Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Elizabeth
BROWNRIGG
Classification: Murderer
Characteristics:
Abuse of servants - Torture
Number of victims: 1
Date of murder:
August 9, 1767
Date of birth: 1720
Victim profile: Mary Clifford,
14 (one
of her domestic servants)
Method of murder: Cumulative
injuries and associated infected wounds
Location: London,
England, United Kingdom
Status:
Executed by hanging at Tyburn on September 14, 1767
Elizabeth Brownrigg
(1720-1767) was an eighteenth century murderer. Her victim, Mary
Clifford, was one of her domestic servants, who died from cumulative
injuries and associated infected wounds. As a result of witness
testimony and medical evidence at her trial, Brownrigg was hung at
Tyburn in September 1767.
Early Life:
1720-1765
Born in 1720 to a
working class family, Elizabeth married James Brownrigg, an apprentice
plumber, while still a teenager. She gave birth to sixteen children,
but only three survived infancy. In 1765, Elizabeth, James and their
son John moved to Flower de Luce Road in London's Fetter Lane. James
was prospering from his career as a plumber, and Elizabeth was a
respected midwife. As a result of her work, Saint Dunstans Parish
appointed her overseer of women and children, and she was given
custody of several female children as domestic servants from the
London Foundling Hospital.
The Foundling
Hospital: Vocational and Educational Debate
Since Thomas Coram had
founded it in 1739, there had been constant debate about what the
station of the Foundling Hospital's young charges should be. There was
debate over whether they were being overeducated, or whether they
should be subject to vocational education and trained for
apprenticeships, which would lead to future stable lives as domestic
servants.
The latter was decided
upon, and the Foundling Hospital began to tender older children and
young adolescents for vocational training as apprentices in 1759,
shortly before the events described in this entry took place.
Elizabeth Brownrigg was not the only abusive adult who used hapless
children as virtual slave labour, however, as contemporary accounts
indicate. After the events described in this entry, the Foundling
Hospital insituted greater safeguards of oversight for apprenticeship
tendering, and reported cases of apprentice abuse dropped
considerably.
Abuse
of Servants: 1765-1767
There is
little biographical information available to explain her subsequent
behaviour. However, Elizabeth Brownrigg proved ill-suited to the task
of caring for her foundling domestic servants and soon began to engage
in severe physical abuse. This often involved stripping her young
charges naked, chaining them to wooden beams or pipes, and then
whipping them severely with switches, bullwhip handles and other
implements for the slightest infraction of her rules.
Mary Jones, one of her
earlier charges, ran away from her house and sought sanctuary with the
London Foundling Hospital. After a medical examination, the Governors
of the London Foundling Hospital demanded that James Brownrigg keep
his wife's abusive tendencies in check, but enforced no further
action.
Heedless of this
reprimand, Brownrigg also severely abused two other domestic servants,
Mary Mitchell and Mary Clifford. Like Jones before her, Mitchell
sought refuge from the abusive behaviour of her employer, but John
Brownrigg forced her to return to Flower de Luce Road. Clifford was
entrusted to Brownrigg's care, despite the Governors earlier concerns
about her abusive behaviour toward her charges. As a result, Brownrigg
engaged in more excessive punishment toward Clifford. She was kept
naked, forced to sleep on a mat inside a coal-hole, and when she
forced open cupboards for food because she was fed only bread and
water, Elizabeth Brownrigg repeatedly beat her for a day's duration,
chained to a roof beam in her kitchen.
By June 1767, Mitchell
and Clifford were experiencing infection of their untreated wounds,
and Brownrigg's repeated assaults gave her no time to heal. However,
Brownrigg's neighbours were beginning to suspect something was awry
within her household, and resultantly, they asked the London Foundling
Hospital to further investigate the premises. As a result, Brownrigg
yielded Mary Mitchell, but Foundling Hospital Inspector Grundy then
demanded to know where Clifford was, and took James Brownrigg
prisoner, although Elizabeth and John Brownrigg escaped.
In Wandsworth, a
chandler recognised the fugitives, and the trio stood trial in the Old
Bailey in August 1767.
Brownrigg's Trial and Execution: August-September 1767
By this
time, Mary Clifford had succumbed to her infected wounds, and
Elizabeth Brownrigg was charged with her murder. At the trial, Mary
Mitchell testified against her former employer, as did Grundy and an
apprentice of James Brownrigg. Medical evidence and autopsy results
indicated that Brownrigg's repeated assaults and negligence of
Clifford's injuries had contributed to the fourteen year old's death,
so Elizabeth Brownrigg was sentenced to hang at Tyburn.
