Early life
Koresh was born in Houston, Texas to
a 14-year-old single mother.. Bonnie Sue Clark, his mother, became
pregnant with Koresh after sleeping with a 20-year-old carpenter named
Bobby Howell. The pair remained unmarried. Two years later his father
met another woman and left. He never knew his father and was raised by
"a harsh stepfather".
Koresh described his early childhood
as lonely, and it has been alleged that he was once raped by older boys.
A poor student because of dyslexia, Koresh dropped out of high school.
By the age of 12, however, he had learned the New Testament by heart.
When he was 19, Koresh had an affair
with a 16-year-old girl who became pregnant, but left him because she
considered him unfit to raise a child. He then became a born-again
Christian in the Southern Baptist Church but soon joined his mother's
church, the Seventh-day Adventist Church.
There he fell in love with the
pastor's daughter and while praying for guidance he opened his eyes and
found the bible open at Isaiah 34 which stated that none should want for
a mate; convinced this was a sign from God he approached the pastor and
told him that God wanted him to have his daughter for a wife. The pastor
threw him out, and when he continued to persist with his pursuit of the
daughter he was expelled from the congregation. A member of the
congregation is reported to have said that he never "thought above his
belt buckle."
In 1981 he moved to Waco, Texas where
he joined the Branch Davidians, a religious group originating from a
schism in the 1950s from the Shepherd's Rod, themselves excommunicated
members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church in the 1930s. They had
established their headquarters at a ranch about 10 miles out of Waco,
which they called the Mount Carmel Center (after the Biblical Mount
Carmel), in 1955.
Ascent to leadership of the
Branch Davidians
In 1983 he began claiming the gift of
prophecy. Koresh then had an affair with Lois Roden, the prophetess and
leader of the sect who was then in her late sixties, eventually claiming
that God had chosen him to father a child with her, who would be the
Chosen One.
In 1983, Roden allowed Koresh to
begin teaching his own message which caused controversy in the group.
Lois Roden's son George intended to be the group's next leader, and
considered Koresh an interloper.
When Koresh announced that God had
instructed him to marry Rachel Jones, there was a short period of calm
at Mount Carmel, but it proved only temporary. In the ensuing power
struggle, George Roden, claiming to have the support of the majority of
the group, forced Koresh and his group off the property at gunpoint.
Disturbed by the events and the move away from the philosophy of the
community's founders, a further splinter group led by Charles Joseph
Pace moved out of Mount Carmel and set up home in Gadsden, Alabama.
Koresh and around 25 followers set up
camp at Palestine, 90 miles from Waco, where they lived rough for the
next two years, during which time Koresh undertook recruitment of new
followers in California, the United Kingdom, Israel and Australia. In
1985 Koresh travelled to Israel and it was there that he had a vision
that he was the modern day Cyrus. The founder of the Davidian movement,
Victor Houteff, wanted to be God's implement and establish the Davidic
kingdom in Palestine, Israel.
Koresh also wanted to be God's tool
and set up the Davidic Kingdom in Jerusalem. At least until 1990, he
believed the place of his martyrdom might be in Israel but by 1991 he
was convinced that his martyrdom would be in the United States. Instead
of Israel, he said the prophecies of Daniel would be fulfilled in Waco
and that the Mount Carmel center was the Davidic kingdom.
At the Palestine, Texas, camp, Koresh
"worked it so that everyone was forced to rely on him, and him alone.
All previous bonds and attachments, family or otherwise, meant nothing.
His rationale was if they had no one to depend on, they had to depend on
him, and that made them vulnerable." By this time, he had already begun
to give the message of his own "Christhood", proclaiming that he was
"the Son of God, the Lamb who could open the Seven seals".
Lois Roden died in 1986. Up until now
Koresh had been teaching that monogamy was the only way to live, but
suddenly announced that polygamy was allowed for him. In March 1986,
Koresh first slept with Karen Doyle, aged 14.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surveillance tapes record conversation
between two males identified as David Koresh and Steve
Schneider.
Koresh: "They got two cans of Coleman fuel down there? Huh?"
Schneider: "Empty"
Koresh: "All of it?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Davidians' motives for arming are unclear. An
op-ed in the Washington Post, written by former ATF Director Steve
Higgins, posits that the Davidians' taking up of arms and fortifying
their building conflicts with their claims of being law-abiding
citizens. The federal trial and appellate courts all agreed that the
affidavit contained ample proof of probable cause for the issuance of
the search and arrest warrants for the firearms and explosives charges.
