Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Derek
William BENTLEY
Characteristics: Robbery
1952
Date of arrest:
Same day
Victim profile: Police
Constable Sidney George Miles, 42
Method of murder: Shooting (Colt New Service .455 Eley calibre revolver)
Location: Croydon,
London, England, United Kingdom
The standard Metropolitan Police pistol at the time
was the .32 Webley automatic, a number of which were issued on the
night. In his book The Scientific Investigation of Crime, the
prosecution's ballistics expert Lewis Nickolls stated that he recovered
four bullets from the roof, two of .45, one of .41 and one of .32
calibre. The last was not entered as an exhibit in the trial, nor
mentioned in Nickolls' evidence to the court.
When Yallop telephoned Haler the day after the
initial interview, he reportedly confirmed his estimate of the bullet
size. Shortly before the publication of Yallop's book, Haler was
provided with a transcript of the interview, and Yallop says Haler again
confirmed as accurate. After the subsequent broadcast of the BBC Play
for Today adaptation of To Encourage the Others, directed by
Alan Clarke and starring Charles Bolton, Haler sought to deny that he
had given any specific estimate of the size of the bullet that killed
Miles beyond being "of large calibre".
Following the execution there was a public sense of
unease about the decision, resulting in a long campaign, mostly led by
Bentley's sister Iris, to secure a posthumous pardon for him. In March
1966 his remains were removed from Wandsworth Prison and reburied in a
family grave. In August 1970, Lord Goddard told Yallop that he thought
Bentley was going to be reprieved, said he should have been, and
attacked Maxwell-Fyfe for allowing the execution to go ahead.
On 29 July 1993 Bentley was granted a royal pardon in
respect of the sentence of death passed upon him and carried out.
However in English law this did not quash his conviction for murder.
Eventually, on 30 July 1998, the Court of Appeal
quashed Bentley's conviction for murder. Craig welcomed the pardon
granted to Bentley. However, Bentley's parents and sister had died by
this date.
Though Bentley had never been accused of attacking
any of the police officers, who were shot at by Craig, for him to be
convicted of murder as an accessory in a joint enterprise it was
necessary for the prosecution to prove that he knew that Craig had a
deadly weapon when they began the breaking. Lord Chief Justice Lord
Bingham of Cornhill ruled that Lord Goddard had not made it clear to the
jury that the prosecution was required to have proved Bentley had known
that Craig was armed. He further ruled that Lord Goddard had failed to
raise the question of Bentley's withdrawal from their joint enterprise.
This would require the prosecution to prove the absence of any attempt
by Bentley to signal to Craig that he wanted Craig to surrender his
weapons to the police. Lord Bingham ruled that Bentley's trial had been
unfair because the judge had misdirected the jury and, in his summing-up,
had put unfair pressure on the jury to convict. It is possible that Lord
Goddard may have been under pressure while summing up since much of the
evidence was not directly relevant to Bentley's defence. Lord Bingham
did not rule that Bentley was innocent, merely that there had been
defects in the trial process. If Bentley had been alive in July 1998 or
convicted of the offence, it would have been possible for him to face a
retrial.
In a case with similarities to the Bentley case, a
House of Lords judgment of 17 July 1997, cleared Philip English of
murdering Sergeant Bill Forth in March 1993, the reasons being given by
Lord Hutton. English had been handcuffed before his companion Paul
Weddle killed Sgt Forth with a concealed knife. The existing joint
enterprise law allowed the conviction of English for murder because they
had both been attacking Sgt Forth with wooden staves, making English an
accessory to any murder committed by Weddle as part of that assault.
Lord Hutton made the 'fine distinction' that a concealed knife was a far
more deadly weapon than a wooden stave, so that proof of English's
knowledge of it was necessary for conviction. The appeal may have
influenced the allowing of a posthumous referral of the Bentley case.
Lord Mustill had asked for new laws on homicide when
setting out his reasons at the time of Lord Hutton's ruling on English's
appeal. However, Lord Bingham's ruling blamed Lord Goddard for a
miscarriage of justice without making further alteration to the law on
joint enterprise. The English judgment, delivered just over two months
after the Labour government took office, remained the most recent
precedent in joint enterprise law, though the Bentley verdict attracted
far more media attention.
The two youths were spotted climbing over the gate
and up a drain pipe to the roof of the warehouse by a nine-year-old girl
in a house across from the building. She alerted her parents and her
father walked to the nearest telephone box and called the police.
