Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
On
03/17/98, Oliver and three juvenile co-defendants were in the
process of burglarizing the residence of a 64-year old white
male.
Oliver and the co-defendants were in the house and Reed
was in the vehicle. The victim surprised Oliver and Oliver shot
the victim in the face with a 380-caliber handgun.
The victim
was beaten around the head with the butt of a rifle. Oliver and
the co-defendants fled the scene. They were arrested in a motel
in Waco, Texas.
Co-defendants
Reed,
Sonya Fawn - 99 years
Rubalcana, Benardo - 5 years
Rubalcana, Lonnie - 10 years
Race and Gender
of Victim
White
male
Khristian Oliver
Texas Execution Information Center by David
Carson - Txexecutions.org
Khristian Phillip Oliver, 32, was executed by
lethal injection on 5 November 2009 in Huntsville, Texas for
murdering a man while burglarizing his home.
On 17 March 1998, Oliver, then 20, his
girlfriend Sonya Reed, 25, and brothers Bennie and Lonnie
Rubalcana, 16 and 15, drove to Joe Collins' house in Nacogdoches
County and knocked on the door. No one answered. Believing no one
was at home, they drove down the road a short distance and parked.
Oliver and Lonnie then went back to the house with bolt cutters
and a .380-caliber handgun while Reed and Bennie stayed in the
truck. Oliver cut the padlock on the door, and he Lonnie went
inside. While they were gathering items from the house to steal,
Collins, 64, returned home. The burglars tried to escape, but
Collins shot Lonnie in the leg with a rifle. Oliver then shot
Collins in the face with his handgun. While Bennie helped his
brother back to the truck, Oliver took the rifle from Collins and
hit him in the face with the butt of the weapon. Oliver continued
shooting Collins while he was lying on his back on the ground.
The group took Lonnie to the hospital, then
went to the sheriff's office and filed reports claiming that
someone drove by and shot Lonnie while they were all at a farm.
The next day, deputies picked up Bennie and questioned him. He
gave a written statement admitting what had actually happened.
Investigators then questioned Lonnie, who, after repeating the
original story about the farm, gave a written statement that
corroborated his brother's. Oliver and Reed were then arrested at
a motel in Waco.
Oliver had no previous felony convictions, but
at his punishment hearing, the state presented testimony from a
long-time accomplice of Oliver's showing that he had committed
over a dozen burglaries over the previous year and a half. When he
was attempting to burglarize Waco High School, Oliver fired a gun
at a security guard and a janitor. The accomplice also testified
that Oliver car-jacked a man at gunpoint in October 1997.
A jury convicted Oliver of capital murder in
April 1999 and sentenced him to death. The Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence in April 2002. All of
his subsequent appeals in state and federal court were denied.
The biggest controversy in Oliver's case was
the fact that some of the jurors at his punishment hearing
consulted the Bible while deciding on his sentence. The courts
ruled that, although the Bible was improperly used as an external
influence in Oliver's sentencing hearing, Oliver and his attorneys
failed to show that it affected the outcome of the jury's
deliberations.
Sonya Fawn Reed was convicted of capital murder
and sentenced to 99 years in prison. Because of their age and in
exchange for their testimonies, the Rubalcana brothers received
lighter sentences. Lonnie Rubalcana was sentenced to ten years,
and Bennie Rubalcana was sentenced to five.
Oliver's execution was attended by members of
both his and his victim's families. "In know you're not going to
get the closure you are looking for," he said to the Collins
family. Still, he said "I wish you the best" and said he prayed
for them "every day and every night". Next, he told his parents
that he loved them. He then began reciting Psalm 23, which begins,
"The Lord is my Shepherd..." He got most of the way through it, to
"my cup runneth over", before the drugs began to take effect. He
was pronounced dead at 6:18 p.m.
Supreme Court Declines Bible-Consulting Jury Case
October 7, 2008
The Supreme Court yesterday declined to hear
the appeal of a death row inmate who argued that the jury
foreman's reading of the Bible during sentencing deliberations was
inappropriate.
At issue in the appeal was whether reading
the Bible aloud during jury deliberations violated the
defendant's right to a fair trial. The precise question was
whether the Bible introduced unauthorized materials and
extraneous considerations into the trial process.
