Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
SANTA ANA – The femme fatale at the center of a love triangle was
convicted of special circumstances murder Monday for convincing her
young lover to kill her rich, older boyfriend in 1994 for financial
gain.
Nanette Johnston, 46, showed no reaction when court clerk Laura
Hoyle read the verdicts: guilty of first-degree murder and guilty of
the special circumstance of committing murder for financial gain.
The nine-woman, three-man jury in Superior Court Judge William
Froeberg's court deliberated for about three hours before reaching the
verdicts.
She now faces a sentence of life in prison without the possibility
of parole at her sentencing on May 18.
Johnston was convicted of orchestrating the murder of William
McLaughlin, 55, the health care entrepreneur she was living with in
his expensive Balboa Coves bayfront home near Lido Village.
McLaughlin was gunned down as he lounged in his robe in the kitchen
on Dec. 15, 1994, by an intruder who gained entrance into the gated
community with a pedestrian access key and into the house with a
freshly made house key.
A separate Orange County jury last year convicted Eric Naposki, a
former NFL linebacker who had been carrying on a secretive affair with
Johnston, of being the killer who pumped six bullets into McLaughlin's
chest at close range with a 9 mm Beretta handgun. He faces a life
without parole sentence in March.
Deputy District Attorney Matt Murphy contended that Johnston, then
29, provided the keys to Naposki so that he could quietly gain access
to the residence and kill McLaughlin at close range.
Murphy said Johnston needed to have McLaughlin killed so that he
would not discover that she had been cheating on him with Naposki, and
stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from his various bank
accounts. She was also making a play to serve as trustee of his
estate, which could have been worth millions, Murphy claimed.
Kim Bayless and Jenny McLaughlin, the victim's grown children,
watched the verdicts silently from the second row of the courtroom.
"This is a huge relief," Bayless said moments after the verdict was
announced. "It's an honor for my dad and for all other people along
the way that this woman harmed."
"We're all real happy to see justice served for my dad," said Jenny
McLaughlin.
The headline-making trial, which drew scores of court watchers
including true-crime authors and producers for two television
documentary shows, lasted two weeks and included 35 witnesses and more
than 156 exhibits. The jury started its deliberations Thursday
afternoon.
Nanette Johnston, who is also known in court records as Nanette
Packard, was an attractive young woman who met McLaughlin after she
placed an ad in a magazine seeking a wealthy man that read, "You take
care of me, and I'll take care of you," The millionaire, who was 25
years her senior, had just gone through a nasty divorce with his wife
of 24 years.
Soon, Packard was living with McLaughlin in his luxury home in a
tight-knit gated community in Newport Beach and managing some of his
personal financial affairs.
In early 1994, about the same time she started her affair with
Naposki, Johnston also started stealing hundreds of thousands of
dollars from McLaughlin. She also wrote a check to herself for
$250,000 dated on the day he was killed, and deposited two days later.
Murphy told the jury that McLaughlin was about to discover that his
much younger girlfriend was cheating on him with Naposki, or that she
was stealing from him. Either way, the prosecutor contended,
Johnston's days living in luxury were about to end.
That love triangle, with Johnston living with McLaughlin but seeing
Naposki, was at the core of the case.
It likely was best summed up by prosecution witness Suzanne Cogar,
who told the jury that she lived in the same Tustin apartment complex
as Naposki in 1994, and that he once told her he hated McLaughlin and
wanted to kill him. Cogar said she also met Packard at the apartment
complex.
She told the jury that it was her impression that Johnston wanted
McLaughlin for his money, and Naposki for his body.
"We had a real good jury. They did the right thing," said Murphy as
he faced a line of television and print cameras after the verdicts
were announced. "She was a greedy thief who committed this murder. ...
She left a trail of destruction through her life".
Defense in millionaire killing: 'She's a thief, not a killer'
January 19, 2012
SANTA ANA – "She's not a nice person," a defense attorney told an
Orange County jury Thursday about his client, a Ladera Ranch woman on
trial here, charged with orchestrating the murder of her millionaire
boyfriend in 1994 for financial gain.
"Hate her as much as you want for being a cheater, a liar and a
thief," Deputy Public Defender Mick Hill said. "But you can't vote her
guilty of murder."