When the police arrived, the two youths hid behind
the lift-housing. One of the police officers, Detective Sergeant
Frederick Fairfax, climbed the drain pipe onto the roof and grabbed hold
of Bentley. Bentley broke free and was alleged by a number of police
witnesses to have shouted the words "Let him have it, Chris".
Both Craig and Bentley denied that those words were ever spoken.
Craig, who was armed with a revolver, opened fire,
grazing Fairfax's shoulder. Nevertheless, Fairfax arrested Bentley, who
is said to have told him that Craig had plenty of ammunition for his
Colt New Service .455 Eley calibre revolver, for which Craig had a
variety of undersized rounds, some of which he had had to modify to fit
the gun. Craig had also sawn off half of the weapon's barrel, so that it
would fit in his pocket. In his pocket Bentley had a knife and a spiked
knuckle-duster, though he never used either. Craig had made the knuckle-duster
himself and had recently given both weapons to Bentley.
Following the arrival of uniformed officers, a group
was sent onto the roof. The first to reach the roof was Police Constable
Sidney Miles, who was immediately killed by a shot to the head. After
exhausting his ammunition and being cornered, Craig jumped some thirty
feet from the roof, fracturing his spine and left wrist when he landed
on a greenhouse. At this point, he was arrested.
Various medals were awarded to the several
participating police officers, including one posthumously to Miles
and the George Cross to Fairfax.
Legal proceedings
Craig would not have faced execution if found guilty,
as he was below the age of 18 when PC Miles was shot. Bentley on the
other hand was not. The trial took place before the Lord Chief Justice
of England and Wales, Lord Goddard, at the Old Bailey in London between
9 December 1952 and 11 December 1952.
The doctrine of 'constructive malice' meant that a
charge of manslaughter was not an option, as the "malicious intent" of
the armed robbery was transferred to the shooting. Bentley's best
defence was that he was effectively under arrest when PC Miles was
killed; however, this was only after an attempt to escape, during which
a police officer had been wounded.
As the trial progressed the jury had more details to
consider. The prosecution was unsure how many shots were fired and by
whom and a ballistics expert cast doubt on whether Craig could have hit
Miles if he had shot at him deliberately: the fatal bullet was not found,
Craig had used bullets of different under-sized calibres and the sawn-off
barrel made it inaccurate to a degree of six feet at the range from
which he fired. There was also the question of what Bentley had meant by
"Let him have it", if indeed he had said it. Though in the gangster
movies of the time the expression meant "shoot", it could also be
construed as signifying that Bentley wanted Craig to surrender the gun.
The Principal Medical Officer responsible was Dr
Matheson and he referred Bentley to Dr. Hill, a psychiatrist at the
Maudsley Hospital. Hill's report stated that Bentley was illiterate and
of low intelligence, almost borderline retarded. However, Matheson was
of the opinion that whilst Bentley was of low intelligence, he was not
suffering from epilepsy at the time of the alleged offence, that he was
not a "feeble-minded person" under the Mental Deficiency Acts and that
he was sane and fit to plead and stand trial.
English law at the time did not recognise the concept
of diminished responsibility due to retarded development, though it
existed in Scottish law (it was introduced to England by the Homicide
Act 1957). Criminal insanity where the accused is unable to
distinguish right from wrong was then the only medical defence to
murder. Bentley, while suffering severe debilitation, was not insane.
The jury took 75 minutes to decide that both Bentley
and Craig were guilty of PC Miles's murder. Bentley was sentenced to
death with a plea for mercy on 11 December 1952, while Craig was ordered
to be detained at Her Majesty's Pleasure (he was eventually released in
1963 after serving 10 years' imprisonment and has been a law abiding
citizen ever since).
Bentley's lawyers filed appeals highlighting the
ambiguities of the ballistic evidence, Bentley's mental age and the fact
that he did not fire the fatal shot. These efforts failed to reverse his
conviction, however and the death sentence was mandatory.
David Maxwell Fyfe, who had helped to draft the
European Convention on Human Rights, had become Home Secretary when the
Conservatives returned to office in 1951. After reading the Home Office
psychiatric reports he refused to request clemency from the Queen,
despite a petition signed by over 200 of his fellow MPs.
Parliament was not allowed to debate Bentley's
sentence until it had been carried out. The Home Office also refused Dr.
Hill permission to make his report public.
At 9am on the morning of 28 January, 1953, Derek
Bentley was hanged at Wandsworth Prison, London by Albert Pierrepoint.
When it was announced the execution had been carried out, there were
protests outside the prison and two people were arrested and later fined
for damage to property.