-
Kevin A. Whitecliff—convicted of voluntary
manslaughter and using a firearm during a crime.
-
Jaime Castillo—convicted of voluntary manslaughter
and using a firearm during a crime.
-
Paul Gordon Fatta—convicted of conspiracy to possess
machine guns and aiding Davidian leader David Koresh in possessing
machine guns.
-
Renos Lenny Avraam—convicted of voluntary
manslaughter and using a firearm during a crime.
-
Graeme Leonard Craddock—convicted of possessing a
grenade and using or possessing a firearm during a crime.
-
Brad Eugene Branch—convicted of voluntary
manslaughter and using a firearm during a crime.
-
Livingstone Fagan—convicted of voluntary
manslaughter and using a firearm during a crime.
-
Ruth Riddle—convicted of using or carrying a weapon
during a crime.
-
Kathryn Schroeder—sentenced to three years after
pleading guilty to a reduced charge of forcibly resisting arrest.
She was the only Davidian to testify against the others.
Controversies
In the aftermath of the initial raid,
the ATF drew heavy criticism for proceeding, despite being aware that
the Davidians knew of the offensive and of the months-long surveillance
of Mount Carmel.
Some critics also continue to ask why
the ATF agents turned down a direct invitation given months before the
initial assault, in which Koresh spoke with the agents by phone and
asked that they come talk with him about their concerns. There is also
controversy over what the exact content of the original search warrants
were.
Some critics claim that ATF
documentation from their observations of Mount Carmel proved that they
knew that Koresh left the property every day for a run. The ATF has so
far not responded to questions about why they did not wait for Koresh to
leave his property on the day of the raid and then arrest him instead of
staging a raid.
Who fired
first?
Helicopters had been obtained from
the Texas National Guard on the pretext that there was a drug laboratory
at Mount Carmel. There were, however, no drug related charges on the
arrest warrant served on the morning of February 28, 1993. While the
official version of events has always stated that the helicopters were
merely used as a diversion, and that the Davidians were not targeted by
sharpshooters within them, in transcripts of the negotiations, as a
negotiating tactic, one negotiator admitted that the occupants were
armed, and may have opened fire:
Koresh: "No! Let me tell you
something. That may be what you want the media to believe, but there's
other people that saw too! Now, tell me Jim, again - you're honestly
going to say those helicopters didn't fire on any of us?"
Jim Cavanaugh: "What I'm saying is the helicopters didn't have
mounted guns. Ok? I'm not disputing the fact that there might have
been fire from the helicopters."
An Austin Chronicle article
noted, "Long before the fire, the Davidians were discussing the evidence
contained in the doors. During the siege, in a phone conversation with
the FBI, Steve Schneider, one of Koresh's main confidantes, told FBI
agents that "the evidence from the front door will clearly show how many
bullets and what happened."
Houston attorney Dick DeGuerin, who
went inside Mount Carmel during the siege, testified at the trial that
protruding metal on the inside of the right-hand entry door made it
clear that the bullet holes were made by incoming rounds. DeGuerin also
testified that only the right-hand entry door had bullet holes, while
the left-hand entry door was intact. The government presented the
left-hand entry door at the trial, claiming that the right-hand entry
door had been lost. The left-hand door contained numerous bullet holes
made by both outgoing and incoming rounds.
Texas Trooper Sgt. David Keys
testified that he witnessed two men loading what could have been the
missing door into a U-Haul van shortly after the siege had ended, but he
did not see the object itself. And Michael Caddell, the lead attorney
for the Davidians' wrongful death lawsuit explained, "The fact that the
left-hand door is in the condition it's in tells you that the right-hand
door was not consumed by the fire. It was lost on purpose by somebody."
Caddell offered no evidence to support this allegation, which has never
been proved.
The fire
Critics suggest that during the final
raid the CS gas was injected into the building by armored vehicles in an
unsafe manner, which could have started a fire. However, two of the
three fires were started well inside the building, away from where the
CS gas was pumped in.
Between 1993 and 1999, FBI spokesmen
denied (even under oath) the use of any sort of pyrotechnic devices
during the assault; non-pyrotechnic Flite-Rite CS gas grenades had been
found in the rubble immediately following the fire.