Hill insisted that circumstantial evidence presented by the
prosecution during a two-week trial does not prove that Nanette
Johnston conspired with her ex-NFL football-playing lover to murder
William McLaughlin on Dec. 15, 1994.
Johnston, 46, faces a potential life term in prison without the
possibility of parole if she is convicted of special-circumstances
murder of McLaughlin, the much-older boyfriend she was living with
when he was gunned down in the kitchen of his Balboa Coves home by an
intruder who gained entry into his home by using one key to get inside
his gated community and another freshly made key to open the front
door.
Deputy District Attorney Matt Murphy argued Wednesday that Johnston
manipulated her secret lover, Eric Naposki, who played parts of two
seasons in the NFL, to murder McLaughlin so he would not discover that
Johnston had been stealing from him and so she could claim a huge
financial reward from his $1 million life insurance policy and as a
beneficiary of his will.
Naposki, 45, was convicted of special-circumstances murder at his
trial last year. He faces a sentence of life in prison without later
this year.
The informal friendliness between the prosecuting and defense
attorneys turned sour Thursday as the closing arguments were
delivered.
Hill called the prosecutor by his first name throughout his final
arguments and said Murphy presented "two hours of horse manure" in his
final arguments. Murphy took offense over being called by his first
name and told the jury that Hill, who was born and raised in Ireland,
gave them "two hours of crap in an Irish accent."
They agreed on one thing in their final arguments: Naposki was the
shooter who pumped six rounds from a 9 mm Beretta into McLaughlin's
chest.
But while Murphy contended that there was "overwhelming evidence"
linking Johnston to the plot to kill McLaughlin, Hill insisted there
is no evidence that she participated in a conspiracy, no confession
and no evidence that she was unhappy with McLaughlin.
"She's a thief," Hill added. "Not a killer."
Both attorneys said the keys used by the killer to gain access to
the McLaughlin home were pivotal to their cases.
Murphy contended that Johnston gave Naposki her pedestrian-access
key so that he could open a gate to get to the bay-front home, and
also gave him her house key for him to copy to that he could open the
front door to kill McLaughlin, who had just returned home from a trip
to Las Vegas on his private plane.
But Hill insisted that the pedestrian key would have said "DO NOT
DUPLICATE" if it belonged to Johnston, while the key dropped by the
killer on the front door step did not have such a stamp.
"It means for sure it's not Nanette's key," Hill said, and he
accused the prosecutor of misleading the jury by arguing that that
gate access key left behind by the killer was stamped "DO NOT
DUPLICATE."
Murphy, in his rebuttal argument, leaped to his feet, red in the
face, and told the jury that he never suggested that the key was
stamped "DO NOT DUPLICATE" and that he was aware from the beginning of
his involvement in the case that there was no such stamp. He accused
Hill of "inventing a Perry Mason moment."
The prosecutor added that when investigators examined Johnston's
keychain the night of the murders, she was supposed to have four keys,
and one of them was missing – the pedestrian-access key.
Jurors hear Nanette deny her guilt
By Frank Mickadeit - The Orange County Register
January 17, 2012
It is highly unlikely Nanette Johnston will testify in her own
murder trial, but jurors on Tuesday were still able to hear her in her
own voice deny her participation or knowledge of the murder of William
McLaughlin. The prosecution played a tape recording of her interview
with detectives on Jan. 19, 1995, more than a month after the murder.
Unfortunately for her, while she sounds pretty convincing, live
testimony that prosecutor Matt Murphy elicited immediately following
the playing of the tape showed she had lied to the detectives about a
key fact: her knowledge of convicted killer Eric Naposki's guns.
The tape, which runs about an hour and a half, was created during
an interview two detectives conducted with Nanette at one of the
Newport Beach houses where McLaughlin had let her live. At the same
time Nanette was being interviewed police were also interviewing
Naposki at another location. In that interview, a tape of which we
heard last week, Naposki was snide, combative and monumentally evasive
about the guns he owned and where they were located.
By contrast Nanette was seemingly helpful and pleasant. At most,
you might say, she was forgetful on some points and, while evasive
about the nature of her relationship with Naposki she indicated that
was embarrassment at having two lovers at the same time. Her voice is
slightly husky, with just a tinge of a twang, reminding me a little of
Jodie Foster's. And, indeed, Nanette proved to be quite the actress.