Crowds condemned her on
the way to her execution, and even sixty years later, the Newgate
Calendar crime periodical still bore testimony to the impression
that Elizabeth Brownrigg's crimes had made on Georgian and Victorian
England. Both the Newgate Calendar and Old Bailey trial records
are available online, and are cited below.
Online References
Elizabeth
Brownrigg: Executed for Torturing Her Female Apprentices
(sic) to Death (from the Newgate Calendar, Volume 2:
1825: 369-374:
James Brownrigg, His
Wife Elizabeth and Their Son John: Killing: Murder, Killing: Murder,
9th September 1767: The Proceedings of the Old Bailey Ref.
t17670909:The Proceedings of the Old Bailey, London 1674 to
1834:
Bibliography
Marthe Jocelyn: A Home for
Foundlings: Toronto: Tundra Books: 2005: ISBN 0-88776-709-5
Ruth McClure:
Coram's Children: The London Foundling Hospital in the Eighteenth
Century: New Haven: Yale University Press: 1981: ISBN
0-300-02465-7
Patty Seleski: "A
Mistress, A Mother and A Murderess Too: Elizabeth Brownrigg and the
Social Construction of the Eighteenth Century Mistress" in Katherine
Kitredge (ed): Lewd and Notorious: Female Transgression in the
Eighteenth Century: Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press:
2003: ISBN 0-472-08906-4
Kristina Straub: "The Tortured
Apprentice: Sexual Monstrosity and the Suffering of Poor Children in
the Brownrigg Murder Case" (p.66-81) in Laura Rosenthal and Mita
Choudhary (ed) Monstrous Dreams of Reason: London: Associated
Universities Presses: 2002: ISBN 0-383-75460-0
Lisa Zunshine: Bastards and Foundlings:
Illegitimacy in Eighteenth Century England: Columbus: Ohio State
University Press: 2005: ISBN 0-8142-0995-5
Wikipedia.org
Brownrigg, Elizabeth
Elizabeth was born in 1720 to a family named either
Hartley or Harkly. She married James Brownrigg, an apprentice plumber,
at an early age and went on to produce sixteen children, but as was
quite common only three of them survived childhood.
By the time Elizabeth had reached her mid-40s, her
husband had prospered and the family had become quite wealthy. In 1765
they moved to their new home in Fetter Lane, London. Elizabeth proved
to quite an adept midwife and she was kept very busy. Her practice
became so busy that she found it necessary to take on an apprentice
from the local workhouse. The first apprentice that she took on was
Mary Mitchell. Once the initial one month trial period was over
Elizabeth started mistreating Mary, punching, kicking and generally
abusing the girl. As the months went by Elizabeth found that she
enjoyed the feeling of power the abuse of the girl gave her.She soon
took on another apprentice from the workhouse, Mary Jones.
Again, the poor girl was subjected to all manner of
beatings and humiliations, not just by Elizabeth but now also by her
husband and son who also found pleasure in torturing the servants.
Unlike Mary Mitchell, Mary Jones was made of sterner stuff. Even
though she was made to sleep under a dresser in the Brownrigg's
bedroom each night, she managed to escape early one morning. She was
found wandering, dazed and emaciated, and was taken to a hospital. She
was blind in one eye and covered in bruises. The hospital wrote to the
Brownriggs demanding damages but, because they failed to reply, the
matter was allowed to lapse with the hospital informing the Brownriggs
that Mary's apprenticeship was terminated.
By this time Mrs Brownrigg had obtained the
services of another apprentice, 14-year-old Mary Clifford. Again, the
girl underwent all sorts of inhuman treatment. She was given
lice-infested clothes to wear, she was beaten, she was hung naked from
a hook in the ceiling, she was beaten into unconsciousness with an
iron bar. On July 12th 1767 Mary Clifford's step-mother, Mrs Deacon,
turned up at the house asking to see the young girl. Elizabeth refused
the woman entry and denied that there were any apprentices in the
house.
Mrs Deacon was not satisfied with this answer and
after talking ot one of the neighbours who confirmed that there were
apprentices in the house she fetched the authorities. The Brownriggs
again denied that Mary Clifford lived in the house but did produce
Mary Mitchell. She was in such a bad way that she was rushed away to
hospital to be treated. When the parish officials returned they
decided enough was enough and forced their way into the house.
A search of the premises found Mary Clifford in a
small cupboard. She, too, was rushed to hospital. Mr Brownrigg was
apprehended but, by this time, Elizabeth and her son had escaped. They
made their way to Wandsworth and lay low at a local inn. Despite the
efforts by the staff at the hospital on 9th August 1767, Mary Clifford
died. Her body had been covered in ulcers, cuts and bruises and her
mouth had been slashed so she could not speak.
