, and then mouthed something else, perhaps to Wayne
Hayes, who sat on the second row. It wasn’t clear what he was trying to
say. Wayne Hayes was the husband of Helisa Stewart Hayes, one of the
people Richmond murdered in 1991 in her home near Fayetteville. Richmond
also killed her two children, Phillip Desmond Hayes, 8, and Darien, 7.
Richmond then lay his head on the pillow of his death bed, closed his
eyes and turned his face away from the window of the viewing room. He
never opened his eyes again.
As the execution began at 2 a.m., Richmond's eyes
fluttered. He took a deep breath 35 seconds later, then his breathing
appeared to stop about a minute into the execution. Everyone in the
witness room remained silent. At 2:12 a.m., Wayne Hayes said something
in a whisper to Theresa Collins, sister of Lisa Nadeau. Richmond was
serving a life sentence for killing Nadeau in 1991 in Fort Dix, N.J. The
curtain to the execution chamber was drawn shut 20 minutes after the
execution began. Central Prison Warden Marvin Polk declared Richmond
dead at 2:19 a.m.
Richmond also was a suspect in the killing of
64-year-old Ann Shanholtz of Fayetteville in December 1990.
In a transcript of Richmond's final statement, he
said, "At this time, I'd like to extend my deepest apologies to all the
victims' families and their loved ones. "I'd like to say that I’m not a
man that shies away from his responsibilities. I'd like to say that I
hope that now, through my death, that y'all can move forward with your
lives. Thank you and God bless you."
Richmond chose to forgo the traditional last meal
offered to condemned inmates, saying, according to his attorney's, that
he didn't want a last meal because his victims didn't have a last meal.
Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis, who
witnessed the execution, said, in a written statement, that his office
is grateful that the state executed Richmond. "We trust that Earl
Richmond Jr.’s execution has provided some measure of justice for his
victims and for the citizens of the State of North Carolina," Grannis
said.
Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Richmond's
request for a stay of execution and North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley
decided against granting clemency. "Given the facts and circumstances of
this case, I find no compelling reason to invalidate the sentence
recommended by the jury and affirmed by the courts," Easley said in a
written statement.
Hayes' four sisters and Nadeau's sister said Thursday
evening that Richmond's death, by lethal injection, would not be severe
enough. The procedure would put him to sleep, paralyze him, and then
stop his heart. "I would just like for him to know that what he's
getting is not enough," said Trenda Boston, one of Helisa Hayes' younger
sisters. "What he really deserves is to be raped, and to be stabbed and
to be strangled. Everything that he's ever done to all these victims, he
needs to have that done to him."
Boston said she dated Richmond in high school in
Fayetteville and introduced her sister to Wayne Hayes, whom Helisa
eventually married. Wayne Hayes and Richmond were close friends, Wayne
Hayes said this week. Helisa Hayes' sisters said that while growing up
they never saw any sign that he would become a serial rapist and a
serial killer.
Theresa Collins of Plainfield, Conn., is Nadeau's
sister. She said that all of the murders could have been prevented if
police and prosecutors in New Jersey had done a better job in 1989. That
year, two women were sexually assaulted. Another man was arrested for
one of the assaults, convicted and sentenced to 14 years in prison. He
was released after 3 years because DNA evidence showed that Richmond
assaulted the woman.
Authorities didn't collect Richmond's DNA until
months after the Hayes murders. The Cumberland County Sheriff's Office
investigated Richmond after one of his sisters told them he was near her
house before the murder. His DNA tied him to the Hayes and Nadeau
killings.
Collins and Tara Clark of Fayetteville, Helisa Hayes'
youngest sister, were chosen to witness the execution. Jim Armstrong of
Fayetteville would have liked to watch it, too. His mother was Ann
Shanholtz. Investigators were almost certain that Richmond killed
Shanholtz, but they never could prove it. "I feel sorry for this man's
family," Armstrong said. "I'm sure that they've gone through a lot, too,
but I've always believed that sooner or later, if you've done wrong,
your turn will come." He said he just wishes he knew for sure whether
Richmond was the killer.
Richmond's family members have declined requests for
interviews. Early Thursday evening, Richmond told prison officials that
he would forgo the traditional final meal. Richmond would be the first
person put to death for a conviction in Cumberland County since 1940.
That year, 20-year-old Robert Williams was executed for raping a 60-year-old
woman from Hope Mills in 1938.
Serial killer Velma Barfield, who was from Cumberland
County and executed in 1984, was sentenced to death in Bladen County
Superior Court for poisoning her boyfriend in Robeson County.
