Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Born in
Freeport, Illinois, Guiteau was routinely beaten by his father as a
child and left home at an early age. He inherited $1000 from his
grandfather as a young man and went to Ann Arbor, Michigan, in order
to attend the university there. Unfortunately, due to inadequate
academic preparation, he failed the entrance examinations.
After some time trying to do remedial work in the
necessary Latin and algebra, during which time he received numerous
letters from his father haranguing him to do so, he quit and joined
the controversial religious sect, the Oneida Community.
Despite the "free love" aspects of that sect, he
was generally rejected during his five years there--his nickname was
"Charles Gitout." He left the community twice. The first time he
went to Hoboken, NJ, and attempted to start a newspaper based on
Oneida religion, to be called "The Daily Theocrat."
This failed, and he returned, only to leave again
and file lawsuits against the community's founder, John Humphrey
Noyes. Guiteau's father, embarrassed, wrote letters in support of
Noyes, and Noyes maintained that he did not hold any ill-will
towards Guiteau, as "I consider him insane."
Guiteau then obtained a law license in Chicago,
based on an extremely casual bar exam. Undeterred he used his money
to start a law firm in Chicago based on ludicrously fraudulent
recommendations from virtually every prominent American family he
could think of.
He was not successful. He only argued one case in
court, the bulk of his business being in bill collecting, where his
annoying persistence was a useful characteristic. Most of his cases,
however, resulted in enraged clients and judicial criticism.
He next turned to theology. He published a book
on the subject called The Truth which was almost entirely
plagiarized from the work of John Humphrey Noyes.
After that embarrassment, Guiteau took an
interest in politics. He wrote a speech in support of Ulysses S.
Grant called "Grant v. Hancock," which he revised to "Garfield v.
Hancock" after Garfield won the Republican nomination in the 1880
presidential campaign. Alas, he changed little more than the title,
hence mixing up Garfield's achievements with those of Grant.
The speech was only delivered a maximum of two
times, but Guiteau believed himself to be largely responsible for
Garfield's victory. He insisted he should be awarded an
ambassadorship for his vital assistance, first asking for Vienna,
then deciding that he would rather be posted in Paris.
His personal requests to the President and to
cabinet members (as one of many job seekers who lined up every day)
were continually rejected; on May 14, 1881, he was finally told
personally never to return by Secretary of State James Blaine.
He then decided that God had commanded him to
kill the President. Guiteau borrowed fifteen dollars and went out to
purchase a revolver. He knew little about firearms, but did know
that he would need a large caliber gun.
He had to choose between a .44 Webley British
Bulldog revolver with a wooden handle and one with a silver handle.
He chose the one with the silver inlay because he wanted it to look
good as a museum exhibit after the assassination, and, as he
explained at his trial, he thought it was worth the extra dollar.
(The revolver has been lost).
He spent the next few weeks in target
practice—the kick from the revolver almost knocked him over the
first time—and in stalking the President.
On one occasion, he trailed Garfield to the
railway station as he was seeing his wife off to a beach resort in
New Jersey, but decided to do it later, as Mrs. Garfield was in poor
health and he didn't want to upset her.
On July 2, 1881, he lay in wait for the President
at the Baltimore and Potomac Railway station, getting his shoes
shined, pacing, and engaging a cab to take him to the jail later.
As President Garfield entered the station,
looking forward to a vacation with his wife in Long Branch, Guiteau
stepped forward and shot Garfield twice from behind, the second shot
lodging in the back "with the exulting words, repeated everywhere:
'I am a Stalwart of the Stalwarts... Arthur is President now.'" (New
York Herald, July 3, 1881)
Garfield died on September 19, eleven weeks after
being shot, after a long, painful bout of blood poisoning brought on
by his doctors poking the wound with unwashed hands.
Guiteau became something of a media darling
during his trial for his bizarre behavior, including constantly
badmouthing his defense team, formatting his testimony in epic poems
which he recited at length, and soliciting legal advice from random
spectators in the audience via passed notes.
He dictated an autobiography to the New York
Herald, ending it with a personal ad for a nice Christian lady under
thirty. He was blissfully oblivious to the American public's outrage
and hatred of him, even after he was almost assassinated twice
himself.