The inn-keeper recognised that his two guests
fitted the description of the two persons sought by the authorities
and turned them in. They were arrested and taken to Newgate. The three
Brownriggs were tried at the Old Bailey. The trial lasted eleven hours
with both husband and son blaming Elizabeth for all the wrong-doing.
Incredible though it sounds they were believed and the husband and son
were fined one shilling and given six month's imprisonment. Mary was
found guilty and sentenced to death. On September 14th 1767, Elizabeth
Brownrigg was taken by open cart to Tyburn and hanged.
Elizabeth
Brownrigg
Elizabeth was born into a working
class family in 1720 to a family named either Hartley or Harkly. She
married James Brownrigg, an apprentice plumber, at an early age and
went on to produce sixteen children, only three of whom survived
childhood.
By the time Elizabeth had reached
her mid-forties, her husband had prospered and the family had become
quite wealthy. In 1765 they moved to their new home in Flower-de-luce
Court, Fleet Street. Elizabeth proved to be quite an adept midwife and
she was kept very busy. Her practice became so busy that she found it
necessary to take on an apprentice from the local workhouse. The first
apprentice that she took on was Mary Mitchell. Once the initial mutual
'upon liking' one month period was over Elizabeth started mistreating
Mary, punching, kicking and generally abusing the girl. As the months
went by Elizabeth started to get the taste for maltreatment and took
on another apprentice from the workhouse, Mary Jones
Again, the poor girl was
subjected to all manner of beatings and humiliations, not just by
Elizabeth but also by her husband and son, who also delighted in
torturing the servants. But Mary Jones was made of sterner stuff. Even
though she was made to sleep under a dresser in the Brownrigg's
bedroom each night, she managed to escape early one morning. She was
found wandering, dazed and emaciated, and was taken to a hospital. She
had become blind in one eye and was covered in bruises. The hospital
wrote to the Brownriggs demanding damages but, because they failed to
reply, the matter was allowed to lapse with the hospital informing the
Brownriggs that Mary's apprenticeship was terminated.
By this time Mrs Brownrigg had
obtained the services of another apprentice, fourteen-year-old Mary
Clifford. Again, the girl underwent all sorts of inhuman treatment.
She was given lice-infested clothes to wear, she was beaten, she was
hung naked from a hook in the ceiling and she was beaten into
unconsciousness with an iron bar. On July 12th 1767 Mary Clifford's
stepmother, Mrs Deacon, turned up at the house asking to see the young
girl. Elizabeth refused the woman entry and denied that there were any
apprentices in the house.
When Mrs Deacon heard from a
neighbour that there were indeed apprentices in the house she fetched
the authorities. The Brownriggs again denied that Mary Clifford lived
in the house but produced Mary Mitchell. She was rushed away to
hospital to be treated. When the parish officials returned they forced
their way into the house. A search of the premises found Mary Clifford
in a small cupboard. She, too, was rushed to hospital. Mr Brownrigg
was apprehended but, by this time, Elizabeth and her son had escaped.
They made their way to Wandsworth and lay low at a local inn. On 9th
August 1767, Mary Clifford died. Her body had been covered in ulcers,
cuts and bruises and her tongue had been cut in two places with
scissors so she could not speak.
The innkeeper realised that his
two guests fitted the description of the two persons sought by the
authorities and turned them in. They were arrested and taken to
Newgate. The three Brownriggs were tried at the Old Bailey. The trial
lasted eleven hours with the males proving that a lack of chivalry is
not a new phenomenon by blaming Elizabeth for all the wrongdoing. The
husband and son were fined one shilling and given six months'
imprisonment. Mary was found guilty and sentenced to death.
On September 14th 1767, Elizabeth
Brownrigg was taken by open cart to Tyburn where she was hanged by
Thomas Turlis. After execution her body was taken to Surgeon's Hall
and anatomised.
Murder-uk.com
BROWNRIGG, Elizabeth
(England)
Hangman Thomas Turlis
had a rewarding task, and the vast crowd were in full agreement with
his actions, for once not abusing him too obscenely, when, on 14
September 1767, he executed Elizabeth Brownrigg, a lady assuredly
receiving everything she
deserved!
Originally a servant,
Elizabeth had married James Brownrigg and they lived in Fetter Lane,
near Fleet Street in London.
Elizabeth became a
midwife and, needing to have assistance in the house, contacted the
local Foundling Hospital for some apprentices. Two of the girls were
thus employed as servants, Mary Mitchell and Mary Jones, but soon
found that they had left the frying pan only to end up in the fire,
for Mrs Brownrigg was a cruel and violent woman who did not hesitate
to beat them.