"Did you stay the night (with Naposki)?" a detective asked her.
"Never the whole night," she replied, trying to either minimize her
involvement with Naposki or her general promiscuity, or both.
What is the "whole night"? asked the detective, who already had
info from neighbors saying she often left Naposki's after dawn.
Until "6 or 7 in the morning," Nanette said, in tone that implied
that any reasonable person would consider leaving at 6 or 7 to be
something less than the "whole night." I guess it depends what your
definition of "whole night" is.
Bad enough, but where she really stepped in it in the 1995
interview was when they asked her about Naposki's guns.
"Ever seen any of Eric's guns?" she was asked. "No," she replied.
Asked about going to a range, she said Naposki "mentioned going to a
gun range. ... He mentioned he wanted to teach me to shoot." She also
told the cops that she never saw Naposki with ammo and never saw
Naposki's then-roommate with a gun.
After the tape was done playing, Murphy called the former roommate,
Leonard Jomsky. Jomsky testified that sometime during the summer
before the murder he, Nanette, Naposki and another man went to a local
range.
"Eric was showing both Nanette and I how to operate the gun and how
to shoot," Jomsky said.
(Jomsky's testimony was a surprise only to jurors; he had said the
same thing in Naposki's trial last summer. In fact, in that trial, he
testified that Nanette had bragged about having been shooting before
and knowing how to use a gun.)
For the record, Nanette asserted her innocence on at least two
occasions during the 1995 police interview. "I know I didn't have
anything to do with this and I really feel he (Naposki) didn't
either," she said at one point. Toward end of the interview, when
things got a little testy and the detectives went from playing nice
cop/nicer cop to nice cop/slightly cranky cop, the latter made it
clear that if they were to "catch up" to her in a lie, they would come
after her unrelentingly.
"You can't 'catch up' ... because I didn't do anything," she said.
Taken alone, Nanette's statement to cops provides nothing
approaching the beyond-a-reasonable doubt standard required to convict
her. The cops at that point simply didn't have enough evidence to
contradict her that day, or they made a strategic decision not to at
that point. In fact, her generally helpful tone throughout most of the
interview serves to give her a voice without her having to testify.
But Jomsky's testimony put the interview in a context highly
favorable to the prosecution, and the defense was not able to do
anything to really undercut it. Nanette's helpful, disembodied voice
only hurts her now.
Autopsy reveals millionaire was shot from close
range
By Larry Welborn - The Orange County Register
January 11, 2012
SANTA ANA – The gunman who pumped six bullets into
the chest of Newport Beach millionaire William McLaughlin in his
Balboa Coves home in December 1994 was accurate and close, a
pathologist testified Wednesday.
Dr. Tony Juguilon, the chief forensic pathologist
for Orange County, told a jury that the autopsy revealed that at least
two of six shots that slammed into McLaughlin as he lounged in a robe
in the kitchen of his bay-front home were fired from less than two
feet away. All six shots struck McLaughlin in the chest or abdomen and
each was potentially fatal, Juguilon added.
The pathologist was called to the witness stand in
the third day of the trial of Nanette Johnston, McLaughlin's
much-younger, live-in girlfriend, who is charged with plotting his
death for financial gain.
Prosecutor Matt Murphy and defense attorney Mick
Hill agree that the gunman who shot with such deadly efficiency was
Eric Naposki, a former NFL linebacker who was having a secretive
affair with Johnston. Naposki, now 45, was convicted last year of
special-circumstances murder for his role in the slaying and faces a
life term in prison without the possibility of parole at his
sentencing, scheduled Jan. 20.
Johnston, now 46, also known in court records as
Nanette Packard, is on trial before a jury in Judge William Froeberg's
court on similar charges.
Hill contends that Naposki acted on his own out of
jealousy when he gained entrance into McLaughlin's home with a
freshly-cut house key and shot the 55-year-old healthcare entrepreneur
while Johnston was shopping on Dec. 15, 1994. Johnston, Hill told the
jury, was not involved in the slaying.
But Murphy insists that Johnston put Naposki up to
murder so that she could get away with stealing hundreds of thousands
of dollars from McLaughlin's bank accounts and reap a financial
windfall as the beneficiary of McLaughlin's life insurance policy and
will. She also stood to have access to his beach house and title to a
luxury car, Murphy said.