Courts in both the First Circuit Court of
Appeals in Boston, the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, and the
11th Circuit in Atlanta have ruled that the introduction of a
Bible into jury deliberations violates the right to an impartial
jury, the right to confrontation, and the right to a fair trial.
But courts in the Fourth Circuit in Richmond and the Ninth
Circuit in San Francisco have ruled that the presentation of
specific Bible verses during jury deliberations does not violate
the Sixth Amendment because the Bible's teachings are a matter
of common knowledge in American culture.
Attorneys applying to the Court argued this
case offered the opportunity to settle that conflict.
No Reprieve for Khristian Condemned by Bible Passages
JonathanTurley.org
August 17, 2008
Convicted murder Kristian Oliver was a bit put
out when he learned that jurors relied not simply on the evidence
but biblical passages during their deliberations to convict him.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has ruled
that the use of a biblical passage in jury deliberations is not
enough to warrant reversal of his death sentence.
The United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas found that, while jurors cited the
passage, it did not influence the jury’s decision — a rather
difficult finding to prove or disprove.
The passage in question is from Numbers:
And if he smite him with an instrument of
iron, so that he die, he is a murderer: the murderer shall
surely be put to death. And if he smite him with throwing a
stone, wherewith he may die, and he die, he is a murderer: the
murderer shall surely be put to death. Or if he smite him with
an hand weapon of wood, wherewith he may die, and he die, he is
a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death. The
revenger of blood himself shall slay the murderer: when he
meeteth him, he shall slay him. Numbers 35:16-19 (King James).
That seems pretty inimical to a fair
deliberation based solely on the evidence in the case. Indeed, the
opinion itself shows that the reading triggered a more
comprehensive discussion of the biblical requirements in dealing
with murderers.
One juror, Kenneth Grace, read the Bible
aloud to a small group of jurors in the corner of the jury room.
McHaney also testified that fellow juror Donna Matheny mentioned
to him that the Bible contained a passage discussing who is a
murderer and who should be put to death, and that he asked
Matheny if he could read her Bible, which Matheny had
highlighted. McHaney recalled reading verses pertaining to the
importance of obeying the law of the land, the commandment that
“thou shalt not kill,” and the passage Matheny pointed out that
discussed who is a murderer and who deserves a death sentence.
In particular,here called reading a passage that says that if a
man strikes someone with an iron object so that he dies, then he
is a murderer and should be put to death.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that
outside sources used in the jury room are presumptively
prejudicial to the proceedings. Parker v. Gladden, 385 U.S. 363,
364-65 (1966) (“the evidence developed against a defendant shall
come from the witness stand in a public courtroom where there is
full judicial protection of the defendant’s right of confrontation,
of cross-examination, and of counsel”). Yet, the Ninth Circuit
refused to reverse in a similar case.
This case seems to involve a much more serious
use of an external religious text than the mere case of a juror
taking a Bible into the proceedings as a personal item of support.
Here, there was direct consultation that linked passages to the
case at hand and the moral basis for the ultimate punishment.
Fifth Circuit rules on jurors using
Bible during sentencing deliberations
August 15,
2008
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
on Thursday refused to grant a writ of habeas corpus to convicted
murder Khristian Oliver, who had argued that his Sixth and Eighth
Amendment rights were violated when the jury took Bible passages
into account when deliberating on his eventual death sentence. The
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas had made a
factual finding that the Bible did not influence the jury’s
decision, and the Fifth Circuit held that Oliver did not present
clear and convincing evidence rebutting that finding.
'Ten Commandments Judge' defends Texas
jury's use of Bible
By Allie Martin - OneNewsNow.vom
March 27, 2008
Former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore is
arguing in a legal brief that a Texas jury's use of the Bible did
not taint deliberations in a death penalty case.
Khristian Oliver was found guilty and sentenced
to death for killing an East Texas farmer during a home invasion
nearly a decade ago. However, Oliver's attorney claims the death
sentence should be overturned because several jury members brought
Bibles and consulted scripture in the deliberation room. But
attorneys with the Foundation for Moral Law -- headed by Judge
Moore -- have argued in a brief that the jury's consultation of
Bible passages did not taint the jury in violation of the Sixth
Amendment. Furthermore, Moore states the murderer's argument
reflects a trend in society.
"It's all about one single, solitary thing ...
eliminating the knowledge of God from society," argues Moore. "It's
not about the Bible, the Ten Commandments, or prayer in a school
classroom .... They're simply saying that if a person considers a
belief toward God in his jury deliberations, the case must be
reversed."