To Encourage the Others
In his 1971 book To Encourage the Others,
David Yallop rigorously documented Bentley's mental deficiencies,
inconsistencies in the police and forensic evidence and the conduct of
the trial. He proposed the theory that PC Miles was actually killed by a
bullet from a gun other than Craig's sawn-off .455 revolver.
Yallop drew this conclusion from an interview with
Dr. David Haler, the pathologist who carried out the autopsy on Miles,
who Yallop reports estimated the head wound was inflicted by a bullet of
between .32 and .38 calibre fired from between six to nine feet away.
Craig had been firing from a distance of just under 40 feet and had used
a variety of under-sized .41, and .45 calibre rounds in his revolver;
Yallop asserted it would have been impossible for him to use a bullet of
.38 or smaller calibre. Haler did not offer in his trial evidence any
estimate of the size of the bullet that had killed Miles. Craig accepts
that the bullet that killed Miles came from his gun, but maintains that
all of his shots were fired over the rear garden of a house adjacent to
the warehouse, approximately 20 degrees to the right of Miles's location
from where Craig had been firing.
The standard Metropolitan Police pistol at the time
was the .32 Webley automatic, a number of which were issued on the
night, although it was claimed that they arrived on the scene after
Miles was killed and that the only ammunition not returned was two
rounds fired by Fairfax. At least one witness, however, claims to have
seen armed officers on the scene before Miles was shot. In his book
The Scientific Investigation of Crime, the prosecution's ballistics
expert Lewis Nickolls stated that he recovered four bullets from the
roof, two of .45, one of .41 and one of .32 calibre. The last was not
entered as an exhibit in the trial, nor mentioned in Nickolls' evidence
to the court.
When Yallop telephoned Haler the day after the
initial interview, he reportedly confirmed his estimate of the bullet
size. Shortly before the publication of Yallop's book, Haler was
provided with a transcript of the interview, and Yallop says Haler again
confirmed as accurate. After the subsequent broadcast of the BBC Play
for Today adaptation of To Encourage the Others (directed by
Alan Clarke) and starring Charles Bolton, Haler sought to deny that he
had given any specific estimate of the size of the bullet that killed
Miles beyond being "of large calibre".
Posthumous pardon and appeal
Following the execution there was a public sense of
unease about the decision, resulting in a long campaign, mostly led by
Bentley's sister Iris, to secure a posthumous pardon for him. In March
1966 his remains were removed from Wandsworth Prison and reburied in a
family grave. Then on 29 July 1993 Bentley was granted a royal pardon in
respect of the sentence of death passed upon him and carried out.
However in English law this did not quash his conviction for murder.
Eventually, on 30 July 1998, the Court of Appeal set
aside Bentley's conviction for murder 45 years earlier
Though Bentley had not been accused of attacking any
of the police officers being shot at by Craig, for him to be convicted
of murder as an accessory in a joint enterprise it was necessary for the
prosecution to prove that he knew that Craig had a deadly weapon when
they began the break-in. Lord Chief Justice Lord Bingham of Cornhill
ruled that Lord Goddard had not made it clear to the jury that the
prosecution was required to have proved Bentley had known that Craig was
armed. He further ruled that Lord Goddard had failed to raise the
question of Bentley's withdrawal from their joint enterprise. This would
require the prosecution to prove the absence of any attempt by Bentley
to signal to Craig that he wanted Craig to surrender his weapons to the
police. Lord Bingham ruled that Bentley's trial had been unfair, in that
the judge had misdirected the jury and, in his summing-up, had put
unfair pressure on the jury to convict. It is possible that Lord Goddard
may have been under pressure while summing up since much of the evidence
was not directly relevant to Bentley's defence. It is important to note
that Lord Bingham did not rule that Bentley was innocent, merely that
there had been defects in the trial process. Had Bentley been alive in
July 1998 or had been convicted of the offence in more recent years, it
would have been likely that he would have faced a retrial.
Another factor in the posthumous defence was that a "confession"
recorded by Bentley, which was claimed by the prosecution to be a "verbatim
record of dictated monologue", was shown by forensic linguistics methods
to have been largely edited by policemen. Linguist Malcolm Coulthard
showed that certain patterns, such as the frequency of the word "then",
and the grammatical use of "then" after the grammatical subject ("I then"
rather than "then I"), was not consistent with Bentley's use of language
(his idiolect), as evidenced in court testimony. These patterns fitted
better the recorded testimony of the policemen involved. This is one of
the earliest uses of forensic linguistics on record.