Murphy contends that Johnston provided the house
key to Naposki for him to copy, and gave him her key to a pedestrian
gate into the private community on Newport Bay, allowing Napsoki to
get inside the home undetected.
The newly-cut house key was found stuck in the lock
of McLaughlin's front door, and the pedestrian-access key was found on
the ground near the entryway, apparently dropped by the gunman,
according to evidence introduced earlier in the trial.
When Newport Beach police detectives examined
Johnston's key chain, it was missing her pedestrian-access key.
Naposki, who played for at least two NFL teams
during his brief career, was with Packard, then 28, at her son's
soccer game in Walnut an hour before the murder, and worked security
at a Newport Beach nightclub less than 200 yards from the Balboa Coves
home.
An ex tells of a Yes, Yes Nanette
By Frank Mickadeit - The Orange County Register
January 11, 2012
Much of the prosecution's case against Nanette
Johnston is a repeat of the trial we saw last year against her alleged
co-conspirator, Eric Naposki, in the murder of Newport Beach
millionaire William McLaughlin. But we also are seeing some old
witnesses providing new information on Nanette. And we're learning
about her at new level of bad. Interestingly, such testimony is being
generated almost equally by the prosecution and defense. It almost
seems like a race to the bottom – which side can elicit more testimony
that Nanette was a tramp.
We knew from Naposki's trial that Nanette had: 1)
been cheating on McLaughlin; 2) embezzled hundreds of thousands of
dollars from him; and 3) used his money to buy Naposki alligator
cowboy boots and a motorcycle in the days around the time of the Dec.
15, 1994 murder.
In the courtroom, Nanette appears attentive but not
very animated, unlike Naposki, who was given to smirking or shaking
his head when he disagreed with a witness's testimony. Rather, she
sits stoic, long brown hair drawn tightly back into a braid, rarely
showing any expression.
Prosecutor Matt Murphy has emphasized how many
times she has been married (four that we know of), and it is indeed
her first husband (that we know of) who gave the jurors the greatest
insight yet into her character.
Kevin Ross Johnston's contribution to the murder
timeline is that he's able to say precisely when Nanette and Naposki
left a soccer field in Walnut the night of the murder (8:20 p.m.) and
bolster the prosecution's theory that Naposki had time to get to the
murder scene in Newport Beach, probably after being dropped off nearby
by Nanette.
He also said Naposki and Nanette were in a
tremendous hurry to leave the soccer game and that Nanette – typically
a doting mother to her and Johnston's son – didn't stay to watch the
boy accept his trophy. That goes to the theory they were in a rush to
kill McLaughlin before his son, Kevin, got home that night.
Her ex also testified that the day after the
shooting, Nanette called him and said she had an "alibi" for the time
McLaughlin was shot, 9:11 p.m. – she was shopping – but that when cops
asked him about seeing her the night before, "she said, 'You don't
need to tell them anything about Eric because he's not involved.'"
But Johnston, 51, also provided much more insight
into Nanette's past than previously known. They were married in
Arizona when he was 23 and she was 18. Both were working at a
Federated electronics store and neither came into the marriage with
much money. Nor did they leave it with much five years later. He had
to pay the divorce lawyer's $500 fee in installments.
She had told people she graduated from Arizona
State. "To my knowledge, she never even graduated from high school,"
Johnston said under cross-examination by defense attorney Mick Hill.
They divorced, he testified, when he found a note that she had left on
a guy's very nice car asking him to meet her for a date. "I couldn't
afford the nicer things," Johnston explained.
Johnston comes off as an immensely likable fellow –
neat silver hair and beard, nice smile, a straightforward way of
answering questions by both lawyers. He admits Nanette hurt him deeply
but talks about how he was cordial to her boyfriends and even agreed
to take her back at one point. He moved her out to California and
hoped for a reconciliation, only to find out that she hadn't told
either her father or her boyfriend back in Arizona that she was going
back with Johnston.
Once divorced, she would bring her many boyfriends
to soccer games and birthday parties. She showed up once at a
double-header soccer game with one guy, Johnston said, and when
Naposki showed up for the second game, she ended up going home with
him.
Johnston said he found she'd been cheating on him
all through the marriage. A guy named Ted, he found out, had bought
her the new BMW she showed up with at home one day. Did her
relationship with Ted last long? Hill asked.