At one point, he argued that Garfield was killed
not by himself but by medical malpractice, which was more than a
little true. Throughout the trial and up until his execution,
Guiteau was housed at St. Elizabeths Hospital in the southeastern
quadrant of Washington, DC.
To the end, Guiteau was actively making plans to
start a lecture tour after his perceived imminent release and to run
for President in 1884, while at the same time he continued to
delight in the media circus surrounding his trial, which he wanted
to be remembered by all if he wasn't released.
He was dismayed when the jury was unconvinced of
his divine inspiration, convicting him of the murder. He was found
guilty on January 23, 1882. He appealed, but his appeal was
rejected, and he was hanged on June 30, 1882 in the District of
Columbia.
On the scaffold, Guiteau recited a poem he had
written called "I am Going to the Lordy." He had originally
requested an orchestra to play as he sung his poem, but this request
was denied.
Guiteau's trial was one of the first high profile
cases in the United States where the insanity defense was
considered. Guiteau vehemently insisted that while he had been
legally insane at the time of the shooting, he was not really
medically insane, which was one of the major causes of the rift
between him and his defense lawyers and probably also a reason the
jury assumed Guiteau was merely trying to deny responsibility.
Background
Guiteau was born in Freeport, Illinois, the
fourth of six children of Luther Wilson Guiteau and Jane Howe. He
moved with his family to Ulao, Wisconsin, (now Grafton, Wisconsin)
in 1850 and lived there until 1855, when his mother died. Soon after,
Guiteau and his father moved back to Freeport.
He inherited $1,000 from his grandfather (worth over $23,000 in
year-2009 dollars) as a young man and went to Ann Arbor, Michigan,
in order to attend the University of Michigan. Due to inadequate
academic preparation, he failed the entrance examinations. After
some time trying to do remedial work in Latin and algebra at Ann
Arbor High School, during which time he received numerous letters
from his father haranguing him to do so, he quit and joined the
controversial religious sect known as the Oneida Community, in
Oneida, New York, to which Guiteau's father already had close
affiliations. Despite the "group marriage" aspects of that sect, he
was generally rejected during his five years there, and he was
nicknamed "Charles Gitout".
He left the community twice. The first time he went to Hoboken, New
Jersey, and attempted to start a newspaper based on Oneida religion,
to be called "The Daily Theocrat". This failed and he returned to
Oneida, only to leave again and file lawsuits against the community's
founder, John Humphrey Noyes. Guiteau's father, embarrassed, wrote
letters in support of Noyes, and Noyes maintained that he did not hold
any ill-will towards Guiteau, saying "I consider him insane."
Guiteau then obtained a law license in Chicago, based on an
extremely casual bar exam. He used his money to start a law firm in
Chicago based on ludicrously fraudulent recommendations from virtually
every prominent American family of the day. He was not successful. He
only argued one case in court, the bulk of his business being in bill
collecting in which his annoying persistence was a useful
characteristic. Most of his cases, however, resulted in enraged
clients and judicial criticism.
He next turned to theology. He published a book on the subject
called The Truth which was almost entirely plagiarized from the
work of John Humphrey Noyes.
Guiteau's interest turned to politics. He wrote a speech in support
of Ulysses S. Grant called "Grant vs. Hancock", which he revised to "Garfield
vs. Hancock" after Garfield won the Republican nomination in the 1880
presidential campaign. Ultimately, he changed little more than the
title (hence mixing up Garfield's achievements with those of Grant).
The speech was delivered at most two times (and copies were passed out
to members of the Republican National Committee at their summer 1880
meeting in New York), but Guiteau believed himself to be largely
responsible for Garfield's victory. He insisted he should be awarded
an ambassadorship for his vital assistance, first asking for Vienna,
then deciding that he would rather be posted in Paris. His personal
requests to the President and to cabinet members (as one of many job
seekers who lined up every day) were continually rejected; on May 14,
1881, he was finally told personally never to return by Secretary of
State James G. Blaine (Guiteau is actually believed to have
encountered Blaine on more than one occasion).
