|
DC# 022762
DOB: 07/21/45
Fifth Judicial Circuit, Sumter
County Case # 78-52
Sentencing Judge: The Honorable
John W. Booth
Trial Attorney: Morton D. Aulls
& H.D. Robuck, Jr. – Private
Attorney, Direct Appeal:
(1981):
Morton D. Aulls & H.D. Robuck, Jr. – Private (1993):
Larry B.Henderson – Assistant Public Defender
Attorney, Collateral Appeals:
Eric Pinkard & James Driscoll – CCRC-M
Date of Offense: 02/21/78
Date of Sentence: 06/27/78
Date of Resentence: 02/21/91
Circumstances of Offense:
On
02/21/78, Karol Hurst, who was twenty-one years old and seven months
pregnant at the time, was leaving the Pantry Pride grocery store in
Leesburg, Florida at approximately 3:00 p.m., when Hall approached her.
Hall and an accomplice, Ruffin, were looking for a car to use in a
robbery, when Hall approached Hurst and forced her into their car. Hall
drove the car away, with Hurst and Ruffin following in another car.
Hurst was driven to a wooded area, beaten, raped, and shot, then the
body was dragged further into the woods.
On
the evening of 02/21/78, Hall and Ruffin walked into a convenience store
in Hernando County, Florida. The conduct of the pair aroused the
suspicions of the store clerk, who called the sheriff substation located
across the street from the store.
Deputy Lonnie Coburn responded to the
call and met Hall and Ruffin in the store’s parking lot, where witnesses
saw Deputy Coburn approach Hall and Ruffin.
Although conflicting
evidence existed, at some point in the confrontation between Hall,
Ruffin, and Deputy Coburn, Deputy Coburn was disarmed and shot and
killed with his own gun. Hall and Ruffin fled the scene.
The pair were
spotted and pursued by another deputy, during which gunfire was
exchanged between the pair and the deputy. Eventually, Hall and Ruffin
abandoned their car and were later apprehended. Deputy Coburn’s gun was
found in the abandoned car.
Hall and Ruffin were both present and principals in the murder of Deputy
Coburn and the assault and murder of Hurst. Both Hall and Ruffin aided
and abetted each other in the commission of the crimes.
Trial Summary:
03/07/78
Indicted on one count of First-Degree Murder
06/08/78
Trial venue changed from Sumter County to Putnam County
06/23/78
Jury returned guilty verdict
06/26/78
Jury recommended death penalty by a majority vote
06/27/78
Sentenced to death
03/09/89
FSC vacated death sentence
02/21/91
Jury recommended a death
sentence by a vote of 8-4. Resentenced to death.
Codefendant Information:
Ruffin and Hall were tried separately murder of Hurst. Ruffin was
convicted and was originally sentenced to death; however, he was later
resentenced to life imprisonment. Ruffin and Hall were tried together
for the murder of Deputy Coburn. Ruffin was sentenced to life
imprisonment.
Additional Information:
Hall and Ruffin were indicted on 03/09/78 for the First-Degree Murder of
Deputy Coburn (Hernando County Case# 78-39). On 05/31/78, the
sentencing jury recommended the death penalty for Hall by a majority
vote, and on 06/01/78, he was sentenced to death. Hall filed a Direct
Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on 06/20/78 (FSC Case# 54,423),
alleging that the conviction must be overturned because the evidence of
guilt was circumstantial, does not preclude all hypotheses of
innocence, and no evidence exists of premeditation.
On 07/16/81, the FSC vacated Hall’s conviction and sentence and remanded to the trial
court with instructions to enter a judgment and sentence of
Second-Degree Murder.
Case Information:
Hall filed a Direct Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on 07/06/78,
challenging his conviction for First-Degree Murder and the resulting
death sentence. Hall raised a number of issues on appeal: the state
failed to prove its case in the trial, inflammatory remarks by the
prosecutor and commenting on Hall’s refusal to testify, and collateral
crime evidence admitted in the trial. The FSC affirmed the conviction
and sentence of death on 07/16/81.
A
death warrant for Hall was signed by the Governor on 09/09/82, and the
execution was set for 10/06/82.
Hall filed a 3.850 Motion with the Circuit Court on 09/28/82, which was
denied on 10/01/82.
A
3.850 Motion Appeal, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and a Stay of
Execution were filed with the Florida Supreme Court on 10/02/82. Hall
cited the following issues in the appeal: the court improperly denied
the motion to vacate, ineffective assistance of counsel, Hall was not
present at some stages of the jury selection, and sentencing errors.