40 clergy urge N.C. Legislature to stop, study
executions
The Herald-Sun
May 3, 2005
RALEIGH, N.C. -- Forty senior members of the clergy
from churches across North Carolina released a letter Tuesday calling on
legislators to pass a two-year moratorium on executions in order to
study whether the death penalty is fairly meted out.
The group, which included high-ranking Baptist, Roman
Catholic, Church of Christ, Presbyterian, Muslim, Jewish and other
clergy from across the state, urged support of a bill currently before a
state House committee.
The measure would, upon passage, call for an
immediate suspension of executions for two years while lawmakers examine
the use of capital punishment in the state. "The future of the death
penalty is not at stake here," the letter, addressed to state House and
Senate members, read. "The principles of fairness and due process are.
... Only such a moratorium can allow a period of careful, balanced
review without the distractions and conflicts of interest among the
experts on both sides of the issue that would be sure to arise if
executions were allowed to proceed while the study was ongoing."
Dozens of congregations and local governments across
the state have voiced their support for a moratorium, including some
individuals who support the death penalty, noted Bishop Michael B. Curry
of the Episcopal Diocese of North Carolina.
Both death penalty supporters and opponents "want to
make certain our laws and practices are consistent with a just and
decent society," he said at a brief news conference held by about a
dozen people who signed the letter. "We want North Carolina to be a
state characterized by justice for all."
State v. Richmond,
347 N.C. 412, 495 S.E.2d 677 (N.C. 1998) (Direct Appeal).
Defendant was convicted in the Superior Court,
Cumberland County, E. Lynn Johnson, J., of three counts of first-degree
murder and imposed three sentences of death. On grant of motion to
bypass Court of Appeals as to additional conviction for first-degree
rape, the Supreme Court, Whichard, J., held that: (1) trial court's
decisions on challenges for cause based on prospective jurors' beliefs
regarding death penalty was not abuse of discretion; (2) evidence that
defendant attended funeral of victims was admissible; (3) serious
personal injury element of first-degree rape can include injury that
results in death; (4) defendant was not entitled to jury instruction on
second-degree murder as to child victims; (5) defendant was not entitled
to instruction on voluntary intoxication; (6) prosecutor's arguments in
guilt/innocence and sentencing phases did not require trial court to
intervene ex mero motu; (7) depraved-heart malice can support first-degree
murder conviction; (8) proposed nonstatutory mitigating circumstances
were subsumed by submitted circumstances; (9) defendant was not entitled
to proposed peremptory instructions; (10) polling of jury satisfied
statutory requirements that each juror agree with each recommendation of
death; and (11) sentence of death was not disproportionate. No error.
Frye, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Webb, J., filed a dissenting
opinion in which Frye , J., joined.
WHICHARD, Justice.
On 6 July 1992 defendant was indicted for three counts of first-degree
murder and one count of first-degree rape, all occurring during the
early morning hours of 2 November 1991. Defendant was tried capitally,
and the jury returned verdicts finding him guilty of the first-degree
rape and the first-degree murder of Helisa Hayes, the latter based on
malice, premeditation, and deliberation and under the felony murder rule;
the first-degree murder of Phillip Hayes based on malice, premeditation,
and deliberation; and the first-degree murder of Darien Hayes based on
malice, premeditation, and deliberation.
Following a capital sentencing
proceeding pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-2000, the jury recommended that
defendant be sentenced to death for each of the three murders. The trial
court sentenced defendant accordingly and additionally sentenced him to
a consecutive **683 term of life imprisonment for the first-degree rape.
For the reasons set forth herein, we conclude that defendant received a
fair trial, free from prejudicial error, and that the sentence of death
is not disproportionate.
The evidence tended to show that in the early morning
hours of 2 November 1991, defendant went to the home of victim Helisa
Hayes, where she resided with her two children, Phillip and Darien.
Defendant was a close friend of Helisa's ex-husband. While at the home,
defendant had "forceful" sex with Helisa, beat her, and strangled her to
death.
Defendant then took her son Phillip into the bathroom, where
defendant strangled him with the electrical cord of a curling iron and
stabbed him numerous times in his head and body with a pair of scissors.
After killing Phillip, defendant went into Darien's bedroom, sat her up
on her bed, and strangled her to death with a curling-iron cord.
* * *
Finally, there are four statutory aggravating
circumstances which, standing alone, this Court has held sufficient to
sustain a sentence of death. Bacon, 337 N.C. at 110 n. 8, 446 S.E.2d at
566 n. 8. The jury found all four in this case: the (e)(3) and (e)(11)
circumstances with regard to all three murders, the (e)(5) circumstance
with regard to the murder of the adult victim, and the (e)(9)
circumstance with regard to the murder of one of the child victims.