Moore continues his argument by stating that
the evidence in the case proves that Oliver beat the farmer to
death, and that the farmer was beaten so badly his face was
unrecognizable. He also cites a 1952 Supreme Court ruling that
recognized Americans are a religious people whose institutions
presuppose a supreme being -- one of those institutions being the
jury system.
The brief asks the Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals to reject Oliver's claims as constitutionally,
historically, and logically baseless.
International Herald Tribune
December 30, 2007
The death sentence of a Texas man is under
scrutiny because jurors at his trial had Bibles with them when
they decided he should be executed
Jurors sentenced Khristian Oliver to the death
penalty in 1999 after he was convicted of brutally killing a 64-year-old
man during a home break-in. His lawyers contend jurors improperly
relied on religious beliefs that called for death as punishment
for murder.
"This is headed toward a showdown on a very
fundamental question on the use of the Bible," Winston Cochran,
Oliver's lawyer, said.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last
month upheld the conviction and denied his request for a hearing
on the Bible-related claims, but agreed to consider written
arguments and then hold oral arguments.
In their ruling Nov. 16, the judges asked
lawyers to explain whether the jurors' consultation of the Bible
amounted to "an external influence that raises a presumption of
prejudice."
At issue is a verse in Chapter 35 of Numbers
which, in the New American Standard Bible, reads: "But if he
struck him down with an iron object, so that he died, he is a
murderer; the murderer shall surely be put to death." Other
versions of the Bible have similar passages, some of them
referring to an "iron rod" as the weapon.
Special Prosecutor Sue Korioth said there never
was an implication jurors voted based on Scripture or had any kind
of religious discussion.
"Several of them carried Bibles in and out like
my daughter carries her "Seventeen" magazine," she said. "It was
just their reading material."
At a state district court hearing two months
after the trial, four jurors testified about the presence of
Bibles in the jury room and gave varying accounts, ranging from
one Bible to several being present. One juror testified he and
fellow jurors carried the books with them because they would go to
Bible study in the evenings following the day's court proceedings,
Another juror testified any reading from the
books came after they had reached a decision. A third said the
reading of Scripture was intended to make people feel better about
their decision.
Oliver is at a Texas Department of Criminal
Justice prison where inmates undergo treatment for psychiatric
conditions and could not be interviewed.
Cochran had until the end of December to
present written briefs to the court. Prosecutors will then have an
opportunity to respond. Oral arguments before the New Orleans-based
court are not likely until later in 2008.
Ex parte Oliver, Not Reported in S.W.3d,
2009 WL 3646682 (Tex.Crim.App. 2009). (PCR)
ORDER - PER CURIAM.
This is a subsequent application for writ of
habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, § 5, and a motion to stay his
execution.
In April 1999, a jury found applicant guilty of
the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special
issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set applicant's
punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction
and sentence on direct appeal. Oliver v. State, No. AP-73,837 (Tex.Crim.App.
Apr. 17, 2002)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed
his initial post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus
in the trial court on January 9, 2002. This Court denied relief.
Ex parte Oliver, No. WR-53,682-01 (Tex.Crim.App. Oct. 30, 2002)(not
designated for publication). After the time to file the initial
application had passed, applicant also filed in the trial court a
document entitled, “Applicant's Objections to Disposition Without
Evidentiary Hearing and Motion for Extension of Time to File
Habeas Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.” Because applicant
attempted to raise two additional claims in this document, the
Court concluded that it was a subsequent application. The Court
reviewed the claims raised under Article 11.071, § 5, determined
that they did not meet the dictates of the statute, and dismissed
them. Ex parte Oliver, No. WR-53,682-02 (Tex.Crim.App. Oct. 30,
2002)(not designated for publication). Applicant's second
subsequent application was filed in the trial court on October 26,
2009.
Applicant presents two allegations in his
application. We have reviewed the application and find that
applicant's allegations fail to satisfy the requirements of
Article 11.071, § 5. Accordingly, the application is dismissed,
and applicant's motion to stay his execution is denied. Applicant
has also filed a motion to recuse the Presiding Judge. That motion
is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED. KELLER, P.J., not
participating. PRICE and JOHNSON, JJ., would dismiss the motion to
recuse as moot.