Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
William VAN
POYCK
Classification: Murderer
Characteristics: Escape
attempt
Number of victims: 1
Date of murder:
June 24,
1987
Date of arrest:
Same day
Date of birth: July
4,
1954
Victim profile: Fred
Griffis (corrections officer)
Method of murder:
Shooting
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida, USA
Status: Sentenced to
death December 21, 1988. Executed by lethal injection on June 12,
2013
STARKE — A Florida man was executed Wednesday for the murder of a guard
during a botched 1987 prison van ambush intended to free an imprisoned
friend.
William Van Poyck, 58, was pronounced dead at 7:24 p.m., 23 minutes
after the injection process began at Florida State Prison.
“Set me free,” were his final words.
Van Poyck's case garnered international attention because he published
three books and maintained a blog while on death row. He even wrote
recently about his pending execution.
“He's finally free from those prison walls,” Lisa Van Poyck, the
inmate's sister, said as she stood among the protesters standing across
the street from the building where her brother was executed.
The family of the slain guard, Fred Griffis, has said in interviews that
they were frustrated that news stories focused on Van Poyck, the crime
and his writings — and not Griffis.
“It's been a very traumatic experience,” said Norman Traylor, the
victim's cousin.
*****
At precisely 7 p.m. the brown curtain raised in the execution chamber at
Florida State Prison to reveal to the 23 witnesses behind the glass, the
ominously calm face of Van Poyck
Van Poyck's body was largely covered in a white sheet. Aside from his
face, his arms were the only part of his body that was visible. They
were in a supine position with a single intravenous line in each and
held to the gurney by large brown leather straps.
When asked by a Department of Corrections official if he had any last
words, Van Poyck lifted his head and answered, “Set me free.” He added
“that's it” before laying his head back down.
Outside the prison a small group of protesters and onlookers were
gathered, including two men who were once sentenced to die at the same
prison, but were exonerated after new evidence uncovered their
innocence.
Herman Lindsey and Seth Penalver spent three years and 17 years on death
row respectively. Lindsey's time on death row overlapped with Van Poyck
and he said they'd developed a friendship.
Both men have been vocal opponents of the “Timely Justice Act,” a
proposed bill that would dramatically expedite the time it takes to
carry out death sentenced on inmates condemned to die by the state of
Florida.
*****
In 1987, William Van Poyck and Frank Valdes ambushed a prison van
outside a West Palm Beach doctor's office in a failed attempt to free
James O'Brien — with whom they'd served time. Griffis was fatally shot
after he threw the van's keys into the bushes to foil the escape. Van
Poyck and Valdes were captured following a car chase.
Steve Turner, one of the corrections officers ambushed that day, spoke
after the execution on Wednesday.
“Justice has prevailed,” he said. “They can close the book.”
In his appeals, Van Poyck argued that Valdes fired the fatal shots and
that if the jury had known that, he wouldn't have been sentenced to
death. The Florida Supreme Court last week rejected Van Poyck's latest
appeal involving Valdes' widow, who says her husband told her he was the
gunman.
The justices noted that Van Poyck planned the escape attempt and that he
and Valdes carried loaded weapons.
In 1999, Valdes was stomped to death in prison. Seven guards were
charged with his death, but none were convicted.
Following Valdes' death, Van Poyck was moved to Sussex State Prison in
Virginia for his safety. That's where he wrote a 324-page autobiography,
“A Checkered Past: A Memoir,” saying his purpose was not to elicit
sympathy but “to put a human face on me and convicts in general.”
Van Poyck went on to write two novels. He won awards for his writing and
kept a blog since 2005 by writing letters to his sister, who posted them
online.
“He is deeply remorseful for the ending of Fred Griffis' life,” Lisa Van
Poyck told The Associated Press on Tuesday. “He is guilty of a crime of
trying to break somebody out of a prison transport van — he had no
intention of hurting anyone.”
In his blog, Van Poyck wrote in recent entries that he has received
dozens of letters a day regarding his pending execution.