We conclude that the present case is more similar to
cases in which we have found the sentence of death proportionate than to
those in which we have found it disproportionate or those in which
juries have returned recommendations of life imprisonment. We conclude
that the sentence of death is not disproportionate and hold that
defendant received a fair trial and capital sentencing proceeding, free
from prejudicial error. NO ERROR.
Richmond v. Polk,
375 F.3d 309 (4th Cir. 2004). (Habeas)
Background: Following affirmance on direct appeal of
his death sentences and his convictions of first-degree rape and three
counts of first-degree murder, 347 N.C. 412, 495 S.E.2d 677, and denial
of post-conviction relief, petitioner sought writ of habeas corpus. The
United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina,
Malcolm J. Howard, J., denied relief, and petitioner appealed.
Holdings: The Court of Appeals, Gregory, Circuit
Judge, held that:
(1) North Carolina statute requiring accompanying affidavits in support
of post-conviction motion was adequate and independent state ground for
procedural default on ineffective assistance claims;
(2) petitioner did not show cause to excuse procedural default;
(3) petitioner did not show that he was actually prejudiced as result of
default;
(4) state court's rejection of Morgan claim regarding voir dire was
neither contrary to nor unreasonable application of Supreme Court
precedent;
(5) state court unreasonably applied Simmons rule regarding instruction
on parole ineligibility; and
(6) petitioner was not entitled to habeas relief due to his inability to
show that Simmons error was not harmless under Brecht standard. Affirmed.
GREGORY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellant Earl Richmond, Jr. was sentenced to death after
being found guilty by a North Carolina jury of three counts of
first-degree murder and one count of first-degree rape. Following
exhaustion of his rights of review in the North Carolina courts,
Richmond filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. §
2254 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina asserting sixteen separate claims.
After reviewing the merits of Richmond's claims, the
district court granted the State of North Carolina's motion for summary
judgment and denied Richmond's habeas petition. The district court
thereafter issued Richmond a certificate of appealability for his claims
that: (1) the state trial court's voir dire questions were
constitutionally inadequate under Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719, 112
S.Ct. 2222, 119 L.Ed.2d 492 (1992); (2) his counsel rendered ineffective
assistance during the guilt phase of his trial by failing to present
expert and available lay testimony regarding his inability to form the
requisite intent for first-degree murder because of his level of
intoxication; (3) his counsel rendered ineffective assistance during the
penalty phase of his trial by failing to present expert testimony
regarding his substance abuse and its effect on his behavior; and (4)
the state trial court's denial of his request for an instruction
informing the jury of his parole ineligibility for a prior federal
murder conviction violated the Supreme Court's holding in Simmons v.
South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154, 114 S.Ct. 2187, 129 L.Ed.2d 133 (1994).
We subsequently issued Richmond a certificate of
appealability for his claim that his counsel rendered ineffective
assistance during the penalty phase of his trial by failing to (1)
retain a sexual abuse expert and (2) request that childhood sexual abuse
be presented to the jury as a possible mitigating factor. For the
reasons that follow, we affirm the district court's denial of Richmond's
habeas petition.
During the early morning of November 2, 1991,
Richmond went to the home of Helisa Hayes, [FN1] the ex-wife of his best
friend, Wayne Hayes, and allegedly engaged in consensual intercourse
with her. Thereafter, Richmond and Ms. Hayes allegedly got into an
argument about Ms. Hayes flaunting her relationships with other men in
front of her ex-husband.
During this argument, Richmond, after
supposedly being struck with an object by Ms. Hayes, grabbed and carried
Ms. Hayes into her bedroom. Once inside of Ms. Hayes' bedroom, Richmond
struck Ms. Hayes in the face with his fist and proceeded to engage in "forceful"
intercourse with her. After having "forceful" intercourse with Ms. Hayes,
Richmond strangled her to death with his hands and poured rubbing
alcohol over her vaginal area. Richmond then grabbed Ms. Hayes' eight-year-old
son, Phillip, who was laying down in the hallway outside of his mother's
bedroom, carried him into the bathroom, stabbed him approximately forty
times with scissors and wrapped an electrical cord five times around his
neck.
After killing Phillip, Richmond went into the bedroom of Ms. Hayes'
seven-year-old daughter, Darien, who was sleeping in her bed, and
strangled her to death with the cord from a curling iron. Ms. Hayes'
father, William Stewart, discovered the bodies of his daughter and two
grandchildren *315 on November 4th when, after having not heard from Ms.
Hayes for two days, he became concerned about her safety and broke into
her home.
