Murderpedia

 

 

Juan Ignacio Blanco  

 

  MALE murderers

index by country

index by name   A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

  FEMALE murderers

index by country

index by name   A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

 

 

 
   

Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.

   

 

 

Kenneth Darcell QUINCE

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 


A.K.A.: Rasikh Abdul-Hakim
 
Classification: Murderer
Characteristics: Rape - Robbery
Number of victims: 1
Date of murder: December 28, 1979
Date of birth: February 10, 1959
Victim profile: An 82-year-old female
Method of murder: Strangulation
Location: Volusia County, Florida, USA
Status: Sentenced to death on October 21, 1980
 
 
 
 
 
 

Florida Supreme Court

 

Docket #77610 - Kenneth Darcell Quince, Appellant, vs. State of Florida, Appellee.
592 So. 2d 669; January 16, 1992.

 
 opinion
 
brief for appellant answer brief of appellee
 
 

Docket #89960 - Kenneth D. Quince, etc., Appellant, vs. State of Florida, Appellee.
732 So. 2d 1059; April 8, 1999.

 
opinion   initial brief for appellant
 
answer brief of appellee reply brief of appellant
 
 
 
 
 
 

AKA:  Rasikh Abdul-Hakim

DC# 075812
DOB:  02/10/59

Seventh Judicial Circuit, Volusia County Case# 80-48-CC
Sentencing Judge:  The Honorable S. Foxman
Attorney, Trial:  Howard B. Pearl – Assistant Public Defender
Attorney, Direct Appeal:  James R. Wulchak – Assistant Public Defender
Attorney, Collateral Appeals:  Eric Pinkard – CCRC-M

Date of Offense:  12/28/79

Date of Sentence:  10/21/80

Circumstances of the Offense: 

On 12/30/79, the body of an 82-year-old female was found lying on the floor of her bedroom. The detective who found the body, Detective Larry Lewis, surveyed bruises on the victim’s forearm and under her ear, a small abrasion on the pelvic area, and dried blood under the victim’s nose.

During the autopsy, it was discerned that the cause of death was strangulation. Two lacerations on the victim’s head were found and attributed to a sharp edge, either from an instrument or the lip of furniture. The lacerations could have rendered the victim unconscious. It was determined that the sexual assault occurred prior to the victim’s death, but it could not be determined if the victim was conscious at the time of the assault. 

Several fingerprints were found around a window in the house. This window was determined to be the point of entry for the assailant. The fingerprints found around the window were compared to Kenneth Quince’s and were found to be a match.

Quince was arrested at his home, which was two blocks away from the scene. After being questioned by police, Quince admitted to the following events. Quince claimed he had been in the house several years earlier when he had mowed the lawn for the victim. He stated that he had burglarized the home believing that no one was home.

While Quince was in the house, Ms. Bowdoin opened the door of her bedroom. Both saw each other, and then Ms. Bowdoin proceeded to shut and lock her bedroom door. Quince then pushed his way through the door, which knocked Ms. Bowdoin onto the floor. Ms. Bowdoin stood up and started screaming.

Quince attempted to silence her by grabbing her by the throat and shaking her. He then pushed her to the floor. Quince then began looking for valuables again and found a tape player, a radio, and a ring. When Quince was leaving the house, he stepped on Ms. Bowdoin’s stomach. During this questioning, Quince denied any knowledge of the sexual assault.

<>During later questioning, when confronted with forensic evidence, Quince admitted to the sexual assault, but refused to discuss the details. Later, when questioned by psychologists, Quince admitted that, when Ms. Bowdoin fell to the floor her nightgown ended up around her waist, which revealed her legs and pelvic area. He claimed this sexually aroused him and resulted in his decision to rape Ms. Bowdoin.

Trial Summary:

01/17/80          Indicted as follows:

Count I:           First-Degree Murder

Count II:          Sexual Battery

Count III:         Burglary of an Occupied Dwelling

08/11/80          Defendant entered a guilty plea and waived his right to have an advisory jury impaneled to recommend sentence

10/21/80          Sentenced as follows:

Count I:           First-Degree Murder – Death

Count II:          Sexual Battery – Dismissed

Count III:         Burglary of an Occupied Dwelling – Death

Case Information:

Quince filed a Direct Appeal to the Florida Supreme Court on 11/24/80. He raised several issues in the appeal, mainly surrounding the judge’s ruling on aggravating and mitigating factors. Another issue raised was that a general sentence was improperly imposed on him for two separate offenses. The Court ruled that the death sentence could have been imposed only for the murder charge and not the burglary.

The Court affirmed the sentence on 03/04/82. The rehearing was denied on 05/27/82 and the mandate was issued on 06/29/82.

Quince filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court on 07/22/82. The Petition was denied on 10/04/82. 

