Even on New Years Eve of 2003, Xinhua News (the
official news agency of the Chinese communist government) was
actively slandering Falun Gong. The state's official news agency
published a fabricated story claiming that a homeless man named
Chen Fuzhao was a Falun Gong practitioner, and that he was
sentenced to death for killing people by poisoning them. We note
that this poisoning incident occurred between May and June of
2003. The homeless man, Chen Fuzhao, murdered 15 out-of-town
beggars.
Why did Xinhua News choose to publish another
slanderous story at year-end 2003? Was it no more than coincidence
that Jiang Zemin's evil political cohorts had tortured Mr. Liu
Chengjun only shortly before this story was published? Liu
Chengjun was a Falun Gong practitioner who broadcasted TV programs
clarifying the truth about Falun Gong on the Changchun City cable
TV network in March of 2002. [Please note that there are no
available venues for Falun Gong practitioners to defend themselves
against the government's fabricated accusations and slanderous
publications.] It is important to note that Mr. Liu Chengjun's
wrongful death has triggered a series of protests worldwide.
Immediately after Jiang's group of political cohorts murdered Mr.
Liu Chengjun, Xinhua News started a new round of persecution in
2004 by associating a public assassin with Falun Gong.
There is no doubt that Falun Gong's teachings
forbid killing. The founder of Falun Gong Mr. Li Hongzhi sets
forth in his book Zhuan Falun (the primary text for Falun Gong), "For
practitioners, we have set the strict requirement that they cannot
kill lives." ("The Issue of Killing" in Lecture Seven of Zhuan
Falun)
In an article dated July 2, 2003 Xinhua News
fabricated an absurd theory that was contrary to Falun Gong's
principles. They claimed that Chen Fuzhao murdered 15 beggars
because of the Falun Gong principles. [of July 20, 1999, Jiang
Zemin banned all Falun Gong's books, videos, and audios in China.
Thus, people in China are unable to obtain a copy of Zhuan Falun
to discover Xinhua News' fabricated stories.] Xinnhua News
published the reasons why Chen Fuzhao, whom they claimed to be a
cultivator, must kill people. They said it was so he could rise in
his cultivation level. The report claimed that being a beggar
would help achieve the highest level of cultivation, and therefore
Chen Fuzhao must kill beggars.
The Xinhua News' invented theory was illogical
and preposterous. While it may be technically difficult to become
a millionaire, far fewer difficulties are encountered when one
wishes to become a beggar. If one is determined to become a beggar,
one simply abandons everything one owns, becomes a street person,
and begs for food with a begging bowl. That is all it takes to
reach the so-called "highest cultivation level" based on Xinhua
News' theory of cultivation. Why even make the effort to kill
people?
Apparently Xinhua News realized how foolish it
was to publish such an absurd story. Thus, when it decided at the
end of 2003 to again slander Falun Gong and revisit the criminal
indictment of Chen Fuzhao, it changed the story and no longer
claimed that being a beggar would allow one to reach the highest
level of cultivation. To prove its point to the public, Xinhua
News made up an equally bizarre and absurd cultivation theory. It
alleged that Chen Fuzhao tried to "increase the ˇ®potency of his
energy' by killing people." It no longer asserted that being a
beggar would allow one to reach the highest level of cultivation;
it now claimed that, "Chen Fuzhao made beggars and homeless men
his killing targets."
Actually, even CCTV (Chinese communist
government's official TV station) wasn't willing to pick up Xinhua
News' preposterous theory in their separate effort to slander
Falun Gong. On July 14, 2003, more than 10 days after Xinhua News
published its article on Chen Fuzhao, CCTV announced another
equally preposterous cultivation theory. They fabricated a
different cultivation theory called "reverse cultivation," which
it expounded on during its talk show "Focus Interview." CCTV
stated that once a cultivator reaches a specific level based on
the principles of Truthfulness, Compassion and Tolerance, he has
to cultivate himself based on the opposites of Truthfulness,
Compassion, and Tolerance. CCTV claimed this to be the "real"
reason why Chen Fuzhao killed people. As to why Chen Fuzhao killed
only beggars, "Focus Interview" said it was a pure coincidence.
CCTV's "reverse cultivation" theory is even
more illogical than the Xinhua News theory. If trying to become a
man of high morality will eventually make a man depraved, does
CCTV imply that by following Jiang Zemin's wicked deeds the
Chinese society will sooner or later return to morality?
Every time Jiang Zemin's group of political
cohorts instigates people's hatred toward Falun Gong by using
slander, they fabricate a variety of lies, which are essential, as
they can not quote directly from any of the Falun Gong books. Why
couldn't they quote directly from Falun Gong's books to support
these slanderous reports? Because Falun Gong texts clearly forbid
Falun Gong practitioners from killing lives or committing suicide.