Mary Mitchell endured
the hardships for a year and then managed to escape, only to be
captured by the son of the family, who brought her back to his
mother’s tender mercies.
Not long afterwards,
the Marys were joined by yet another Mary, 14-year-old Mary Clifford,
who was particularly ill-treated by her mistress. For the most
trifling offence she would be tied up naked and beaten with a cane, a
horsewhip, a broom handle or anything else that came to hand; made to
lie in the cold, damp cellar on sacking; and was fed only on bread and
water. Later she was confined in the yard, a chain around her neck
securing her to the door, her hands being tied behind her.
Mrs Brownrigg’s
cruelty knew no bounds, but retribution was in sight when, on 13 July
1767, she stripped Mary Clifford naked and hung her up by her arms to
a staple in the ceiling, then whipped her already severely scarred
body until the blood flowed across the kitchen floor. But the brutal
treatment was witnessed by a neighbour, who sent for the police. On
arrival, although they released Mary Clifford from her bonds, ‘her
body being one continual ulcer, ready to mortify’, Elizabeth Brownrigg
and her son had escaped. The badly injured Mary Clifford died in St
Bartholomew’s Hospital a few days later; the Brownriggs, mother and
son, were now wanted on murder charges.
The couple had rented
rooms in Wandsworth in a house owned by a Mr Dunbar, and he happened
to see a wanted poster that included a detailed description of his two
lodgers. He promptly informed the police and both were arrested. On 12
September they appeared in the Old Bailey; Master Brownrigg received a
prison sentence but, after a trial lasting eleven hours, during which
every lurid detail of the injuries sustained by the victim was
described, Elizabeth Brownrigg was sentenced to death.
On 14 September, en
route to Tyburn scaffold, she was accompanied in the horse-drawn cart
by the Ordinary, the Reverend Mr James, and a prison missionary, Silas
Told, who afterwards described how the two men sat, one each side of
her, continuing:
“When we had fixed
ourselves, I perceived that the whole powers of darkness were ready to
give us a reception. Beckoning to the multitude, I desired them to
pray for her, at which they were rather silent, until the cart began
to move. Then they triumphed over her with three huzzas; this was
followed by a combination of hellish curses. When we had passed
through the gates [of Newgate Gaol], carts had been placed each side
of the street, filled principally with women. Here I may say, with the
greatest truth, nothing could have equalled them but the damned
spirits let loose from the infernal pit. Some of the common cries from
the thoughtless concourse were ‘Pull her hat off, pull her hat off,
that we may see the b*****s face!’, accompanied by the most dreadful
imprecations.”
As they neared the
execution site Elizabeth joined in prayers with the Ordinary and
acknowledged the justice of her sentence, but on arrival, so great was
the uproar that she was held firmly while hangman Thomas Turlis noosed
her, tied the rope to the overhead beam of the gallows, then, hastily
dismounting, gave the horse a smart slap on the flanks. At that the
cart moved away, leaving Mrs Brownrigg to swing in the same manner as
she had suspended poor Mary Clifford from the staple – although not by
the wrists, but by the neck!
Her body was
subsequently taken to Surgeons’ Hall and handed over to be anatomised.
After that ‘her skeleton was exposed in the niche opposite the first
door in the Surgeons’ Theatre, so that the heinousness of her cruelty
may make the more lasting impression on the minds of the spectators
attending the dissection sessions.’
As a perquisite,
English executioners would sell small lengths of the rope with which
they had hanged particularly notorious criminals as souvenirs or for
allegedly curative purposes. But this facility was not available
across the Channel during the French Revolution, and so French women,
desperately requiring such bizarre artefacts to bring them luck at the
card table, would contact the appropriate government department in
London, pleading to be given the address of the possible supplier!
Amazing True Stories
of Female Executions by Geoffrey Abbott
Elizabeth Brownrigg
There
was usually, at least an ambivalent attitude amongst the public
towards criminals on their way to execution at Tyburn. Yes, they had
committed crimes but everyone wanted to watch the “Hanging Match”
especially if the condemned participated in it and behaved bravely.
The crowds along the way and around the gallows would tend to be
sympathetic to them. However there was absolutely no public sympathy
for the lone woman in the cart on the morning of Monday, September the
14th 1767.
She had
systematically tortured and abused her apprentice girls, eventually
killing one of them. Attitudes to child abuse and murder have not
changed over the centuries and people expressed their abhorrence of
her crime, praying for her damnation rather than her salvation and
saying “the devil would fetch her” and hoping that she would go to
hell.