In a case with similarities to the Bentley case, a
House of Lords judgment of 17 July, 1997, cleared Philip English of
murdering Sergeant Bill Forth in March 1993, the reasons being given by
Lord Hutton. English had been handcuffed before his companion Paul
Weddle killed Sgt Forth with a concealed knife. The existing joint
enterprise law allowed the conviction of English for murder because they
had both been attacking Sgt Forth with wooden staves, making English an
accessory to any murder committed by Weddle as part of that assault.
Lord Hutton made the 'fine distinction' that a concealed knife was a far
more deadly weapon than a wooden stave, so that proof of English's
knowledge of it was necessary for conviction. The appeal may have
influenced the allowing of a posthumous referral of the Bentley case.
Lord Mustill had asked for new laws on homicide when
setting out his reasons at the time of Lord Hutton's ruling on English's
appeal. However, Lord Bingham's ruling blamed Lord Goddard for a
miscarriage of justice without making further alteration to the law on
joint enterprise. The English judgment, delivered just over two months
after the Labour government took office, remained the most recent
precedent in joint enterprise law, though the Bentley verdict attracted
far more media attention.
For his gallantry in pursuing Bentley and Craig,
Fairfax was awarded the George Cross. In addition Police Constables
Norman Harrison (London Gazette 6 January 1953 Page 167) and James
McDonald (London Gazette 6 January 1953 Page 167) were awarded the
George Medal, Police Constable Robert Jaggs the British Empire Medal and
Police Constable Miles was posthumously awarded the Queen's Police Medal
for Gallantry.
Derek William Bentley
"A victim of British justice"
On the 30th of July 1998 the Appeal Court finally
ruled (after 45 years of campaigning by his father, sister Iris and
since Iris' death the previous year, by her daughter, Maria Bentley
Dingwall, that his conviction was unsafe.
Derek Bentley was illiterate and is alleged to have
had a mental age of 11. He also suffered from epilepsy as a result of
head injury received during the war.
On Sunday the 2nd of November 1952, Derek Bentley
went with his friend, 16 year old Christopher Craig, to see if they
could carry out a burglary. Bentley was armed with a knife and a knuckle-duster
which Craig had recently given him. Craig had a similar knife but was
also armed with a .455 Eley revolver. Craig normally carried a gun and
it is reasonable to suppose that Bentley would have known this. They
were thwarted in their attempts on their first two targets and finally
chose to break into a warehouse belonging to a company called Parker &
Barlow in Croydon Surrey. As they climbed onto the roof of the warehouse
they were noticed by a little girl who lived opposite and whose mother
phoned the police. The nearest patrol car arrived very quickly and
contained a detective constable (DC Fairfax) and a uniformed constable.
Craig and Bentley were on the roof as the police
arrived and attempted to run but DC Fairfax quickly detained Bentley
(note I have not said arrested). Craig decided to shoot his way out and
fired at DC Fairfax wounding him in the shoulder. At some time during
the shooting Bentley is alleged to have said the now famous words "Let
him have it, Chris".
Bentley offered no resistance to Fairfax and stood by
the injured policeman without any restraint for the next 30 minutes or
so. (Hardly the action of a desperate young thug who could very probably
have easily overpowered the wounded and unarmed Fairfax)
Other officers arrived on the scene within minutes,
some of them armed. Craig continued shooting at anyone that moved and as
the first of the reinforcements, PC Sidney Miles, came up the stairs and
through the door onto the roof he was shot through the head and died
almost instantly.
Craig eventually ran out of bullets and threw himself
off the roof in a vain attempt to avoid capture. He landed on a
greenhouse roof 30 feet below and broke his back.
Both Craig and Bentley were charged with the murder
of PC Miles. But should Bentley have been charged with murder at all?
There were reasons for such a charge, but they took no account of his
retarded mental state or the undisputed fact that he neither had
possessed nor fired a gun.
Perhaps in the climate of 1952 London where gangs of
armed young thugs were striking terror in the populace it is not
surprising that they both were. Four policeman had been murdered in
1951.
They came to trial at the Old Bailey on Thursday the
9th of December 1952 before the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Goddard, and
both pleaded not guilty. The case against Craig was not actually as
conclusive as one would imagine. There was some debate as to whether the
bullet that had killed PC Miles had been fired form a .455 revolver and
the bullet exhibited in court had no traces of blood on it. However this
was passed over and Craig was convicted. One could argue that Craig was
still responsible for PC Miles' death as wherever the bullet came from,
it would never have been fired if Craig had not been armed and started
shooting at the police.
The case against Derek Bentley rested on three main
points.