Assassination of Garfield
Guiteau then decided that God had commanded him to kill the
ungrateful President. Borrowing fifteen dollars, he went out to
purchase a revolver. He knew little about firearms, but did know that
he would need a large caliber gun. He had to choose between a .442
Webley British Bulldog revolver with a wooden handle and one with an
ivory handle. He wanted the one with the ivory handle because he
wanted it to look good as a museum exhibit after the assassination,
but he could not afford the extra dollar. (The revolver was recovered
and even photographed by the Smithsonian in the early 1900s but has
since been lost). He spent the next few weeks in target practice—the
kick from the revolver almost knocked him over the first time- and
stalking the President.
On one occasion, he trailed Garfield to the railway station as the
President was seeing his wife off to a beach resort in Long Branch,
New Jersey, but he decided to shoot him later, as Mrs. Garfield was in
poor health and he didn't want to upset her. On July 2, 1881, he lay
in wait for the President at the (since demolished) Baltimore and
Potomac Railroad Station, getting his shoes shined, pacing, and
engaging a cab to take him to the jail later. As President Garfield
entered the station, looking forward to a vacation with his wife in
Long Branch, New Jersey, Guiteau stepped forward and shot Garfield
twice from behind, the second shot piercing the first lumbar vertebra
but missing the spinal cord. As he surrendered to authorities, Guiteau
fired with the exulting words, repeated everywhere: 'I am a Stalwart
of the Stalwarts. .. Arthur is President now!!'" (New York Herald,
July 3, 1881).
After a long, painful battle with infections brought on by his
doctors poking and probing the wound with unwashed hands and non-sterilized
instruments, Garfield died on September 19, eleven weeks after being
shot. Most modern physicians familiar with the case state that
Garfield would have easily recovered from his wounds with medical care
that was available 20 years later.
Trial and
execution
Once President Garfield died, the government offically charged
Guiteau with murder. The trial began on November 14, 1881 in
Washington D.C. The presiding judge in the case was Walter Smith Cox.
Guiteau's court appointed defense lawyers were Leigh Robinson and
George Scoville, although Guiteau would insist on trying to represent
himself during the entire trial. Wayne MacVeagh, the U.S. Attorney,
served as the chief prosecutor where he named five lawyers to the
prosecution team: George Corkhill, Walter Davidge, John K. Porter,
Elihu Root, and E.B. Smith.
Guiteau's trial was one of the first high profile cases in the
United States where the insanity defense was considered. Guiteau
vehemently insisted that while he had been legally insane at the time
of the shooting, he was not really medically insane, which was one of
the major causes of the rift between him and his defense lawyers and
probably also a reason the jury assumed Guiteau was merely trying to
deny responsibility for the murder of the President.
George Corkhill, who was the District of Columbia's district
attorney and on the prosecuting team, summed up the prosecution's
opinion of Guiteau's insanity defense in a pre-trial press statement
that also mirrored public opinion on the issue. Corkhill stated; "He's
no more insane than I am. There's nothing of the mad about Guiteau:
he's a cool, calculating blackguard, a polished ruffian, who has
gradually prepared himself to pose in this way before the world. He
was a deadbeat, pure and simple. Finally, he got tired of the monotony
of deadbeating. He wanted excitement of some other kind and notoriety,
and he got it."
Guiteau became something of a media darling during his entire trial
for his bizarre behavior, including constantly cursing and badmouthing
the judge, witnesses, and even his defense team, formatting his
testimony in epic poems which he recited at length, and soliciting
legal advice from random spectators in the audience via passed notes.
He dictated an autobiography to the New York Herald, ending it
with a personal ad for a nice Christian lady under thirty. He was
blissfully oblivious to the American public's outrage and hatred of
him, even after he was almost assassinated twice himself. At one point,
he argued before Judge Cox that Garfield was killed not by himself but
by medical malpractice, which was more than a little true ("The
doctors killed Garfield, I just shot him"). But Guiteau's argument had
no legal support. Throughout the trial and up until his execution,
Guiteau was housed at St. Elizabeths Hospital in the southeastern
quadrant of Washington, D.C.
There is still some debate over what constitutes legal insanity,
but most authorities generally agree that the basic test is whether
the defendant knew what he was doing and that his actions were wrong.