The
object of this hatred was 47 year old Elizabeth Brownrigg. She had
been born in 1720 to a working class family and as a teenager had
married James Brownrigg, an apprentice plumber. The couple had sixteen
children, of whom just three survived to adulthood, such was the rate
of child mortality in those days.
The
marriage was a success and over the years James’ business did well and
Elizabeth also ran a successful business as a midwife from her home at
Flower-de-luce Court, in London’s Fetter Lane. She was appointed by
the overseers St. Dunstan's-in-the-West parish to take care of the
poor women in the workhouse which she did very well, apparently
showing much kindness and consideration to these women. She decided to
take on an apprentice girl to assist her, such was the demand for her
services.
Mary
Mitchell from Whitefriars was to be the first unfortunate girl to join
the family in 1765. She was quickly followed by Mary Jones. Both
girls endured frequent physical and verbal abuse, with regular
beatings for the smallest mistakes. At this time a young person could
join a tradesman or woman for a month “on liking” and if at the end of
the month both parties still “liked” each other the youngster would
agree to become bound as an apprentice for a period of years.
Initially Mary Jones was treated very well but after her trial period
ended she became increasingly abused. She made plans to escape having
noted that the key was left in the front door over night and managed
to find her way to the Foundling Hospital where she was examined by it
doctor who discovered that she was covered in bruises and sores.
The
governors of the hospital had their solicitor send James Brownrigg a
letter, threatening a prosecution if he could not explain the girl’s
injuries. Brownrigg however ignored the letter and it was decided by
the hospital to take no further action. (Does this sound familiar in
present day child abuse cases?) Mary Mitchell stayed with the
Brownriggs for around 12 months before resolving to leave. She too
managed to escape from the house, but was spotted in the street by one
of the Brownrigg’s sons who forced her to return home, where she was
treated with even greater cruelty for having tried to leave.
In the
meantime another poor girl was to be apprenticed to the Brownrigg’s by
the overseers of the precinct of Whitefriars. 14-year-old Mary
Clifford joined the household in early 1766. Initially she too was
treated well but as soon as she was legally bound to the Brownriggs,
the serious abuse began.
Mary’s
stepmother, also Mary Clifford, went to visit her on July the 12th
1767 but was refused entry by one of the servants, who had been
instructed to do this and to deny that the girl was there. Mrs.
Clifford was not satisfied with this and having consulted with her
husband, persuaded Mr. Deacon, the Brownrigg’s next door neighbour to
post one of his servants, William Clipson, to watch the Brownrigg’s
house and yard.
On
Monday the 3rd of August William saw a badly beaten and half starved
girl in the yard, so the matter was reported to Mr. William Grundy,
the overseer of St. Dunstan’s, who went to the house with Mr. Elsdale
the overseer of White-Friars precinct, who knew Mary and demanded that
the Brownrigg’s produce Mary, which after an altercation they did.
William Clipson however did not identify the girl he had seen in the
yard as Mary Clifford (she was Mary Mitchell), so Mr. Grundy ordered a
proper search of the house despite threats of litigation from the
Brownrigg’s.
Mary
Clifford was eventually found locked in a cupboard. Her step mother
described her as being in “a sad condition indeed, her face was
swelled as big as two, her mouth was so swelled she could not shut it,
and she was cut all under her throat, as if it had been with a cane,
she could not speak; all her shoulders had sores all in one, she had
two bits of rags upon them.”
She was taken straight
to hospital while Mr. Brownrigg was arrested but Elizabeth and her son
managed to escape. Mary Clifford died in hospital on the 9th of August
1767. The inquest into her death returned a verdict of wilful murder
against James and Elizabeth Brownrigg, and their son John. An arrest
warrant was issued against Elizabeth and John and adverts placed in
the newspapers.
Arrest and trial
Elizabeth and John
moved around London disguising themselves as best they could, finally
taking lodgings in Wandsworth, at the house of a Mr Dunbar, who kept a
chandler's shop.
On the
15th of August Mr. Dunbar read one of the advertisements in his
newspaper, from which he identified his lodgers as the Brownriggs. He
summoned a constable and mother and son were arrested and remanded to
Newgate.
They
came to trial at the September Sessions of the Old Bailey on the 7th
of that month before Sir Robert Kite. Their case took eleven hours to
hear with Mary Mitchell appearing as the star witness for the
prosecution.
16 year old Mary
Mitchell had been with the Brownriggs for just under two and a half
years and told the court that she had been mistreated as soon as her
probationary period as an apprentice had ended and that Mary Clifford
had began to be abused after the completion of her month trial period
when she became legally bound. Mary Mitchell described how Mary
Clifford had been beaten over the head and shoulders with a walking
cane and a earth-brush by their mistress and also hit by John
Brownrigg.