“I am not unusual in wanting to believe, at the end of my line, that my
life counted for something good, that I had some positive influence on
someone, that my life made a difference, that I was able to at least
partially atone for the many mistakes I made earlier in life,” he wrote.
Griffis family members planned a gathering Wednesday for quiet
reflection about Fred Griffis' life.
“When he was murdered, it basically ripped a hole in the family's heart
that's never really healed,” said brother Ronald Griffis.
Ronald Griffis said his brother was always looking out for others. He
was released on medical discharge after his first tour in Vietnam, but
re-enlisted for two more because he felt he could help. In his final
moments, he was determined not to let a killer escape.
Said Ronald Griffis: “I knew that even at the end, he was still my
brother, he was still Freddy, that's who he was. He protected others.”
Star-Banner staff writer Maru I. Opabola contributed to this report.
Death sentence upheld in killing
of Glades Correctional guard
By jane Musgrave -
PalmBeachPost.com
February 16, 2012
After spending more than two decades on Death Row,
time might be running out for a 57-year-old who was convicted of killing
a guard in hopes of springing his best friend from prison.
In a unanimous decision, the Florida Supreme Court on
Thursday denied William Van Poyck's latest appeal of his 1988 conviction
for killing Fred Griffis, a guard at Glades Correctional Institution.
The decorated Vietnam veteran was fatally shot outside a West Palm Beach
doctor's office in 1987 when he was taking Van Poyck's friend to an
appointment.
"It's very upsetting," said attorney Gerald Bettman,
who has filed appeals for Van Poyck since the late 1990s. "It might have
been his last one."
Bettman said he was dismayed the high court upheld
Van Poyck's death sentence despite affidavits from four jurors who said
they would have voted for a life sentence had they been told the son of
an Eastern Airlines executive wasn't the trigger man.
Rather than be swayed by the affidavits, the justices
scolded Bettman for presenting them. Florida Bar rules prohibit lawyers
from contacting jurors. While the affidavits were obtained by a private
investigator, the justices said by using them Bettman violated the
"spirit of the rule."
They also said that the affidavits were based on
false information. They emphasized that they never said Van Poyck's
accomplice, Frank Valdes, fired the fatal shots. Instead, they ruled in
the early 1990s that evidence presented at Van Poyck's trial was
inconclusive but upheld his death sentence.
Even if jurors had been told that Van Poyck didn't
kill Griffis, based on the affidavits, it wouldn't have changed their
decision. They still would have voted 7-5 to put him to death, the
justices wrote.
During his trial, Van Poyck disputed the prosecutors'
contention that he pulled the trigger. He admitted he masterminded the
plan and made sure he and Valdes had enough guns to pull it off.
Valdes, who also received a death sentence, in 1999
was fatally beaten by guards at Florida State Prison. Three were tried
and acquitted. The state paid his family $737,000 to settle a civil
lawsuit.
Bettman said he will appeal the Supreme Court's
decision to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
William Van Poyck
DC #034071 DOB: 07/04/54
Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County, Case #87-6736-CF-A02
Sentencing Judge: The Honorable
Michael D. Miller
Attorney, Trial: Cary E. Klein,
Esq.
Attorneys, Direct Appeal:
William Lasley and Peter Grable – Private
Attorney, Collateral Appeals:
Ned Nasban – Private
Date of Offense: 06/24/87
Date of Sentence: 12/21/88
Circumstances of Offense:
On 06/24/87, during the
transport of a state prisoner named James O’Brien, Van Poyck and an
accomplice, Frank Valdez, ambushed the two guards in the prison van,
assaulted them, and fired three shots, one to the head and two to the
chest, into one of the guards, killing him instantly.
In an attempt to
free O’Brien from the van, Van Poyck fired numerous shots at the padlock
of the van door, with one ricocheting and striking the other guard.
Van Poyck and Valdez then fled
the scene in a Cadillac, and a chase with police ensued. During the
chase, Van Poyck fired numerous shots at the pursuing police cars,
striking three of them.
