Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
04/10/98 Jury returned guilty verdicts on both counts of the
indictment
04/19/98 Jury recommended death by votes of 10-2
09/29/98 Sentenced as follows:
Count I: First-Degree
Murder (Rachel Carlson) – Death
Count II: First-Degree
Murder (Alexis Stuart) – Death
Second Trial:
01/23/02 Jury returned guilty verdicts on both counts of the
indictment
01/30/02 Jury recommended death by votes of 9-3 (Count I) and
11-1 (Count II)
02/25/02 Sentenced as follows:
Count I: First-Degree
Murder (Rachel Carlson) – Death
Brooks filed a Direct Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on 11/13/98,
citing the following errors: permitting improper hearsay evidence;
violating rights to confront witnesses and due process by permitting
non-testifying codefendants statements; denying motions for new trial;
permitting the testimony of certain witnesses; denying a motion for
mistrial after impermissible comments on a right to remain silent;
determining juror qualifications; permitting the admission of
photographs taken during a second autopsy; denying a motion to strike
venire/change venue; permitting the admission of statements to law
enforcement by codefendant under the hearsay rule; denying a motion for
judgment of acquittal; and erroneously instructing, finding and doubling
aggravating factors. On 04/05/01, the Florida Supreme Court reversed
the convictions and vacated the death sentences.
Brooks filed a Direct
Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on 03/06/02, citing the following
errors: admitting the testimony of a life insurance salesman; allowing
irrelevant testimony; admitting notes the police seized from the
codefendant; allowing the state to impeach the testimony of a witness;
allowing testimony from a witness; denying several defense objections to
the closing argument of the state; refusing to give a conspiracy
instruction; denying motions for mistrial; denying a motion to change
the venue of the trial; finding that a death sentence is warranted in
the case; finding that the murder occurred during the course of an
aggravated child abuse and then using that fact to justify imposing a
death sentence; refusing to require the jury to indicate if they found a
verdict of guilty for felony murder, which aggravating factors they
found and by what vote; finding the pecuniary gain and cold, calculated
and premeditated aggravating factors; and giving the jury’s death
recommendation great weight because of extensive mitigation.
On
06/23/05, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the convictions and
sentences.