She also stated that
Mary Clifford was made to sleep “on boards in the parlour, sometimes
in the passage, and very often down in the cellar”. Apparently the
girls were often locked in the cellar at night. Somewhere around a
year before her death, the then 15 year old Mary Clifford was starving
and desperate for food so she broke open a cupboard and was caught.
For this she was made to strip naked and was severely beaten. She was
now kept locked up in the unlit cellar at nights with no bedding.
Mary
Clifford, it seems, was also occasionally beaten by others members of
the family. Mary Mitchell described how John had whipped her with a
leather belt about the head and shoulders for not making up a bed to
his satisfaction. This whipping re-opened wounds from previous
beatings. Mary Mitchell also recounted that James had beaten Mary
Clifford with an old hearth-brush, but this was the only time she had
seen him abuse her.
The
evidence against Elizabeth was more damning. Mary Mitchell said that
Elizabeth “used to tie her (Mary Clifford) up in the kitchen “when
first she began to be at her, she used to tie her up to the
water-pipe, with her two hands drawed up above her head.” For these
beatings Mary Clifford was stripped naked. Elizabeth beat her most
commonly with a horse-whip and “seldom left off till she had fetched
blood.”
It
would seem that this phase of beatings had begun in the Spring of 1767
and that it was succeeded by tying the poor girl up to a hook which
was put up in the kitchen specially for the purpose. Mary Clifford
suffered weekly whippings tied up to this hook. Mary Mitchell told
the court that no one else in the family normally whipped Mary
Clifford, although on one occasion John had taken over from his
mother. She also testified that Mary Clifford was chained to a door
by her neck having attempted to obtain food and drink one night and
broken down some boarding.
Elizabeth was away for about a week during which time Mary Clifford
made something of a recovery although her back and shoulders were
covered in scabs and bruises. Elizabeth accused Mary of not doing any
work while she had been away and on the Friday morning once more tied
her up to the hook in the kitchen and beat her. She suffered several
more whipping sessions during that day and was left naked through the
day and the night. Mary Mitchell told the court that she and Mary
Clifford were effectively kept prisoners in the house. Mary Mitchell
was cross examined on her evidence by both Brownriggs, but held up
well.
Testimony was also heard from James Brownrigg’s apprentice, George
Benham who confirmed much of what Mary Mitchell had said. He also
told the court that he visited James Brownrigg in the Compter (small
lock-up prison), after his arrest, who had told him to go and take
down the hook from the beam in the kitchen and to burn all the sticks
in the house. He testified that Elizabeth had told him and Mary
Mitchell that if Mary Clifford’s stepmother visited the house asking
for Mary she was not to be admitted as Elizabeth had told them that
“the girl's mother was a bad woman, and might teach bad things to her
daughter”.
Evidence was heard from the Overseers and from the doctor at the
workhouse hospital where Mary Clifford was taken after her removal
from the Brownrigg’s house. William Denbeigh described Mary’s
injuries thus : “The top of her head and shoulders and back, appeared
very bloody; I turned down the sheet, and found from the bottom of her
feet to the top of her head almost one continued sore, scars that
seemed as if cut with an instrument upon the body, legs, and thighs;
upon one hip was a very large wound; it spread about half the palm of
my hand.”
On the
5th of August Mary was transferred to St. Bartholomew's hospital where
she was seen by Mr. Young, the surgeon, the following day, who
confirmed the medical evidence.
In her
defence Elizabeth stated that “I did give her several lashes, but with
no design of killing her; the fall of the saucepan with the handle
against her neck, occasioned her face and neck to swell; I poulticed
her neck three times, and bathed the place, and put three plaisters to
her shoulders.” Mr. Young, the surgeon disputed that Mary’s neck
injury could have been caused by a saucepan handle.
The
Brownrigg’s produced several character witnesses but they were not
believed by the jury.
At the
end of the trial James and John were acquitted of Mary’s murder but
were ordered to be detained on an indictment of assaulting and abusing
Mary Mitchell, for which they were subsequently sentenced to six
month's imprisonment and fined one shilling each.
Elizabeth was found
guilty, and on Friday the 11th of September the judge told her “It is
my duty to pronounce sentence in accordance with the law, that you are
to be taken from hence to the prison from whence you came; that you be
removed on Monday next, the 14th of this instant September, to the
usual place of execution, and there to be hanged by the neck until you
are dead; your body afterwards, to be dissected and anatomised,
according to the statute - and God have mercy on your soul."
In accordance with the
Murder Act of 1752, it was mandatory that the body of a murderer
should be dissected after execution. It was normal for those being
condemned for murder to be sentenced on a Friday to allow them an
extra day of life, i.e. the Sunday.