Eventually, Valdez lost control
of the car and it struck a tree. The two were arrested and four pistols
were recovered from the car, including the service revolver of the guard
that was killed.
Trial Summary:
07/14/87 Van Poyck was indicted on the following:
Count I:
First-Degree Murder
Count II: Armed
Robbery
Counts VI-XI: Attempted Manslaughter
Count XII: Aggravated Assault
Count XIV: Aiding
the Escape of an Inmate
Information presented by
the prosecutor, charging Van Poyck with one count of Attempted
First-Degree Murder
11/15/88 The jury
returned guilty verdicts on all counts of the indictment and
information.
11/18/88 By a vote of 11-1, the jury recommended the death
penalty.
12/21/88 Van Poyck was sentenced as follows:
Count I: First-Degree
Murder – Death
Count II: Armed Robbery –
Life
Counts VI-XI: Attempted Manslaughter
– 15 years
Count XII: Aggravated Assault –
5 years
Count XIV: Aiding the Escape of
an Inmate – 15 year - Life
imprisonment
Case Information:
Van
Poyck filed a Direct Appeal in the Florida Supreme Court on 02/06/89.
He appealed his multiple convictions and sentences, including the death
sentence, from 12/21/88. Van Poyck raised six issues from the guilt
phase of the trial and fifteen issues from the penalty phase of his
trial. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the convictions and sentence
of death on 07/05/90.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the United States
Supreme Court on 01/15/91, which was denied on 03/18/91.
Van
Poyck filed a 3.850 Motion in the Circuit Court on 12/01/92, which was
denied on 07/08/94.
Van
Poyck filed a 3.850 Motion Appeal in the Florida Supreme Court on
09/07/94. He contended ineffective assistance of counsel. The Florida
Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of the 3.850 Motion on
03/27/97.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the United States
Supreme Court on 05/27/97, which was denied on 10/06/97.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Florida Supreme
Court on 02/10/97. He argued ineffective assistance of counsel, that
error occurred in the weighing of invalid aggravating circumstances
during the penalty phase of the trial, and that he was charged and
convicted of criminal offenses that did not exist as a matter of law
(attempted first degree murder). The Florida Supreme Court denied the
petition on 05/14/98.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the United States
Supreme Court on 08/25/97, which was denied on 12/01/97.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Florida Supreme
Court on 10/28/98. The Florida Supreme Court denied the petition
without a published opinion on 12/01/98.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the United States
Supreme Court on 01/13/99, which was denied on 03/22/99.
Van
Poyck filed a federal Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the United
States District Court on 02/12/99, which was denied on 09/20/99.
Van
Poyck filed an Appeal in the United States Court of Appeals on
12/27/99. The Appeal raised issues of ineffective assistance of counsel
and Brady claims. On 05/09/02, the United States Court of Appeals
affirmed the United States District Court’s denial of the Habeas
Petition.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court
on 02/07/01, which was denied on 10/07/02.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court
on 09/19/02, which was denied on 01/13/03.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Florida Supreme
Court on 12/20/02. He raised issues regarding the U.S. Supreme Court
case Ring v. Arizona. On 08/20/03, the Petition was denied without a
published opinion. Rehearing was denied on 10/31/03.
Van
Poyck filed a 3.853 (DNA) Motion in the Circuit Court on 09/30/03. The
Motion was denied on 02/24/04.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court
on 01/29/04. The U.S. Supreme Court denied the petition on 04/05/04.
Van
Poyck filed a 3.853 (DNA) Appeal in the Florida Supreme Court on
04/26/04. On 05/19/05, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the circuit
court’s denial of Van Poyck’s motion for postconviction DNA testing.
On
04/26/05, Van Poyck filed a 3.850 Motion in the Circuit Court. The
motion was denied on 06/23/05.
On
08/15/05, Van Poyck filed a 3.850 Appeal in the Florida Supreme Court.
The appeal is currently pending.
Van
Poyck filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari on 12/05/05. The petition
was denied on 03/20/06.