FN1. Although the parties spell Ms. Hayes' first name
as "Halisa" in their briefs, we spell Ms. Hayes' first name in this
opinion as "Helisa" because this is how it is spelled in Richmond's
indictment and the opinions rendered by the district court and state
courts.
Because Richmond was Wayne Hayes' best friend and
because he was well acquainted with Ms. Hayes and her children, even
serving as a pallbearer at their funerals, police interviewed Richmond,
among others, soon after the dead bodies of Ms. Hayes and her two
children were discovered. During this initial interview, Richmond told
police that he had not been to Ms. Hayes' home during the weekend of the
murders. Moreover, Richmond sought to shift attention from himself by
telling police that he believed Wayne Hayes had visited Ms. Hayes' home
at some point during the weekend in question.
Consequently, police,
rather than considering Richmond a suspect, focused their attention on
Ms. Hayes' ex-husband, Wayne Hayes, her boyfriend at the time of the
murders, Barrett Parks, and her father, William Stewart.
Approximately
three months after the murders, however, Richmond became a suspect when
his sister, Andrea Knight, informed police that she had dropped Richmond
off near Ms. Hayes' home on the early morning of November 2nd after they
and others attended an all night house party. In light of this
information, police requested a suspect rape kit from Richmond, which
revealed, through DNA evidence, that the semen found inside of Ms. Hayes'
body belonged to Richmond. Based on this DNA evidence, police brought
Richmond in for an interview on April 3, 1992.
During this interview, Richmond, after initially
denying any involvement in the murders of Ms. Hayes and her two
children, confessed to having committed the murders upon being informed
that DNA evidence revealed that his semen was found inside of Ms. Hayes'
body. When asked to describe the murders, Richmond told police, in sum,
the following:
At approximately 3:45 a.m. on the morning of November
2nd, he went to Ms. Hayes' home after leaving an all night house party.
Upon arriving at Ms. Hayes' home, he and Ms. Hayes got into an argument
about her "messing" around on Wayne Hayes. After arguing, he and Ms.
Hayes engaged in "forceful" sex and then got into another argument.
During this argument, Ms. Hayes struck him with an object and called her
son, Phillip, into the room. In response, he knocked Ms. Hayes to the
ground by striking her in the face with his fist, grabbed her son, who
at this point had entered the room, and took him into the bathroom where
he stabbed him to death with scissors. After killing Phillip, he went
into the bedroom of Ms. Hayes' daughter, Darien, and strangled her to
death with the cord from a curling iron. He then went back into Ms.
Hayes' bedroom where he strangled her to death with his hands and poured
rubbing alcohol on her vaginal area. J.A. 346-67 (testimony of
Lieutenant Don Smith).
During a subsequent interview on April 5th, Richmond,
although altering his recollection of the events, confirmed his
confession. During this interview, Richmond told police, in sum, the
following: Upon arriving at Ms. Hayes' home at approximately 3:45 a.m.,
he engaged in consensual intercourse with Ms. Hayes. After having
consensual intercourse, he and Ms. Hayes got into an argument about Ms.
Hayes flaunting her relationships with other men in front of Wayne Hayes.
During this argument, Ms. Hayes struck him with an object and called her
son, Phillip, into the room. In response, he carried Ms. Hayes into her
bedroom, struck her in the face with his fist, engaged in "forceful" sex
with her, strangled her to death with his hands, and poured rubbing
alcohol on her vaginal area.
After killing Ms. Hayes, he grabbed her
son, who had entered and left the room during the aforementioned events
and subsequently laid down in the hallway outside Ms. Hayes' bedroom,
and took him into the bathroom where he stabbed him to death with
scissors. After killing Ms. Hayes' son, he went into her daughter's
bedroom, Darien, and strangled her to death with the cord from a curling
iron. Id. at 474-86 (testimony of Captain Art Binder).
Based on his
April 3rd and 5th confessions, Richmond was indicted on July 6, 1992 for
the first-degree rape of Ms. Hayes; the first-degree murder of Ms. Hayes;
the first-degree murder of Phillip Hayes; and the first-degree murder of
Darien Hayes.
While awaiting trial on these charges, Richmond was
charged in the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey with the April 4, 1991 murder of Lisa Ann Nadeau, an army
dispersing clerk at the Fort Dix military base. On May 28, 1993,
Richmond was convicted of Ms. Nadeau's murder and subsequently sentenced
to a term of life imprisonment. Because the Sentencing Reform Act of
1984, Pub.L. No. 98-473, Title II, 98 Stat.1987, abolished parole for
federal offenses committed after November 1, 1987, Richmond is not
eligible for parole on this conviction.