At the time of the Guiteau trial, however, the prevailing test of
legal insanity was whether the defendant knew his actions were
criminal. Therefore, even though someone like Guiteau might be
considered insane because he didn't think it was wrong to shoot
President Garfield, he could be convicted if the judge determined that
he understood that the law made it illegal to shoot people. By the
1880s, courts were beginning to apply the less harsh "was it wrong"
test, which also gave the jury rather than the judge the task to
determining insanity. In delivering the closing argument to the jury,
prosecutor Davidge asserted that Guiteau's erratic behavior throughout
the trial stemmed not from insanity, but from his overwhelming ego.
To the end, Guiteau was actively making plans to start a lecture
tour after his perceived imminent release and to run for President
himself in 1884, while at the same time continuing to delight in the
media circus surrounding his trial. He was dismayed when the jury was
unconvinced of his divine inspiration, convicting him of the murder.
He was found guilty on January 25, 1882.
After the guilty verdict was read, Guiteau stood up, despite his
lawyers efforts to tell him to be quiet, and yelled at the jury saying:
"you are all low, consummate jackasses", plus a further stream of
curses and obscenities before he was taken away by guards to his cell
to await execution. He appealed, but his appeal was rejected, and he
was hanged on June 30, 1882 in the District of Columbia. Of the four
presidential assassins, Guiteau lived longer than any after his
victim's death (nine months). On the scaffold, Guiteau recited a poem
he had written called "I am Going to the Lordy". He had originally
requested an orchestra to play as he sang his poem, but this request
was denied.
Part of Guiteau's brain remains on display at the Mütter Museum in
Philadelphia.
The Assassination
Events Leading to the Trial
In the weeks following Garfield's shooting, Guiteau seemed to enjoy
his new found notoriety. He sent a letter to "the Chicago Press"
announcing his intention to write and publish and autobiography
entitled "The Life and Theology of Charles Guiteau." He expected to
make bail and head out on the lecture circuit to speak on matters
ranging from religion and politics--and he expected the fees for his
lectures to pay for the first-rate lawyers that would surely win his
acquittal.
As the summer progressed, Guiteau became more agitated. He was
upset with prison officials for denying him access to newspapers and
keeping him in near isolation. When word came in September that the
president had died, Guiteau fell to his knees.
Guiteau rebounded quickly, however. The day after Garfield died, he
penned a letter to the new president, Chester Arthur. "I presume you
appreciate [my act]," Guiteau wrote, noting that "It raises you from
$8,000 to $50,000 a year" and from "a political cypher to President of
the United States with all its powers and honors." He described his
victim as "a good man but a weak politician." Guiteau's spirits seem
to rise further with the publication of the autobiography he had
written in prison. The autobiography, published in the New York
Herald, included his personal note that he was "looking for a wife"
and his hope that applicants for the job might include "an elegant
Christian lady of wealth, under thirty, belonging to a first-class
family."
Needless to say, the public included far more Guiteau haters that
Guiteau fans. Concern about lynching led officials to move Guiteau to
a brick cell with only a small opening at the top of a bulletproof
oaken door. His biggest threat, it turned out, was not from the
public, but from prison guards. On September 11, 1881, a guard named
William Mason fired at Guiteau, but missed. (The public responded
with donations to Mason and his family, but the trigger-happy guard
still was court-martialed and received an eight-year term.)
George Corkhill, the district attorney for Washington, understood
that Guiteau was likely to raise an insanity defense. Guiteau's
speeches, statements, and letters were more than passing strange--and
assassination almost seems by its very nature to be the product of a
diseased mind. Corkhill's early statements on the issue were
dismissive of Guiteau's potential insanity claim. "He's no more
insane than I am," Corkhill told a reporter on July 9. In Corkhill's
view, Guiteau was a "deadbeat" who "wanted excitement" and now "he's
got it."
Formal proceedings against Guiteau began in October. On October 8,
Corkhill filed the presentment and indictment against the prisoner for
the murder of James Garfield. Six days later, Guiteau was arraigned.
George Scoville, Guiteau's brother-in-law, appeared and asked the
court for a continuance to gather witnesses for the defense. He told
Judge Walter Cox that the defense intended to make two primary
arguments: that Guiteau was legally insane and that the president's
death resulted from medical malpractice, not Guiteau's shooting.