Execution
Elizabeth was taken back to Newgate and fettered (handcuffs and leg
irons) in the condemned hold. She was allowed only bread and water.
It is reported that she confessed to and acknowledged the enormity of
her crimes to the Reverend Joseph Moore, the Ordinary of Newgate, over
the weekend. There was a moving scene in the Press Yard on the Monday
morning when James and John were allowed to see her for the last
time. She embraced John and the three of them prayed together. She
is quoted as saying : “Dear James, I beg that God, for Christ's sake,
will be reconciled, and that he will not leave me, nor forsake me, in
the hour of death, and in the day of judgment.”
Her
irons were removed by the blacksmith and her hands and arms tied with
cord. The rope placed around her neck and she was put into the cart,
accompanied by Thomas Turlis, the hangman, to make the journey to
Tyburn. When she finally got there she prayed with the Ordinary and
asked him to tell the crowd that she confessed her guilt and
acknowledged the justice of her sentence. She was turned off and
after hanging for half an hour her body was put into a hackney-coach
and taken to Surgeons' Hall for dissection. Her skeleton was later
hung up in the Hall as a permanent exhibit. Her execution drew a huge
and hostile crowd, such was the feeling against her. Reverend Moore
later wrote “This unchristian behaviour greatly shocked me and I could
not help exclaiming : Are these people called Christians?”
The Complete Newgate Calendar
Volume IV
ELIZABETH BROWNRIGG
Executed at
Tyburn, 14th of September, 1767, for torturing her Female Apprentices to Death
ELIZABETH BROWNRIGG was
married to James Brownrigg, a plumber, who, after being seven years in
Greenwich, came to London and took a house in Flower-de-Luce Court,
Fleet Street, where he carried on a considerable share of business,
and had a little house at Islington for an occasional retreat.
She
had been the mother of sixteen children, and, having practised
midwifery, was appointed by the overseers of the poor of St Dunstan's
parish to take care of the poor women in the workhouse; which duty she
performed to the entire satisfaction of her employers.
Mary
Mitchell, a poor girl, of the precinct of Whitefriars, was put
apprentice to Mrs Brownrigg in the year 1765 ; and at about the same
time Mary Jones, one of the children of the Foundling Hospital, was
likewise placed with her in the same capacity; and she had other
apprentices.
As
Mrs Brownrigg received pregnant women to lie-in privately, these girls
were taken with a view of saving the expense of women-servants. At
first the poor orphans were treated with some degree of civility; but
this was soon changed for the most savage barbarity. Having laid Mary
Jones across two chairs in the kitchen, she whipped her with such
wanton cruelty that she was occasionally obliged to desist through
mere weariness. This treatment was frequently repeated; and Mrs
Brownrigg used to throw water on her when she had done whipping her,
and sometimes she would dip her head into a pail of water. The room
appointed for the girl to sleep in adjoined the passage leading to the
street door, and, as she had received many wounds on her head,
shoulders and various parts of her body, she determined not to bear
such treatment any longer if she could effect her escape.
Observing that the key
was left in the street door when the family went to bed, she opened
the door cautiously one morning and escaped into the street. Thus
freed from her horrid confinement, she repeatedly inquired her way to
the Foundling Hospital till she found it, and was admitted, after
describing in what manner she had been treated, and showing the
bruises she had received. The child having been examined by a surgeon,
who found her wounds to be of a most alarming nature, the governors of
the hospital ordered Mr Plumbtree, their solicitor, to write to James
Brownrigg, threatening a prosecution if he did not give a proper
reason for the severities exercised towards the child.
No
notice of this having been taken, and the governors of the hospital
thinking it imprudent to indict at common law, the girl was
discharged, in consequence of an application to the Chamberlain of
London. The other girl, Mary Mitchell, continued with her mistress for
the space of a year, during which she was treated with equal cruelty,
and she also resolved to quit her service. Having escaped out of the
house, she was met in the street by the younger son of Brownrigg, who
forced her to return home, where her sufferings were greatly
aggravated on account of her elopement. In the interim the overseers
of the precinct of Whitefriars bound Mary Clifford to Brownrigg; it
was not long before she experienced similar cruelties to those
inflicted on the other poor girls, and possibly still more severe.
She
was frequently tied up naked and beaten with a hearth broom, a
horsewhip or a cane till she was absolutely speechless. This poor girl
having a natural infirmity, the mistress would not permit her to lie
in a bed, but placed her on a mat in a coal-hole that was remarkably
cold; however, after some time, a sack and a quantity of straw formed
her bed, instead of the mat. During her confinement in this wretched
situation she had nothing to subsist on but bread and water; and her
covering, during the night, consisted only of her own clothes, so that
she sometimes lay almost perished with cold.