After being convicted and receiving a life sentence
in federal court for Ms. Nadeau's murder, Richmond was tried during the
May 1, 1995 criminal session of the Superior Court for Cumberland County,
North Carolina for the rape and murder of Ms. Hayes and the murders of
her two children. Prior to the commencement of Richmond's trial, the
court ruled that the State would be allowed to introduce evidence about
Richmond's federal conviction for the murder of Ms. Nadeau, as an
aggravating factor, during the penalty phase.
Consequently, Richmond's
attorneys requested the court's permission to ask potential jurors
during voir dire whether "if ... knowing that [Richmond] had a previous
first-degree murder conviction, they could still consider mitigating
circumstances ... in determining what their ultimate recommendation as
to life or death is going to be." State v. Richmond, 347 N.C. 412, 495
S.E.2d 677, 683 (1998).
The court denied this request on the basis that
it was a "stakeout" question aimed at determining what prospective
jurors would do if presented with a certain state of evidence. Moreover,
the court noted that Richmond's attorneys could get the information they
needed to empanel an impartial jury through broader and more appropriate
questions.
At trial, Richmond's attorneys called his two
sisters, Sheila Jordan and Erica Richmond, as their sole witnesses.
Jordan testified that: (1) Richmond drank beer on a regular basis; (2)
she observed Richmond consume about two to three forty-ounce beers prior
to attending a house party on the night of November 1st; (3) Richmond
consumed a lot of hard liquor, which he did not regularly drink, within
the first couple hours of arriving at the party; (4) Richmond drove her
to purchase twenty dollars worth of crack cocaine, of which each of them
took one hit; (5) Richmond became extremely obnoxious after taking a hit
of the crack cocaine, which frightened her because she had never
witnessed him have such a reaction to crack cocaine; (6) Richmond, after
returning to the party at approximately 1:45 a.m., consumed alcohol for
another two hours prior to leaving the party; and (7) she had never
observed Richmond consume so much alcohol. Erica Richmond testified that
Richmond regularly *317 drank beer and that, although she could not
quantify the amount of alcohol that Richmond consumed at the party, she
saw Richmond with a glass of alcohol throughout the night.
At the conclusion of Richmond's two day trial, the
court held a charge conference. During this conference, the court denied
Richmond's request for a voluntary intoxication jury instruction on his
three first-degree murder charges because Richmond's attorneys failed to
produce substantial evidence showing that he was "utterly incapable of
forming a deliberate and premeditated purpose to kill." Id. at 557, 495
S.E.2d 677. Specifically, the court found:
Assuming arguendo that the Defendant has shown
consumption of alcohol and drugs through the testimony of one or more of
his own family members, that same evidence also shows an ability of the
Defendant to drive an automobile and to follow directions to and from
the scene of the party to a locale where drugs apparently were consumed.
Later, the Defendant, at his request was dropped off approximately a
mile to a mile and a half from the trailer of H[e]lisa Hayes at
approximately 3:45 a.m.
There now remains a void about the Defendant and
his activities after 3:45 a.m. that can be illustrated by a few simple
questions: Where did the Defendant go? Did the Defendant go directly to
H[e]lisa Hayes' trailer? Did the Defendant stop, rest or sleep before
going to the Hayes trailer? How long did it take the Defendant to get to
the trailer? Did the Defendant walk? Did the Defendant catch a ride? If
the Defendant walked, how long did it take him? What was the time that
the Defendant arrived at the Hayes trailer? Did the Defendant arrive a
couple of hours later, which would be approximately 5:45 a.m.? The
Defendant's various statements contained details and recollections of
events that depict a man aware of the events unfolding in the Hayes
trailer on the morning hours of that day.
* * *
We hold that Richmond's ineffective assistance of
counsel claims were procedurally defaulted in state court pursuant to
N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A-1420(b)(1), an adequate and independent state
procedural rule. Because Richmond does not argue that our failure to
consider his claims will result in a "fundamental miscarriage of justice"
and because Richmond has failed to establish cause to excuse his
procedural default and prejudice therefrom, we are precluded from
considering his ineffective assistance of counsel claims under the
procedural default doctrine.
We also hold that the North Carolina
Supreme Court's adjudication of Richmond's Morgan claim was neither
contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established
federal law. We do, however, hold that the North Carolina Supreme
Court's adjudication of Richmond's Simmons claim constituted an
unreasonable application of Simmons because Richmond's future
dangerousness was put in issue and not limited to the threat he posed in
prison. Nonetheless, we hold that Richmond is not entitled to habeas
relief on his Simmons claim because he is unable to show that the trial
court's Simmons error was not harmless under Brecht. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court's denial of Richmond's habeas petition.
AFFIRMED