In 1999, FBI spokesmen were forced to
admit that they had used the grenades, however they claimed that these
devices, which dispense CS gas through an internal burning process, had
been used during an early morning attempt to penetrate a covered,
water-filled construction pit, and were not fired into the building
itself. According to FBI claims, the fires started approximately four
hours after the grenades had been fired.
FBI-released video and audio tapes,
and aerial infra-red videotape shot by the FBI, shows flashes of light
that some have suggested might be heat signatures consistent with the
launching of CS gas grenades moments before the first heat plume of fire
appears. Several expert studies concluded that the flashes were caused
by reflected infrared radiation and not muzzle blasts.
The FBI has also admitted to using
incendiary flares during the stand-off to illuminate areas at night, but
claims not to have used illumination flares during the assault, all of
which took place during daylight hours.
The Branch Davidians had given
ominous warnings involving fire on several occasions. This may or may
not be indicative of the Davidians' future actions, but could be
construed as evidence that the fire was started by the Davidians.
On May 12, less than a month after
the incident, Texas state authorities bulldozed the site, rendering
further gathering of forensic evidence impossible.
Gunfire
Several documentaries suggest that
the FBI fired weapons into the building, which the FBI denies. The main
evidence for gunfire is bright flashes in aerial infra-red recordings
from Forward looking infrared (FLIR) cameras on government aircraft
flying overhead. Edward Allard, a former government specialist on
infra-red imagery, submitted an affidavit in which he declared that the
video revealed bursts of automatic gunfire coming from government
agents. Another independent FLIR expert, Carlos Ghigliotti, also
confirms gunfire, when shown the original video kept by government
officials.
International experts hired by the
Office of Special Counsel claimed that the flashes were not gunfire
because (1) they lasted too long, (2) there were no guns or people on
the tapes anywhere near the flashes; and (3) the flashes were consistent
with reflections of debris and other materials near the building.
Edward Allard commented on the
reflection theory, saying that it was impossible for the flashes on the
FLIR film to be reflections, because FLIR does not record light, it
records heat, and reflections do not produce enough heat to be
noticeable on tape. Actually, FLIR records infrared radiation, which can
be reflected or absorbed by different materials. Maurice Cox, a former
analyst from the US intelligence community, tested the reflection theory
using the principles of solar geometry. Cox's Sun Reflection Report
concluded that the flashes seen on the FLIR footage could only be from
gunfire.
In January, 1999 Mr Cox challenged
FBI director Louis Freeh and FBI scientists to dispute his findings.
There was no response.
Secondary proof was a summary of a
statement made by FBI sniper Charles Riley several weeks after the
incident to an FBI investigator. Riley stated that he had heard shots
fired from a nearby sniper position Sierra 1. The sniper team had
included Lon Horiuchi and Christopher Curran who had been involved in
the Ruby Ridge incident, with the former having fired the fatal shots.
In 1995, when attorneys submitted the
summary of Riley's statement as evidence to Judge Smith, the FBI
produced an additional interview in which Riley clarified that he had
heard the statement "shots fired" from Sierra 1, which meant that
agents at Sierra 1 had observed shots being fired at FBI vehicles by
the Davidians.
Finally, .308 cartridge cases found
at Sierra 1 were examined by ballistics experts hired by the Branch
Davidians. They agreed with government experts that the casings matched
guns used by the ATF during the first raid on February 28, and the
Davidians dropped the Sierra 1 shooting claim from their lawsuit against
the government.
Autopsies
Autopsies of the dead revealed that
some women and children found beneath a fallen concrete wall of a
storage room died of skull injuries. Photographs taken after the fire
show that the M728 CEV that penetrated the building while injecting CS
gas did not come close enough to cause the collapse, which was more
likely the result of the fire; photographs show signs of spalling on the
concrete, which suggests that it was damaged by the intense heat). Some
claim that the cooking off of some of the ammunition stored in the bank
vault damaged the walls, but so little energy is released by rounds
which cook off that this is highly unlikely.
Autopsy photographs of other children
locked in what appear to be spasmic death poses have been attributed by
some to cyanide poisoning produced by burning CS gas. However, these
poses are more likely the post-mortem "boxer pose" all bodies caught in
fires eventually assume, created as ligaments connecting bones together
shorten as the fire dries them.