"Well, she was cheating on him with another guy,"
Johnston explained matter-of-factly, as the courtroom tittered.
Hill then asked: "You kept a file on all her
shenanigans?"
Johnston: "I wouldn't come close to saying it was
all of them."
Girlfriend goes on trial in millionaire's 1994 slaying
Man who was having an affair with her has already been convicted of
first-degree murder plus the special circumstances of murder for
financial gain
By Larry Welborn - The Orange County Register
January 3, 2012
SANTA ANA – The classified ad in a dating magazine was directed at
"Wealthy Men Only," according to court documents. "Classy,
well-educated woman ... knows how to take care of her man ... you take
care of me and I'll take care of you."
At 25, Nanette Johnston was beautiful, sexy and young.
At 50, William McLaughlin was divorced, lonely and wealthy.
In 1991, he answered her ad.
Three years later he was dead, shot to death inside his Balboa Cove
home.
McLaughlin had made a fortune in the pharmaceutical industry with a
device that filters blood and was going through a messy divorce after
a longtime marriage when he sought Johnston's companionship. First
they dated, and she soon moved into his expensive home inside a gated
community on Newport Bay.
A few minutes after 9 p.m. Dec. 15, 1994, someone got inside
McLaughlin's home with a brand new key – apparently while Johnston was
out shopping – and shot him six times in the chest with a 9 mm
handgun. He died in a pool of blood while his son frantically called
911.
Deputy District Attorney Matt Murphy contends the shooter was Eric
Naposki, a former National Football League linebacker who was carrying
on an affair with Johnston behind McLaughlin's back.
Naposki, who is now 45, was convicted by an Orange County jury in
July of first-degree murder plus the special circumstances of murder
for financial gain. He faces life in prison without the possibility of
parole at his sentencing Jan. 20 by Superior Court Judge William
Froeberg.
Murphy contends that it was Johnston, who is also known in court
documents as Nanette Packard, who put Naposki up to the killing.
Johnston, according to Murphy, stood to collect $1 million in life
insurance from McLaughlin's death, was entitled to $150,000 from
McLaughlin's will, would get title to a late model Infiniti
automobile, and be allowed to live for a year in a beach house
McLaughlin also owned.
This week, more than 17 years after the slaying, opening statements
will begin in Johnston's trial on the 10th floor of the Central
Justice Center. She is charged with the special circumstances murder
of her millionaire boyfriend, and also faces a life term in prison
without the possibility of parole if convicted.
Deputy Public Defender Mick Hill, however, insists Johnston had
nothing to do with McLaughlin's murder.
He said both sides – the prosecution and the defense – in the
Naposki trial felt it was in their best interest to portray his client
in the worst possible light. And, Hill said, since her trial was
separated and postponed, she had no forum to rebut the allegations.
But now, in a trial that is slated to last 10 days, he will have a
chance to tell her side of the story.
"She didn't so it," Hill said in an interview. "Naposki did it
alone. There is no doubt he did the shooting. The question is, why?"
"I think it was jealously, that he wanted Nannette for himself,"
Hill added. "My client would never leave McLaughlin for a deadbeat
loser."
No arrests were made in 1994 for McLaughlin's murder, which played
out on local newspapers and television stations for weeks, although
detectives always suspected that Johnston and Naposki were involved.
Johnston was arrested and convicted in 1995 of stealing from
McLaughlin. But she was not charged with murder – not for 14 years.
In 2009, district attorney's investigator Larry Montgomery reopened
the investigation, analyzed old files, reinterviewed witnesses, and
re-examined evidence. Authorities subsequently made two arrests:
Johnston, who was then living in Ladera Ranch with her third husband,
and Naposki, who played parts of two seasons in the NFL, who was then
living in Greenwich, Conn.
Witnesses testified in Naposki's trial last year that he
accompanied Johnston on the evening of Dec. 15, 1994, to watch her
young son play youth soccer in Walnut.
Murphy argued during his trial that he had just enough time to
return to McLaughlin's home, get inside with a duplicate key made from
one provided by Johnston, and then murder McLaughlin in his kitchen.
Naposki's trial last year was often jammed with more than 100
spectators in the courtroom gallery, including McLaughlin's two adult
children, their husbands and several friends, and producers and
cameramen from two true-crime television shows – "Dateline NBC" and
"48 Hours."