"For practitioners, we have set the strict
requirement that they cannot kill lives." ("The Issue of Killing"
in Lecture Seven of Zhuan Falun) (Zhuan Falun is the
primary text for Falun Gong)
"Question: The third question is the issue
of killing as mentioned in the book. Killing a life is a very big
sin. If a person commits suicide, does it count as a sin or not?
Master: It counts as a sin. [...] Committing
suicide has another sin. This is because a person's life is pre-arranged.
You have disrupted the sequence of the god's entire layout.
Through the obligations you carry out to society, between people
there is this kind of interrelationship. If the person dies, won't
this entire sequence disrupt the god's arrangement then? If you
disrupt it, he will not let you go. Therefore, committing suicide
is sinful." ("Falun Dafa Lecture in Sydney")
Jiang Zemin's group of political cohorts
clearly recognizes that Falun Gong forbids killing lives and
committing suicide; therefore, they destroyed and banned Falun
Gong books in China. They wanted to assure that non-practitioners
in China would be unable to verify the facts and would thus
believe the preposterous lies disseminated about Falun Gong. Their
lies have become so illogical that even their fellow conspirators
find each other's versions ridiculous.
The official Chinese news began using Chen
Fuzhou's murder to slander Falun Gong in July 2003. It was because
July 20 was an unforgettable day for Falun Gong practitioners. On
July 20, 1999 Jiang Zemin ignored everyone else's favorable
opinions of Falun Gong and intentionally began the public
persecution of the practice. Since then, Falun Gong practitioners
throughout the world have and will continue to hold public
protests calling for an end to the persecution against Falun Gong.
As July 20, 2003 approached, Jiang ordered the Chinese media to
publish slanderous reports, as he wanted to instigate people's
hatred towards Falun Gong. He needed to justify his persecution
against Falun Gong. To reach this goal, they claimed that Chen
Fuzhao was a Falun Gong practitioner and that he followed Falun
Gong's teachings by killing people.
The aforementioned serial killing case was not
the only one of its kind. Another such serial murder case occurred
in Zhejiang Province a month before Chen Fuzhao committed murder.
A man named Chen Yongfeng killed ten beggars and dismembered nine
of their bodies. The frequency and brutality of these serial
murder cases reveal an acute social problem in Zhejiang Province.
Why is Jiang's group of political cohorts refusing to restore
public safety and social order in that area? Why are they using
the security resources for persecuting Falun Gong practitioners,
people who are known to be of high morality? According to Xinhua
News, it was under the direct "supervision" of the Minister of
Public Security Ministry, Mr. Zhou Yongkang, that the murder case
of Chen Fuzhao in Zhejiang Province was quickly solved. Who is Mr.
Zhou Yongkang? He is one of the key collaborators with Jiang Zemin
in persecuting Falun Gong practitioners. When he visited the
United States, Falun Gong practitioners in the United States filed
a civil lawsuit against Zhou Yongkang and served him an official
summons from the United States Federal Court.
In examining the Xinhua News reports over the
years, one will discover that murders by poisoning are widespread
in today's Chinese society. It is an indisputable fact that
Falun Gong forbids its practitioners to kill lives or commit
suicide. There are no "facts" to support Jiang Zemin's
persecution of Falun Gong practitioners. Jiang's group of evil
political cohorts must lie to the Chinese people and ban Falun
Gong books, which would expose their lies, to instigate and
sustain Chinese people's hatred of Falun Gong.
There is another downside to CCTV's cultivation
theory. If Chen Fuzhou was cultivating according to "reverse
cultivation," or according to the "reverse" of Falun Gong's
teaching, then logically speaking Chen Fuzhao's killing behavior
would have nothing to do with Falun Gong.
For example, if an operator refuses to follow
the safety instructions while operating machinery, and insists on
doing the opposite of the safety instructions, is anyone entitled
to attack the validity of the safety instructions? If one is
indeed entitled to attack the validity of the safety instructions,
then, by the same logic, one is entitled to attack everything in
the world.
Xinhua News also stated in their report, "During
the trial, the defendant Mr. Chen Fuzhao and his attorney were
given sufficient opportunities for defense. The local residents of
different walks of life also sat through the trial and heard the
judge's verdict."
I cannot help questioning their truthfulness
when Xinhua News said "local residents of different walks of life
also sat through the trial." Were Falun Gong practitioners allowed
to attend this trial? Were Falun Gong practitioners allowed to
testify that Mr. Chen Fuzhao was not doing anything remotely close
to what Falun Gong requires of its practitioners? I think we can
reach a conclusion by reviewing what happens when Chinese
communist party leaders visit foreign countries. Once it was found
that a journalist in the country visited was also a Falun Gong
practitioner. The Chinese Embassy and consulate staff used all
kinds of underhanded tactics to assure that he/she was not allowed
to participate. They wanted to assure that the visiting party
leaders would not be contradicted. Thus it follows that if the
Chinese communist government does not allow Falun Gong
practitioners to participate in a public event in democratic
countries, they would not allow practitioners to be present during
trials in China.