Judge Cox granted the defense motion and set the trial for November.
Guiteau, unsurprisingly, considered himself supremely qualified to
head his own defense. He drew a sharp distinction between "legal
insanity," which he was willing to claim, and "actual insanity," which
he thought a detestable insult. He was sharply critical, for example,
of Scoville's questions concerning whether any of his relatives had
spent time in lunatic asylums: "If you waste time on such things, you
will never clear me." Instead, in Guiteau's view, he was legally
insane because the Lord had temporarily removed his free will and
assigned him the task he could not refuse. In addition to insanity,
Guiteau proposed to argue that the doctor's clumsy treatment attempts
were the true cause of Garfield's death and, moreover, the court in
Washington lacked jurisdiction to try him for murder because Garfield
died at his seaside New Jersey home.
Scolville's legal conclusions differed from those of his client on
both the issue of causation and jurisdiction. He decided to drop both
arguments and concentrate on insanity. Both Scoville and attorneys
for the government began scouring the country for medical witnesses
best able to address the issue of the assassin's mental state.
Corkhill landed Dr. John Gray, the superintendent of New York's Utica
Asylum, as the prosecution's chief adviser on insanity issues. After
interviewing Guiteau, Gray wrote in a memo to Corkhill that Guiteau
acted out of "wounded vanity and disappointment," not insanity.
Gaining an acquittal by reason of insanity in 1881 was no easy task.
Under the prevailing test, the so-called M'Naghten rule, the
government need only show that the defendant understood the
consequences and the unlawfulness of his conduct. This test, for
Guiteau, posed nearly insurmountable obstacles. Guiteau knew that it
was illegal to shoot the president. He knew that if he pulled out his
revolver and shot and hit the president, that the president might die.
Moreover, Guiteau did not act impulsively, but planned the
assassination and waited for a good opportunity. Under the
conventional interpretation of M'Naghten, Guiteau was a dead man.
The trial of Charles Guiteau opened on November 14, 1881 in a packed
courtroom in Washington's old criminal court building. Guiteau,
dressed in a black suit and white shirt, asked the proceedings be
deliberate so not to offend "the Deity whose servant I was when I
sought to remove the late President." Jury selection proved difficult.
Many potential jurors claimed that their opinions as to Guiteau's
guilt were fixed. "He ought to be hung or burnt," one panel member
said, adding, "I don't think there is any evidence in the United
States to convince me any other way." It took three days, and the
questioning of 175 potential jurors, to finally settle on a jury of
twelve men--including, against the wishes of Guiteau, one African-American.
As the prosecution was set to begin its case, Guiteau jumped up to
announce that he was none too happy about his team of "blunderbuss
lawyers" and that he planned to handle much of the defense himself.
"I came in here in the capacity as an agent of the Deity in this
matter, and I am going to assert my right in this case," he said.
The prosecution focused its early efforts in the trial on detailing
the events surrounding Garfield's assassination. Witnesses included
Secretary of State Blaine, Patrick Kearney (the arresting officer),
and Dr. D. W. Bliss, who performed the autopsy. Letters written by
Garfield shortly before the assassination were introduced as exhibits,
as were several of the vertebrae shattered by Guiteau's bullet.
The most important testimony came from Dr. Bliss. Spectators cried
and cringed as Bliss made his point, using Garfield's actual spine,
that the shot fired by Guiteau directly caused the President's death,
however long it took to do so. As Guiteau was driven away from the
courtroom after Bliss's testimony, a horse pulled alongside his van
and the horse's drunk rider--a farmer named Bill Jones--fired a pistol
through the bars of the van. The bullet struck Guiteau's coat, but
left the prisoner uninjured.
In his opening statement for the defense, George Scoville told
jurors that as society has gained more knowledge of insanity it has
come to recognize that persons so afflicted deserve sympathy and
treatment, not punishment. This trend, he said, is part of becoming a
civilized people: "It is a change all the while progressing to a
better state of things, to higher intelligence, to better judgment."
He argued that the jury should try to determine, based on expert
testimony, whether Guiteau's actions were the product of a deranged
mind. Guiteau, meanwhile, offered untimely interjections. When
Scoville said Guiteau's "want of mental capacity is manifest" in his
business dealings, the prisoner rose to his feet and insisted, "I had
brains enough but I had theology on my mind." At times, according to
newspaper accounts, Guiteau was "foaming at the mouth" as he shouted
his objections to Scoville's characterizations of his odd legal
practice.