The FSC affirmed the denial of the 3.850 Motion, denied the Petition for
Habeas relief and the Stay of Execution on 10/05/82.
A
Stay of Execution was issued by the U.S. District Court, Middle
District, on 10/05/82 and expired on 06/03/83.
Hall filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the U.S. District
Court, Middle District on 9/30/82 that was denied on 05/18/83.
On
appeal, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed
in part the decision of the USDC. The case was remanded for an
evidentiary hearing on 05/16/84.
The State filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme
Court on 01/29/85 that was denied on 05/13/85.
Hall filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court
on 02/28/85 that was denied on 05/13/85.
On
01/08/86, the USDC denied relief, and the USCA affirmed this decision on
11/17/86.
Hall filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court
on 07/06/87 that was denied on 10/13/87.
Hall filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the Florida Supreme
Court on 10/14/87, arguing that the court did not consider non-statutory
mitigating circumstances in the sentencing phase of the trial. Prior to
this appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hitchcock v. Dugger
(1987) that courts must consider non-statutory, as well as statutory
mitigating circumstances, in the sentencing phases of capital trials.
The FSC denied the Petition on 05/12/88.
On
08/11/88, a second death warrant was signed by the Governor, scheduling
the execution for 09/20/88.
Hall filed a 3.850 Motion with the Circuit Court on 08/23/88, which was
denied on 09/09/88.
Hall filed a 3.850 Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on 09/12/88,
citing that the court erred in not weighing non-statutory mitigating
circumstances in the sentencing phase of the trial. Previously, the FSC
denied a Habeas Petition that argued those exact points, yet the FSC
decided to address these points in the present 3.850 Motion Appeal,
instead of the Habeas Petition.
During the deliberation in this appeal,
the FSC issued a Stay of Execution on 09/14/88. On 03/09/89, the FSC
vacated Hall’s death sentence and remanded it for resentencing with a
new jury. In addition to this ruling, the court ordered that all future
Hitchcock claims be raised in 3.850 motions, not Habeas petitions.
Hall filed a pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus with the
Florida Supreme Court on 01/23/91 that was denied, without comment, by
the FSC on 02/26/91.
Hall was resentenced to death on 02/21/91. The jury recommended a death
sentence by a vote of 8-4.
Hall filed a Direct Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on 03/08/91,
citing numerous issues: juror selection bias; exclusion of sympathetic
juror instructions; exclusion of co-defendant’s conviction; exclusion of
sympathetic witness testimony; improper consideration of jury
recommendation by the judge; the re-sentencing court improperly found
additional aggravating factors; the state did not prove two aggravating
factors – avoid or prevent arrest and cold, calculated, and premeditated
murder; unconstitutional vagueness of the heinous, atrocious, or cruel
aggravating factor; findings of mitigating evidence; and death sentence
not proportionate with his codefendant’s sentence. The FSC affirmed the
resentence on 01/14/93.
Hall filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme
Court on 05/17/93 that was denied on 10/04/93.
Hall filed a 3.850 Motion with the Circuit Court on 02/14/97, which was
denied on 10/30/97.
Hall filed a 3.850 Motion Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on
12/15/97, citing five issues: the unconstitutionality of Florida’s
capital sentencing statute in that it allows for the execution of a
mentally retarded inmate, Hall is not competent to be resentenced,
electrocution is cruel and unusual punishment, trial court’s summary
denial of all but one of Hall’s thirty-three claims violated due process
guarantees, and fundamental error that aggravators outweighed mitigating
circumstances in the resentencing. The FSC affirmed the lower court’s
denial of the 3.850 Motion on 07/01/99.
Hall filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the Florida Supreme
Court on 08/02/00, citing ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The
FSC denied the Petition on 05/10/01.
Hall filed a federal Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the U.S.
District Court, Middle District on 08/07/00. On 01/29/01, the USDC
administratively closed the case pending resolution of the state-level
Habeas Petition. On 07/26/01, the USDC administratively reopened the
case, which is currently pending before the court. On 03/20/03, the
USDC stayed proceedings in the case pending the resolution of the 3.850
Motion. On 07/12/04, the USDC administratively closed the case pending
resolution of state-level proceedings.
Hall filed a 3.850 Motion in the Circuit Court on 08/10/01, citing
mental retardation issues. The motion is pending before the court.
Hall filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court
on 10/12/01 that was denied on 02/19/02.
Hall filed
a 3.851 Motion with the Circuit Court on 11/30/04, citing claims of
mental retardation. The motion is pending before the court.
FloridaCapitalCases.state.fl.us |