Two true-crime book authors, Caitlin Rother and Stella Sands, also
monitored Naposki's trial, and are expected back for Johnston's trial.
Woman accused of killing rich boyfriend
arraigned
She, former lover charged with murder
for financial gain, which could lead to life without parole on
conviction
By Larry Welborn - The Orange County
Register
May 21, 2009
NEWPORT
BEACH - A Ladera Ranch woman stood in a dark blue jail jumpsuit in a
courthouse holding cell this afternoon and told her family "I love
you" moments before her arraignment on charges she conspired to murder
her millionaire boyfriend for money in 1994.
Nanette Johnston Packard McNeal's husband and two
adult children sat in the courtroom gallery and gave her the OK sign,
blew her kisses and told her they loved her back before they were
warned by a bailiff that communicating with prisoners in court is
prohibited.
Packard McNeal, 43, was arrested at her home on
Wednesday on a warrant charging her and a former paramour with the
Dec. 15, 1994, shooting death of entrepreneur William Francis
McLaughlin, 55, in his home in a gated community in Newport Beach.
Eric Andrew Naposki, 42, her alleged
co-conspirator, was arrested Wednesday at his home in Greenwich, Conn.
He will be extradited to Orange County within the next ten days,
prosecutors said.
Deputy District Attorney Matt Murphy charged both
defendants with murdering McLaughlin for financial gain - a special
circumstance that could lead to a sentence of life in prison without
the possibility of parole if they are convicted.
Superior Court Judge Karen L. Robinson agreed to
delay Packard McNeal's arraignment until June 8 at the request of
defense attorney Barry Bernstein. Packard McNeal, a mother of four
children including a new infant, will remain in custody without bail
pending a bail review hearing in Orange County Superior Court's Harbor
Justice Center on May 26.
Her husband and two adult children left the
courthouse hastily and declined to comment to reporters.
Bernstein, who also represented Packard McNeal in
1996 when she pleaded guilty to embezzling from McLaughlin before his
death, also declined to comment.
Murphy said a re-examination of all the evidence in
the case prompted him to file charges. "The Newport Beach Police
Department never gave up on this case," Murphy said. "We greatly look
forward to presenting our evidence to a jury."
He declined to reveal what new evidence led to
charges being filed now, nearly 15 years after McLaughlin was shot six
times in the chest as he stood in the kitchen of his
million-dollar-plus home in Balboa Cove.
Murphy contends that Packard McNeal met Bill
McLaughlin, who made a fortune in the 1980s with a machine that
separated plasma from blood, in about 1990 when she was about 25.
According to Murphy, he responded to her personal ad that read, "I
know how to take care of my man if he knows how to take care of me."
McLaughlin, who was in his 50s and who had just
gone through a divorce, later began dating and financially supporting
Packard McNeal, according to prosecutors. Packard McNeal, who at the
time was divorced with two children, started living with him in a
beachfront home he purchased for her and also stayed with him in his
bayfront home.
At the same time, she also was allegedly an affair
with Naposki, a former National Football League player for the New
England Patriots and Indianapolis Colts, according to prosecutors. At
the time of McLaughlin's murder, Naposki worked as a bouncer at the
Thunderbird Nightclub, located in Newport Beach, less than 500 feet
from the McLaughlin's home.
Prosecutors believe that Packard McNeal, who had a
$1 million life insurance policy on McLaughlin, provided Naposki with
a key to the McLaughlin's home and information about when he was
expected to be at the house.
At about 9 p.m. on Dec. 15, 1994, Naposki allegedly
entered McLaughlin's home using the house key Packard McNeal provided,
and shot McLaughlin six times with a 9 MM handgun while he was
standing in the kitchen, according to the District Attorney's Office.
He then walked over to the Thunderbird and reported for work,
prosecutors said.
McLaughlin's son, a young adult who suffered brain
damage as a result of being hit by a drunken driver a few years
earlier, was upstairs listening to music and heard the gunshots. The
victim's son found his murdered father and called 9-1-1.
Packard McNeal was named in McLaughlin's will, and
was due to receive $150,000 in cash the event of his death and also
have the right to live in his beach house rent free for one year,
according to prosecutors.