Defense witnesses painted the picture of a strange and disturbed man.
A physician summoned to Guiteau's home after he threatened his wife
was an ask testified that he had told Guiteau's sister at the time
that his brother was insane and should be committed. He concluded
Guiteau had been captured by "an intense pseudo-religious feeling." A
Chicago attorney who visited Guiteau shortly after the assassination
told how Guiteau, in a voice that veered from a whisper to a shout,
claimed that the shooting of Garfield was the Lord's work and he
merely carried it out. Other witnesses pointed to the strange
behavior of Guiteau's father as evidence that the defendant's insanity
might be a hereditary condition. They told of Luther Guiteau's
attempts at faith healing and his belief that some men could live
forever.
Charles Guiteau took the stand on November 28. Responding to his
attorney's questions in a hurried and nervous style, Guiteau traced
for jurors the story of his life. Much of the testimony focused on
his years at the Oneida Community--the community Guiteau grew to hate
and sought to destroy. He also described in great detail his
political activities and inclinations during the spring of 1881,
finally turning to the prayerful period of June when he awaited word
from God as to whether his inspiration to kill Garfield was divine.
He took some of his own narrow escapes from death (a ship collision at
sea, a jump from a speeding train, three attempted shootings) as
evidence that God had an important plan for him. He insisted that he
had performed a valuable service in killing Garfield: "Some of these
days instead of saying 'Guiteau the assassin', they will say 'Guiteau
the patriot'."
On cross-examination, prosecutor John K. Porter tried to suggest to
jurors that what the defense claimed was evidence of insanity was
instead only evidence of sin. He forced Guiteau to concede that he
thought the assassination would increase sales of his autobiography.
He demanded to know whether Guiteau was familiar with the Biblical
commandment, "Thou shalt not kill." Guiteau responded that in this
case "the divine authority overcame the written law." He insisted, "I
am a man of destiny as much as the Savior, or Paul, or Martin Luther."
The heart of the defense case was built by medical experts. Dr.
James Kienarn, a Chicago neurologist, testified that a man could be
insane without suffering from delusions or hallucinations. He offered
his expert opinion--accepting as true a long list of assertions about
Guiteau and his state of mind--that the defendant was doubtless insane.
(Kiernan's credibility, however, was badly damaged in cross-examination
when he guessed one out of every five adults was--or would become--insane.)
Seven additional medical experts for the defense followed Kiernan to
the stand, but seemed--to most observers--to add little new support
for the insanity claim.
Few experts had been as adamant about Guiteau's insanity as New York
neurologist Dr. Edward C. Spitzka. He had written that it was as
plain as day that "Guiteau is not only now insane, but that he was
never anything else." It is no wonder that Scoville depended heavily
on Spitzka's testimony. On the stand, Spitzka told jurors that he had
"no doubt" that Guiteau was both insane and "a moral monstrosity."
The doctor drew his conclusions as much from his looks (including his
lopsided smile) as his statements, concluding that the defendant had "the
insane manner" he had so often observed in asylums. He added, based
on his interview with the prisoner, that Guiteau was a "morbid egotist"
who misinterpreted and overly personalized the real events of life.
He thought the condition to be the result of "a congenital
malformation of the brain." On cross-examination, prosecutor Walter
Davidge forced Spitzka to admit that his training was as a veterinary
surgeon, not a neurologist. Conceding the point, Spitzka said
sarcastically: "In the sense that I treat asses who ask me stupid
questions, I am."
The prosecution countered with its own medical experts. Dr. Fordyce
Barker testified that "there was no such disease in science as
hereditary insanity." Irresistible impulses, the doctor testified,
were not a manifestation of insanity, but rather "a vice." Prison
physician Dr. Noble Young testified that Guiteau was "perfectly sane"
and "as bright and intelligent a man as you will ever see in a
summer's day." Psychiatrist (called an "alienist" at the time) Allen
Hamilton told jurors that the defendant was "sane, though eccentric"
and "knew the difference between right and wrong."