On a particular
occasion, when she was almost starving with hunger, she broke open a
cupboard in search of food, but found it empty; and on another
occasion she broke down some boards, in order to procure a draught of
water. Though she was thus pressed for the humblest necessaries of
life, Mrs Brownrigg determined to punish her with rigour for the means
she had taken to supply herself with them. On this she caused the girl
to strip to the skin, and during the course of a whole day, while she
remained naked, she repeatedly beat her with the butt-end of a whip.
In
the course of this most inhuman treatment a jack-chain was fixed round
her neck, the end of which was fastened to the yard door, and then it
was pulled as tight as possible without strangling her. A day being
passed in the practice of these savage barbarities, the girl was
remanded to the coal-hole at night, her hands being tied behind her,
and the chain still remaining about her neck.
The
husband being obliged to find his wife's apprentices in wearing
apparel, they were repeatedly stripped naked, and kept so for whole
days, if their garments happened to be torn. Sometimes Mrs Brownrigg,
when resolved on uncommon severity, used to tie their hands with a
cord and draw them up to a water-pipe which ran across the ceiling in
the kitchen; but that giving way, she desired her husband to fix a
hook in the beam, through which a cord was drawn, and, their arms
being extended, she used to horsewhip them till she was weary, and
till the blood flowed at every stroke.
The
elder son one day directed Mary Clifford to put up a half-tester
bedstead, but the poor girl was unable to do it; on which he beat her
till she could no longer support his severity; and at another time,
when the mother had been whipping her in the kitchen till she was
absolutely tired, the son renewed the savage treatment. Mrs Brownrigg
would sometimes seize the poor girl by the cheeks and, forcing the
skin down violently with her fingers, cause the blood to gush from her
eyes.
Mary Clifford, unable to
bear these repeated severities, complained of her hard treatment to a
French lady who lodged in the house; and she having represented the
impropriety of such behaviour to Mrs Brownrigg, the inhuman monster
flew at the girl and cut her tongue in two places with a pair of
scissors.
On
the morning of the 13th of July this barbarous woman went into the
kitchen and, after obliging Mary Clifford to strip to the skin, drew
her up to the staple; and though her body was an entire sore, from
former bruises, yet this wretch renewed her cruelties with her
accustomed severity.
After
whipping her till the blood streamed down her body she let her down,
and made her wash herself in a tub of cold water, Mary Mitchell, the
other poor girl, being present during this transaction. While Clifford
was washing herself Mrs Brownrigg struck her on the shoulders, already
sore with former bruises, with the butt-end of a whip ; and she
treated the child in this manner five times in the same day.
At
length the parish authorities were persuaded to take action, and
Brownrigg was conveyed to Wood Street Compter; but his wife and son
made their escape, taking with them a gold watch and some money. Mr
Brownrigg was carried before Alderman Crossby, who committed him, and
ordered the girls to be taken to St Bartholomew's Hospital, where Mary
Clifford died within a few days. The coroner's inquest was summoned,
and found a verdict of wilful murder against James and Elizabeth
Brownrigg, and John, their son.
In
the meantime Mrs Brownrigg and her son shifted from place to place in
London, bought clothes in Rag Fair to disguise themselves, and then
went to Wandsworth, where they took lodgings in the house of Mr
Dunbar, who kept a chandler's shop.
This
chandler, happening to read a newspaper on the 15th of August, saw an
advertisement which so clearly described his lodgers that he had no
doubt but they were the murderers. A constable went to the house, and
the mother and son were conveyed to London. At the ensuing sessions at
the Old Bailey the father, mother and son were indicted, when
Elizabeth Brownrigg, after a trial of eleven hours, was found guilty
of murder, and ordered for execution; but the man and his son, being
acquitted of the higher charge, were detained, to take their trials
for a misdemeanour, of which they were convicted, and imprisoned for
the space of six months.
After sentence of death
was passed on Mrs Brownrigg she was attended by a clergyman, to whom
she confessed the enormity of her crime, and acknowledged the justice
of the sentence by which she had been condemned. The parting between
her and her husband and son, on the morning of her execution, was
affecting. The son fell on his knees, and she bent over him and
embraced him; while the husband knelt on the other side.
On
her way to the fatal tree the people expressed their abhorrence of her
crime in terms which testified their detestation of her cruelty.
After execution her body was put into a hackney-coach, conveyed to
Surgeons' Hall, dissected and anatomised; and her skeleton was hung up
in Surgeons' Hall.