Quince filed a 3.850 Motion to the Circuit Court on 07/05/83.  During the time that the motion was pending, Governor Chiles signed a death warrant for Quince on 01/31/84. The Circuit Court granted a Stay of Execution on 02/08/84.  The 3.850 motion was denied on 04/30/84.  

Quince then filed a 3.850 Appeal to the Florida Supreme Court on 06/04/84. Many of the issues raised in the appeal by Quince were considered in the Direct Appeal and therefore were procedurally barred.  The remaining issues surrounded the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.  The Court applied the two-part test described in <>Strickland v. Washington<>.  The Court ruled that Quince failed to meet the first part of the Strickland test.  The Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of the 3.850 Motion on 09/05/85.  The rehearing was denied on 11/19/85 and the mandate was issued on 12/26/85.<>

Quince filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court on 02/14/86.  The Petition was denied on 04/21/86. 

Quince filed a petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to the United States District Court (USDC), Middle District, on 08/11/86.  The petition was denied on 12/14/87. A motion to amend the judgment was filed on 12/23/87.  An amendment to the motion was filed on 01/20/88.  The petition was denied on 12/21/88.  

Quince filed an appeal of the USDC’s denial to the United States Court of Appeals (USCA), 11th  Circuit, on 01/18/89.  On 09/21/89, the USCA vacated the USDC’s order and remanded the case.  The USDC gave Quince 20 days to file an amended petition.  On 10/26/90, the case was administratively closed by the USDC so that issues could be decided at the state level.

During this time, Quince also filed a second 3.850 Motion to the Circuit Court on 05/30/89.  The main issue within the motion was conflict of interest based on <>Harich v. State<>.  Quince’s defense attorney, Howard Pearl, served as a special deputy sheriff.  The motion was denied on 11/06/89.  

Quince filed a motion to disqualify Judge S. James Foxman and a petition for rehearing on 11/20/89.  The motion to disqualify the judge was based on a comment that Judge Foxman had made stating that out-of-state lawyers “look down their noses at us and tend to think we’re a bunch of rednecks.”  At the time, an attorney from Washington, D.C., was representing Quince.  The Motion and Petition were denied on 02/19/91.  

Quince filed an appeal of the Circuit Court’s denial of his 3.850 Motion to the Florida Supreme Court on 03/18/91.  The main issues raised in the appeal were that the trial court erroneously ruled against Quince in his attempt to disqualify the judge and that the trial court had ruled on the 3.850 Motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing.  

The Court ruled that Quince’s motion to disqualify the judge was legally insufficient and found no error in the trial court’s decision.  In regard to the absence of an evidentiary hearing, the Court referred to the Harich decision, in which the Florida Supreme Court directed the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing into the possibility of a conflict of interest and remanded the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing to be held on the matter.  This opinion was rendered on 01/16/92.  The mandate was issued on 02/17/92. <>

The Circuit Court held a consolidated evidentiary hearing for four defendants previously represented by Howard Pearl on 12/15/92-12/18/92.  An order was issued on 04/02/93 stating there was no conflict of interest and again denying Quince’s 3.850 motion.  Quince filed an appeal of the trial court’s decision to the Florida Supreme Court on 05/07/93.  

The Court ruled that the evidentiary proceedings were procedurally flawed which violated the appellant’s right to due process.  The Court vacated the trial court’s order denying 3.850 relief and remanded the case for proceedings that dealt with each appellant’s claims individually. The rehearing was denied on 07/10/96 and the mandate was issued on 08/09/96. 

Quince’s 3.850 Motion was remanded to the Circuit Court by the Florida Supreme Court, as stated above.  Quince filed a motion to the Circuit Court to have Judge Foxman disqualified because he had been a witness in the previous evidentiary hearing.  On 08/27/96, Judge Foxman recused himself.  Quince filed a motion to recuse Judge Johnson, Judge Foxman’s replacement, and the court denied the motion.  The 3.850 motion was denied on 11/12/96.  

Quince then filed a 3.850 Appeal in the Florida Supreme Court on 02/24/97.  The issues raised in the appeal included the following issues:  the trial court’s refusal to disqualify Judge Johnson, ineffective assistance of counsel, and conflict of interest due to the Howard Pearl issue.  The Court found no error.  The Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of the 3.850 Motion on 04/08/99. The rehearing was denied on 06/15/99 and the mandate was issued on 07/15/99. 

Quince’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was reopened in the United States District Court, Middle District, on 06/28/00.  The Petition was denied on 05/10/02.

On 06/25/02, Quince filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus to the United States Court of Appeals, which appealed the United States District Court’s decision to deny his petition.  The USCA affirmed the denial of his Petition on 02/18/04.

On 11/01/04, Quince filed a 3.850 Motion to the Circuit Court, which is currently pending.

FloridaCapitalCases.state.fl.us

 

 

 
 
 
 
home last updates contact