The famous words "Let him have it, Chris". It is by
no means clear that these words were ever uttered by Bentley or
whether they were invented later to strengthen the case against him by
showing "common purpose". If, however, the words "Let him have it,
Chris" could be shown to be an incitement to shoot, there would be an
indication of common purpose. This was the prosecution's
interpretation of the them.
The law states that if two (or more) people commit a crime they can be
held equally responsible where there was common purpose, i.e. they
both intended or could have reasonably foreseen the outcome. This is
fair where, for instance, a man and a woman have an affair and wish to
get rid of her husband. She lures the husband to a suitable place
where the lover kills him. Although it may be possible to prove that
she did not strike the fatal blow she is equally guilty because she
wanted and intended the outcome.
Again two robbers, both armed and shooting, may be involved in a gun
fight with the police which leads to the death of an officer but the
criminals escape. Later they are caught and each blames the other for
the shooting but it not possible to prove who fired the fatal shot.
However the known and undisputed circumstances of this case do not
align with either of these examples.
Whether or not Bentley was actually under arrest at
the time of the shooting. It is not disputed that Fairfax had detained
him and that he had made no attempt to escape. However Fairfax had not
formally arrested him (i.e. read him his rights and charged him with
something) It is not surprising that, wounded and in the excitement of
the situation, Fairfax did not formally charge Bentley, it was
probably the last thing on his mind at that time. However had he done
so, it could have easily have saved Bentley as being under arrest is a
strong defence. In the witness box Bentley was unclear as to whether
he was under arrest and generally made a poor and confused witness
The fact was that Bentley had voluntarily gone with
Craig to break into the warehouse and was armed with a knife and a
particularly vicious knuckle duster of which much was made by Lord
Goddard.
It has often been said that Lord Goddard was biased
against them and his summing up was certainly not sympathetic to their
case.
It took the jury just 75 minutes to return guilty
verdicts against both youths.
Lord Goddard proceeded to sentence Craig to be
detained at Her Majesty's Pleasure and then passed the mandatory death
sentence on Bentley. (Craig actually served just over 10 years).
The jury had made a recommendation to mercy in
respect of Bentley but Lord Goddard did not make the same recommendation
to the Home Office in his report after the trial. It has been said that
Goddard never expected Bentley to hang and therefore probably thought it
unnecessary.
Derek Bentley's appeal was heard and dismissed on the
13th of January 1953. If Lord Goddard had been biased against the two
accused, the Court of Appeal found no reason to question his handling of
the case.
His fate now rested entirely with the Home Secretary,
Sir David Maxwell Fife. The Home Secretary had the right to recommend to
the Queen that she exercise the Royal Prerogative of Mercy (in plain
English to reprieve the condemned prisoner) without giving his reasons
for this decision. This right had devolved upon the Home secretary when
Queen Victoria came to the throne in 1837, as it was not considered
right to expect a nineteen year old girl as Victoria was, to make such
decisions.
In practice around 50% of all death sentences were
commuted to life in prison by this time (there were 13 hangings in 1953
which was an unusually high annual total).
It was standard practice at this time, that when a
person was sentenced to death, they were examined by a Home Office
psychiatrist to make sure they were mentally competent. I do not know
whether this was done in Bentley's case, but if it was they did not find
reason to recommend commutation which invariably happened where the
condemned was not found to be competent.
There was a considerable campaign against the
execution led by Derek Bentley's father and also in Parliament (who, in
law, were unable to debate the individual case until after the
execution had been carried out!) 200 MP's signed a petition calling for
a reprieve.
An enormous crowd gathered outside
The Court of Appeal on Thursday quashed the
conviction of 19-year-old Derek Bentley who was hanged in 1953 and
pardoned him.
This is his full statement:
"Today, after 46 years, the conviction of Derek
Bentley has been quashed and his name cleared. While I am grateful and
relieved about this, I am saddened that it has taken those 46 years for
the authorities in this country to admit the truth.
"I am truly sorry that my actions on 2 November 1952
caused so much pain and misery for the family of Pc Miles, who died that
night doing his duty.
Also, for the Bentley family, I regret that Iris,
Derek's sister, who fought all those years for Derek's pardon, died
recently before this appeal was concluded.
Finally, I apologise to my family, who have had to
endure Press attention over the years.
Innocence proved
"At the end of the day, the lawyers decided it was
not necessary for me to give evidence at the appeal hearing but I was
ready and willing to do so in the interests of justice.
"A day does not go by when I don't think about Derek
and now his innocence has been proved with this judgment.
"Now at last this case is over. My gratitude goes to
those who have fought so tirelessly for justice."