Autopsy records indicate that at
least 20 Davidians were shot, including five children under the age of
14, and three-year-old Dayland Gent was stabbed in the chest. The expert
retained by the Office of Special Counsel concluded that many of the
gunshot wounds "support self-destruction either by overt suicide,
consensual execution (suicide by proxy), or less likely, forced
execution."
Documentary
films
The Waco siege has been the subject
of a number of documentary films. The first of these was a made for
television film, In the Line of Duty: Ambush at Waco, which was
made before the final assault on the church and essentially promoted the
government's view of the initial ambush.
The first film that was critical of
the official reports was Waco: The Big Lie, produced by Linda
Thompson followed by Waco II: The Big Lie Continues. The Linda
Thompson videos were controversial and made a number of allegations, the
most famous of which was footage of a tank with what appears to be light
reflected from it; Thompson's narration claimed this was a flame-thrower
attached to the tank.
Thompson's subsequent activities,
such as declaring an armed march on Washington, D.C. and her
denunciation of many other researchers into the Waco siege as part of a
cover-up, limited her credibility in most circles. Other researchers
released footage showing the "flame" to have been a reflection on
aluminized insulation that was torn from the wall and snagged on the
M728 CEV, which is a vehicle that does not come equipped with a
flamethrower. In fact, no flamethrowers were in service in the US
military at the time or even today.
Thompson's "creative editing" was
exposed by the film Waco: An Apparent Deviation (produced by a
group led by Michael McNulty, as the result of a comprehensive
investigation by people associated with the Citizens' Organization for
Public Safety.)
The next film was Day 51: The True
Story of Waco, which featured Ron Cole, a self-proclaimed militia
member from Colorado who was later prosecuted for weapons violations.
The Linda Thompson and Ron Cole films, along with extensive coverage
given to the Branch Davidian siege on some talk radio shows, galvanized
support for the Branch Davidians among some sections of the right
including the Nascent Militia Movement, while critics on the left also
denounced the government siege on civil liberties grounds.
The New Alliance Party produced a
report blaming the siege on the influence of the Cult Awareness Network.
Timothy McVeigh cited the Waco Siege
as a primary motivation for the Oklahoma City bombing and was known to
be a fan of both the Linda Thompson and Ron Cole videos. In March 1993,
McVeigh drove from Arizona to Waco in order to observe firsthand the
federal siege. Along with other protesters, he was photographed by the
F.B.I.
Perhaps because most of the critical
views were seen as coming from the political fringes of the right and
left, most mainstream media discounted any critical views presented by
early documentary films.
This changed when professional
film-makers Dan Gifford and Amy Sommer produced their Emmy Award winning
documentary, Waco: The Rules of Engagement. This film presents a
history of the Branch Davidian movement and most important, a critical
examination of the conduct of law enforcement leading up to the raid,
and through the aftermath of the fire. The film features footage of the
Congressional hearings on Waco, and juxtaposition of official government
spokespeople with footage and evidence often directly contradicting
them.
The documentary also shows infra-red
footage that they claim demonstrated that the FBI likely used incendiary
devices to start the fire which consumed the building and did indeed
fire on, and kill, Branch Davidians attempting to flee the fire.
Notwithstanding the cinematic quality of that film, subsequent
scientific studies disproved both the claim that the FBI fired gunshots
and the claim that the FBI started the fire. Moreover, Professor Kenneth
Newport's book, "The Branch Davidians of Waco" (2006), shows that
starting the fire themselves was consistent with the Branch Davidians'
theology.
Waco: The Rules of Engagement
was nominated for a 1997 Academy Award for best documentary and was
followed by another film: Waco: A New Revelation.
America Wake Up (Or Waco)
was another film released in 2000 by Alex Jones which documents the 1993
Waco incident with the Branch Davidians.
The Assault on Waco
was released on September 16, 2006 on the Discovery channel, and it
details the entire attack on Waco.
Inside Waco
is an Anglo-American documentary that attempts to show what really
happened inside by piecing together accounts from the parties involved.
It was produced jointly by Channel 4 and HBO. It aired on More4 in the
UK on 1 February 2007 and the 10 February 2007.
Bibliography
-
Anthony, D. and
T. Robbins (1997). "Religious totalism, exemplary dualism and the
Waco tragedy." In Robbins and Palmer 1997, 261–284.