Dr. John Gray, superintendent of New York's Utica Asylum and editor
of the American Journal of Insanity,
took the stand as the prosecution's final--and star--witness. Gray,
based on two full days of interviews with Guiteau, testified that the
defendant was seriously "depraved," but not insane. Insanity, he said,
is a "disease" (typically associated with cerebral lesions, in his
opinion) that shows itself in more than bad acts. Guiteau displayed
far too much rationality and planning to be truly insane, Gray
concluded.
Closing arguments began on January 12, 1882. Prosecutor Davidge
emphasized the legal test for insanity, which he claimed Guiteau
failed to meet. Guiteau, Davidge argued, knew that it was wrong to
shoot the President--and yet he did. He warned the jury not to reach
a result that would be "tantamount to inviting every crack-brained,
ill-balanced man, with or without a motive, to resort to the knife or
to the pistol." Judge Porter, in the government's final argument,
predicted that Guiteau will soon feel for the first time real "divine
pressure, and in the form of the hangman's rope." For the defense,
Charles Reed argued that common sense alone--the facts of his life,
his vacant glance--should persuade jurors of Guiteau's insanity. He
told jurors that if it were up to Christ, he would heal and not punish
such an obviously disturbed man as his client. Scoville, in a closing
argument that lasted five days, suggested that Guiteau's writings
could not be the product of a sane mind and that the defendant was
owed the benefit of doubt. He scoffed at the prosecution's suggestion
that only a cerebral lesion could prove a man insane: "Those experts
hang a man and examine his brain afterward."
Guiteau offered his own closing. At first, Judge Cox denied his
request. Disappointed, Guiteau said that the judge had denied the
jurors "an oration like Cicero's" that would have gone "thundering
down the ages." Later, when the prosecution (fearing adding a
possible point of error to the record) withdrew its objection to
Guiteau's request, Judge Cox reversed his decision. Guiteau looked
skyward and swayed periodically during his address, which included the
singing of "John Brown's Body" and featured comparison's between his
own life as "a patriot" and other patriots such as George Washington
and Ulysses S. Grant. He insisted that the shooting of Garfield was
divinely inspired and that "the Deity allowed the doctors to finish my
work gradually, because He wanted to prepare the people for the change."
He warned the jury that if they convicted him, "the nation will pay
for it as sure as you are alive."
The jury deliberated for only an hour. In a candlelit courtroom,
jury foreman John P. Hamlin announced the verdict: "Guilty as indicted,
sir." Applause filled the room. Guiteau remained oddly silent.
The Sentence and Aftermath
Judge Cox sentenced Guiteau "to be hanged by the neck until you are
dead" on June 30, 1882. Guiteau shouted at the judge, "I had rather
stand where I am that where the jury does or where your Honor does."
On May 22, Guiteau's appeals were rejected. Guiteau still held out
the hope that President Arthur, the benefactor--as he saw it--of his
act, would grant a pardon. Arthur listened to arguments by defense
experts for twenty minutes on June 22. Five days later, the President
granted an interview with another defense partisan, John Wilson.
Guiteau wrote a letter to Garfield asking that he at least stay the
execution until the following January so that his case might "be heard
by the Supreme Court in full bench." On June 24, President Arthur
announced that he would not intervene. Hearing the news, an angry
Guiteau shouted, "Arthur has sealed his own doom and the doom of this
nation."
Guiteau approached his hanging with a sense of opportunity. He
abandoned his plan to appear for the event dressed only in underwear
(so as to remind spectators of Christ's execution) after being
persuaded that the immodest garb might be seen as further evidence of
his insanity. In the prison courtyard on June 30, 1882, Guiteau read
fourteen verses of Matthew and a poem of his own that ended with the
words, "Glory hallelujah! Glory hallelujah! I am with the Lord!" The
trapdoor opened and Guiteau fell to his death. Outside the jail, a
thousand spectators cheered the announcement of the assassin's demise.
In the years following Guiteau's execution, public opinion on the
issue of his insanity shifted. More people--and almost all
neurologists--came to the view that he was indeed suffering from a
serious mental illness. Guiteau's case was seen in medical circles as
supporting the theory that criminal tendencies were often the result
of hereditary disease.