-
Christopher
Whitcomb. Cold Zero: Inside the FBI Hostage Rescue Team. ISBN
0-552-14788-5. (Also covers Ruby Ridge.)
-
Docherty, Jayne
Seminare. Learning Lessons From Waco: When the Parties Bring
Their Gods to the Negotiation Table (Syracuse, New York:
Syracuse University Press, 2001). ISBN 0-8156-2751-3
-
Heymann, Philip B.
(U.S. Department of Justice). Lessons of Waco: Proposed Changes
in Federal Law Enforcement (Washington: USDOJ, 1993). ISBN
0-16-042977-3
-
Kerstetter, Todd.
"'That's Just the American Way': The Branch Davidian Tragedy and
Western Religious History", Western Historical Quarterly,
Vol. 35, No. 4, Winter 2004.
-
Kopel, David B. and
Paul H. Blackman. No More Wacos: What’s Wrong With Federal Law
Enforcement and How to Fix It (Amherst, New York: Prometheus
Books, 1997). ISBN 1-57392-125-4
-
Lewis, James R.
(ed.). From the Ashes: Making Sense of Waco (Lanham,
Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994). ISBN 0-8476-7915-2 (cloth)
ISBN 0-8476-7914-4 (paper)
-
Linedecker, Clifford
L. Massacre at Waco, Texas: The Shocking Story of Cult Leader
David Koresh and the Branch Davidians (New York: St. Martin’s
Paperbacks, 1993). ISBN 0-312-95226-0
-
Lynch, Timothy.
No Confidence: An Unofficial Account of the Waco Incident
(Washington: Cato Institute, 2001).
-
Moore, Carol. The
Davidian Massacre: Disturbing Questions Abut Waco Which Must Be
Answered." (Virginia: Gun Owners Foundation, 1995). ISBN
1-880692-22-8
-
Newport, Kenneth G.
C. "The Branch Davidians of Waco: The History and Beliefs of an
Apocalyptic Sect" (Oxford University Press, 2006). ISBN 0199245746
-
Reavis, Dick J.
The Ashes of Waco: An Investigation (New York: Simon and
Schuster, 1995). ISBN 0-684-81132-4
-
Tabor, James D. and
Eugene V. Gallagher. Why Waco?: Cults and the Battle for
Religious Freedom in America (Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1995). ISBN 0-520-20186-8
-
Thibodeau, David and
Leon Whiteson. A Place Called Waco: A Survivor's Story (New
York: PublicAffairs, 1999). ISBN 1-891620-42-8
-
Wright, Stuart A.
(ed.). Armageddon in Waco: Critical Perspectives on the Branch
Davidian Conflict (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).
Legal and governmental
-
United States v. Branch, W.D.
Texas Criminal Case No. 6:93cr46, trial transcript 1/10/94 -
2/26/94; 91 F.3d 699 (5th Cir. 1996)
-
United States v. Castillo, 179 F.3d 321 (1999);
Castillo v. United States, 120 S.Ct. 2090 (2000); on remand, 220
F.3d 648 (5th Cir. 2000)
-
Andrade v. United States, W.D. Texas Civil Action
No. W-96-CA-139, trial transcript 6/19/2000 - 7/14/2000; 116
F.Supp.2d 778 (W.D. Tex. 2000)
-
Andrade v. Chojnacki, 338 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2003)
-
United States Department of Justice.
Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law
Enforcement After Waco (Washington: USDOJ, 1993). ISBN
0-16-042974-9
Ammerman, Nancy T.
(1993). "Report to the Justice and Treasury Departments regarding law
enforcement interaction with the Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas."
Submitted September 3, 1993. Recommendations of Experts for
Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Stone, Alan A.
(1993). "Report and Recommendations Concerning the Handling of Incidents
Such As the Branch Davidian Standoff in Waco Texas." Submitted November
10, 1993. Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law
Enforcement After Waco. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice
and U.S.
Final Report to the
Deputy Attorney General concening the 1993 confrontation at the Mt.
Carmel Complex, Waco, Texas, John C. Danforth, Special Counsel (November
8, 2000)
Committee on the Judiciary (in conjunction with the
Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives,
104th Congress, Second Session. Materials Relating to the
Investigation Into the Activities of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies
Toward the Branch Davidians (Washington: USGPO, 1997). ISBN
0-16-055211-7.
|